Thank you for your grateful comments.

And good luck in your futur projects.

I do not understand very clearly your thoughts.

I hesitate before telling you no definitively.

Dear William Amos Carine,

Yes, (e) is a mystery.

(e) for eEnergy, for a new science in coming : a binary Science, dual Science, fundamental Science.

I have discovered the functionning of eUniverse : eDuality is in all things, like motion.

And all things arising, by couple, pair.

« simple, complex », « wave, particle », « space, time », « matter, antimatter », « electicity, magnetism », « Weak force , Strong force », « gravity, expansion of space », and so on...

Duality is in all cultures (Egyptians, Greecs, Indians, Chineses, ...) and in each one of us, but never explained and equaled like in China.

The « Yin, Yang » duality is full of truth, but this must be completed and reinterpreted, like our Science.

eDuality is present in physics, mathematics, philosophy, economics, biology, chemistry, religion, our thinking, in computers and mechanical machinery, linguistics, and so on...

Each one of us speaks with eDuality.

eDuality is the same everywhere.

There is one kind of eDuality when this concept is clear known.

eUniverse is very simple at the begining, very complex after.

This eDuality, these opposites, these contraries, are the 0 and 1 of information.

It takes a book to explain all these concepts : eEnergy, eInfo, eReality, eDuality, and so on...

Good luck,

Amazigh H.

See above, answer to William Amos Carine.

Thank you for your grateful comments.

And good.

Amazigh,

Short remark about your statements.

'It is like the motion. Aristotle advanced things, but it was necessary to wait for Galilee, with the experimental science to know more about it'

Comm.Physicists can say that Galileo experiment with free fall bodies rejected Aristotle philosophical illusion on motion.Moreover, Galileo first formulated new fundamental principle ( principle of equivalence of inertia and gravitation ) used later by Newton and Einstein.Thus, this example can demonstrate an existence of opposition - wrong speculations vs scientific experiment.

'duality is the basis of symmetry'?

Comm.I think there is difference between physical and mathematical subcultures on notion duality based symmetry.It is complex definition.Dirac believed that physical symmetry could be connected with mathematical beauty. Schrodinger produced beautiful equation, but was not able to solve it ( mathematician Weyl brought it to perfection ).

Michael.

    Thank you for your grateful comments and recommendation.

    And best wishes

    Thank you for your grateful comments and recommendation.

    And best wishes

    I can not position myself in relation to your comments because too long. It takes me a long time to translate.

    But there is much truth in the theory of Yin Yang.

    Thank you for your grateful comments.

    And best wishes

    Thank you for your grateful comments.

    I rated your essay too.

    And best wishes

    Not sure I follow it all, but I rated you a ten because it seems like the thing to do.

    http://www.fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1616

      motion is everywhere, duality is everywhere, 1 and 10 is everywhere.

      Thank you.