Alternative Models of Reality

Steve Dufourny

The diagrams of Feynman are so important for our standard model,we know the comportments of fermions and bosons.But we have not this quantum gravitation.I am insisting on this cold dark matter produced by supermassive BHs and my intuitive equation E=mc²+ml² and mlosV=constant(this second equation seems having a problem with the 3 motions of spherical volumes and their mass about the equivalce) that said we can see the proportions with the BH and the particles produced.We could create new diagrams with these particles and correlated waves.They act in the same logic than our electromagnetic waves in fact but not relativistic nor baryonic.That is why they can pass c.After all if this entropical infinity has created a physicality,it is not a prison due to our special relativity.We can pass c and it is logic for future interactions between galaxies and stars.That has no sense to be limited with this c limit.God has not created a prison where we cannot discover the others galaxies and lifes.It is just that we are still youngs at this universal scale.We evolve and we know so few still about our universal laws.We utilise thermo and heat since less of 150 years perhaps and we utilise only a kind of optimised combustion, that is all,the energy is more than this simple analyse when we consider gravitation like main chief orchestra having this zero and maximum thermo like tool.The matter and its interactions of evolution are more complex than our actual simple standard model, even if we find relevant détails about it.But we are at doors of a new sciences, the sciences of the gravitation.You imagine the potential of applications in sciences.We could produce energy without thermo and PV....T,it is important for technologies.But frankly I ask me all days how to find a method to check these particles of gravitation.I must admit that it is not easy, they are speeder,farer.Difficult to find these waves and particles at all scales in fact ,encoded or linear like gravitational informations.If somebody has ideas, he is welcome.How to check this quantum gravitation? The fissions and fusions are just for our standard model, so all systems thermo or of forces,of pression ...are not sufficient like electricity and photons also it is not sufficient in logic.Now if we insert a new gravitational force correlated with this zero absolute, perhaps we can see if the quantum BHs and spherons encoded imply several proportions with the volumes of sphères and the rotations orbital and spinal.The universe seems acts with the rotations of sphères, see that more a sphere is important in volume, less is its spinal rotation,the central cosm singularity so is the sphere turning the most slowly.The quantum mechanic of course turns more quickly in function of volumes in logic.The universal sphere does not turn.If these motions about potential and kinetic energy are proportional with thermo and gravitation with this cold dark matter.It becomes relevant at my humble opinion when we insert the numbers and the series,finite.

Steve Agnew

It seems futile to rail against the parts of science that work really well, like quantum QED and relativity's E=mc2, and so aethertime conforms to known properties and measurements.

The finite aether particle, mae = h / (2c2Tu), does introduce some new notions like the importance of quantum phase noise in driving aether decay and all force. The h is Planck's, c speed of light, and Tu the universe pulse lifetime of 13.4 Byrs.

In other words, aether is the smallest particle and makes up everything and determines the universe lifetime as well. The notions of space and time both emerge from the action of aether and the notion of a sphere emerges from the electron charge radius,

[math]r_e = q^2/(4\pi \epsilon_o m_e c^2) .[/math]Quantum charge and electron mass are what defines space and the notion of a sphere emerges from matter and action. Spheres emerge and therefore do not define.

Black holes exist in spacetime only because of gravity's 1/r force since at r=0, force is infinite. In quantum gravity, there is no 1/r force since quantum gravity is biphoton exchange. This means mass accretions known as black holes are just sources of spinning aether just like electrons are sources of spinning aether, i.e. matter and action. Quantum gravity does away with the messy business of microscopic black holes, which now are well defined quantum sources.

The universe is simply made up of aether and action and our reality of space and time emerges from that simplicity. The fine structure constant now defines not only the electron self energy, but the spinning black hole self energy as well. Instead of filling the universe with an infinity of vacuum oscillators, the aethertime universe is a finite but very, very large number of aether particles. Photons are then excitations of aether pairs and the probability of aether excitation is sqrt(alpha).

So QED renormalization of infinite energy becomes aethertime's renormalization of finite aether. However, instead of an expanding spacetime universe, aethertime is an expanding action and shrinking mass universe where now the expansion of alpha complements the decoherence of aether.

James Putnam

Steven,

I have written about photons. Now I need to go back to the beginning in order make clear what it is that I am talking about when I write about photons. The definition of mass makes clear that the cause of all mechanical, thermodynamic, and electromagnetic effects is photons. There may be more to add to this list and I feel certain that will be the case; but, I try to write only about things I feel certain about. Yet, I needed to immediately write about photons. I avoided the wave nature because it ends up collapsing into a photon anyway. Since that time, I have gone a long way revising physics equations without needing to include the idea that there is a wave nature.

Now the point of this message: I didn't begin to guess about photons in order to write about them. The path I choose was to implement a model for the photon. That model was not designed to represent the official state of knowledge about photons that existed at the time. Instead, I felt that I saw in the definition of mass that the variation of light was the cause for all physics effects. What i saw for sure was that Relativity theory was clearly wrong. In addition, mass is pervasive throughout theoretical physics making all of physics in need of review. sss

James Putnam

Steven,

My last message froze up on me. I decided to post and continue it later:

"What I saw for sure was that Relativity theory was clearly wrong. In addition, mass is pervasive throughout theoretical physics making all of physics in need of review. sss "

The model for the photon had to be flexible while remaining simple. That was easy to achieve. The photon isn't necessarily what I might guess about it; and, it cannot be everything theoretical physics says about it. There is no point to accounting for time being stopped or length not existing while a photon flies around. There is no need to begin by fitting the photon model to the event horizon propertise of a black hole. The model I chose to use was as simple as I could make it while retaining a remarkable ability to fit with empirical evidence and carry a record of its history. The model is a very short piece of wire that is bendible and stretchable and shrinkable. What wire is that? The answer does not matter, it is the device of a model of a photon. It can be straight, bent, wound, stretched, and shrunk. Maybe even more abilities than these; however, it has served very well without additional properties, and, without the need for a wave nature. It is my model. When I refer to what photons do and how I account for that, I am speaking of the model. Who knows what the photon is really like until they have explained both physics properties and intelligent life. My model can mimic any ability that a photon needs. The physics, which is only about mechanical causes for mechanical effects is reduced to the mechanical manipulation of a very short piece of pliable wire.

Hopefully this explains enough for now. I will come back to it. There are detailed explanations with the mathematics at my website. The wire works. The mathematics works. All along with these results there exists the constant clear presence of fundamental unity: One cause for all mechanical effects. Since the orderly operation of the universe requires that this be so, I move on with my work with confidence that theoretical physics will have to return to its foundation and fix it. Then the evasive, indirect, circular answers that have found their way into physics talk and some into physics equations, will give way in spite of their empirically unearned badge of orthodoxy.

James Putnam

Steven Andresen

James

I dont have time to write right now, but I will respond in kind soon. I wanted to say quickly, I do very much appreciate your views. I believe I do understand you well enough, and I think your methodology is inspired, and has led you to a very real approximation of what nature is doing. But of course, that is only my opinion, for which it has to be said, is bias based on my views which are similar enough to yours that I relate your views. Your account of an atoms training of a photon within its close proximity, due to its light field. And how as the photon moves away from the individual atom, the photon becomes less influenced by the single atom, and more influenced by the composite effects of the many atoms in the proximity, that make up a composite light field of a larger body, bodies.

A local light fields training of photons in its proximity, is precisely what is needed to describe the Michael Morley Experiment. You set up the apparatus and perform the experiment on Earth, it tells you the Earth is standing still in space in respect of lights progression. But perform the same experiment on Mars, it tells you Mars is standing still in space. But you can stand on Earth, and look across at mars and know there are photons traveling down an apparatus at C, plus the speed you see mars moving through space.

Photons are trained by local light fields (gravitational potentials) for those not in on the lingo.

I havent attempted writing an essay yet. So I want to direct some of my limited attention towards doing that now. Which is really hard when you make such fascinating distractions. But I do want to answer to your resent messages first. And then if you want to talk about the universal complexity problem? it might help my creative process. James, why do the universes photons build the structures that they do, photonic, atomic and cosmological? What explains the exquisite order of their interactions, that describe this interesting world? You dont need to answer these questions, but thats what I'm turning my attention to now

Sue Lingo

Hello Jose...

At fundamental resolution, spheres have Q-jaggies... but yes Jose, "spherical-packing" is implicit in an Emission of minimum units of Energy in all directions from a single point source.

There currently are several models of spherical equilibrium singularities, and considerable interest in resolve of a mathematical model that verifies an unbroken kinematic geometry/logic chain from a Source Singularity, to a verifiable Energy choreography of the Hydrogen proton/neutron... i.e. Mass.

I will reiterate from Hans van Leunen post of Jan. 12, 2017 @ 11:26 GMT:

"What can help is a purely mathematical model that starts with a founding structure, which is the same as the structure of the foundation of physical reality."

Verifying the structure of the foundation of physical reality... i.e. Which model?... is a hot topic, and digital visual media presentations are now being created to document the mathematics and physics as visual geometry for the general public.

REF: Nassim Haramein Black Whole Part 1 and 2

A distinction must be made between criteria required for resolving a solid geometry in equilibrium and criteria required for resolving a Single Point Energy Source Encapsulation Quantization for an Emission SIM...i.e. the model must not only provide geometric equilibrium it must also define a unique minimum unit of Space (QI) which resolves deterministic dictates for Energy Emission of a unique minimum Quanta of Energy (QE) as animated 2D Sprites within the fixed 3D coordinate structure.

REF: UQS Analysis: Black-Whole, at http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQST-TVNH.php

If you visit the work of Hans van Leunen's... REF: https://docs.com/hans-van-leunen... you will find that he qualifies the complexity in achieving such a model:

"... it is a complicated task because extending this foundation must automatically lead to a higher level of the structure of physical reality that shows more features that can be recognized as features of physical reality. In addition, the lower levels of the structure of physical reality must leave some indications that are visible in many facets of the universe".

The magic word in that statement is "automatically"... i.e. the initial "boot" of QE onto the system logic must provide enough information to sustain self-modifying code growth as intelligence.

REF: UQS Re: Tommaso Bolognesi, at http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSReTB.php

I quote from Hans van Leunen's 'Hilbert Book Project'... REF: https://doc.co/WmxXCB

"... this foundation must be relatively simple. This means that this foundation can easily be comprehended by skilled scientists. The question now is how exactly this foundation is structured."

I agree with Hans that the system will be simple such that it "can easily be comprehended by skilled scientists"... and upon verification of the Origin Singularity building blocks, children Cartesian building blocks should be upgraded with scaled minimum unit of Space (QI) geometry blocks...i.e. so simple that anyone will find it intuitive.

What can help is a purely visual representation... i.e. a CAD Simulation... of the expansion of the mathematically defined geometry entities that constitute the Origin Singularity.

A Virtual Quantum Lab Game (VQLG) in which to test/verify Emission SIMS within proposed CAD geometry candidates, is currently being developed.

REF: UQS Data Bus, at http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSDB.php

Given a valid "Unified Field Model" as it's CAD base, the Virtual Quantum Lab Game (VQLG) could be utilized by a physicist to digitally structure a proton and animate it's Energy chorography, by an eye surgeon to digitally structure and animate an eyeball, by a neuron surgeon to digitally structure and animate a synapse, by a genetic engineer to digitally structure and animate a gene, by children to digitally visualize and animate their imaginations, and all could be scaled, timed, and integrated within an intelligent information network.

REF: UQS Consciousness Investigation, at http://www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com/UQSConInv.php

S. Lingo

UQS Author/Logician

www.uqsmatrixmechanix.com

Steven Andresen

James

Quoting you

"I am online tonight and it is late. I was reading through your message when I saw this:

"It is important that we have this formula for a photons decrease in energy as it approaches lower gravitational potentials."

I am interested in the whole message, but for tonight I have to separate this out and clarify it. Photons increase their energy as they approach the Earth just as the Pound-Rebka experiment confirmed. What I say that is new is that photons descending toward the center of the Earth slow their velocity with respect to time by the same magnitude as freely falling objects increase their velocity with respect to time. In other words, their accelerations are equal in magnitude but opposite in sign."

I need to acknowledge the incompleteness of my thinking, in terms of photon dynamics as they transition gravitational fields. So I put forward the following comments, not as assertions of mine, but rather to define what I think I understand, and where I believe my inquiries are leading. And most fortunate for me, it seams I have found myself a guide in yourself, which I realize could save me untold hours. Your help will not go unappreciated James, if you will please?

Ok, so I've woken up to the significants of variable photon velocities, variable C. My original assumption that I feel I am testing with these questions, is that photon velocity is the mechanical action at the heart of all universal interactions. And therefore, the most correct notion of what an energy value is, is based on the value of photon velocity. I would build my model, so that every other consideration is a secondary one.

But here's the contradiction. light traveling down a gravitational field towards the Earths surface, lowers its velocity, but in doing so, increases its frequency.

I liken it to the circumstance of an ocean born storm. Strong ocean swells radiate out from the storm, but as they migrate towards the coast, the shallower waters have the effect of sequentially slowing the swells velocity. Faster moving swells behind, catch up to the slower moving swells in front, which has the effect of stacking the swells closer together. So although the swells move with less velocity, which constitutes a loss of energy, the waves are stacked closer together, which increases the energy per ocean surface area. So it can be said, that the shallower waters are draining energy out of the swell overall, however having the effect of concentrating the wave energy per ocean surface area.

So a fishing boat working the shallower coastal waters, might be right in saying that there is more energy in the shallow waters. But if they didn't comment to the changing velocity of the ocean swells moving from deep toward shallower ocean, then they would be missing a very important aspect of the universal picture.

My question for you, does the above serve as an effective analogy? Is the conventional approach to gravitational effects on light, comparable to the shallow water fisherman's perspective? If so, then velocity is a very important component in representing the overall energy content of photons. Making C a constant will have made science blind to these greater considerations.

I haven't rationalized the observed mathematical values of dilated light, to see if this is a possible interpretation. So I'm bracing myself for surprises?

Steve

James Putnam

Steven,

What you explain is correct concerning the wave nature view of how electromagnetism increases its energy as it approaches the Earth. The reason my responses seem to avoid saying this is because so far as the results of my work are concerned, I have come a long way without needing to include a wave nature. It will not be included unless empirical evidence makes it necessary to be included. Schrodinger's wave equation lies ahead. It appears to make a wave nature a necessary part of quantum physics. I will see. My opinion is that it will not become necessary.

More to the point for your question: I have derived a kinetic energy equation to replace Einstein's kinetic energy equation. The equation is only about energy and not about waves. Yet my equation predicts the existence of frequency. In other words, it appears to establish that frequency is not solely a property of waves. Frequency is accounted for also by my simple model of a photon. The tilt that I mentioned as being responsible for increasing the energy of a photon also accounts for frequency.

It may be helpful for you to look at my derivation of the kinetic energy equation replacement for Einstein's kinetic energy equation. My equation was presented here at FQXi.org in the essay contest Is Reality Digital or Analog? in my essay entry Our Analog Universe. In case you might be wondering, my essays repeatedly receive low ratings here.

James Putnam

Steve Dufourny

Hi steve, we have all our lines of reasonings and we are all persuaded that we are right,logic when we consider our psychology and the road of studies.That said steve I have exp;lained you several X that aether was gravitational for me and that quantum gravity is not an emergent electromagnetic force.It is not universal to consider that only photons exist and are the only one piece of encodings of evolution.That is why I have inserted these spherons not baryonic cold correlated with dark matter produced by supermassive BHs central to galaxies.This zero absolute seems the answer.But of course steve I am also persuaded like you :) now let's analyse deeper this alpha constant,this constant shows us how acts this electromagnetism.We calculate the / charges² and the constant of planck reduced so h/2pi and epsilon0 the permittivity,c so e²/h reduced c 4pi Epsilon0 and we have this constant alpha utilised to better encircle and understand the emissions absorptions of photons and électrons.Now if we want to insert the gravitational so it is totally different because c is l and l is not constant, h must be also extended more far than our planck scale and the permittivity in logic for the gravitational aether implies that we have not a space,only matter and energy exist.Now the relevance is to insert these spherical volumes and their motions more the cold superimposed to our standard model.That will give the road for this gravitation.But alpha is just for electromagnetism.Feynman and his diagrams helping, we see how the informations photonic act in fact in détails.But gravity is different,that said the npure newtonian mechanic and the motions could help.The elementary charges and the planck charges permit to have this constant.The charges are for electromagnetism, now the method can be extrapolated with the gravitation.The fact that the standard model is encircled by this gravitation with quantum BHs and spherons permit to have an equilibrium.It exists a constant for this gravitation ....

James Putnam

Steven,

Adding to my last message concerning the idea of a wave-nature. The can be waveforms without a wave-nature. One of interest to me is that photons can be released one after the other in a pattern such as a sine-wave. That formation of photons is not an example of the wave-nature idea. The wave-nature applied to a photon describes the photon as actually being an electromagnetic wave without a particle form. Later in its travel an impact with a particle of 'matter', can be imminent. Before the impact can actually occur, the wave-nature of the photon is said to collapse transforming itself into the electromagnetic particle we call the photon. When a 'charged particle' accelerates, photons are released and later photons are received causing a charged particle to accelerate. I am finding, so far, that all wave properties, which start with the existence of a photon and end with the existence of a photon, can be accounted for, during the complete transfer process, with the particle form of electromagnetism, the photon. In a past message, I said that the photon and the light-field are constantly interacting. When I said that, I was indicating that the photon remains a photon during its travels. I have only begun to address the behavior and effect of a photon. I was also indicating that the property that is inversely represented by mass is continuous. It extends from its point of origin out into space with no end. Its curve, strength and extension speed will come out in later discussions.

James Putnam

Steve Agnew

It is not correct to say that gravity is a form of EM. It is correct to say that both gravity and EM are different forms of the fundamental phase decoherence of the expanding force and shrinking mass aethertime universe.

A biphoton is a convenient representation for quantum gravity as a single aether particle exchange just like a single photon is a convenient representation for quantum charge as a bound pair of aether particles.

There are many equivalent ways to describe quantum gravity that are all consistent with quantum charge. Aethertime happens to be a convenient way to unify charge and gravity and there are likely many other equivalent ways.

The math, however, must make sense and there must be some definite answers. In aethertime, galaxies rotate with an added force of quantum gravity and there is no need for dark matter. Black holes are spinning aether of quantum gravity just like electrons are spinning aether of quantum charge. Time has two dimensions; atomic time and decoherence time...and so on.

Intuition is great, but there are limits to classical consciousness and intuition. We need a spectrometer to detect quantum phase to make sense out of the part of the universe determined by quantum phase noise.

Just like magnetism comes from the motion of charge, gravity matterism comes from the motion of neutral matter decay. Instead of the matter decay of stars and galaxies being just a product of the chaos of classical noise, the decays of stars and galaxies entangle each other's futures with coherent motions.

Steve Dufourny

Forget your electromagnetic chains steve and all will be easier.The fact ton insist on this luminiferous aether and electromagntism is like accepting a prison created nby God, that has no sense universally speaking.If like in 150 years we had found all our foundamentals.Electromagnetism is a step, a fuel that is all.BHS have a matter not baryonbic like dark matter and gravitationn logically.Open a little your mind above this electromagnetism.Consider that God does not play at dices.It is sometimes very ironical to insit on these photons and thermo of our standard model.150 years of physics and we have all encircled the 13,7 billions of electromagnetism??? Frankly it seems odd simply.We cannotn pass c , we ca,not travel in galaxies, we cannot this and that???? you think really that this entropy infinite has created only this photonic system ????Not possible in a general and universal analyse.Quantum phases quantum phases ,charges and this and that .....It is not sufficient it seems to me humbly.Let's be objective about this universe and its laws.Like the MOND it is not logic to modify this newtonian mechanic.The aether for the BHs ??? and what are they ? a door? a whormholes due to symmetries ? what ? a road towards eternity?

Steven Andresen

James

I might have to get back to you in a few days time, unless I have time to write tomorrow morning. Heading off for adventure boating on the high seas, and island camp. Then I will have time to comment towards the wave subject. But yes, I will be interested to learn more about the reasons for your view.

Quoting you

"In case you might be wondering, my essays repeatedly receive low ratings here. "

That doesnt influence my opinion at all. But your not playing the popular card anyway. The game you're playing is much more interesting than that. If you wanted to pander to pop, a variable C theory probably wouldnt be your first choice. Its a fashion thingy. But that could change in time. Maybe we can change it.

I have to go to bed now, but lots of things I wish I had time to say. Will have to wait

Steve

Steve Dufourny

Our supermassive BHs central to galaxies are there for something it seems to me.If they exist and that all stars are balanced and turn around this central BH,there are reasons.It is not a door or this or that.All galaxies, our 1000 billions of galaxies possesse a supermassive BH at their centers.They are probably a spherical volumes of matter not baryonic probably also correlated with this cold dark matter when we consider particles produced.If these BHs exist there are reasons I am repeating,they permit the universal rotations and they embark also the stars in their dance Inside this sphere.If the BHs exist they have rules, properties,....but if we interpret them like the gravitation in the logic of thermo photonic electromagnetic mechanic,never we could really encircle them.When we analyse the radiations of Hawking, we have a wonderful work permitting to see the comportments of photons at this event horizons where we have a kind of bridge between these two kind of matter.Baryonic and not baryionic.We can see indeed at this wall if I can say these comportments but we do not know what are really these BHs in fact.The relevance now is also to consider quantum BHs.We are at a new sciences, a new physics,the physics of gravitation.If E=mc²+ml²is correct ,we have the road.If now we have only these photons,it is simply sad entropically speaking.It is not rational considering this infinite potential of creativity.The aether is from God in its pure meaning....Best Steve :)

Steve Agnew

I too believe in black holes, but they are a product of a 1/r gravity force. With the aether exchange of quantum gravity, there is no longer a singularity in space and time. Rather, black holes are simply a spinning aether accretion.

Electrons are likewise spinning aether accretions and that means that electrons share some properties with BH's. Electron self energy was infinite with classical 1/r potentials, but with QED, electron self energy reduces to the fine structure constant and the gyromagnetic ratio.

Classical black holes with 1/r gravity likewise show infinite self energy, which is what a singularity is. Black holes with quantum gravity, though, show finite self energies. Spinning black holes now show a quantum gravity matterism that entangles stars and other black holes. There is a gravity gyromatter constant for a spinning black hole that is about 2 just like the gyromagnetic constant and the fine structure constant shows black hole self energy just like it shows electron self energy.

Steve Dufourny

It is a road of explainations.I beleive in finite systems,that is why I consider the physical singularities,I beleive that all possesses its intrinsic main gravitational codes and so the central main code,the central BH in my model.Thus we need these singularities.If a supermassive BH for example is what it is,so it is due to its main code in fact implying stability in our space time in evolution of matter energy by encoding of informations.If the aether is gravitational and connected with all singularities,that implies several relevance philosophical like in physics.I understand your extrapolation with these BHs and the aether and électrons.But we analyse still the electromagnetic forces and not an other kind of matter.We have a beautiful infinite potential and it is relevant when we correlate with our kinetic energy and its steps due to this quantum gravitation in logic encircling this standard model.I asked me yesterday if the supermassive BHs are the number one and the x is the number of particles produced and that we correlate with c and photons them produced by the number of stars ,so we could have several proportions appearing,if we consider a fractal near this zero absolute tending to infinity like gravitation.This method in series could help to better encircle this gravitation and particles waves and fields correlated.If it is the case we can find their linear velocities and the proportions with the supermassive BH.We can also extrapolate the same relative logic for our quantum serie.It becomes relevant I think.Because we have a road towards this entire entropy, we could even calculate the volume of our central BH.If the multiverse of Mr Tegmark is correct, so we can even extrapolate with these volumes and even return to this uniquenss considering God simply and its infinite entropy.The spherical volumes and their motions purely newtonian in logic are universal keys where we could better understand what are these photons and particles of gravitation sent by this entropy infinite.The multispheres seem relevant if and only if after all we return at this number of uniquenss 1.The aether will be always correlated with this 1 now the universes them .....The relevance seems this play with our laws.But the principle of uniquness like the principle of entropy in its pure philosophical meaning are essential and foundamental.The self energy is infinite in all when we consider the BHs ,the quantum BHs and the spherons,after it is just a question of codes and paramters giving properties and rules in spacetime.God is near us, above us,in us,around us.....in this weakest and strongest paradoxal gravitational force.....we are babies in evolution where bodies, matter,souls evolve.....we create, imrpove,work :)for this entropy in all humility like travellers from stars.We were, we are, we shallbe after all simply we die electromagnetically not gravitationally, it is a real hope for all créations in fact considering these singular souls....

Steven Andresen

James

There are a number of things on my mind right now that I would like to communicate, however I've only a few minutes to write this. So just for the pragmatic points.

I think you will find that we dont need consideration of waves for what we are attempting to do here either. I believe that is the point which my explanation makes, the point of lights frequency evolving as it traverses a gravitational field. That convention is fixated on frequency being lights primary measure of energy value. Like shallow water fisherman, unaware that ocean waves have a variable speed, and the implications of variable speed.

The correlation you and I have uncovered, concerning lights variable speed at lower gravitational potential, and galaxy rotation curves based on a lower potential for mass at lower gravitational potential, is a direct correlation. I think that lights changing frequencies are correlated, but not directly so, and infact might be better described as inversely correlated.

So we needed worry about waves, or frequencies, nor anti-correlations etc. All it seams we need to factor, is variable speed of C, and a direct correlation with variable Mass potential. Otherwise, our very simple observation which seams to describe galaxy rotation curves, wouldn't have shown anything of interest. C is the only unit we need to define, to show the proportional variations of masses at different galaxy radius.

Do you understand my meaning, and have an idea how to set out these measures?

Steve

Steve Agnew

The singularities are in our math and not in our reality. The problem with singularities is, depending on what limit you use to approach them, you can get very different answers...in fact, you can get any answer you want.

Black hole logic is very specious and full of loopholes in logic. The mainstream science black hole logic has been recently challenged by several papers with alternative and entirely reasonable assumptions. Different assumptions lead to radically different black holes and this is not a good thing.

If your theory hangs its hat on black hole logic, get ready for many different hat stands.

Steve Dufourny

In our maths ??Since when ? These mathematical or physical singularities and their main codes are hypothesis ,in maths and in physics at my knowledge.

I agree that said that we have several roads of explainations but they must be rational and objective these extrapolations.

:) I have chosen the spherical 3D hat lol But I respect the others hats of course.

Hans van Leunen

A complete model of the universe describes both the creation and the evolution of the target.

The universe

The creator did his job in one stroke, and he stored the result in a repository that uses quaternions as storage lockers. A quaternion can hold a combination of a timestamp and a three-dimensional location. All discrete objects in the universe are either modules, or they are modular systems. Elementary modules exist that are no conglomerates. They are the point-like subjects, which the separate lockers will store.

This model makes only sense after ordering of the stored items. First, order the timestamps. Next, the application of coordinate systems will order the locations.

A second repository stores continuums. It embeds the first repository, such that the discrete objects get embedded in some of the continuums. The ordering process exposes the embedding as an ongoing process that embeds the discrete items as a function of their location and timestamp.

This view makes it possible to interpret all discrete items as observers, which receive information about their environment. It requires that one of the continuums gets deformed by the embedding of each of the elementary objects. The embedding lasts only a single progression instant and the deformation will normally quickly fade away. However, if the embedding of the elementary modules reoccurs with a sufficiently high repetition rate and in coherent spatial location swarms, then the deformation becomes persistent.

This result occurs when a type of elementary module hops around in a stochastic hopping path that after a while has formed a coherent hop landing location swarm. That location path and the coherent location swarm characterize the elementary module type. The swarm that represents the elementary module type will act and move as an individual object.

For comprehending what happens, it is important to understand the behavior of the embedding continuum as a response to an embedding event. Quaternionic differential calculus describes this behavior. The second order partial differential equations describe the response to the embedding of point-like artifacts.

One-shot triggers cause a response in the form of a vibration of the embedding continuum. A single three-dimensional isotropic trigger causes a spherical shock front. We will call this response a clamp. Clamps diminish their amplitude as 1/r with distance r from the trigger location. Clamps travel with light speed.

When integrated over a long enough period, clamps result in the Green's function of the continuum. Convoluting this Green's function with the location density distribution of a coherent trigger location swarm results in the deformation that the swarm poses onto the continuum.

The mutual deformation of their carrier affects the position of the elementary modules inside the embedding continuum. However, also other solutions of the second order partial differential equations occur. For example, one-dimensional one-shot triggers cause one-dimensional shock fronts. We call these responses warps. During their travel, warps keep their amplitude. They also travel with light speed. Warps act as information messengers. Each warp carries a bit of information. Similarly, each clamp carries a bit of deformation capability. Warps do not deform the embedding continuum.

If a warp arrives at the platform on which the swarm of an elementary module resides, then it influences the kinematics of that platform.

Platforms exist in types. Each type has its private parameter space. A version of the quaternionic number system spans each of the paramater spaces. One of these parameter space is singled out. It defines the background parameter space of the model. The parameter spaces differ in the location of the geometric center of the parameter space in correspondence to the background parameter space. Further, the versions of the quaternionic number systems differ in their ordering. Cartesian coordinate systems and subsequently polar coordinate systems can order the number system. The ordering specifies the symmetry of the versions of number systems and corresponding parameter speces. The difference in ordereing between a selected parameter space and the background parameter space defines the symmetry flavor of the platform. This symmetry flavor corresponds to a symmetry related charge. This charge resides at the geometric center of the platform. The elementary particle that resides on the platform inherits the symmetry related charge of the platform. The symmetry related charges are the sources of a symmetry related field.

In physics, the symmetry related charge corresponds to the electric charge and the color charge.

Where clamps operate in swarms, will warps operate equidistant in strings. These strings follow the deformation of their carrier.

The maximum speed at which the carriers of that information can travel restricts the information transfer. Therefore, the observers get their information in a converted way. First, they only get information that arrives from the past. Thus, where the storage of information in the repositories occurs in a Euclidean quaternionic format, will the observers get their information in spacetime format. This spacetime format features a Minkowski signature. A Lorentz transform describes the information conversion process

This description shows that observers receive only a small portion of the information that is available in the repositories. This remark qualifies the requirement to verify all significant physical statements by experiments as nonsense.

The creator applies modular design and construction. This fact represents a very efficient way of generating and configuring complicated structures. On earth, after a trial and error based evolution that took more than thirteen billion years, it has proven to be able to generate intelligent species. This occurrence happened even though design and construction occurred in a stochastic fashion. Since the arrival of humans, intelligent modular design can replace stochastic modular design. From that moment on, intelligent modular design becomes possible. It has its greatest influence on complicated system configuration.

The Model

An infinite dimensional separable quaternionic Hilbert space and its unique companion non-separable Hilbert space can act as the repositories in the above-described model. This pure mathematical model merges Hilbert space operator technology with quaternionic function theory and quaternionic differential calculus.

See: Reverse bra-ket method by Hans van Leunen https://doc.co/mhUWkW

« Previous Page Next Page »