Ulla Mattfolk
Hi Ulla, I would like to have your points of view to go further into what I call the universal spherical logic. There is a clear logic and there are constants involved. We must consider the primary properties of spherical volumes. Penrose, in his cosmological work, considers radius and mass, Dirac, through his large-number hypothesis, does the same, Hawking’s work also relies on mass and radius,and Einstein in general relativity treats mass and radius as fundamental. The same applies to Newton, Friedmann, Lemaître, Bohr, Rutherford, Fermi, Eddington, and Hubble. Radius and mass are everywhere important.
This suggests that we can extrapolate a universal logic across the scales, both quantum and cosmological. Mass–energy and thermodynamics form one fundamental parameter. Then we have the radius or volume. But we can also consider motions,spins and rotations,which may be linked to time. We also need an informational logic, and probably densities as well. I am persuaded that a universal constant or dimensionless invariants exist that links all of this. The universe can be described as a universal sphere,we can take quantum spherical systems, like the proton, as references. Then we can extend the reasoning to cosmological and quantum objects. Additional corrective parameters may be needed, but the logic remains.
The universal spherical logic of my theory of spherisation, involving quantum and cosmological spherical volumes, must therefore consider fundamental parameters if we want constants to emerge. Let me summarize the main parameters,
Mass–energy content, possibly extended to a mass–energy–information equivalence (according to my earlier assumptions, which I do not assert as fact, but which guide the reasoning). Mass–energy defines gravity, thermodynamics, and wavelengths.
Radius or volume, defining density and connecting to spacetime curvature, horizon area and entropy, and quantum boundary conditions.
Spin/rotation, which appears at all scales. This is an essential point in my reasoning. All these quantum and cosmological spherical volumes rotate,electron spin, proton spin, atomic angular momentum, stellar spin, galactic spin, black-hole Kerr angular momentum, and possible cosmic rotation discussed by Penrose or Barbour. Spin is intriguing for the concept of time, because these motions,especially quantum and cosmological rotations.are periodic and suggest a link to time.
Information, which is essential even though the universal ontology of its origin is unknown.
Density, important for gravity, pressure, evolution, nuclear analysis, and localization.
Entropy and negentropy, related to information and to the mass–energy–information equivalence. The motions of these spherical volumes and their ontology matter here.
Information and spherical volumes seem to be key, and entropy appears geometrical and spherical. Dimensionless invariants should appear at all scales in a purely spherical universal logic. Quantum physics and cosmological physics may both fall under a mass–energy–information equivalence, with information acting as a kind of conductor. Time, resulting from motions of spherical volumes, becomes relevant through frequency and periodicity. In fact, rotations, periodicity, and time can be correlated to mass–energy, general relativity, and the gravitational radius,but a crucial point is that time cannot be separated from motion.
If constants or dimensionless invariants exist within a spherical logic, then it becomes interesting to compute or analyze them more deeply. If a scale‑invariant spherical quantity relates mass, radius, spin, density, and information across all scales, it would be extremely relevant. Even Dirac’s large numbers, the fine‑structure constant, the gravitational coupling, and holographic entropy all seem to belong to the same spherical logic.
Should we consider a universal constant built from a product of the main parameters:
M (mass–energy), R (radius/volume/curvature), J (spin/rotation/angular momentum), ρ (density), S (entropy), T (time/frequency/periodicity), and I (information)?
I do not yet know how to combine them, but there appears to be a universal logic, and constants or dimensionless invariants should emerge. Something is missing that unifies all spherical systems across all scales. Universal sphere, cosmological spheres, quantum spheres. It is the ontology.
There does seem to be a universal spherical architecture connecting quantum spheres, nuclear spheres, planetary spheres, stellar spheres, galactic spheres, cosmic spheres, black‑hole spheres, the Hubble sphere, and the evolving universal sphere itself. This is the meaning of my theory of spherisation: the evolution of a universal sphere, possibly (though I do not assert it) with a central core, a central universal sphere or “super‑matter–energy” diffusing three main systems that later merge under information. I search roads and try calculations, not easy . I try also with the spherical topological geometric algebras for the tensors, vectors, scalars to have quantum and cosmological links. correlations, not easy. Regards
