Dear KoGuan Leo,

Thanks for your kind comments and rating. I quite agree with you when you say that knowledge is monism, because that is the basic philosophy behind my whole argument of unifying all the four forces in physics in the form of QG thus agreeing with your concept of KUID. In fact in my 2011 fqxi essay contest, that is, "Is reality digital or analog?" I based my essay on QG on the Indian philosophy of "Advaitha", literally meaning non-dualism or monism. If you need any clarifications regarding this, please, contact me. I am too going to rate your essay much more favorably.

Best regards,

Sreenath

Dear esteemed judges, community and public:

Following the wise advises from Armin Shirazi, Jonathan J. Dickau, Brian L Ji, Joe Fisher, Cristinel Stoica, Artur Ekert and others who considered KQID jargons are talking gibberish that turned them off immediately and beclouding the substance of the essay. Let me break down my essays into four big subgroups in plain language: Physics, Philosophy, Law, Economics.

First, KQID makes physics simple.

Second, KQID makes philosophy of free-will, information. consciousness, time and energy ideas simple.

Third, KQID makes Scientific Outlook Rule of Law and Principle simple.

Fourth, KQID makes Scientific Outlook Free-Lunch Economic System simple.

First, KQID makes physics a simple idea, others will be in different threads:

All things are one Qbit. This Qbit is our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit as Planck's matrix of all matter and as Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory storage, so that no qbit was, is and will be deleted ever. This infinite being is splitting itself in qbits in absolute zero temperature without any cost to itself and our Multiverse consistent with the second law of thermodynamics ΔS = 0 and conservation laws. We are holograms as Plato's copies from Plato's only one Form as the only one singularity Qbit Multiverse/Existence at absolute zero temperature that projects its computed Einstein complex coordinates numbers (Pythagoras triangles) onto the 2D screen Minkowski Null geodesics of our Multiverse made of singularity points of photon A, graviton S and computed A + S = E = ψI(CTE) that in turn projects those Einstein Coordinates into the bulk of our Multiverse in the form/language/transformation of KQID relativity ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) Multiverse based on inverse Lorentz transformation KQID τ = √(1-v^2/c^2)t where t is the time origin, v is velocity of the object, and c is light speed in vacuum, i is √-1 and iLx,y,z is 3D space in time and Lm is our Multiverse timeline in zeroth dimension of the KQID-Minkowski space-in-time, not spacetime. Using KQID flexible c-timerod, KQID measures our reality as fiction but real. Space is by product of time. Time shrinks; space shrinks computed instantaneously by that one Qbit. Time is the mother of space and space is the child of time. Space is in time. Our Multiverse is an hologram. We are holograms. The above description is KQID mechanism of Existence that when I asked the great Physicist Susskind, one of the founders of Holographic Principle about 4 weeks ago whether he knows the mechanism of Holographic Principle, he told me emphatically that he did not know and he did not think any one knows either. Thus, KQID prescribes the why, how and what Existence and describes mechanism of Existence's existent. Furthermore, KQID offers a simple Creation story and mythology. Where we are from and who we are in scientific way subject to verification and falsification. As KQID: bit is it and it is bit, physicists can and must deal with the why, how and what Existence, God and the meaning of life. This is the new paradigm of physics with distinctive ancient pedigree.

KQID is the only theory that combines the Creation story and unifies Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, QM that can calculate and predict everything from our Multiverse to a photon in physical bits that can be falsified by experiments:

1. QID calculates the upper bound dark energy of our Multiverse ≤ 1.523 x 10^-153Pm/Pv at assumed our Multiverse CMBR at about ≤ 3x10^-30K calculated by Smooth et.al as the temperature of the event horizon of our universe. KQID postulates that this is the upper bound of our Multiverse CMBR. And the event horizon of our Multiverse must be the absolute zero: Applying the Hawking's (Θ) formula = 1/Rs where (Schwarzschild Rs = 2Gm/c2), then the Hawking Θ must be the absolute zero K because the Rs = infinity as Multiverse mass = infinity. Thus, Hawking Θ = 0K. Alternatively, we know that the event horizon is bordering with non-existence, and Non-existence has no reading at all. For our Multiverse's dark energy: Kqid(AΘ-ΘS) = 9.92938 x 10^-115 J/KPv x (3 x 10^-30K - 0K) = 1.523 x 10-153Pm/Pv. (See appendix) KQID postulates that this dark energy (Λm) of our Multiverse 1.523 x 10-153Pm/Pv must be Λm > 0, because if not our Multiverse has to collapse and our Multiverse and us will simply disappear without any trace. No record and nothing left: existence will cease to exist and non-existence is forever and ever. Thus, it is necessarily, our Multiverse dark energy Λm is ≤ 1.523 x 10-153Pm/Pv > 0. Our Multiverse MUST expand forever and ever in the time-present ≤ 10^-1000s.

2. Our Multiverse has lower bound bits ≥ 6.3 x 10^153 bits. I believe the KQID is the only theory out there that has done the above calculations.

3. KQID estimates the first burst of the Bit Bang rather than the Big Bang, with the temperature of about 7.8 x10^126K

4. In 1.43478x10^-147 seconds

5. The first wavelength λ of the Bit Bang = 1.43478x10^-147 s x c = 4.3x10^-139 meter. These numbers are far higher and lower than the existing standard model.

6. Our universe has precisely 1.77649 x 10^136 bits at CMBR temperature Θ = 2.725K with assuming our universe has the energy at Planck Pressure *m^3 = 4.6 x 10^113J.

7. Since the Bit Bang, how many bits are there in our universe and Multiverse using Bousso's formula? Bousso, The holographic principle, says that Sglobal ≤ 3π/Λ, thus, KQID computes Suniverse ≤ 3π/Λ based on observation that Λ = (1.38 x 10^-123Pm/Pv) is ≤ 6,8 x 10^123 bits that is a rough match with Seth Loyd upper bound bits since the Bit Bang about 10^122 bits. For our Multiverse, KQID calculates at the minimum bound SMultiverse ≥ 6.3 x 10^153 bits that are projected onto our Multiverse 2D screen. Our Multiverse is indeed a Susskind's colossal hologram!

8. KQID predicts and calculates when our universe will collapse, rather than forever expanding based on the existing model. KQID predicts that when A = S, our universe will inevitably start its contraction and acceleration into a Bit Crush, rather than a Big Crush, in hundreds of trillion years sometimes later. Quoting my essay as follows: "The question is when it will be reaching the total transactions around the KQID upper bound 1.77649 x 10^136 bits based the CMB Θ = 2.725K. Applying KbΘln2 we find the value of one bit ≥ KbΘLn2 where Θ = 2.725K thus 2.725 x 1.3806503 ﾃ-- 10^-23 x 0.6932 = 2.608 x 10^-23 J. Then, how many bits if S is equal with A assuming at the Bit Bang, the total energy of S was at 4.63309 x 10^113/(2.608 x 10^-23) = 1.77649 x 10^136 bits. If we divide this number with Lloyd's upper bound 10^122, we get 1.77649 x 10^136/10^122 = 1.77649 x 10^14 or 177.649 trillion times more bits. As of now, it looks like our cute baby universe (13.8 billion years old) has many hundreds trillions years more to go and furthermore as our universe is aging it is using less energy to compute, thus it will use even less energy than before for doing the same thing.

Interestingly, we can get the same value 177.649 trillion times larger when we use different method in unit of Joules energy of calculation using Lloyd upper bound bits of transactions (10^122 bits) in our universe since the Bit Bang, the energy of one bit at CMB 2.725K as follows: assuming the S entropic energy that has been accumulated since the Bit Bang, Lloyd's numbers = 10^122 x 2.608 x 10^-23 J = 2.608 x 10^-99 J. Thus this is the value of A used up or S, entropic bits, in energy J unit of measurement since the Bit Bang. If we divide the energy of A at the bit bang moment by approximately A energy assuming the CMB as the energy now and assuming at the Bit Bang as 4.63309 x 10^113 J. What have left is A/S = 4.63309 x 10^113/(2.608 x 10^99) = 1.77649 x 10^14 or 177.649 trillions times of magnitude bigger, which are the same numbers as above using different calculation!"

9. Sun light is Sun qbits

Berut et al confirmed that one bit of information at 298.15K is about 3x10^-21 J. Planck/Einstein using E = hf: we get f = 4.5x10^14 hertz or near infra-red spectrum.

We get the same result if we use Landauer's bound 1 bit ≥ Kb Θ Ln2. Thus, Θ = 298.15K: KbΘln2 = 1.3806503x10^-23 x 298.15K x 0.6932 = 2.853494x10^-21J

A particle with a rest mass contains one bit? E = mc^2 = 2.858494x10^-21J = m x (3x10^8)^2= m x 9x10^16 at 298.15K

m = 2.853494x10^-21J/9x10^16 = 2.568141x10^-36Kg.

Hence, I formulate KQID's equivalent principle of bits/frequency and mass/bits ratio as follows:

KQID Equivalent relationships at 298.15K:

1. The numbers of bits (Nb): Nb= f/ (4.5 x 10^14) where Nb = number of bits, f = E/h contains energy per Planck constant h, bit must be in bit quanta like light quanta h at a given temperature according to KbΘ.

2. For bit to mass ratio: the KQID equivalent simple formula: Nb = mass at rest/1 bit mass at room temperature 298.15K = Rest mass/ 2.568 x 10^-36

The predictions above and below can be easily falsified and verified: bit is it and it is bit.

Therefore: KQID's bits to frequency equivalent at 298.15 K predicts:

10 bits ~ 4.5 x 10^15 Hz, ultraviolet.

100 bits ~ 4.5 x 10^16 Hz, ultraviolet

1000 bits ~ 4.5 x 10^17Hz, x-rays. Thus, it is clear that not only energy proportionally relates to frequency but also to quanta of bits.

KQID bit-mass equivalent at Θ = 298.15K at a room temperature

Electron at rest mass in terms of bits: electron mass-bit equivalent= 9.109 x 10^-31 / 2.568 x 10^-36 = 3.547 x 10^5 bits.

Proton mass: (1.6726 x 10^-27 kg) about 1836 x mass of an electron = 0.65132 x 10^9 = 6.5132 x 10^8 bits.

Neutron mass: 1.6749 x 10^-27 kg / 2.568141 x 10^-36 kg= 6.5218 x 10^8 bits.

They are many more examples but space is limited.

The above examples proved that Landauer's principle holds: information is physical, and matter is bit, thus bit is it and it is bit. Both Wheeler's it from bit and bit from it are true as bit = it.

I do strongly believe that we must encourage diversity of opinions/theories. Because uniformity of opinion is a heat-death state of thermodynamic equilibrium tantamount to Schrodinger's defunct bumblebee. Let us celebrate symphonies of ideas. Let 1000 flowers of bumblebee's thought bloom and prosper.

Respectfully submitted for your consideration,

Leo KoGuan

I rather be a bumblebee poet than not to be.

    Dear Jonathan,

    It is my great fortune to meet a great ancient Plato's soul like you. Thanks for your generous comment. Time is meme. Existence is meme. Our Multiverse, God/s and us are meme. A meme is simply ψI(CTE) where I is information as the bits-waves function of consciousness (C), time (T) and energy (E). Consequently, our ancestors great thinkers from the first human walked on earth to Einstein cannot understand consciousness, time and energy independently. Einstein famously complained in 1951: ""All these fifty years of pondering have not brought me closer to answering the question, what is light quanta?" It is because energy is bits-waves quantum function that is a shapeshifter that moves surreptitiously from one language/form/substance to a another combination of consciousness (C), time(T) and energy (E). Energy is hiding under the veil of consciousness and time and vise versa. Below in my letter to all, I boldly and humbly claim KQID knows what is energy, time and consciousness: "KQID is the only theory that combines the Creation story and unifies Newton, Maxwell, Einstein, QM that can calculate and predict everything from our Multiverse to a photon in physical bits that can be falsified by experiments." Too extravagant declaration I know but with deep humility. The Qbit is us. The Qbit is all things. The Qbit talks through each one of us as its medium subject to scientific falsification and verification. Each contributes his/her thought bits. Let me know what you think.

    Humbly,

    Leo KoGuan

    I rather be a bumblebee poet than not to be

    Dear Akinbo,

    I need to think seriously to your clever and profound questions. I must read your essay first to find clues what you are asking about. I saw Joe Fisher's profound answers to the above questions.

    Best regards,

    Leo KoGuan

    Dear Armin,

    I took your advice and removed the Chineses cultural meme which is "gibberish meme" understandingly to some who are too busy to learn a new language/strange idea in a short time, so that they can easily evaluate my essay. Of course that will cut off the living head and only study a dead body. Thanks for your advice. See my letter to judges, community and public below: "Following the wise advises from Armin Shirazi, Jonathan J. Dickau, Brian L Ji, Joe Fisher, Cristinel Stoica, Artur Ekert and others who considered KQID jargons are talking gibberish that turned them off immediately and beclouding the substance of the essay."

    I know you are so busy with your own things but in case you have an interest to give me comment on it, I will appreciate it. if you can kindly send me your articles I will study it. Thanks for sharing your idea with me.

    Best of lucks to everything.

    Best wishes,

    Leo KoGuan

    Leo,

    You show a very good grasp of my argument, but reading through yours, I think there is one important issue you are missing. That is that nature does erase information. It is just that in this quantized physics, energy is treated as information; the quantum, which is conserved.

    What this means to me is that in expressing an idea, being able to edit it as much as possible is necessary. You, on the other hand, have a very interesting and expressive essay, but in some parts, the energy goes more to heat than light. There was a time when I was much better at focusing on such works, but at my age, mid fifties, the mind tends to wander very quickly and that is what you have to take into account with your audience.

    There were directions I could have taken my own essay, such as that I see the two sides of the brain, the scalar and the linear, as reflective of temperature and time, but that would distract from the basic central point of information as one side of a dichotomy with energy.

    There is an old saying, that we miss more in a fraction of a second than we will ever see in our entire lives. Nature is a fierce editor. Always remember that. She will let us go on for a very long time, but when the time is up.....

    Here is another essay I wrote, trying to tie physics and society together and take them to a point.

      Hello again Leo,

      I enjoyed your essay, upon finally reading it through to the end, and found some of your explanations above are helpful to understanding the intent of your work. I have rated it favorably, though not as highly as some, and I appreciate your openness to the diversity of ideas and viewpoints. You will certainly find plenty of that here.

      Have Fun!

      Jonathan

        Also,

        I enjoyed the idea of a Bit Bang. I have the thought, based on one of my theories, that perhaps in the Big Crush there are portions of the universe that started out in opposite directions of time, but found themselves in the same place at the end.

        I also observe that your usage of a 0 K baseline is consistent with the work of Royce Haynes, one of the other entrants in this contest. His Zero K Big Bang theory might be of interest. While it is not a fully developed theory of Physics his ZKBB model is worth consideration.

        All the Best,

        Jonathan

        Dear Leo

        A beautiful essay and description of the universe. Your approach is quite different to mine but I had the uncanny feeling of reading a foundational 'subtext' beneath my own description of a mechanism underlying observer reality. Your background kept popping through randomly.

        I agree all things derive from or 'are' one complex bit. I describe the intelligent 'IQbit' with infinitely many higher order dimensions or 'sample spaces', then use empirical evidence to show how we are only just tapping it's power. This is; "Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory storage." But is a finite cycle infinitely repeated. I discussed the DFM cyclic model here two years ago and love your 'bit crush'.

        Bizzarely I also wrote a closing Sonnet last year! But I prefer yours.

        Thank you and very well done for yours, which should be higher so I'm happy to help. It was an uplifting experience. I do hope you can find time to read mine. A very different approach but I think showing the power of the universe of dimensions beyond the simple binary 0,1 that most still assume.

        Very best wishes.

        Peter

          Dear Brian,

          I am really touched by your erudite kind remark. I am grateful to make a friend like you, which is the reason why I entered this contest of ideas the first place. Let us share our ideas and pull our resources together to deal with humankind challenges here and now.

          Live long and prosper,

          Leo KoGuan

          Dear esteemed judges, community and public:

          KQID Operating System (OP)

          KQID is not only merely about physics but also it is an operating system of Existence. Who is the operator of this operating system? You are! As a matter of fact, every living system is like an amoeba who deploys strategy to capture a bacteria with its pseudopod, and in turn that bacteria is whipping its flagella to escape from that hungry amoeba to avoid to be a meal are operators far excellent. When you were a baby using nature's object oriented programing meme ψI(CTE) for example you thirst for H2O molecules and you drink H2O, or you want a fragrant Fuji apple, bits-rich calories, and eat that apple to satisfy your desire. You pointed your tiny fingers to that apple and looked at your mom and yelled mama...maaama and your mom happily grabbed that apple and gave it to you, you were already a far excellent operator. Even before that when you were the Maxwell's "finite embryo" inside your mother's womb or in a test tube, you were already the master of bits programmer and commanded and programmed our Multiverse to do your bidding to grow into a wonderful and powerful ruler who rules our Multiverse. You demanded attention and resources not only from your parent but also from our Multiverse. You were already the conscious far excellent operator of Existence hacking into the KQID operating system to survive long and prosper. You are conscious hacker of time (T) and energy (E). You are the latest meme ψI(CTE), operator of bits-waves function of consciousness(C), time (T) and energy (E) at T-moment equipped with the latest version of operating system of our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit. You are our latest Ancestor Qbit (00,1,-1) itself in your form and substance. You imports anti-entropic A, time-future bits-waves function or Schrödinger's negative entropy into your system and export efficiently S, entropic time-past bit-waves function, into our Multiverse and in the process, you ψI(CTE) are optimally creating and distributing yourself as the time-present bits-wave function as Shakespearean actor who acts on the world stage.

          This KQID operating system is embedded with

          1. Xuan Yuan's Mandate of Heaven as the first principle written in blood that everyone has the right and duty to remove and kill tyrant of any society if necessary.

          2. From Dao comes law and virtue. Therefore, no one is above the law and principle, and everyone and organization are treated equally under the law and principle in which nothing cannot be curbed. Then, KQID Free-Lunch Economic System can be established to provide free education, free health care and free material wealth for everyone including alien, cyborg and robot.

          3. Similar to Thomas Jefferson's unalienable Rights of Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness, Xuan Yuan Da Tong society is to enable and uphold the governing principle "from each to each according to his/her dreams and aspirations."

          4. The KQID Five Mandates of Kongzi's Humanity and Justice, Yang Zhu's six freedoms, the Wang Yaming unity of rights and duties and regulated but free and open market system are the super-principles as the super-constitution that are prescribing boundary on what positive laws and principles could be mandated in any society.

          5. Carl Sagan's Prime Directive of protecting native culture and life stated in his book Cosmos: "If there is life on Mars...we should do nothing with Mars. Mars then belongs to the Martians, even if the Martians are only microbes."

          In short, all things are one Qbit; the Qbit is all things. We are the Qbit in action in time. As Zhuangzi said that he and the world live and die together and are one; we and the Qbit live and die together and are one.

          We greet each other with Spock salutes: "live long and prosper."

          Live long and prosper,

          Leo KoGuan

          KoGuan,

          This is my observation

          How it correspond to China ancient philosophy?

          http://vixra.org/abs/1212.0030

          Regards

          Yuri

          KoGuan

          Richard Feynman in his Nobel Acceptance Speech

          (http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/laureates/1965/feynman-lecture.html)

          said: "It always seems odd to me that the fundamental laws of physics, when discovered, can appear in so many different forms that are not apparently identical at first, but with a little mathematical fiddling you can show the relationship. And example of this is the Schrodinger equation and the Heisenberg formulation of quantum mechanics. I don't know why that is - it remains a mystery, but it was something I learned from experience. There is always another way to say the same thing that doesn't look at all like the way you said it before. I don't know what the reason for this is. I think it is somehow a representation of the simplicity of nature."

          I too believe in the simplicity of nature, and I am glad that Richard Feynman, a Nobel-winning famous physicist, also believe in the same thing I do, but I had come to my belief long before I knew about that particular statement.

          The belief that "Nature is simple" is however being expressed differently in my essay "Analogical Engine" linked to http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1865 .

          Specifically though, I said "Planck constant is the Mother of All Dualities" and I put it schematically as: wave-particle ~ quantum-classical ~ gene-protein ~ analogy- reasoning ~ linear-nonlinear ~ connected-notconnected ~ computable-notcomputable ~ mind-body ~ Bit-It ~ variation-selection ~ freedom-determinism ... and so on.

          Taken two at a time, it can be read as "what quantum is to classical" is similar to (~) "what wave is to particle." You can choose any two from among the multitudes that can be found in our discourses.

          I could have put Schrodinger wave ontology-Heisenberg particle ontology duality in the list had it comes to my mind!

          Since "Nature is Analogical", we are free to probe nature in so many different ways. And each of us surely must have touched some corners of it.

          Good luck and good cheers!

          Than Tin

          I wanted to comment KoGuan Leo..

          I am greatly enjoying reading your explanations of your work in extended comments above. You display a wonderful ability to portray the sense of wonderment in prose, that is possessed by little children but few can manifest as adults. I think that ability, above all else, is needed for Science to progress and mankind to prosper.

          If we can encourage an acceptance, or even make a celebration of the playful approach in the Research workplace; there will be more abundance for all to share, because it will increase the pace of progress and discovery. I have heard this message from Nobel laureates in Physics and top researchers elsewhere, in many fields of Science.

          It comes through clearly in your writing, Sir, that you have an appreciation for this fact, and share my mission that Education should develop the natural ability we all have to learn nature's secrets through playful exploration -- and that scientific researchers also need to remember we are like children playing in the garden of nature.

          Have Fun!

          Jonathan

            Dear Jonathan,

            You are so kind and generous. This is exactly the reason why I entered this contest to meet such wonderful people like you not only as co-passenger of our earth-timeship but also co-mind sharing. Hopefully, we can be good friend online and off-line. Perhaps we can meet in person. I hope KQID could be one of 40 essays to be considered by the distinguished judges but look like my rating is too low to meet the cut. I shall find a different venue to promote KQID.

            Grateful for your kind comment,

            Leo KoGuan

            Dear Peter,

            Thanks for your kind comment. I have been reading your sophisticated and setious essay several times but not yet able to make a comment. I will reply to your above comment later.

            Best wishes,

            Leo KoGuan

            Dear Leo,

            I just now read your essay and in doing so, wish I had read it sooner. First, I want to let you know that there are technical aspects that I do not fully comprehend due to my ignorance of the symbols and equations, however, I intend to study them so that I may (hopefully) gain a fuller appreciation of them. However, I believe that I have grasped the underlying premise of everything you are saying and I am in full and complete agreement with your message and conclusion. The universe is a hologram; we are within the whole and the whole is within us. I felt a deep sense of hope and connection arise within me as I read your words, something I found rather odd (because I didn't intellectually comprehend everything at the first reading), but also comforting, because I sensed that you 'get it.' You 'get' who we are, why we're here, and what we're supposed to do and become as human beings. I suspect that what you're saying offers a much more technical and mathematical basis and foundation that would more scientifically describe what I believe to be the case of what the universe 'is' and our relationship to it. I have rated it accordingly.

            As an aside, I am also an attorney, and have been interested in the meaning and purpose of life, the universe, and the meaning of human existence since I was 5 years old and awoke inside an oxygen tent and spent the next 3 months struggling for each breath to stay alive due to a severe asthma attack. I found it odd that none of the adults around me could answer the simplest of questions: Why are we here? What does it mean to be alive? What is the purpose of us being here?

            Thank you, sir, for your essay. I will continue to study it more in depth and hope that perhaps, if you are so inclined, that we will correspond in the future. I believe that by working together, we can truly create a better world for ourselves and everyone and everything around us.

            Sincerely,

            Ralph

              That sounds good Leo KoGuan..

              I shall look forward to keeping in touch with you. I am honored by the kind attention I have received from you, and from numerous others in this contest. I see that likewise; you have received much good will. There will be many new opportunities generated from our participation in this contest. It may be like the Space program where the spin-offs are at least as valuable as the accomplished mission.

              Good luck. May you progress toward the accomplishment of your mission, and have great spin-offs too.

              All the Best,

              Jonathan

              Dear Peter,

              You are very kind with your comment. I hope that you rated my essay as good as your comment. Right now my rating is below the cut of being top 40.

              You wrote above:

              "This is; "Maxwell's infinite being with infinite memory storage." But is a finite cycle infinitely repeated."

              Yes, I respectfully agree and disagree with you at the same time. I agree that our solar system and our universe are finites and must age and must die after they reach their natural limit. KQID calculates when A = S or when our universe expands 1.77649 x 10^14 magnitude bigger than our existing universe before it must collapse into a Bit Crush A=E-S where A = 0. Then due to time reversal, S is transformed into A as a caterpillar transformed itself to become a beautiful baby butterfly that is flying away by flapping its colorful wings with the amazement of a delightfully cheering crowd. KQID Bit Bang when A=E-S where S = 0. These resources shall be recycled endlessly. However, for our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit (00,1,-1) or ψI(CTE), it must physically and informationally forever one Qbit. Due to the second law of thermodynamics ΔS ≥ 0 and due to Landauer principle that information is physical and if any information is erased it must generate entropy. This poses a huge obstacle for our founder Qbit on how and on what to exist and replicate itself without cost to itself and to its environment. One, it has to be forever in the state of absolute zero temperature or zero Kelvin where ΔS = 0, and two, it has to replicate itself as meme ψI(CTE) without producing any entropy or ΔS = 0, so that, Qbit does not delete any qbit/bit created and distributed. Because if Qbit deletes any qbit/bit in order to produce more qbits/bits as Szilard and Bennett proved entropy must occur and the Qbit and Existence must disappear because it is no longer able to sustain Existence and it must cease to exist. This Qbit solves this problem by having unlimited storage capacity, therefore no information is ever be deleted or destroyed. Three, it has to reboot, refresh, regenerate, renew, resynchronize, reunite itself every KQID absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000s.This is why our Multiverse does not crash like normal computers do and that is why we witness quantum entanglement to our amazement: how these spooky actions at a distance are possible? KQID explains this away easily at the same time retains our perceived causality causation in place. KQId does not have grandfather paradox. No you can not go back in time and murder your grandfather in the time-past but you could murder him in the time-present. This is because, every T-moment, our Qbit and our Multiverse as one jumps in Feynman's sum-over-histories to new undetermined location in non-existence realm. As a result Existence must necessarily indeed an hologram movie that moves every slice of all Minkowski events at every T-moment. During this T-moment, our block Multiverse has symmetrical time in which everything can move backward in time-past and forward in time-future and everything is being synchronized into the NOW where past and future merged. Thus, Einstein and Barbour persistent illusion of time is true in this block Multiverse only but only a brief every T-moment. Time disappears. But as a whole, as Existence jumps from T-moment to T-moment, we are living in asymmetrical time realm ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) as explained beautifully by Smolin's Time Reborn. Time reemerges. Asymmetrical time is pregnant with asymmetrical space in time. Thus nature uses both symmetrical and assymetrical time to sustain and expand Existence. KQID as far as I know is the only theory out there that is bold enough to propose the why, how and what of mechanism of holographic Existence. Existence is Qbit. Qbit is all things; all things are Qbit. There is only one singularity Qbit Multiverse that projects its computations in the form of Einstein complex coordinates (Pythagorean numbers and Fu Xi's trigrams) into ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) Multiverse.

              Existence is necessarily infinite, any theory that explains this infinite Existence must therefore necessarily infinite, a deep paradox of a yes, a no and infinite possibilities in between.

              I like your IQbit and IQbit must be our intellegent Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit.

              Live long and prosper Peter,

              Leo KoGuan

              Dear John,

              You are very kind with your comment and advise.

              I love what you wrote below in "What is Your Occupation":

              "At its most elemental, reality is energy and energy is motion. It is even the root of emotion. Feeling, seeing, moving, thinking, etc. all require activity. Religion tells us God is an all-knowing absolute, but the absolute is equilibrium. Zero. All action balanced out. The big flatline on the universal heart monitor. Motion is a breaking of that balance. Positive/negative, attraction/repulsion, expansion/contraction, good/bad, up/down, left/right, forward/backward, past/future. The spiritual absolute isn't an ideal from which we fell, but the essence of being from which we rise.

              Without motion, nothing exists, but with motion, nothing exists forever. This energy creates, but it also consumes. The forms, structures and information define the energy, as the energy manifests this order. The future is this raw energy moving on, while the past is the defining structures. Our awareness is like that energy moving forward, while thoughts are the mental structures forming and receding in its wake."

              You are truly a renaissance man. I admire you.

              However, I will discuss the nuances in more details below.

              You wrote above: " That is that nature does erase information."

              If I may I just repeat most of my answers to Peter Jackson below.

              Yes, I respectfully agree and disagree with you at the same time. Yes nature does erase information in our universe but not necessarily in our Multiverse. Our Multiverse cannot and must not erase any information. I agree that our solar system and our universe are finites and must age and must die after they reach their natural limit. KQID calculates when A = S or when our universe expands 1.77649 x 10^14 magnitude bigger than our existing universe before it must collapse into a Bit Crush A=E-S where A = 0. Then due to time reversal, S is transformed into A as a caterpillar transformed itself to become a beautiful baby butterfly that is flying away by flapping its colorful wings with the amazement of a delightfully cheering crowd. KQID Bit Bang when A=E-S where S = 0. These resources shall be recycled endlessly. However, for our Ancestor FAPAMA Qbit (00,1,-1) or ψI(CTE), it must physically and informationally forever one Qbit. Due to the second law of thermodynamics ΔS ≥ 0 and due to Landauer principle that information is physical and if any information is erased it must generate entropy. This poses a huge obstacle for our founder Qbit on how and on what to exist and replicate itself without cost to itself and to its environment. One, it has to be forever in the state of absolute zero temperature or zero Kelvin where ΔS = 0, and two, it has to replicate itself as meme ψI(CTE) without producing any entropy or ΔS = 0, so that, Qbit does not delete any qbit/bit created and distributed. Because if Qbit deletes any qbit/bit in order to produce more qbits/bits as Szilard and Bennett proved entropy must occur and the Qbit and Existence must disappear because it is no longer able to sustain Existence and it must cease to exist. This Qbit solves this problem by having unlimited storage capacity, therefore no information is ever be deleted or destroyed. Three, it has to reboot, refresh, regenerate, renew, resynchronize, reunite itself every KQID absolute digital time T ≤ 10^-1000s.This is why our Multiverse does not crash like normal computers do and that is why we witness quantum entanglement to our amazement: how these spooky actions at a distance are possible? KQID explains this away easily at the same time retains our perceived causality causation in place. KQId does not have grandfather paradox. No you can not go back in time and murder your grandfather in the time-past but you could murder him in the time-present. This is because, every T-moment, our Qbit and our Multiverse as one jumps in Feynman's sum-over-histories to new undetermined location in non-existence realm. As a result Existence must necessarily indeed an hologram movie that moves every slice of all Minkowski events at every T-moment. During this T-moment, our block Multiverse has symmetrical time in which everything can move backward in time-past and forward in time-future and everything is being synchronized into the NOW where past and future merged. Thus, Einstein and Barbour persistent illusion of time is true in this block Multiverse only but only a brief every T-moment. Time disappears. But as a whole, as Existence jumps from T-moment to T-moment, we are living in asymmetrical time realm ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) as explained beautifully by Smolin's Time Reborn. Time reemerges. Asymmetrical time is pregnant with asymmetrical space in time. Thus nature uses both symmetrical and assymetrical time to sustain and expand Existence. KQID as far as I know is the only theory out there that is bold enough to propose the why, how and what of mechanism of holographic Existence. Existence is Qbit. Qbit is all things; all things are Qbit. There is only one singularity Qbit Multiverse that projects its computations in the form of Einstein complex coordinates (Pythagorean numbers and Fu Xi's trigrams) into ψτ(iLx,y,z, Lm) Multiverse.

              Existence is necessarily infinite, any theory that explains this infinite Existence must therefore necessarily infinite, a deep paradox of a yes, a no and infinite possibilities in between.

              Live long and prosper John,

              Leo KoGuan