John C,
Presumably it is not of multiverses.
Regards,
John M
John C,
Presumably it is not of multiverses.
Regards,
John M
Quote from article:"If you have a million dollars, you are a million times more likely to get an extra dollar than someone who only has one dollar, according to this model." That is because when you have a network in which one node has many connections, if another node enters the network, it is highly likely that this new node will also connect to a highly connected node.
My response: Yes, that is correct.
Another quote from the article: However, microscopic processes are time symmetric--collisions between atoms or chemical reactions--can occur backwards or forwards.
My response: Reality is time symmetric.
Is anybody else having trouble scrolling after expanding thread to view all comments? email won't link either.
A misinformed sciforums.com member said:
The grandfather paradox is nonsense because time is a measure of local motion. It isn't something we move or travel through.
My response: Of course it is. How else can we get from one place to another? Time travel is demonstrated mathematically by the existence of closed time-like curves
Reality is reversed in time symmetry.
A sciforums member wrote:
when systems join to cross into/over. there's a " drift " of energy moving with the entity from one system to another, for a brief moment. the signature.
as you know[hopefully], temp is nothing but an energy level. for a moment as crossing into another system, there's an energy buildup [disturbance that creates the moment of equilibrium][like a chemical reaction,stress on the system moves the energy to a less stressful moment,equilibrium.].. the signature.
that's all this time symmetry is, nothing more.
as for replacing the former, i have no clue what you mean.
I responded with:
Reality is an energy system transferring from one moment to another? Also, are you saying time is not real?
Emergence then, is the point(s) at which complex networks at the quantum level transition to macro systems identifiable as part of the classical, macro world. As network complexity increases, we arrive at the level we call reality where probabilistic quantum events in toto, appear deterministic and measurable, i.e. real.
Fractals I am convinced are the key to understanding QM and the geometry of the universe, not to mention our reality.
I am an economist and was drawn to fractals for their behaviour being similar to economic system models. This has lead me to QM. An isolated fractal behaves (as I have shown in my blog) as QM is described.It shows wave particle duality; am more.
I have inverted the fractal to show what would be observed if measured/ observation. I am convinced from this experimentthe universe is a fractal : it grows at an accelerating rate, and demonstrates Hubble's Law.
I am an amateur and am currently writing up my insights from from the fractal which I first shared on my blog. There are many. I would very much like to discuss my findings.
Fractals I am convinced are the key to understanding QM and the geometry of the universe, not to mention our reality.
I am an economist and was drawn to fractals for their behaviour being similar to economic system models. This has lead me to QM. An isolated fractal behaves (as I have shown in my blog) as QM is described.It shows wave particle duality; am more.
I have inverted the fractal to show what would be observed if measured/ observation. I am convinced from this experimentthe universe is a fractal : it grows at an accelerating rate, and demonstrates Hubble's Law.
I am an amateur and am currently writing up my insights from from the fractal which I first shared on my blog. There are many. I would very much like to discuss my findings.
Aye aye Captain..
Certainly fractals have much to teach us, about the nature of the universe and natural law. I bookmarked your blog for later reference.
Regards,
Jonathan
The emergence of reality fundamentally and necessarily involves our growth and becoming other than we are.
Spacetime is a sytem that we suppose consists of one time dimension and three space dimensions. I wonder whether space dimensions are pure space dimensions (they do not incorporate time as well). In other words by Universe's expansion (and hence space expansion) time may HAS to follow the direction it follows.
For example: 1. if T=t and S=t+s, where T,S are the real time and space and t,s are the measured time and space then 2. t=S-s always positive if S>s (SPACE MEASURED IS SMALLER THAN THE REAL SPACE). Is it?