Aha -- I found the "Disproof of Bell's Theorem" paper -- but there are numerous issues.
Among them:
In his first few equations Christian attempts to establish a local realist interpretation via non-commuting observables--the trouble is his formalism is masking something which is not possible.
In Equation 5 he also shows in his summation that he doesn't really even "get" lambda.
It's my understanding that complex notation should not impact the proof of Bell's theorem; it should hold up in any other established, legitimate write-up of quantum theory.
Cheers! (Just wanted to formalize my opinion on this, if someone can show me a counterexample or another paper I'd be delighted!)
Jenny