Hello Georgina,
Well done on your effort. I see you must have put in a lot physically and mentally into it and to encourage let me make one or two criticisms (to further encourage not discourage).
- The paper seems to be belong more to philosophy category than physics category.
- Although there was a lot of effort to show the difficulties with Special relativity there was not a single mention of "postulate" in the paper. Perhaps, you do not agree that this is is the bone of contention and even the foundation on which the theory itself is built.
- The closest to the "postulate" was when you said, "The speed of light is not infinite but finite, measured as 299 792458 m/s. Relating that premise to the given example. Traveling at the speed of light it takes time for light emitted from source substantial object A to get to B". And further claimed as FACTS that
"a) Einstein's relativity works to describe what will be observed. b) It's a mathematically complete theory in itself. c) It corresponds with experimental results".
The question I have for you here is: If B moves towards the source just as the light is emitted and on its way, will the time for light to get to B be altered? If so, why do you still go ahead to claim as fact that Einstein's relativity corresponds with experimental results? If you claim that the time of arrival is not altered, do you want me to give you experimental instances where the movement of B affects light arrival time?
- What do you understand by Galilean relativity concerning light and how does your proposal differ from it?
That will be all for now.
Regards,
Akinbo