Is There a Simulation for a Thought Experiment of Who Should Steer What Desirable? by Gyenge Valeria

Gyenge Valeria

Dear Mike!

Thank you for adding me to your review list.

All the best for you, too. Bye - Valeria

Don Limuti

Hi Gyenge,

I find your essay very interesting and foundational. There are no other essays that go into the nature of human thought and how it is fundamental to how we can even make any sense of what it means to steer the future.

Thanks for your contribution,

Don Limuti

Gyenge Valeria

Dear Don!

Thank you for your respect and a high score given me supposedly by you.

Unfortunately, the 9 pages for this essay were not quite enough to properly unfold that matter what I wished to draw to our attention.

I lack, and think we are tending to put the crown of the physics of thought or at least its reconciliation with a re-considered philosophy being the utmost underlying ideological framework describing nature, society, and generally the most principal all-pervasive laws of the thinking process, what our contemporary theoretical physics almost quite well is trying to figure out.

I keep, - thoughts - are the utmost capability for the MAN! The thought is energy and information (on many structured levels, even our emotions, deep senses are as much thoughts we are able to consciously formulate into being been intellectually aware, we should say a man is composed of his thoughts and his way for living in healthy organism and organization keeping his thoughts both intellectually and emotionally balanced. ) which allows us to create, to materialize around us our ideas, desires, will etc., independently from the existence exists in any kind of form we can conceive about it. The thoughts are both local and non-local and exist neither in time and space and as much as the existence exists. So, the comprehension and examining of our thoughts are what makes us to be a higher order being.

I'm not a physicist at all, however I can deem from what the contemporary physics tries to speak of.

I hold, neither the spirit or mind nor its vehicle (i.e. the genetically arranged material physical one) through which the consciousness can express itself are more important. Neither is over each other but may be balanced. We would already understand much putting our thoughts into a contemporary right context of theoretical physics of space time and time space frameworks as experienced/researched memory patterns lived out in several fragment parts of same self or selves involved, and as far as unfolding M-theory tries to explain as an extension of string theory in which 11 dimensions of spacetime are identified as 7 higher-dimensions plus the 4 common dimensions (11D st = 7 hd 4D)(The latter phrasing needs some correction yet, I feel so)

What I drew in my illustration is one's thoughts development during several incarnations (the latter is unscientific term yet,) of which memories are folded into light bodies which are factually wave-fields. The so called actual genetic make-up i.e. one's physical, biologically arranged body (see: The Body Electric - Electromagnetism and a foundation of Life by Robert O. Becker M.D, Gary Selden) need to fit to express what his actual (Levels of Energy - An introduction to spectral consciousness by Frederick E. Dodson) can read as one's approachable memories held in those wave-fields e.g. Light bodies.

In connection with the message of your essay ( I' haven't read over yet with perusal only its abstract) I can agree preliminarily, surely there is a need for a proper education system to concur all of our knowledge and 'how to use our thoughts' describable with much simpler terms being been understandable, comprehensible for anyone. (i.e. the notion philosophy exerts a [Latin-Greek: 'Philo' = (in composition) partake in, savant 'Sophia' = wisdom of life])

Kind regards,

Valeria

Aaron Feeney

Hi Valeria,

Thank you for your post on my page. I was aware of most of that material, but it was nice to get the transcript for one of the interviews. You are the only person here who has mentioned anything "off the beaten path" in relation to my work.

Your paper is quite amazing in it scope. I like the areas you explore. I think you will really like Lawrence B. Crowell's paper, "Duality in Cosmology and the Limits to the Acquisition of Information," as it discusses in great detail what would be required in order to simulate our world as we find it. He argues very effectively that we will soon be able to mathematically prove that we are not in a simulation someday, if that is indeed the case.

Your work is a valuable contribution and I have rated it highly. Best wishes to you.

Warmly,

Aaron

Gyenge Valeria

Dear Aaron!

Thank you for your respect, and rating my essay with high value.

I thought, you might be aware of some of those materials :) and right, those were not included in a kind of competition such we've done here. However, those all admitted to/on a larger scale of our reality.

I basically have not a concern about the competition here, as I've answered to your comment above here on my page. I participated only to disseminate crucial information for regards 'whose have a need to understand my messages, I hope, perhaps they will'.

I did not argue your work and its/the possible importance of (and I'm curious whether there is a free ebook version of your ) Understanding Future-Viewing Machines and Time Travel. I only wished to point out to that what may be dangerous and sometimes undesirable to know and want steering everything about our future. We finally would lose our humaness, Albeit as far as I mentioned in my essay, and some of posts put here, surely we need to develop a consciously steerable ability in ourselves even remaing in human, for seeing back/forth so far in our memory and examine and estimate the cause and effect of our deeds basically for not acting without cogent thinking or only based our natural insticts (only emotionally driven) in real-time. However our truly humaness lies in we are capable to decide sometimes just in time, for what any quite sophisticate AI even so based on quantum computation of predictability of all events won't be able. (If was so he/it might be quite human :) (see my comment on REALITY, ONCE by Joe Fisher's essay)

Perhaps, this is some consideration deeply involved and may be in connection with written in Lawrence B. Crowell's paper, "Duality in Cosmology and the Limits to the Acquisition of Information,". I've not read yet, but I will. Thank you for the remark.

All the best for you, your further works and progress here and anywhere.

You can contact me at the given email in my essay at any time you wish.

Warmly too,

Valeria

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Dear Gyenge

first of all thanks a lot for your comment on my thread, you are one of the few who understand the message behind this writing..

But indeed you are also are aware that our TIMELESS KNOWLEDGE is "compressed in the Eternal NOW Moments , and that our causal prison is only one of the eternal ways of Total Simultaneity (GOD) of BEING, this only facet of the Kaleidoscopically ONE, and of course one facet is not able to reveal us the infinitely amount of beautiful images that are available.

Human thought is only a blink of the one facet I mentioned above , but we can evolve....

I appreciate your essay and rated it accordingly.

best regards

and maybe keep in touch

Wilhelmus

Gyenge Valeria

Dear Wilhelmus!

Thanks a lot for your appreciation and your high score.

Yes, I understand your message, and also what you write here about the only facet is not able to reveal the whole. However I'm aware of that too, I may be here at this present moment of the Total Simultaneity, because the two (and only two parallel exists and only the holographic one can contain many alternative facets of being and in only the latter one may exist a total simultaneity) realities convolutes in a never was so dangerous just right now moment.

I keep, and know there is not else utmost capability and power than the thought which may have no form even can contain every information and a proper shape in it. So that is a very dangerous capability for not adequately trained ones who are not fully naturally advanced humans.

Keep in touch, if you feel so. I wrote down here which presently max be enough to know for a proper decision making.

High regards,

Valeria

Petio Hristov

Dear Guende

We, the cosmos and all that exists are a fruit of the "idea" of the thought. On academic level it is even debated that we live in a kind of computer simulated world.

Are we an illusion? The reality that we all perceive, our physical existence and our thoughts are mere results of a dynamic, virtual processing of information.

We live in an illusion because we cannot see reality. The General theory of illusion is the always opposite of the Theory of Unity and can be expressed via the Theory of Relativity.

We at best can learn from the nature recognizing our inner outer nature its unconditional interconnectedness. To overcome the nature or conquer the cosmos should mean creating an autocratic power over us. We are connected with nature and we will learn from it. We are not above nature. The scale inflation and the scale cycle determine our life and the reactions are controlled by the idea.

I believe your essay should be rated highly.

I wish you good luck on the competition.

Regards,

Petio

Gyenge Valeria

Dear Petio!

Thank you for your comment, and your appreciation of my essay.

I think, we - our original beingness - are basically not an illusion. But some part of our consciousness how to think about our reality, what we may know about our original existence, had been advisedly engineered not necessarily with a kind of simulation of which fundamentals lie on contemporary computer technologies. We are in a very crucial moment in the JUST NOW on a culmination points of our alternative (realities) ideas to decide: Whether may we need to recall our lost knowledge gained from our natural origin if we want to keep our humanness or we would finally lose our natural origin.

I wrote much about it, on my last comments put on your essay page. I'm curious: Whether did you read it or not?

I also look forward for our mutual progress in a project which can bring together such specially dedicated scientists who are able to maintain a consensus about those ideas which are adequate for keeping our humanness and steering our fate at that stage which is desirable to steer.

I'm look forward for hearing from you and your books.

Kind regards,

---If I will be Anonymous here that is because the time elapses for typing my text, and the system will log me off. -----

Valeria (Gyenge)

Jayakar Joseph

Dear Valeria,

In relevant to your statement, 'our thoughts are mere results of a dynamic virtual information processing', I would like to emphasize that:

'Thought' is the result of real-time information process rather than virtual.

While my interpretation on your assumption, 'The light being as a pure existence not a standalone entity independent from a physical structure, but the concept which is an instant imprint about an entire physical body structure what the mind is able to apprehend at a speed of its own conceptualization instantaneously and it may be named light, or anyhow.' is explained as:

Light and ion are expressional from the eigen-rotational energy of string-matter continuum, in ECSU paradigm.

Thus, 'thought' is the real-time process of information by the eigen-rotational energy of string-matter segments of molecules of Central Nervous System; that is unique for the higher species of living organisms.

With best wishes,

Jayakar

Gyenge Valeria

Dear Jayakar!

Thanks Jayakar for your comment.

You write: "'Thought' is the result of real-time information process rather than virtual." I think so too.

However, I distinguish at last two realities may co-exist. One is the original in which not necessarily exists any control system, but may be created with a kind of special technology which establishes sensing the reality(ies) in space time frameworks.

You write: '.. 'thought' is the real-time process of information by the eigen-rotational energy of string-matter segments of molecules of Central Nervous System; that is unique for the higher species of living organisms...";

I think, the real time thought may be naturally unique for higher living organism, but in my essay terminology: The 'eigen-rotational energy of string-matter segments' exist only in the created realities. I mean, there are created holographical matter segments of ones who are engaged on that experiments and their thoughts and bodily genetic arrangement either can eventually fit (resonate synchronic) with their original thoughts and genetic (end of simulation) or there may be several cycles in running and error correction systems for achieving of a termination of the process (a.k.a. reach the proper self ['eigen'] identities)

I feel, the problem is truly what you mentioned in your essay, the sequential feedback loops (thinking in linear time and only the negative back-coupling) for the projected identities are not enough for error correction to gather their likeness and to vibrate the original body(ies) with the several of alternating string-matter segments to get the original him/their back.

The bigger problem and danger is, the natural original humans were not originally involved and planned to partake in such kind of experiment, however their energetics and consciousness also had been disturbed, and later quite intentionally distorted!

I feel your work quite important, so I rated your essay high.

I glanced over your site, and I'd be glad if you could give an email address in spite of the contact form on your site. My one is in my essay.

Kind regards,

Valeria

« Previous Page