Why Quantum?

Steve Dufourny

You are welcome Mr Saidane,

You poem is very relevant Mr Saidane,it is rare to see a person who understands really what is entropy. A lot of people forget the essential, the universal faith.

I like to write also poems but in English, it is difficult for me :)

Malika has chance also to be with you, take care both of you.

Universally yours

[deleted]

I Was There

I was there when the Big Bang erupted

I was there when the universe was born

I was there when all matter was sown

I was there when all genes were encoded

I was there when the screens were torn

I was there when entropy ruthlessly ruled

When the planets were still twirling as gases

And black holes filled with energies

When the gravity ghost pulled all matter

Together to make runaway galaxies

I was there when the dinosaurs roamed

The earth for millions of years alone

Before their species instantly disappeared

Leaving your planet with dust all smeared

I was there and I saw what had happened

I could tell you but you wouldn't understand

I was there when Adam bit the Apple

That was meant to seed the Great Garden

I was there when he had to leave Eden

With his beloved Eve to love and grapple

As I weaved the leaves they had to wear

She was ashamed of the whole scam

By now you must wander who I am

I was there when Noah escaped

The big flood and saved what he could

When the prophets relentlessly pleaded

Their people to quit the bad and really be good

When the Pharaohs ruled as universal Gods

At the center of all glories and modes

Using their slaves to build them

Eternal pyramids

What they did was encrypted in their codes

Would you venture to guess who I am?

I was there when people killed each other

In the name of ideas religion or power

It was then that they thought all humans

Were perfect and superior to all

I was there when egotistic heartless fathers

Gladly sacrificed children of their own

When sons killed fathers and mothers

And little ones were murdered by others

When you smashed the atom to burn millions

When biology was medicine and weapons

While chemicals polluted by the mega tons

When your planet was systematically raped

For wealth and power that's bound to be gone

When empires were built to last for ever

And benefit the few with injustice for all

They were all destroyed by greed and carnage

Great shame more than glory

Survived their carnival

No, no that's not who I am

I was there when the mediocrity rule prevailed

When humans realized their uncertain fate

As determinism was hopelessly sought

And chaos was found to be your eternal mate

As freedom of choice could never be bought

I was there when humans stubbornly created

Sophisticated weapons of mass destruction

To pulverize each other again and again

In exchange for the much coveted green bill

When economics as the voodoo of science still

Ordered wasting resources with no restraint

And turn them into polluting trash and gas

While the population bomb

Silently grew its mass

And hunger was rampant not for lack of food

But under the spell

Of the invisible hand's mood

What kind of a perfect being are you man?

Perfect for turning your beautiful planet

Into the largest staunchest garbage can

So by now you can't' wait to know who I am

By the time I tell you will you be there

To finally sober up and wise up soon

Will you be there to all work together

To ever repair the accumulated damage

And finally stop the insane carnage

And make amends for your own salvage

Before the imminent point of no return

I will be there when global warming

Together with the lethal greenhouse effect

Aided by up to now unknown science

Humans will come close to blowing it all

If you stop plucking the wrong strings

And get to be fair

I'll be there to help all and inspire

The wise few that dare with me to prepare

To take on the whirling forces of entropy

And turn that chaos you created

Into serene harmony

Now may I tell you who I really am

I am your primordial building material

I weave the particles in your body and soul

I am the code that runs your genes right

I am the engine of your material form

I am the ray that shines your living light

I am the Super String that weaves your norm

My brothers, cousins and all my sisters

Along with my parents and my ancestors

We all united to weave your times and spaces

And every matter and anti-matter so far

It all began with the strings' original plucking

That made us all vibrate in harmony

Those modes create chaos and order

As we vibrate randomly or in unison

We're tired of your stretching us and pulling

And playing the wrong chords like a moribund

If you continue we'll definitely snap broken

This will scramble your every harmonic

And that'll mean the end of your zoo

For it will breed tunes so a-synchronic

That may spring other beings than you

I live to spin all forces and matter

That hold your being and universe together

And I'll be watching to limit your woes

But please wise up and now don't you cheat me

And play my strings in due harmony

For at the end it's your string that's on the line

As I can weave wiser beings than you

Now that you finally got to know who I am

Be diligently wise and get to befriend me

If you really want to prosper in harmony

For I am your primordial essence

I am your precious and only monogram

I am the Super String that runs your program

Steve Dufourny

Hello ,

wawww you are incredible in fact,Mr Witten will like I am persuaded Mr Saidane.

I like the idea of superstrings. They give a road to explain the quantum gravity.But I like the sphères which can explain also the quantum gravity with my two general équations. I am persuaded that several correspondences are possible for the computing.

ps in my theory,the quantum gravity is explained with 2 things,the fermionic system is like a relative photo of our Universal sphere and its cosmological sphere,so with a central black sphere without rotation,the biggest volume and all cosmological sphères with a kind of finite number.For the quantum entanglement, it is the same logic, a central sphere ....and these black sphères produce these black particles,these darkmatter.Now since the hypothetical BB,we have an evolution in times,it is the meaning of my theory,the spherisation imrpovement correlated with an increase of mass.So the fermions encorde the bosons and also the black particles correlated with the different black sphères,the gravitons.The spherical waves are also in this line of proportional reasoning.In fact so the quantum gravity is explained because we have dark matter there also.The quantum system so is like our cosomological universal sphere with of course volumes different.My équations permit to correlate with the rotations.The quantum uniqueness .with a finite number,is the same but more the encodings of bosons and gravitons on this line time,13.6billions years.So they go more quickly than bosons these black particles.They are produced by the black cosmological spheres, the bosons, we know all that it is from stars.Now it is very intriguing spiritually speaking in a pure analyzeof entropy and its general order.The central black sphere produced the smallest gravitons and they are rapid these informative sphères.God is not very far of us in fact .....and all this storyy Inside a beautiful sphere in spherisation evolution towards eternity....

A correspondance with superstrings is relevant at my humble opinion,the rotations and volumes can be put in harmonisation considering a kind of universal entropic music of spherisation :)

Best Regards

Steve Dufourny

It is more comprehensible in this post,I write too quickly and my English is literal,so sorry.But there it is a little better.

wawww you are incredible in fact,Mr Witten will like I am persuaded Mr Saidane.

I like the idea of superstrings. They give a road to explain the quantum gravity.

But I like the sphères which can explain also the quantum gravity with my two general équations. I am persuaded that several correspondences are possible for the computing.

ps in my theory,the quantum gravity is explained with 2 things

The fermionic system is like a relative photo of our Universal sphere and its cosmological sphereS,

so with a central black sphere without rotation,the biggest volume and all others cosmological sphères with a kind of finite number.

For the quantum entanglement, it is the same logic, a central sphere ....

After these black cosmological sphères produce these black particles,these grvtions, darkmatter.

Now since the hypothetical BB,we have an evolution in times,it is the meaning of my theory,the spherisation improvement correlated with an increase of mass.So the fermions encode the bosons and also the black particles correlated with the different black cosmological sphères(several sorts exist correlated with thevolumes of these black cosmological sphères)( It is the second kind of energy,black with different sorts of course)it is my second equation calculating all this universal energy.I am asking me if the newtonian mecanic and the einstienian relativity are sufficient, I don't think thermodynamically speaking and relativelly speaking.

The spherical waves are also in this line of proportional reasoning.

In fact so the quantum gravity is explained because we have dark matter there also.The quantum system so is like our cosomological universal sphere with of course volumes different.My équations permit to correlate with the rotations.The quantum uniqueness .with a finite number,is the same so but more the encodings of bosons and gravitons on this line time,13.6billions years.So they go more quickly than bosons these black particles.They are produced by the black cosmological sphères.

The bosons,them,like we know all are from stars(first kind of energy thermodynamic).

Now it is very intriguing spiritually speaking in a pure analyzeof entropy and its general order.The central black sphere produced the smallest gravitons and they are rapid these informative sphères.God is not very far of us in fact .....and all this storyy Inside a beautiful sphere in spherisation evolution towards eternity....

A correspondance with superstrings is relevant at my humble opinion,the rotations and volumes can be put in harmonisation considering a kind of universal entropic music of spherisation :)

Best Regards

Steve Dufourny

I have made an error about the fermions , bosons and nucléons,I have confound the fermions and nucléons, sorry.

Nucléons are the relative foto of our universe and the fermions and bosons are encoded more the gravitons ,sorry still.

Steve Dufourny

If I continue in this line of resoning, so the dark matter is fascinating completing the encodings of nucléons on an evolutive line times.

These gravitons are so numerous in their difference due to the different volumes of cosmological black sphères producing them.

We cannot class them in the fermions or bosons.It is an other category with a different spin also at my humble opinion correlated with my équations if they are correct.

The entangled protons and neutrons seem the same for all uniqueness,I am asking me if the mendeleev table does not need an imrpovement considering this uniqueness.The différences of matters is so implied with the encodingsof bosons, fermions and gravitons.It is inriguing this uniqueness and its finite number.

Just a thought about our uniqueness and its finite number.The numbers and the complexity so are just due to encodings.Of course it is a hypothesis

Regards

Steve Dufourny

The protons are the key in fact due to their long duration and stability,they permits even the sortings of encodings,the neutrons complete their codes with électrons in fact.

Hydrogen is intresting about the number of this uniqueness correlated with the cosmological finite number.

The protons and its quarks and gluons are the key for the evolutive encodings.The main codes are in theseprotons and the complemantary particles permits the building of matter and their waves.The rotating sphères and their volumes permits to create thecomplexity with all these combinations , evolutive of imrpovement of mass.

Steve Dufourny

The free neutrons and their 3 quarks more gluons are incredible so in their energy, nuclear if I can say.It is bizare all that. You imagine the energy correlated with the equation of Eisntein.But we have still more energy with my equation about energy considering the other encodings in these protons.Ho my God, this energy must be utiliuzed with the biggest consciousness,it is more than a nuclear bomb in fact, it is dangerous this chain of separation???

Steve Dufourny

I am going to try to make a general resume about our universal model implying gravitation.

If I resume so we have the fermions of spin 1/2.

First generation electron,neutrino,quark up,quark down

second generation muon,neutrinomu,quark charm,quark strange

third generation Tau,neutrino tau,quark top,quark bottom

with hadrons composed by 2 quarks and Baryons composed by 3 quarks.

The bosons,them, are of spin 1

we have the photon(electromagnetism) GROUPE U(1)

the weak bosons(weak interactions)GROUPE SU(2)

the gluons(strong interactions) GROUPE SU(3)

perhaps also the bosons of higgs and their scalarity and their spin 0

so our standard model is simply SU(3)x SU(2)x U(1)

the gravitons so are where if we consider the encodings , on bosons logically speaking but it is not rational considering the thermodynamics and the volumes of sphères cosmologican and quantic.

A OTHER GROUP MUST BE INVENTED AT MY HUMBLE OPINION CONSIDERING A NEWKIND OF ENERGY ,furthermore the protons are also in the line of reasonoing of the dark matter considering a system and its uniqueness about the number of entangled primordial sphères. Where are encoded these black particles produced by cosmological black sphères and how is the associated energy .In logic it is a complemantarity of the standard model.

Who have ideas considering my 2 équations about all sphères and their volumes, mmass, rotations spinal and orbital, considering an increase of mass entropically speaking in a pure evolutive point of vue.

Regards

Steve Dufourny

There is a problem about their volume, their velocity and their spin, really.

The scalar symmetry and the vectorial symmetry seems to be a problem.

If the spin 1/2 is for fermions and neutrons and protons, and the spin 1 is for bosons,the bosons of higgs with 0 , and hypothecally speaking 2 for gravitons, so it is essential to insert correctly the cinetic momment considering the stability of evolution and the encodings.I am insidting about the volumes and the mass of entangled sphères considering a pure evolutive polarisation and its sortings and synchronizations.The gravitons have somany different volumes that it is necessary to class them also in complementarity of our standard model.I am not sure that these gravitons are bosons, they must be classed differently in complementarity of our Standard model it seems to me.

Steve Dufourny

Even the angular moment must be improved,it is so complex these encodings of informations.The vectors of orientations also ,that is why I am insisting about the volumes of sphères and their rotations spinal and orbitals for the synchronizations and encodings and sortings.

Steve Dufourny

Where are Peter Jackson, Lawrence, Florin,Georgina Parry and john Merryman,

it was cool when they were here on FQXi.

Georgina Woodward

Hi Steve,

I'm still here (Georgina Parry) but taking a back seat. I wanted my name changed for the last essay but that changed my name everywhere.

Steve Dufourny

Hello Georgina,

I am understanding now :)Happy to see you again on this wonderful Platform.

Hope you are well

Regards

Steve Dufourny

I am asking me how is the space between sphères, quant and cosmol.,if I link the quantum world and the cosmol world, there is space between these sphères.But in fact it is not really space but gravitons after all.If their volumes are very small,so the space disappear.If the volumes arecorrectly analysed, it becomes very relevant because the space does not really exist due to the decrease of spherical volumes.The gravitational universalspherical wave from the central cosmological centralsphere becomes so very relevant permitting the stability of mass and so the gravity.

Dark energy is fascinating in fact and the word is weak.If wecalculate that only a weak part is in mass,and that the rest is dark matter and dark energy, it is possible to see our future withnthe maximum volume of this universalsphere before the critical point of equilibrium of contraction.The space does not really exists in this line of reasoning.

Steve Dufourny

I discussed on LinkedIn with Mr Michael Boyd of his ideas very very relevant about the gravitomagnetism and the gravitons.He is very relevant in his studies.

,I beleive that with the ideas of Mr Cameron Peter and Mr Boyd Michael and my humble équations , it is possible to find several very relevant roads foundamental. I need a team for the mathemaTical formalisation,the empirism like the light of results.

Here is my post

It is very relevant.Thanks for sharing it,it is nice , I asked me if these encoded gravitons were on the laws of electromagnetism , heat and thermo.I thought that they were above this logic.It is perhaps an other kind of energy.

I discussed about that with Mr Peter Cameron about the phases and the Clifford algebras for the encodings of informations. If they are encoded ,where are they encoded,?.If I see the quantum entanglement and its uniqueness like a foto of our universal sphere,so perhaps that they are encoded differently that bosons.I asked me if they were around the nucleis, Inside by fusion or an other possibility.The sphericalvolumes and their motions, rotations become very relevant at my humble opinion for the sortings, the synchro and superimposings.I liked the works of mr cameron about impedance.Your works also can be inserted with determinism, empirism and rationality about these phases of encodings of informaions;In all case these gravitons are numerous if welink them with the cosmological sphères where they are produced,more the rotations.

The gravitational waves are very intriguing if we link with the central sphere and its linear speed.

Regards

ps sorry for my English, I am french speaking.

Steve Dufourny

Here is the discussion, he is veryrelevant and general.

Michael Boyd

The thought occurred to me that the currently accepted theory is that our universe is an expanding [emergent] hypersphere at the speed of light, mine is that there is a super massive black hole at the center of our universe instead, and all matter in our universe is entangled with it, making the universe steady state. I treat matter-energy differently then electromagnetic energy. The electromagnetic spacetime continuum is an open universe that coexists with a closed mass-energy universe in a close by, but separate [bran] gravitational spacetime continuum. Certain vibrational frequencies of the gravitational spacetime continuum form harmonics where entanglement occurs. The fourth harmonic is where gravity [so-called dark matter] occurs in the presence of matter. The tenth harmonic is where anti-gravity [so-called dark energy] occurs, where there is an absence of matter.

The important thing is that you have to remember to produce frequencies that have equal number of odd and even harmonics so that when you produce harmonic progression by creating two of these special shaped frequencies you will produce a Plasmon wave at the eighth harmonic. Plasmon waves are carriers of energy and have the ability to travel resistance free." That's not inconsistent with my theory that the "spontaneous absorption and emission of light" is a by product of properties of gravitation produced by matter's [hole states] in two of the Fibonacci sequences that are quantum entangled on both sides of the super massive black hole at the center of the universe. When I was studying dislocation in the semiconductor crystal I noticed that in most crystal matrix the spontaneous appearance of interstitial screw type dislocations appear in the crystal lattice over time. I hypothesis these appear due to the emergent nature of gravitational space and time [i.e. space-time] from the super massive black hole at the center of our universe. Because we are constantly in motion there are characteristic plasmon waves, where these wave states act as carriers of energy [quasi-particles] and have the ability to travel resistance free [superconductivity]....but they also have the ability through the superposition of states [harmonics] to act as a power amplifier too.

Gravity it's closed convergent gravity which is time dependent [massive graviton quasi particle], an open time independent divergent electromagnetism [massless photon quasi particle], superimposing to produce divergent antigravity, which is also time dependent in the same time domain as gravity is [i.e. massless anti-graviton quasi particle]. GR is built on gravitational time dependance [i.e., frame dragging] while EM and SR is not. That's why speed of EM is independent from your frame of reference; it's time independent. SR [linear space time] is a special case of GR [non-linear spacetime] after all.

The black hole is a type of mass spin-valve [or gravity rectifier] which is best described as a gravitational equivalent of a semiconductor junction [a gravity diode].

By steady state I mean the universe is in a constant state of creation and annihilation of matter energy [a closed steady state universe], while the electromagnetic signature of that universe [an open universe] propagates at 3x10^8 m/sec everywhere. So our universe is steady state in the same way that atoms making up matter at the nano-scale are steady state [not]. But I thought stable matter lasted for ever, and only radioactive matter was unstable?

42 minutes ago

Unlike(1)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Michael Boyd

In Cartography of the Local Cosmos the authors' examine what is called "The Great Attractor" in the Centaurus A Cluster. The video can be found in standard and high definition here: https://vimeo.com/64868713 My hypothesis is that this video and the article Cartography of the Local Cosmos support the theory that there is a super massive black hole at the center of our universe; instead of the currently accepted theory that it is an expanding [emergent] hypersphere instead. But you really have to take the time to watch this carefully at around twelve minutes in until around fifteen minutes. If you look closely you will find [as i have] that we exist in the jet of this super massive black hole [follow the vector arrows directions near the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies]. Also you should note that the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are entangled together too, due to some time in the past the two galaxies embracing....maybe that's what produces the gravitomagnetic fields....i.e., the gravitational bran.

42 minutes ago

Like(0)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

It is cool, I learn in the same time,thanks for that.You know if the universal sphere increases due to inflation and accelerated expansion.So it is possible to see the maximum volume of this universal sphere.If we know the quantitity of dark matter and dark energy transformed in mass , we can see the critical point of maximum volume.In logic , after we shall have a contraction towards the perfect equilibrium between all spheres.In logic so , like we see our past due to relativity, we can see also the different steps of accelerations and even a deceleration towards this maximum volume.After we shall have also an acceleration and a deceleration towards the equilibrium of this contraction giving the minimum volume and the maximum mass,perhaps it is the eternity without time at thispoint.In my model of spherisation, this central black sphere BH is the key correlated with the universal spherical aether wave,different than the other gravitationalwaves implied by other BH sphere.

About the semi conductor, I don't know well. I suppose it is correlatedwith the binar code in computing,with a turn on and a turn off and after the algorythms make the rest,but I don't know well this topic. I see the universe with a more important logic than binar codes.If the codes are created, it is from this central sphere, the biggest cosmological sphere, the big attractor like you name it.I am persuaded that the gravitational waves are above this electromagnetism and the SR,A photon cannot go faster than c , but a graviton, why not.The correlated energy so is perhaps different than our thermo and heat.

For the BH,they have several rules, the recycling of bosonic infpormations, a rule of motion embarking our stars and also a rule of production of gravitons.For the expansion, I beleive that it is withngravitons and not with photons also.But of course I need to test my intuitions and Ã©quations.The empirism and dterminism like a priority in respect of our school of Copenaghen.

Thanks for sharing your ideas and models,it is cool and nice.

Steve Dufourny

Michael Boyd

"About the semi conductor, I don't know well. I suppose it is correlated with the binary code in computing,with a turn on and a turn off and after the algorithms make the rest,but I don't know well this topic. " Binary code is just a byproduct of the application of the semiconductor junction diode to make a memory device to record binary data. In electronics, a semiconductor junction is called a diode and it is a two-terminal electronic component that conducts primarily in one direction (asymmetric conductance); it has low (ideally zero) resistance to the flow of current in one direction, and high (ideally infinite) resistance in the other. A semiconductor diode, the most common type today, is a crystalline piece of semiconductor material with a p-n junction connected to two electrical terminals. A p-n junction diode is made of a crystal of semiconductor, usually silicon, but germanium and gallium arsenide are also used. Impurities are added to it to create a region on one side that contains negative charge carriers (electrons), called an n-type semiconductor, and a region on the other side that contains positive charge carriers (holes), called a p-type semiconductor. When the two materials i.e. n-type and p-type are attached together, a momentary flow of electrons occur from the n to the p side resulting in a third region between the two where no charge carriers are present. This region is called the depletion region due to the absence of charge carriers (electrons and holes in this case). The diode's terminals are attached to the n-type and p-type regions. The boundary between these two regions, called a p-n junction, is where the action of the diode takes place. When a higher electrical potential is applied to the N side (the cathode) than to the P side (the anode), it allows electrons to flow from the N-type side (called the cathode) to the P-type side. The junction does not allow the flow of electrons in the opposite direction when the potential is applied in reverse, creating, in a sense, an electrical check-valve.

1 day ago

Like(1)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

thank you , i see clearer, it permits so to embark the Ã©lectrons in different sides if I am understanding well. It is a kind of sorting of datas with the atrraction with or without conduction.It is well thought in fact. After the codes make the rest at a very high speed. I see better now.I am going to study a little this topic. I must go because I amvery tired due to severalmeds that I must take for my health,I take antiepileptic,more neuroleptic and antidepressor,a big soup :) .I will be here tomorrow if you have time.I am going to send you an invitation.It willbe cool if you accept,thanks still for this interesting discussion Mr Boyd and your time.

Regards

1 day ago

Like(1)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

Here is my second equation about matter and energy.It explains logically the dark energy and the dark matter with a bridge above mcÂ² ,I have inserted the 2 other motions of spheres and it is at exp 3.In logic it permits to calculate the entire entropy. Of course they are intuitive.

E=mcÂ²+l^3o^3s^3 with l linear velocity of the black studied sphere ,o orbital vel and s spinal vel. I need to improve it perhaps this one E=mcÂ²+m(l^3o^3s^3),or E=mcÂ²+m(lÂ²oÂ²sÂ²)considering l o s for black sphÃ¨res, quant and cosm,A last possibility if only the linear velocity is inserted but tha does not calculate the entire entropy , E=mcÂ²+mlÂ²

15 hours ago

Like(1)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Michael Boyd

E=mcÂ²+mlÂ² here is my empirically derived results for the Effects of geometry on gravitational fields and time

See http://www.calfree.com/FiguresGravityRectifierPZTvGMRpit&bump.pdf

The geometry of matter, or lack there of, causes a force field to be produced that I could measure. The reason gravitation is a direct tensor is because it has two components one is the normal gravitational energy produced by the presence of matter's nucleus in the universe and the other what we call repulsive anti-gravity or dark energy is produced by its absence. But the tensor for gravity is much stronger than anti-gravity since the absence of mass produces only about 16% of the magnitude for the same volume (geometry). Some other differences are normal gravity is much stronger below 1 mm from matter than it is above that distance; as is the antigravity force. I found for normal gravity above 1 mm it is consistently linear with distance; while antigravity is ~ 0. That means the force is 1/r^2 above 1mm and 1/r^4 below 1 mm but that means gravity is still linear with distance within both regions of normal gravity space time. Antigravity is 1/r^3 on the other hand is a third order force repulsive force tensor whose force fields are like that of balloon with their force field's strength being strongest at the membrane of the balloon and weak inside.

Based on the results of measurements listed in Specifications Table 1 and paragraph "[0056] The relationship of mass to normal gravity is described by the relationship [additional mass] Bump Volume (Âµm^3) = 6(-Gf)^2 - 7(-Gf) - 0.4 [where Gf is the [-] attractive force of Gravity] which is a parabolic force field which has two mathematically real factors. [See Fig.11] Assuming the Gravitational induction force (-Gf) is variable x and the volume of additional mass is y. Solving for y = 0, by simplifying the equation by multiplying both sides with 5, gives two real factors x1 and x2: x1 = 1.221255 x2 = -0.054589. Repulsive [+] anti-gravity exists in hyperbolic force field with one real part and two imaginary factors [relative to the MR sensor] described by the relationship [missing mass] Pit Volume (Âµm^3) = -3000Gf^3 + 1000Gf^2 - 200Gf + 8. [See Fig.11] Assuming the anti-gravitational induction force (Gf) is variable x and the volume of missing mass is y, then y = -3000x^3+1000x^2-200x+8 = 8(-375x^3 + 125x^2 - 25x + 1) and (-375x^3 + 125x^2 - 25x + 1) the factors are two imaginary one real. Solving for y = 0 gives: x1 = 0.0510251 x2 = 0.141154 + 0.179826*i x3 = 0.141154 - 0.179826*i" my experimental evidence shows there are at least two dimensions of space-time, one for electromagnetism (EM), and one for gravitation.

Based on my data the force tensor of gravity is a force based on a mass times acceleration of gravity, a second order tensor, above 1 millimeter distance, and fourth order tensor below 1 millimeter distance according to my experimental evidence. The force tensor of anti-gravity is third order force tensor like that of balloon. Normal gravity we experience in our lives is a superposition of these two force tensors.

15 hours ago

Unlike(1)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Michael Boyd

The no-signaling arguments for orthodox quantum theory assume a violation of the general action-reaction principle that Einstein used to get from special relativity to general relativity. Special relativity had action of spacetime geometry on the geodesic motion of particles without any direct reaction of those particles back on the spacetime geometry. The no-signaling property of orthodox quantum theory's entanglement depended on the Schrodinger quantum information pilot field having "no sources." The pilot field changed the classical world lines of particles without any direct reaction of those particles back on their quantum information pilot field. Such direct back-reaction would result in stand-alone entanglement signals. These entanglement signals seem to violate special relativity because they appear to be spacelike faster-than-the speed

of light. The pilot field isn't a 3D hologram [now] from the surface of the super massive black hole at the center of our universe, but from the retro-causal back to the future reflection from the inner surface of the anti-gravity bubble at the perimeter of our cyclic gravitational energy universe produced by the jet of that super massive black hole we exist in. Therefore emergent spacetime may be only a phenomenon of our existing spacetime locality [i.e., reference frame] in our cyclic steady state universe.

4 hours ago

Unlike(1)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

Fascinating, I like your works.It is rare to see a person who understands really what is the entropy from this central sphere. I am persuaded that the wave pilot of Bohm or the gravitational spherical aether is from this central sphere and is linear;If Iink with the spherical volumes, it is very intriguing even this linear velocity.I speak rarely about god , but in fact it is not far respecting this velocity. But I don't speak about an omnipresent god in the sciences community because a small number understands it.

I liked the idea of two tensors about gravitation,the evolution can be inserted with the gravity and the aniti gravity becomining gravity in the future linked with the contraction after the maximum volume.The decay of protons proof what you say about nucleus and their stability.I am persuaded that the central sphere of nucleis is linked witht the central cosmological sphere.They are black also and are the biggest quantum volume in logic.I am asking me if gravitons are encoded there with a fusion implying an increasing of density without a change of vol ,or even if this volume increases or also if they are encoded in orbits.It is difficult to extrapolate.An universal constant can be found between these central sphÃ¨res, quant and this central cosmological sphere. The planck constant can be utilised and the Clifford algebras and the complex numbers.

Have you an idea about the universal rotation around this central sphere.If all our galaxies turn around this big atrractor,so the dark energy implies also this rotation ,but how and by what ? My idea is by a small rotation of this central sphere

Regards and thanks for this discussion.

An other relevant thing is to found the finite number of sphÃ¨res for our system of uniqueness.But how and with what Tools ?It exists a number of cosmological sphÃ¨res between 1 for the central sphere and x , it is logically the same quantum number considering this uniqueness and the finite serie.

Yesterday I was not there because I come from belgium and the time is different :)

1 hour ago

Like(0)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

ps if in your works the signals don't respect SR , it is logic because it is gravitational waves are different than electromagnetic waves.A photon cannot go faster than c but a gravitons, yes in logic if my constant is correct about the linear velocity.It exists even an intriguing velocity when we analyze this central sphere

Regards

1 hour ago

Like(0)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

I have extrapolated the BB.Let's imagine a micro sphere with its incredible density and all its codes.

For the number, quant and cosmol,it is interesting to see the fractal.

I see first a multiplication of this central sphere perhaps with prime numbers with a decreasing of volumes giving the finite number,after logically we have a multiplication of this finite number ,this uniqueness system giving the number.The expansion so is this multiplication of this uniqueness.The codes of this central sphÃ¨re so after make the road with the rotations and encodings of informations from the central sphere.More the bosonic codes also from other cosmological sphÃ¨res and blacks cosmological spheres. Dark energy is necessary for the stability of encodings before the critic point of maximum volume.The space so does not really exist but is composed of particles and energy. The waVe particle duality is relevant if we analyse that dark matter and dark energy becoming mass on the time line evolution spherisation.It exists so several quantum nuber very relevant, finite.The cosmologicalnumber is the same that the quantumnumber for this uniqueness, different so of the maximum number of particles, quantum sphÃ¨res.This number increases correlated with the increasing of mass/entropy due to this central cosmological sphere and a kind of planck wall giving an infinte energy if I can say.It is fascinating and intriguing this central sphere, the big atrratctor where all sphÃ¨res turn around it.If this black sphere has allcreated, so even the light and electromagnetismal so come from this sphere.So there is a paradox about the black giving all light..A Spectrum also so can be seen with black matter;but it is difficult because it isdifferent than light Spectrum .What a puzzle, I am asking me if it is possible to light the black particles to see their Spectrum giving all light, paradoxal but logic.

Regards

1 hour ago

Like(0)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

I am asking me also if our heat and thermo are sufficient for this dark energy and dark matter.

I beleive that it is an other kind of energy aboveour lectromagnetism and heat/thermodynamics.

Maxwell ,,Boltzman,Celsius,planck,Kirchhoff,Bose,Gibbs, Einstein.,Riemann..... help us :)

1 hour ago

Like(0)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

I have seen several informations about this big attractor, it is possible to find the diameter of this central Black sphÃ¨rs.If we correlate with its probable mass in respect of datas.If its mass is 5.10^16 solar mass, so with some parameters inserted , we can found its spherical volume.So after we can found if my equation is correct about an universal constant between all sphÃ¨res,the spinal rotation.So if the expansion is spherical, it is possible to correlate with all the other rotations around it.The orbital rotation is a problem considering that it is a sphere which have not an orbital rotation.The number 1 so for this orbital rotation as an exception.The density and vol mass must be analyzed for the correct diameter of this central black sphere.The spinalrotation gives us the universal rotation and expansion, spherical.

9 minutes ago

Like(0)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

If the decreasing of volumes is a reality with prime numbers, so we can find the other super massive BH and also the BH central to galaxies.After we can correlate with the quantum entanglement and its spherical volumes of black sphÃ¨res also.After we can correlate with the encodings of bosons and gravitons.

Steve Dufourny

The Equation of Schrödinger is relevant and foundamental.E = p²\2m+ V(r).ifwe consider also E=h\v and p=h\lambda so it is relevant to insert the spherical volumes with the function of wave and the rotations spinal and orbital.

If the gravitons are also sphères and if their volumes is small , so their rotations correlated with mass can be inserted for an evolution temporal about the encodings of informations.In a kind of BEC so the time can be raised showing an other equation without time.THe inertial motions can be correlated.If the synchronisations of informations arecorrelated with sphericalvolumes, it becomes relevant but of course we must found where are encoded these gravitons giving mass.Is it Inside the protonic enatnglement and its uniquenes,or in orbit around this nucleis.The logic considering the entanglement and its uniqueness is probably by fusion with the black sphères with so an increase of mass and density, but the volume perhaps also increases.It is there it becomes relevant to consider the cosmological volumes where they are produced these gravitons.With the central main sphere, the big attractor, so we have the smallest gravitons ,but it exists other BH and so other spherical volumes, so probably that the encoding are correlated in the quantum entanglement also.The équations of maxwell can help but we don't know if the heat and thermo can be considered for these gravitons and the correlated dark energy.It seems to me that other parameters must be inserted , but How ? If the logic of electromagnetism is not sufficient, so it becomes very difficult to encircle this new energy.So perhaps that a BEC is not sufficient like for our electromagnetism. It is complex in fact.In all case it is big puzzle.

Steve Dufourny

An universal spherical harmonical partition is logically correlated with tthe rotating sphères and their spherical volumes. The encodings and phases of synchronizations and sortings and superimposings become relevant if we link with my humble constant equation considering all physical sphères, quant and cosmol. The works of Mr Cameron are relevant considering the impedence.But a bridge is necessary for these geomatricalalgebras respecting the 3D.I am asking me if really our heat and thermo can be correlated with the gravitons.If we have an other kindof energy , so it is not sufficient these thermo and heat.It is only for elmectromagnetism.But several logics can be inserted about the rotations orbital and spinal more the volumes.A good sorting must be inserted giving the road of this new energy purely linked with dark matter and dark energy.The number of this uniqueness,cosmol and quant , the same logically,becomes a key if the volumes are inserted.If the encodings are byfusion, so we can differenciate the electromagnetism with the gravitation ,because this gravitation does not move by orbits.Only the spinal rotations and the volumes and mass become the key.Now if it is by fusion these encodings, we cannot affirm that the volumes increase but perhaps only the density.It is there it becomes relevant about the stability of protons.A proof is their decay .In logic if the density of this central cosmological sphere decreases, so we have an increasing of the density of protonic volumes.So we can find a constant between these central black sphères, cosmol and quant.It is a big puzzle all that.

Steve Dufourny

Here is the continued discussion

Michael Boyd

Steve, Light and heat are the same stuff, it is not anything to do with mass, that property is due to proton [hole] mass only. Photons [light] has no inertia and photoelectric effect is only a property of non-bonding electron orbitals in matter, not anything to do with gravitation what ever. The simplest flaw I see is it fails to address the anti-symmetric nature between the mass of electrons (electron 0.00091x10-27 kg ) and protons (proton 1.6726 x 10-27 kg ) and how that effects the flow [mobility] of the different types of charge, protons[holes] and electrons. Since the form of energy the light weight electrons produce is light [mass-less photons] and the force of energy protons produce is attractive gravity [massive gravitons] therefore I assume EM and gravitation are not directly related, but only indirectly instead. In order to understand why gravity is different [stronger] close-up you have to understand the theory of gravitation being what's called the large extra-dimension...

Theoretical physicists Arkani-Hamed, Dimopoulos and Dvali pointed [2], out that prior to now, gravity had not been measured below a distance of about a millimeter. They whose model is known as ADD, suggest that there could be extra dimensions as large as a millimeter in diameter. In particle physics, the ADD model, also known as the model with large extra dimensions [1], offers an alternative scenario to explain the weakness of gravity relative to the other forces. This theory requires that the fields of the standard model are confined to a four-dimensional membrane, while gravity propagates in several additional spatial dimensions that are large compared to the Planck scale.

Theoretical physics typically treats the Planck scale as the highest energy scale and all dimensional parameters are measured in terms of the Planck scale. In models of large extra dimensions the fundamental scale is much lower than the Planck scale. This occurs because the power law of gravity changes. For example, assuming r is the distance between the gravitational induction sensor and the spinning disk; when there are two extra dimensions of size d, the power law of gravity is 1/r4 for objects with r > d. This relationship suggests if we want the Planck scale to be equal to the next accelerator energy (1 TeV) we should take d approximately 1mm.

As suggested by ADD, gravity could be just as strong as the other forces but only felt strongly at short distances. Scientists funded by the European Space Agency have measured the gravitational equivalent of a magnetic field for the first time in a laboratory. Just as a moving electrical charge creates a magnetic field, so a moving mass generates a gravitomagnetic field. According to Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, the effect is virtually negligible. However Tajmar [3] have measured the effect in a laboratory. Their experiment involves a ring of superconducting material rotating up to 6,500 times a minute.

[1] ANTONIADIS, N., ARKANI-HAMED, N., DIMOPOULOS, S., DVALI, G. New dimensions at a millimeter to a Fermi and superstrings at a TeV. arXiv: hep-ph/9804398, 1998.

[2] ARKANI-HAMED, N., DIMOPOULOS, S., DVALI, G. The Hierarchy problem and new dimensions at a millimeter. arXiv: hepph/9803315, 1998.

[3] TAJMAR, M., MATOS, C.J. Gravitomagnetic Fields in Rotating Superconductors to Solve Tate's Cooper Pair Mass Anomaly. arXiv: gr-qc/060786, 2006.

1 hour ago

Like(0)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Michael Boyd

Regarding the gravitational temporal relation both forms of gravitation experience the same amount of frame dragging as described in Einstein's General Relativity theory; so doesn't that means Time must be the substance between gravitational energy and EM energy that makes up our existence? Time must be a substance. That's because gravitational space time is produced by hole states of matter and electromagnetism spacetime (EM or light) is produced by electron states of matter. QM is built on EM space time; not gravitational space time. However Special Relativity is built on EM space time while General Relativity is built on gravitational space time. The manifold of events in spacetime are a "substance" which exists independently of the matter within it...Special Relativity and General Relativity created a conundrum for Einstein that he tried to resolve unsuccessfully to unit the two theory in to one grand unified field theory. My discovery is that while the speed of light is constant that's not true for gravitation. It can be slower in speed and faster too. Einstein focused to much on the speed of light and not enough on the "holes" all around him. That's where the gravitation is. That "electromagnetism is in spacetime A" let's call that space-time "{EM} space-time", and this is what Einstein's "Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Korper"[4] ("On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies") described which reconciles Maxwell's equations for electricity and magnetism with the laws of mechanics, by introducing major changes to mechanics close to the speed of light. This later became known as Einstein's special theory of relativity (SR).[5][6] That "gravitation is in spacetime B" let's call that space-time "{G}space-time" and this is what Einstein's General relativity (GR) describes. According to general relativity,[7] the observed gravitational attraction between masses results from the "warping of space and time by those masses". When I write about this "manifold of events in spacetime are a "substance" which exists independently of the matter within it" this "manifold of events in spacetime" is this property that makes Time; as we measure it; the emergent {positive arrow of time}. Therefore time is a vector which direction depends on your position in our universe which is created by a change of energy states between gravitation to electromagnetism; and visa versa.

[4] EINSTEIN, A. Zur Elektrodynamik bewegter Korper. Annalen der Physik 17: 891-921, 1905.

[5] EINSTEIN, A.; GROSSMANN, M. Entwurf einer verallgemeinerten Relativitatstheorie und einer Theorie der Gravitation. Zeitschrift fur Mathematik und Physik 62: 225-261, 1913.

[6] EINSTEIN, A. Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitatstheorie. Annalen der Physik, 49, 1916.

[7] HILBERT, D., Die Grundlagen der Physik. Mathematische Annalen, 92, 1924.

1 hour ago

Like(0)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Michael Boyd

Theoretical Implications of Nano-scale Quantum Gravitomagnetism

In the event horizon of a black hole gravity is said to be faster than the speed of light. As I explained earlier it isn't really moving at all. In that domain light is forbidden. Einstein's problem was he only understood the universe from the side of electrons not the holes side that dominates it. If you think of empty space as a high density of holes and matter as regions where electron density is higher then you see Einstein Dirac etc..., where blinded by the light produced by electrons..., that's why they couldn't see the holes in the universe all around them.

The mass of a neutron is greater than the mass of a proton because the neutron contains a proton, contains an electron with some subatomic particles.

Neutron stars are collapsed matter leaving only neutrons at the atomic scale that makes up the neutron star and black holes are nearly identical but made of protons [holes] instead.

Black holes are black not because light doesn't escape but because black holes are made of holes [collapsed protons] where light is not present because there are no electrons to absorb the light for re-emission of the light.

My hypothesis is that protons [holes in the semiconductor junction] in all forms of matter and their presence in our location in the universe, this is the source of the attractive force of gravity in the vicinity of matter. My discovery is at 100nm the force of gravity is magnified and can be harnessed to produce gravitomagnetic induction with my invention the mass spin-valve or gravitational rectifier due to this gravity large extra dimension. The other novel thing I discovered is the absence of matter produces a repulsive anti-gravity force that is much weaker then the gravity force and balloon like. Electrons however do not contribute enough mass to real effect gravitation in any real way as far as I can measure.

1 hour ago

Like(0)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

I know Mr Boyd, I have a wonderful book of Zemanky i know what is electromagnetic energies ,this book is a good book of Zemanski "Heat and Thermodynamics",I say that the gravitation is different than our electromagnetism. That is why the gravitomagnetism is not correct.

About the holes, it is not possible respecting the principle of equivalence and the planck walls.

About the extradiemnsions, it is not deterministic because for the proportions, the 3D and a duration of time is essential.The extradimensions arejust a mathematical plays where several foundamental loose their universal meaning. Like the quaternions or octonions or the extradimensions of strings theory ,it is not rational.It is just dueto a bad utilisation of symmetries as with the Clifford algebras for example. The universal proportions and Ã©quivalences need real convergences and for that, the 3D is essential.

Let's take an other example, the time for example is not reversible respecting the SR and the general relativity.Thereversible time is also a problem dueto mathematical Tools, badly utilized.

I agree that said about the planck scales and the highest Ã©nergies. If the quantum entanglement and its uniqueness is like a relative foto of our universal sphere and its cosmological sphÃ¨res so, we have indeed the maximum energy without add.The volumes so are important considering the black sphÃ¨res. A BH is nor a hole, nor a door .It is just a sphere with foundamental properties.

I doubt really about the gravitational waves and the gravitons which are really correlated with electromagnetism.But perhaps I make an error, I don't know.I just say my line of reasoning respecting the principle of equivalence.I agree that Gravity is a force respecting Newton but the volumes , spherical ,can show us the road like SchrÃ¶dinger and Maxwell.

The Planck scale are the limits separating the physicality and this unknown, but the physicality has its intrinsic foundamental laws.There is a bridge between the Ã©quations of Einstein and the Ã©quations of maxwell it seems to me for a real understanding of this gravitation.Perhaps that the orbital rotations are simply the answer for this electromagnetism..If the impedence,is relevant , perhaps that the cinetic effect of the gravitation is simply an other logic that the magnetic effect,so the electric charge is not sufficient,,it is there that it becomes relevant to consider all the motions of entangled sphÃ¨res with a kind of sorting about the rotations and motions in time.

What do you think ?

41 minutes ago

Michael Boyd

The black hole is a type of mass spin-valve [or gravity rectifier] which is best described as a gravitational equivalent of a semiconductor junction [a gravity diode]. Another example from nature is the lightning called a Sprite. The technical description is what's called a Maxwell's Demon in thermodynamics. It is called that because it violates the second law of thermodynamics; i.e., entropy. The two perfectly concentric Einstein Rings in the universe's [electromagnetic] microwave cosmic background as reported by Sir Penrose in 2010 show we exist in the jet of this super massive black hole; otherwise we wouldn't see them at all.

Einstein's theory of General Relativity predicts a phenomenon called Einstein Rings which are produced by the presence of a super massive black at the center of our universe's cosmic background radiation [electromagnetic] as reported by V.G.Gurzadyan, R.Penrose. See http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1011/1011.3706.pdf [astro-ph.CO] "Concentric circles in WMAP data may provide evidence of violent pre-Big- Bang activity", V.G.Gurzadyan, R.Penrose, (Submitted on 16 Nov 2010).

Gravity is a property of matter; but not a property of electromagnetism. Electromagnetism is a property of electron states in matter. That doesn't mean time travel isn't possible [theoretically] because time travel is a byproduct of quantum entanglement because the point of entanglement is established when two black holes collide for example. So that means at some time billions of years ago when the nucleus black hole of the nearby Andromeda Galaxy "embraced" the nucleus black hole of the Milky Way Galaxy we reside in it first established quantum entanglement between the two nucleus black holes and all other matter nuclei within our nearby universe. So that doesn't mean we can travel through time though; just that if we can understand how this instantaneous "spooky action at a distance" as Einstein called it works....maybe we can figure out time travel too? But that's a big MAYBE? How does your equations explain quantum entanglement of our home Milky Way Galaxy with the Andromeda Galaxy; with the two expected to embrace each other in another 4 billion years? See http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/31may_andromeda/ Why can we not use the point of previous galactic embrace to travel backwards in time? What do your equations say about backwards time?

Steve Dufourny

Why you see Holes Mr Boyd,it is not really rational ,it is not a door separating the unknown and the physicality.It is the same with our protons or BH or our big attractor.The rotations are essential and the sphere is the perfect equilibrium of forces permitting the rotations furthermore.The BH are just sphÃ¨res with several properties , they produce gravitons, they embark due to theirmass the stars, and they recycle the bosonic informations simply.

About the protons like semiconductor, I beleive that it is not sufficient considering the codes of evolution and the increasing of entropy and mass and so gravitation.

About the holographic principles of Hawking, it is relevant ,I discussed about this on FQXi with Mr Corda who makes the same kind of rational works. The event horizon is just a mathematical extrapolation permitting to see better because this incredible mass take all informations. It is black because it absorbs all even the light, that is whey they recycle particles, bosonic.The radiations of Hawking are relevant considering these recycled photons .We are still at the begining of what is this dark matter and dark energy, but several rational roads show us the truth. For the productions of these gravitons and their diffusion in the space time, it is essential to have rotations and a sphere. The holes so at these planck scales are not for me rational because we must have a pure physicality respÃªcting the 3d and its evolution spherisation.

What do you think?

19 minutes ago

Like(0)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Michael Boyd

Steve, Hole is a semiconductor terminology. A semiconductor diode, the most common type today, is a crystalline piece of semiconductor material with a p-n junction connected to two electrical terminals. A p-n junction diode is made of a crystal of semiconductor, usually silicon, but germanium and gallium arsenide are also used. Impurities are added to it to create a region on one side that contains negative charge carriers (electrons), called an n-type semiconductor, and a region on the other side that contains positive charge carriers (holes), called a p-type semiconductor. I don't know if they are little mini black holes ~0.885x10^-15 meters across or not...maybe..I say why not!

14 minutes ago

Like(0)î€¬

Reply privatelyî€¬

Report spamî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

There I agree that gravitation is a property of matter and not of electromagnetism.

About the backwards time, it is not possible like I explained before, the SR permits toseeour past like we see our sun 8 min after.It is tool permitting toc lass our cosmological evolution.It is the same with the anisotropy ,there is nothing of bizare, like the sagnac effetc and the rotations.It is just atool also permitting to correct our technical errors. The time is not reversible physically speaking because it is just a duration.The only one thing possible is to decrease our internal clocks and so we can go in the future, the problem is that we cannot return at our present, it is not reversible at all scales.We can see our past, it is our only solution.

The spookyness at distance is a pure joke in fact created by several labs .We cannot go faster than c with light and alectromagnetic waves.The only solution is with gravitons and like we search them still, it is not possible(LISA,XmassLIGO....experiments)

What do you think?

9 minutes ago

Like(0)î€¬

Deleteî€¬

Alessandro Cappelli

Steve Dufourny

I am understanding Mr Boyd, but if an omnipresent God has created codes, it is more complex than our simple human inventions.If a contact with this entropy exists, it is from this central sphere, the big attractor at my humble opinion. Not in the quantum entanglement.That is why the primordial informations come from there. The universal spherical gravitational aether is from there, and it is the only solution for God to inform us ,that said it is intriguing considering the incredible velocity of this primordial wave.Don't forget that all has begun from there.That is why I can see one only solution for a convergence with a holesphere separating the unknown and the physicality,it is there the central sphere.

Steve Dufourny

E=mc² is correct but not sufficient.Because this equation don't calculate the entire,total energy of our principle of uniqueness.

The steps of énergies towards our quantum entanglement must insert the dark matter at my humble opinion.The eletromagnetism correlated with heat and thermo is a step, but does not calculate the other steps towards the central sphere in my theory of spherisation.

There is a problem which can be analized in several roads of reasoning.

There is probably a kind of bridge between the thermodynamical energy and this dark energy.The method can utilise our logics of thermo to find the road.But it seems that this dark energy is an other thing than our laws in theormo.

That said thecalculations with thesphericalvolumes seems relevant.

Energy after all have different meanings in correlation with its transformations.In all case, if the road of this dark energy is found, it can transformed in thermodynamical energy.

If the cosmological black sphères,like our centers of galaxies,produce these gravitons, these black quantum sphères, so the aim is to find where they are encoded,and how with the other entangled sphères.

If my constant is on the good road, so the orbital and thespinal rotations and these volumes become relevant to sort these steps of disponible énergies.I don't know where they are encoded these gravitons and the correlated energy.Have we an increase of volumes for the dark entangled sphères of protons so a fusion or even an orbital rotation around them?.Are they encoded orbitally speaking,before or after the electromagnetism.Or even are they around the bosons?It is a big puzzle anddifficult to see.If they are around thebosons,it is so the gravitons which gives mass to higgsbosons.But it isjust a thought ofcourse .In all case the entangled spherical volumes become relevant to find the roadsof encoding of this dark matter.

It is relevant to consider the central black sphere of our universal sphere, its volume is correltaed with thecentral black sphere of the system of uniqueness.It is so important to consider the volumes.This center is essential it seemsto me for the understanding of what it produces and its volumes and what are the propeties of these primordial gravitons if I can say.I ask me how many sûper massives black sphères have we between our central massive BH of galaxies and this central sphere.It is the same logic for the quantum entanglement considering its uniqueness and thefinite number.I see them linked with the prime numbers correlated with the decreasings of volumes.We can so correlated with the different gravitons produce by these cosmological sphères due to their volumes.How many super mega BH have we between our galaxies and this central sphere.3 5 7 11....I don't know.In all case these spherical volumes for the cosmologicaland quantum scales become very relevant.If the primordial informations come from this central sphere, so we can see their transformations when they pass Inside the other cosmologicalspheres before to arrive in the planets if I can say and the elements protonic.If the protons don't decay, so their primordial codes are a reality and the evolutive informations permits this increasing of mass and linked entropy.Now ofcourse it is a big puzzle but the different ways can be searched with proportions and rationalities.This dark matter and correlated dark energy are very intriguing.The spherisation Inside an evolutive universal sphere is a big puzzle considering the kindof informations correlated with volumes.

I am asking me what is this energy in fact, what are its physical properties.

If one of my équations are correct about E=mc²is in fact E=mc²+ml² this one seems the best .with l being about the velocity, linear of smallest gravitons from this central sphere.This equation can be adapted in several domains if the spherical volumes are inserted and the two other motionsof these sphères,spinal andorbital.It is interesting for the phases of encodings by synchro, sortings or fusions.It is a big puzzle in fact.

Steve Dufourny

In logic the energy can have many forms and sorts.We can consider that the researchs of Clausius, Caratheodory or Carnot or others applied to thermodynamics can be applied for these gravitons in the sense of energy and work.Even if the energy is different than heat and thermo, the methods can be utilised after all.The fact that all systems with its entropy S can be changed in work is relevant considering the multiple sorts of possible conversions of this energy.Even if this energy is different than electromagnetism, it can be utilised in inserting the sphericalvolumes and their correspondances and proportions.

The works about the entropy of an ideal gas can be extrapolated in inserting these gravitons anddark energy with a finite number considering the number of uniqueness.Instead of taking the heat and temperature like parameters, we can choose an other parameter.The spherical volumes are important.The changement of entropy can be seen with different steps more we go towards the central main black sphères,quant(the same logic isfor the cosmological case towards the main central Black Hole sphere)

A Bose Einstein condensate can be applied also to gravitons in the same way that for photons but with these bridges of convertible énergies.The motions of sphères become an universal key with the volumes also.The rotations orbital and spinal also.Perhaps that the spinal rotation is purely linked with mass.The cinetic energy can be correlated.

Steve Dufourny

I have thought a lot about these gravitons which are bosons Under our special relativity and sttandard model.There is really a problem with these gravitons because gravitation tends to infinity with our actual model.Furermore we must consider thisdark matter and our BH because they are a reality.The gravitaion seems really to be different than our baryonic matter.These gravitons are not possible and cannot answer to gravitation for several reasons.We know so few still about ournuclei.It seems essential to insert the quantum BH and dark matter.The relevance is to consider that the photons are not the only one quantum of E and furthermore is not the foundamental primordial E.Of course these photons are bosons and respect the special relativity and general but they seem encircled by this matter not baryonic.We see the gravitation and dark matter encircling the photons and our standard model,and even at cosmological scale.The photons so are photons because the gravitational codes are the chief orchestra.The cold seems the answer if we consider the heat and thermo.It is in fascinating when we understand this in deeper analyse.The gravitation is the real secret and not photons.It is really intriguing philosophically speaking.God is near us in this weakest weakest instantaneous force due to this central BH of the universal producing the gravitational aether tending to infinity furthermore, it is crazy in fact with the spherons of dark matter not baryonic produced by this central biggest spherical volume,the only one cosmological singularity linked withall gravitational quantum singularities evolving and encoding.Our nucleis are encircled by this matter.It becomes very relevant if we want break the secial relativity with spherons instead of photons, that said these spherons are encircled by quantum BH and dark matter.But like they are coded by the gravitation in the main singulatrity, a photon never can pass c,that said a spheron which is not a photon yes in logic.Now of course the real ask is how to check these particles ,it seems that the BEC could be imrpoved and we could find these spherons, they are everywhere in fact simply but with their intrinsic gravitational codes.It is an incredible puzzle technologicall speaking.

« Previous Page Next Page »