I have writen this to the Professor Matti Pitkanen and his topological geometrodymanics and Cosmic strings and strings.I d like that Witten read it too.
It is a Beautiful extrapolation Professor Matti Pitkänen, unfortunally the Cosmic strings like the strings like foundamental mathematic and physical objects are assumptions.It is correlated with a field from God and we return still philosophically at this 1D main field of God, unfortunally like my spheres and the gravitational aether , all this are just assumptions.
We can tell all what we want about the luminiferous aether or a gravitational one and explain all what we want about the DE and DM,that will not change this reality,all what we have are assumptions about mainly the main cause of our reality and about what are the foundamentral objects.We cannot affirm and nothing has been proved exactly with mathematical proofs,if it was the case so it is the nobel prize.But no nobody has proved these things ,the same for the quantum gravitation.
Personally I respect a lot your works but you cannot affirm nor your main cause of topologies,geometries and properties of matters,nor philophically about God,nor about the foundamnetal objects nor so about these Cosmic strings.We can even speak like a partition ,a music of God for the Cosmic strings ,that will not change, the same for my theory , the spheres and the gravitational aether, they are all assumptions simply.
But I recognise a Beautiful generality in your TGD and philosophically speaking about God ,but nor you nor me nor nobody can define exactly what is God and how it acts really,it is a fact
Of course lol when we have worked hard and studied a lot ,we are all persuaded but with humility we must accept this truth, nobody knows the real language of God and its mathematics and physics,we have still so many things to discover and I doubt really that God have only created photons and philophically speaking that it considers these strings at quantum and cosmological scale,we can say all what we want with a splendid philosophy like if it creates a musical partitions,no we cannot affirm unfortunally
And between us, you are a creative genius and I respect a lot your works and I recognise several relevances about QFT and the mathematics that you have utilised,for me you are the best in this topic,I am frank but we cannot Affirm ,really.Nor you,nor me about the generality in philosphy and about the main nature and main foundamental objects.My spheres oscillate too,and the gravitational aether too,the only difference is that I consider particles coded and the cosmological spheres like transformators.But me too I must recognise it is an assumption generally speaking
Maybe simply we need proofs but the problem is technological lol and still during many years we are going to have the same problem,we cannot see these foundamental objects,mains codes and main origin.We are unfortunally limited technologically speaking and even in knowledges.
For me and I am very sincere Professor Pitkänen,you are relevant like Witten, you understand the generality like him about God and the partitionings.You have the same kind of interpretation about God and our main cause of topologies, geometries, matters and correlated fields Waves. You are like him of course persuaded. But I see humbly differently like you know about these spheres instead of strings and about a new logic superimpossed to our luminiferous aether with a gravitational one. But like I said nobody can affirm about these causes and foundamentals unfortunally. I respect you a lot , be sure ,I just explain my points of vue.
Sometimes we must accept after all our limits , we are so Youngs considering this evolution and correlated knowledges, we must be humble about this truth, we have so many things to discover ,and in 100 years of relativity or works with strings and QFT and Waves, branes,fields we have not really all understood and I d say even that I doubt God has only created photons and their oscillations,really I beleive this strongly.
