Sujatha,

Thanks for introducing me to Vedanta beliefs. Concepts born several thousands years ago, such as these, seem to have inspired ideas in our modern world. The cyclic model proposes that the big bang is a collision between branes that occurs at regular intervals. From my memory, its every trillion years or so. It perhaps inspires the fractal, a mathematical set that exhibits a repeating pattern that displays at every scale.

It is an informative essay and well written.

Jim

    Dear Miss.,

    My command of English is perhaps not good enough as to always understand you. That's why I looked into your essay after you made a comment on mine that I felt rather cryptic.

    Did you read the essay by Akinbo Ojo? While his mother tongue is also not English - he is a physician in Nigeria - we do understand each other well enough as to agree on that we disagree, I am sure, you didn't understand his question.

    Eckard Blumschein

    Thank you very much for your kind views and precious time!

    Smiles :)

    Sincerely,

    Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

    Dear Sir,

    According to my understanding your good friend had asked me regarding the length in question that whether if it is divisible in various positions or has some limit to it; to that I simplified this by saying every length has to the divisions or scattering has a particular end point to it.

    Hope you got my point!

    Sincerely,

    Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

    Dear Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan,

    The present period is the Kali Yuga and Brahma is not sleeping. Is it same, on the far place. Maybe Bhrama is sleeping at that place. You realize that it is important question about egzistance of singularity, Theory of Big Bang and Cyclisity.

    Best Regards,

    Branko Zivlak

      Dear Branko Zivlak,

      I cannot argue or derive a formula for existence of God here, I do not want to comment upon the existence of God to an atheist.

      With regards,

      Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

      a month later

      Dear Miss Sujata

      There has been much discussion on the subject of the relation of science and religion which mostly dealt with Christianity. I myself concluded that it is best to keep the two separate for best results ! Having said that I must admit enjoying the part of your essay telling about Schrodinger and the others reading the Vedas. You might have added that Oppenheimer the father of the atom bomb quoted the Bhagavad Vita after testing the Bomb :

      """'We knew the world would not be the same. A few people laughed, a few people cried. Most people were silent. I remembered the line from the Hindu scripture, the Bhagavad-Gita; Vishnu is trying to persuade the Prince that he should do his duty, and to impress him, takes on his multi-armed form and says, 'Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.' I suppose we all thought that, one way or another.'""".

      madame Curie believed you should respect people's faith even though you donot share it. For example in my physics theory I believe the concept of time is not fundamental while you explain in your essay that in Hinduism it is. I wish you all success

      with best wishes

      Vladimir

        You had given valuable comments before too.

        And this time too.

        Thanks for your valuable time and comments. I wish your work a great success. Thanks again.

        Smiles

        Best regards,

        Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

        Sujatha,

        I apologize in advance for my question. I assure you that I mean no insult or disrespect. My question is as follows: "R__U__a__T_u_R_i_N_g__T_e_$_t"?

        Best Regards and Good Luck,

        Gary Simpson

          Your apologies are accepted, henceforth I hope you won't question silly.

          - Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

          Your apologies are accepted, henceforth I hope you won't question me silly.

          - Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

          Dear Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan, in response to your comments on my Essay Forum:

          If you would be so kind as to provide "the exact definitive questions of Universal Truth" there, I will be pleased to respond re any deviations.

          For example, noting that such questions are not provided in your essay: We might then productively discuss my "deviating from your paper" in the context of "those exact definitive questions".

          With best regards; Gordon Watson: Essay Forum. Essay Only.

            You say my essay doesn't convey the "Universal Truth" the foundation questions of the cosmological evolution; it clearly states that you "did not get the purport of my essay."

            I have made various mentions in footnotes : U can explore more about the subject since everything is not possible to explain in this comment box.

            Your doubts or questions will be simplified there.

            - Sincerely,

            Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

            Dear Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan, these comment boxes are surely large enough for you to provide at least one of your "exact definitive questions of Universal Truth" that you say my essay does not address.

            Further, if you need additional space, simply open another comment box!

            NB: In truth, any reference that I made to your essay related to your use of the phrase "the exact definitive questions of Universal Truth" when you commented on my essay.

            PS: Since the four experiments that I analyse yield truths, such will not conflict with any valid Truth that you care to offer.

            With best regards; Gordon Watson: Essay Forum. Essay Only.

            (b) UNIVERSAL TRUTH (/b)

            how do you explain that in your essay?

            The supposedly phrased man (b) "exact definitive questions of Universal truth" (/b)

            You're quite offensive in the forum discussion, no doubt about that!

            - Sincerely,

            Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

            UNIVERSAL TRUTH

            how do you explain that in your essay?

            The supposedly phrased man "exact definitive questions of Universal truth"

            You're quite offensive in the forum discussion, no doubt about that!

            - Sincerely,

            Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

            You say my essay doesn't convey the "Universal Truth" the foundation questions of the cosmological evolution; it clearly states that you "did not get the purport of my essay."

            Tell me what foundational questions does my essay lack Mr.Supposedly "exact definitive man"?

            - Sincerely,

            Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

            8 days later

            Dear Sujatha,

            Thanks for your great essay which thrives on what I would call the SOURCE OF ALL

            SOURCES- "the VEDAS".Your resort to cosmology as a means of probing the maths-physics nexus as examplified in the "Rig Vedas" view of the cosmos is an approximation of Niel Bohr's proof of assessment on the subject matter.

            There is nothing wrong in looking up to the "Upanisads" for an answer;it is all encompassing.

            Keep the the flying.

            Lloyd Tamarapreye Okoko.

              6 days later

              Sujatha Jagannathan wrote on Apr. 19, 2015 @ 13:56 GMT stub

              Hands-on conceptualized framed layers!

              - Regards

              Miss. Sujatha Jagannathan

              report post as inappropriate

              Author En Passant replied on Apr. 21, 2015 @ 07:53 GMT stub

              Dear Sujatha,

              Your last name (in Sanskrit) means something like "the man who has unstoppable force."

              It is simply impossible to take Vedic (Sanskrit) wisdom, and think it is applicable to modern day physics.

              I know you would like to make that case, and those people were very wise. But you need experimentation to do science. That did not develop until not that long ago in Europe. Yes, I am aware of Ramanujan and Sun Tzu, and they were brilliant in their way.

              Your paternal line is likely to be R1a (possibly Brahmin).

              En