Alternative Models of Reality

It is the problem ,our standard model seems not complete.Quantum mechanics are not complete.Thermo and heat with electromagnetic forces due to photons encoded are not complete.This gravitation seems to be a new kind of force.That said I like the cold in your reasoning.I discussed about this zero absolute on LinkedIn with some friends.But perhaps that the cold is not the answer also.We know so few still about this dark matter and BHs.It seems a new physics but in logic the quantum mechanic is proportional wih many paramters and many constants appear also.Perhaos that simply the 3 motions of 3D sphères can answer for the proportions more the spherical volumes and the mass.It is not easy to find the method to check this matter not baryonic.

Re. Reality in the context of physics: New simplified and extended diagram showing Object and Image reality and the relations of two futures; unwritten and pre-written, present Now, material past and history/records.Attachment #1: RICP_plus_and_minus_Flat_New_2016.png

This diagram makes clearer the way in which we encounter time. The material events occurring across the sequence of uni-temporal Nows are encoded in emitted/reflected EM potential sensory data (the potential pre-written future). The information, when received and processed becomes the present-now and is then stored as records and or memories called history. The material future (unwritten future) does not exist and nor dues the material past. A non existent material future allows the possibility of true randomness and free will. Persisting configurations of matter are subsumed by the youngest Object universal configuration so are part of uni-temporal Now and not the past. Non existent material past and future prevent time travel. This organisation dispels the paradoxes of relativity. I have written potential pre-written future as it is only after receipt of the information that it can be said it was a pre-written future. Not all information will be received and so pre-written future is a subset of the data pool.Perhaps I should have drawn it so. It will include the subset of information shown as received within the data pool.

Though, I don't think it is quite right to have a set of as yet uncertain contents. There isn't a way to divide up the data into that which will,'at some time', be received and that which will not, as those future events don't already exist as certainties in a space-time. So it may be best just to leave all of the potential sensory data as potential pre-written future even though some of it is far more unlikely to be received than other parts.

I said gravity gets stronger as it travels there is not any dark matter. All forces get stronger as they travel. Because all forces get stronger as they travel second law of thermodynamics does not work.

Kurt Stocklmeir

With the arrangement shown, it can be seen that the source of the present now is not a material future. The world is not revealed by moving along a world line through space-time, into new pre-existent spatial configurations. Without a geometric time dimension observers do not have world lines through space-time and are not 4 dimensional objects. A historical representation can be made that could show the path through the sequence of former configurations. However it is only a representation not a physical object, as only the youngest configuration exists.

for years I have talked about this - gravity gets stronger as it travels gravitons get more energy as they travel - because of this things fall at different speeds

Kurt Stocklmeir

Dear FQXI,Zeeya,Mr Aguirre ,Mr Tegmark, please if you can like you live at New York and that Professor Neil Degrasse Tyson also.In fact my LinkedIn ishacked.I cannot even publish now,it is crazzy even.I was honored to be endorsed by him on linkedin and that the Professor Tyson liked my posts and works.I love so much his cosmos television and works.I am sorry but like my net was hacked I have deleted contacts.But In fact I am sorry because I respect him very much and now he thinks probably that no.It is just due to my net hacked.If you see him , please explain him my apologies.Best Regards

Friendly

I have put a new collection of ideas about time on viXra. It can be found here Uni-Temporalism, the Relation of Human Beings to Time and the 'future' of Time in Physics A lot of the ideas have already been presented and discussed within the FQXi community pages. This writing is concentrating on the ideas about time I have presented and relevant issues, and gives some other ideas about time for comparison.

Any comments on that would be much appreciated either on the viXra page or here. If you find it interesting please share it.

"Uni-temporal" or "now time" fits for the great bulk of the so called empty universe (the vacuum) but does not fully cover distortions in the pace of change caused by mass and motion. And "Uni-temporal" does not show the origin of "now time"

Your paper has a good starting argument for the underlying structure of the Universe in the "Appendix: Evidence for another component of Object reality and member of the set representation:"

I posted in this Forum Category and Topic on Oct. 31, 2016 a very brief description of the origin of time and matter. Also my entry in the first FQXI contest describes the nature of mass, energy and time. We could call this variation from "Uni-temporal" time something like (here and there now time).

I hope to enter the present contest, "Wandering Towards a Goal," and tell how I achieved enlightenment re: time, matter and the goal. Time, energy and matter are all parts of one puzzle that can only be seen as the whole assembly of the Universe.

Hi Sherman Loran,

Did you read the difference between uni-temporal (-Now)time and Newtonian time? Uni-temporal-Now is not now. Uni-temporal Now (-Now) is the configuration of the Object universe, not an absolute time irrespective of the contents of space nor the experienced present. The present now is emergent from information processing.

I made reference to your ("Appendix: Evidence for another component of Object reality and member of the set representation") as it seems to fit with my view. Namely that there is an underlying structure of the universe. And I am certain that this structure is key to understanding time, mass, gravity and a reference distance. Time, mass and all that exist derive from this 'fabric' of the Universe.

Having several of the historical views of time cataloged and displayed as you have done is very good and I did enjoy reading your collection of ideas about time on viXra.

Hello everybody

I have been looking for a place to open a pet topic. I've had a bit of a look around here, and it does seem people here might be open somewhat to unfamiliar abstract notions, if they offered some promise of tackling the more stubborn unknowns. But I have to warn you, I do not hold conventional wisdom as sacred. If I suggest something that contradicts your preconceptions, then please ask yourself what justifications you have for those preconceptions. If your justification is based on acceptance of conventional theory, then it is not necessarily a disproof of what I say. And besides, sometimes you just entertain a discussion because of its originality, to see what can be said in its defence.

Space is observed to possess an expansive quality (Auv), and this expansion is thought to be undertaking work on the universe state. What if we are right about dark energies emergent work capacity, but our theories are misdirecting where that capacity for work is directed within the universal system? Take a moment to consider the possibility that mass (Tuv) is a form of "work" performed by Gauge Bosons, and that the capacity to perform this work originates with this earlier mentioned expansive quality Auv.

In this respect Auv will be the emergence rate of a space born regenerative elemental field, and its subsequent absorption and conversion into a form of work that is Mass, Auv = Tuv, which is typically written as Guv = Tuv . This explanation honours the equality known to exist between Gravity and mass, and is simply surmised as a field energy conversion, to mass work potential.

Why would this system arise in nature, whereby a space born regenerative field would give its energy content up, an exchange enabling Gauge Boson animation toward acts of work? And that Gauge Bosons would then direct that work towards building atomic and cosmological structures, such that we see in the universe today?

This is where I show you towards a door, which you might peer through, judge on having seen nothing familiar, then simply turn away. I on the other hand have walked through this door, and although I would describe my account as rudimentary, I have noted enough things of interest to serve as guide. If you will follow my lead?

If you hypothesize that the regenerative elemental field of space is generational in nature, then you can envision the possibility of it being Darwinian in nature. And interestingly, although people demonstrate a strong eversion to thoughts of Darwinian principle being applied outside of biology, it is the only driver of articulated complexity and apparent fine tuned purposefulness known to science. Does physics demonstrate an articulated complexity and apparent fine tuned purposefulness? I think so, and I also think it requires a natural explanation. Are peoples eversions to Darwinian physics rational, or is it simply because no reasonable self consistent hypothesis has been put forward for consideration?

Life on Earth is enslaved to Darwinian progression. If you're not evolving in this finite competitive environment, then eventually you're going to fall to disadvantage, of a something that is advancing its scope for survival and resource. This is essentially the main reason life on Earth relies heavily on systems of mortality, enabling healthy generational exchange and evolutionary progression. So what does this have to do with the wider universal circumstance, you ask?

If the universe and everything within it has one original cause, emerged from an ultimate simplest configuration and progressed towards a more advanced state. The space born regenerative field will have emerged first, and at some point within its growing population body, it will have needed a solution for clearing prior generations for renewal. Facilitating generational exchange and evolutionary advancement. The Gauge Boson emerges for the first time stage left, and provides this universal mortality function. Bosons consume the field, allowing the field to advance its evolutionary state, which surely includes refining its metabolism of whatever natural energy potential of space, it must be that it is exploiting. Over time the field achieves higher energy levels, for which the gauge Bosons ultimately become beneficiary's. Gauge Bosons begin to evolve structures that direct the fields energy potential towards useful acts of work, that enhance its role within the universal system. The better the Bosons perform their role, the healthier the field, the more energy flows to the Bosons. A feedback loop that drives towards ever increasing universal energy levels and fine tuned purposeful complexities. All properties of matter, including mass, nuclear, molecular bonds, heat, chemistry, are various activities that point to Gauge Bosons as their cause, and build the universe we witness around us.

Each of these acts of Bosonic work, contribute towards building just such a material universe, as if to enhance an atmospheric interaction between elemental field and matter. Atoms in their articulated structural complexities, spread across space 100,000 times the volume of nucleonic parts, and galaxies spread across awe-inspiring stretches. And all for reasons so humble, as to be analogous to why we hang washing out to dry, increased atmospheric interaction.

I reiterate, don't let unfamiliarity be your judgement. There within is a line of reasoning that makes a remarkable kind of sense of even subtleties of universal order. A full bodied explanation of micro and macro, and provides ultimate gap filler for many scientific unknowns. It takes practice to work your way through to the contemplations I now entertain, but at the same time it's not so complicated, once you've found the thread.

Nice to meet everybody and look forward to dialog.

Steve

Zeeya Merali,

I claim that I have arrived at 'a theory of Everything'. It is based on the hypothesis that "motion at speed 'c' is the fundamental property of matter, and force is reaction to motion". This makes both energy and force finite and equal , and thereby removes all infinities and singularities. Newtonian physics is enough to explain the universe, if we just make the above modifications.

Energy = Force = mc2/2 (energy units can be used for force also)

There is only one type of fundamental particle, and light is streams of fundamental-particle pairs. The pairs rotate as they move forward and this creates three-dimensional wave patterns, and so light shows properties of waves.

The fundamental particles integrate into electron-positron pairs. Positron is slightly heavier. Half the energy remains inside electron/positron and half remains as speed. The force also splits into two; half as gravity and half as electrostatic force. Thus gravity and electrostatic force have the same constant at that level, and force can be calculated in both cases using mass. Gravity and electrostatic force are separately conserved; magnetic force is created at the expense of electrostatic force. Charge represents the quantized internal-energy of electron/positron.

Charge= quantized energy = mc2/4.

Neutron contains 919 electron-positron pairs. Atoms are formed from neutrons. Molecules are formed solely by magnetic interactions between unpaired electrons in atoms. Atoms/ molecules get packed as large bodies like stars and planets using the whole electrostatic force and part of gravity. The rest of the gravity is used for interaction between large-scale structures, and this gravity is very weak. G is directly proportional to the square of the speed of the moving body. Motion is absolute, and we can know whether a body is moving by measuring its G. G is zero for a body at rest.

The so-called universal G = G for the speed of Earth (can be theoretically deduced)

Galaxy clusters are the individual units of the universe, and move at about one-third the speed of light. They have high internal energy also. Speed- internal energy ratio cannot remain static, and oscillates between the extremes. When internal energy changes into speed, the clusters move outwards causing expansion. Once the speed reaches the limit, the speed starts decreasing and the universe contracts.

The universe oscillates between hot and cold states. Cold state is symmetrically opposite to hot states, and the temperature can be taken as negative. The expansion starts with maximum acceleration. At halfway, the acceleration is zero, the average temperature is 0K, and the speed of expansion is maximum. Now it has reached nearly halfway. The existence of life and intelligent beings indicate this.

Speed of expansion at halfway = 2c/p ..... (p is the mathematical constant pi)

Absolute zero wavelength = 5.14x10-3m

The universe is in a dynamic equilibrium. when the speeds of the clusters increase, their G increases, and as gravity available is finite, the distance between them has to increase. So the distance between large-scale structures is not arbitrary. The present Earth- moon distance can be correctly predicted from the theory.

This alternate model is simple: Only one type of particle and one type of force to start with, and everything emerges from these. However the universe always existed as a pulsating single unit and never as particles, only that it is theoretically possible to explain the formation of such a structure in a bottom-up way.

My research is completely independent, and I think this the only forum available to discuss this. Thanking you for providing such a forum. I invite every body associated with this forum for a discussion.

Jose P Koshy

time and space are negative energy tachyons - time and space decrease mass and energy of positive energy particles - shape of time and space around mass creates a force away from mass - gravitons create attraction gravitons are tachyons with negative momentum

for years I have talked about this - if there is dark matter it needs to have a certain size a certain shape and a certain density to work - tidal forces between galaxies would change size shape density - there is not any dark matter

for years I have talked about this - kill cancer - give photoactive dye and nano particles to person - send particles like protons and ions through person particles hit photoactive dye and nano particles photoactive dye excited state kill cancer - it could be true this can save almost any person who gets cancer

Kurt Stocklmeir

Thank you Jose, I enjoyed the read.

I'm curious about your atomic structure being entirely a composite assemblage of positron - electron pairs. If you have something further to add about this, I would be interested plz? Matter being a composite antimatter structure, it solves the absent universal antimatter problem doesn't it? So you propose they exist together within Neutrons obeying an exclusion principle?

Steve

Dear Steven,

My theory, whether it is right or wrong, is complete in nearly all respects. Gravity and electrostatic force are similar. So both should be calculated using mass. However we use charge (a relative value for mass) for calculating electrostatic force, and the difference is adjusted in the constant used. But for proton and nuclei, the charge- mass ratio is different, and so using charge leads us to the wrong conclusion that proton and nuclei have a smaller size. I argue that size of neutron is proportionally larger that it can contain 919 electron-positron pairs. So exclusion principle is not applicable.

Here, it may be noted that in spherical-packing, 1838 smaller spheres are required to obtain a larger sphere having minimum imperfection and perfect symmetry, if the smaller spheres come in pairs. That is, 919 is not an arbitrary number. The structure of neutron is explained here.

The strong nuclear force is actually gravity at the level of electron/positron, and is as strong as the electrostatic force. When an electron and positron remain touching, the electrostatic force is completely used. The pair can either disintegrate, or integrate into neutron using whole gravity, forming a closed chain of electrons and positrons with alternate gravitational and electrostatic bonds.

Neutron being unstable, changes into a proton-electron system. Here, one electron-positron pair splits, the electron comes out, and the lone positron remains at the center thus forming a proton. Some radiations (particles along with the natural energy) are released as a consequence.

Jose P Koshy

Hello to you 3 and happy new year 2017 also,

Mr Koshy,

Do you consider quantum gravitation like an emergent electromagnetic force?

Regards

Hi Steve D, and yes happy new year all.

Jose, I'm reading some tech detail which clearly makes sense to you. You understand it takes practice to realize your view, so I and everybody else have to find short cuts for rudimentary assessment. So we can decide if its worth the greater effort necessary to realize.

What are the top five advancements to scientific understanding that your theory offers? I'm not asking for a detailed account. I just want a plainly spoken conversational type summery plz? Something for the lazy listener