Steve Dufourny...
Dialog can benefit greatly from illustrations and models that facilitate clarity of concept... and to facilitate a more precise conceptual conveyance... I am currently illustrating a Visual Pulse-by-Pulse Walk-Thru of the UQS Singularity quantization... and will correlate the associated QE/QI Computational Algebra log derived from the process... to the illustrations. Upon completion I will post a link herein.
In the interim it is hoped that the following discussion will get us all on the same page regarding the "invention of Algebras".
Computational Algebras can be derived from data process operations... but the process should be well defined and the Computational Algebra derived from the process may be specific to that process.
Reduction of a process to equations... utilizing any of the various Algebras... before the process geometry is accurately modeled... may require revision of the equations... but will not necessarily invalidate the concepts from which the equations were extracted.
As a logic reduction... I have modeled a non-perturbative Energy Emission Process within an addressable data structure... i.e. a navigable (CAD/SIM) space.
I utilized the most elementary concepts of geometry... and did not adhere to the notion that the process, or the data structure, should be dictated/constrained by existing algebraic abstractions that may or may not apply to the process being investigated... i.e. backward in time may be algebraically resolvable in an x,y,z Cartesian coordinate quantization of space, but the concept does not reflect the logic reduction of non-perturbative Energy Emission.
A "point" element in geometry has a definite location but no size, shape, or extension... i.e. no internal addressable mathematical entities, axis, or orientation can be associated with a "point".
Our only perception of Energy is as a differential... and relative or otherwise... perception of a differential event requires time... i.e. event, next event, next event, next... etc.
The "point" location can be framed in time... but without spatial dimension there can be no time functions within a "point".
A "line" as a sequence of "points" does not support a differential that conveys time within the "line" itself... and algebraic concepts of time derived from a sequence of "points", are derived from the process of connecting the "points"... i.e. distance in "points".
A 2D "plane" supports internal addressable mathematical entities... and therefor time can be framed within the dimensions of a "plane".
A 3D "volume" can have associated internal addressable mathematical entities... i.e. "points", "planes", internal/external surfaces, radii... axis, and orientations... and dimensionality facilitates motion... i.e. a perception of time. REF:UQS Base Unit Volume http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQVDerivationBU.jpg
The 3D address quantization structure of any 3D navigable spatial field is a 3D Coordinate System.
Investigations of 3D spatial Singularities are specific to their quantization structure.
Energy requires Space... and investigation of any spatial expansion process from a "point" of Origin Emission requires a spatial Navigation Structure/Coordinate System consistent with the Origin Singularity quantization ... to register process decisions... i.e. databus navigation... and any Computational Algebra derived from the process... is Coordinate System specific.
As you have correctly perceived... this does not infer "ether"... but fortunately it does infer that data processing functions can be derived from the Energy Emission Process... to facilitate constructs of Computational Algebras .
A volumetric "Unified Field" Coordinate System is quantized by a singularly unique volume unit... i.e. the Base Unit Volume defining the Coordinate System in which process navigation is structured within a "Unified Field", is throughout the field uniform in algorithm... and the Base Unit Volume can be quantized by scaled units of self, without creating internal spatial units inconsistent with the specified Base Unit Volume.
That is to say that "Unified Field" Base Unit Volume packing, creates no internal spatial units inconsistent with the Base Unit Volume... and scalability of the Base Unit Volume must also satisfy "Unified Field" dictates.
The Cartesian Coordinate System is an example of a "Unified Field" Coordinate System... but it is not the only possible solution, and it does not support a minimal unit Singularity that facilitates the concept of an Origin Energy Emission process. REF: Coordinate Systems http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/SLLImage2.jpg
In that Origin implies NO pertrubative influences... i.e. Energy Emission at "point" of Origin must be distributed equally in all directions... the packing of the Base Volume Unit chosen for the Coordinate System must facilitate a sector quantization of the Origin Singularity that resolves a common single mathematical "point" of Origin... and must also support a Computational Algebra that facilitates expansion of the Emission process equally in all directions from the Origin Singularity.
Preferably as closed shells of the Base Unit Volume Radii.... but not necessarily as classical spheres in which the integral of the chord is imperceptible... i.e. in a quantum navigational space "quantum jaggies" are acceptable.
Packing of classical spherical volumes creates asymptotic volumes... i.e. no unified volume quantization can be achieved with spherical units... and any sector quantization of a sphere does not produce a uniform volume unit that will facilitate unit radii shell expansion closure.
The dimensions of Space differentiated by an initial pulse of Energy is unknowable... i.e. is an indivisible "Unity"... ... and therefor a single event Energy Emission... as a spherical expansion from a "point" undefined by an intersection of sector quantization of the sphere as a Singularity... does not resolve a minimum quanta of Energy (QE), or a minimum quanta of Space (QE)... nor does it facilitate a minimum quanta of Time (QT)... i.e. a universal clock.
If Origin Energy distribution is to be facilitated by Origin Singularity quantization... and subsequent pulsed distribution of a constant Origin Energy Emission quanta is to be facilitated by a Navigation Structure/Coordinate System consistent with the Origin Singularity quantization... a Pulsed Emission Source at Origin must be assumed...i.e. network expansion requires a continuous streamed differential.
That is to say that a Navigation Structure/Coordinate System derived from Origin Singularity quantization, must facilitate addressable internal entities which give definition to an expanding QE/QI relationship... i.e. a minimum quanta of Energy (QE) and minimum quanta of Space (QI) are resolved by Origin Singularity quantization distribution geometry dictates on Pulse-One-Open/Close cycle... and Pulsed Emission Energy provides a minimum temporal Universal referent in which subsequent QE/QI events can be verified.
UQS is an acronym for Unified Quantization of a Spherical Singularity... and the UQS quantization is an x',y',z' Coordinate System that supports a successful non-perturbative Energy Emission Process... from which UQS Computational Algebraic constructs can be derived and applied to subsequent Quantum Energy Mechanix... within the UQS uniform field quantization... i.e. the UQS "Unified Field".
There is only one Origin Singularity within a non-pertubative Energy Emission system... but all UQS Coordinate System nodes emulate UQS Origin Singularity geometry... and although not formal "Spheres", UQS Singularities expand as Base Unit Volume radii shells... equally in all directions... thus emulating spherical algebraic concepts/abstractions. REF: UQS Shell Expansion http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/SLLImage1.jpg
The data processes of non-perturbative Energy expansion as a Network/Computational Geometry can only be facilitated by knowledge/data generated by successful resolve of previous QE pulsed distribution within available QI.
Example: QE as a minimum quanta of Energy, can not divide itself into 2 or more QE at a QI gate... i.e. algebraically an even number of QE is required to cross a 2 directional QI switch/intersection.
That is to say that no decision can be made by Energy without spatial dictate or previous decision log... and Computational Algebraic constructs are only generated as a result of successful resolve of QE distribution dictated by the Network/Computational Geometry... utilizing only previous solutions... i.e. analogous to booting a databus.
UQS resolves directional gate decisions utilizing internal and external sector plane surfaces... which adds complexity to the data processing structure... but the complexity provides a two channel Energy Emission which facilitates Inertial and Radiation Energy forms, and thereby eliminates subsequent "physical reality" observation conflicts .
The complexity of a conventional computer databus... which is essentially a layered 2D logic tree structure... often requires a "virtual" visual navigation tool/app. to resolve expansion of the databus... i.e. Computational Algebras are developed with the assistance of a network/databus process "Trace On".
Although a 3D logic structure which expands in all directions equally... vastly increases network/databus connectivity potential... it also vastly increases the variables that must be tracked on any given pulse resolve ... and to resolve Pulse-75-Open... it became necessary to develop a "virtual" visual databus navigation tool/app. to register process decisions... and log Computational Algebra constructs derived from the Emission Process.
That is to say that the Logic Reduction and Process discussed herein is currently being programed as a "virtual" Quantum Logic Computer Application (Lab/Game)... and it is anticipated that the resulting CAD/SIM environment will be open structured to facilitate Energy Emission Databus validity test on any "Unified Field" Coordinate System. REF: UQS CAD/SIM Environment http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/GameAIscrnP-1.jpg
S. Lingo
UQS Author/Logician
www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com
