Dear Leo KoGuan,
I think Newton was wrong about abstract gravity; Einstein was wrong about abstract space/time, and Hawking was wrong about the explosive capability of NOTHING.
All I ask is that you give my essay WHY THE REAL UNIVERSE IS NOT MATHEMATICAL a fair reading and that you allow me to answer any objections you may leave in my comment box about it.
Joe Fisher
Leo,
I enjoyed improving my familiarity with KQUID theory, which I love. Someone called my essay 'beautiful', but I think that word far better applies to yours. Unfortunately it seems many still struggle to understand it. I suspect the different way of thinking between east and west doesn't help. I feel the 'western' science of the last few centuries lacks much empathy with nature.
I take a practical view, trying to communicate with those schooled in current western doctrine by focusing on very direct physical matters. As that doesn't seem to work either maybe your way is best! None the less in practical terms I strongly agree 'absolute' time, and that that any 'multiverse' is temporally sequenced, although also propose there are physical dimensions beyond our detectability. You may recall my discrete regions of space can move relatively, (including like planets and atmospheres) in 'virial' systems from a particle to a universe. I recall we established KQID does not conflict with such hierarchical sequences. I hope you'll read my new revelations supporting that hypothesis. (I also certainly preclude time travel!)
Though probably hard to read and understand for any westerner yours is a beautiful approach and essay, worthy of a lot higher placing. Well done and very best of luck in the contest.
Peter
Is there any representation of KQID in the physical world? If the information is stored, then what is the mechanism to retrieve and represent it? It has intriguing possibilities but I'd like to know more.
Dear Edwin,
I always enjoy reading your erudite essays that combine humanity and science. Yes, we do have similar worldview that I think is simply logical, rational and shockingly simple. I agree with you that reality is a brute force one cannot ignore: you put it bluntly: "The physical world does exist, as anyone can prove by jumping from a high place." Another I also believe in: "Specifically, what should we do when map logic conflicts with our physical intuition? I believe that the physical world can be trusted."
I know community find my essay is too abstracts with many Chinese, Shakespearian and Greek philosophy that difficult to understand but actually it is so simple based on reality as it is like yours. I believe in nature is infinite, thus, everything is paradoxically true like both local and non-local communications and events of nature. I describes this phenomena in KQID. Therefore, your conclusion that Bell's non-local entanglement could be explained also in local causality make sense to me. I believe this is correct. You have done great work and path a new insight of nature as it is.
Let us work together to make our world a better place for all, including aliens, cyborgs and self-conscious robots and androids. I would like to visit your Caligornia sunny hut and together every morning we declare: we are in paradise!
Best wishes,
Leo KoGuan
Dear Peter,
Thank you for your kind complement. Yours I agree more beautiful than my essay. I join in this essay contest to learn and join the celebration of beautiful ideas of our great bits-beings civilization with all wonderful and colorful ideas. I like them all. Yes, I combine not only Greek, Shakespearian but also Chinese philosophy that amazed me that we share common bond in ideas. People look for differences but I look for similarity and beauty of all ideas. Your red and green socks picture are really wonderful and simple to understand to explain complicated ideas. Well done! Let us celebrate diversity and enjoy many varieties foods for thought as presented here.
On serious note, our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously. We must have both relativistic time as described by KQID pictures using Lorentz's inverse transformation to KQID-Newton's absolute time that is clocking at Multiversal time clock per absolute digital time тЙд 10^-1000seconds. Believe me or not KQID has also discovered from it's equations how light speed c evolved from the Bit Bang to our present light speed c. So wonderful right if it is true. We can know Newton's mass as we know Eintein's equation of mass = E/c^2 that eluded Einstein. He did not know what is energy because he did not what is c.
Let us celebrate diversity of ideas and all bits-beings human as well as self-conscious robots and cyborgs. Let us live forever here and now in harmony and after this precious life that we have. No wars but Giving first Taking later in a regulated but free and open market of ideas.
On math, KQID picture is that math is fiction but real or real but fiction. It is both a trick and a truth. Any way, I rated your essay as usual to what it deserved a full score. Thank you again for your kind comment on my essay.
Best wishes,
Leo KoGuan
Dear R J,
Yes, KQID is purely physical theory since it is physical monism, everything is bit or bit is it and it is bit. It is a bit paradigm rather than a it paradigm. However, the bit paradigm is a newly evolved paradigm that does the thinking part like our neocortex brain and the it paradigm is doing the instinctive part of our senses like our mammalian brain. We need both to function well in our wotld, fiction but real. It has a vivid picture of Existence and it is the only theory right now that can calculate how our c emerged from the Bit Bang to our present light speed in the vacuum as we have observed. The size of our universe at the creation and its temperature and its light speed. It is falsifiable theory base on real equations with real numbers that can be verified or falsified easily by any thing, any living thing like virus, bacteria or human.
Please stay in touch and we can converse in real numbers based on real equations based on nature as it is.
Best regards and thanks for your comment,
Leo KoGuan
Dear Rick,
Thank you for your kind comment and your interest in my thought. I don't know about an interview for I have never given any before. KQID is based on Xuan Yuan's DAO concept that it is the substance that creates and distributes everything that is. Dao as Giving first Taking later (Love) has been unfolding itself from its first emergent out of Non-existence by its own free will by itself and for itself. As I mentioned in my blog, this Philosoy has its theory, equations and numbers like that can be falsified or verified in scientific experiments or by everyday life experiences. As mentioned here, KQId is the only terry right now that can calculate with numbers precisely the size of our baby universe at birth, its temperature and its speed.how c evolve from the creation to the present light speed in the vacuum within 5 thousand years after the Bit Bang.
I looked at your essay and thought very highly and rated it accordingly,
Let us continue our discussion and I believe in strongly the symphony of ideas,
Sincerely yours,
Leo KoGuan
Dear Leo KoGuan,
Once again this contest you present us a with a puzzle-essay about the KQID "Bit Bang" cosmos. I must admit that I do not understand all the mysteries of KQID, but I agree with your comment to Peter Jackson above: "Our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously." In my essay, I argue that we live simultaneously in a potentially infinite number of larger realities that have equivalent observable consequences. By being everything, the multiverse sums up to nothing... but nothing splits back into everything, as the whole of physical reality is spawn by the whole of abstract mathematical existence.
I find your limitless enthusiasm about the sharing of ideas heart warming. Keep it up, and all the best!
Dear Marc,
Thank you giving me your kind comment and rated my essay highly. If I may differ with you a little but agree with you a lot in most fundamental way in which physics is math but this math is KQID Zeroth Law.
Physics = KQID Zeroth Law = math. This Zeroth Law is ☰00☷ = Ee^iτ = A+S= IΨ(CTE) = Ψ(iτLx,y,z, T) ⊆T=1. This is why we have an orderly universe that we have been observing as the privileged Anthropic Observers that create and distribute Anthropic principle. Thus we have many similarities but each is unique being. Each has infinite clones if physics = math. Furthermore, if physics = math, we will have so many bizarre realities which we have observed. I believe Existence must be "orderly" and "regular" infinite possibilities, Theregore, KQID Zeroth Law governed its evolution from its initial to its infinite potentialities. KQID has the bit paradigm that functions like our neocortex brain on top of the it paradigm that function like our mammalian brain. The bit rules over it whereas its manifested the bits in our realm.
I rated highly your essay and I wish you the best in this contest.
Leo KoGuan
reply to this thread
Leo,
"Our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously."
Your quote reminds me of particle superposition, a state of coherence that many functions in the classical world depend on, some of which I cite in my essay: http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2345
Regards as always,
Jim
Dear James,
I looked at your article, I could not find the sentence that I wrote above with Peter Jacson on his article on Bell's non-locality that :
"Our Multiverse is infinite, it can not be constrained by limited rule this or that. It must be both this and that simultaneously. It must be both this and that simultaneously."
When I wrote "all this and all that" I had Zhuangzi and Huishi's picture of reality in mind that everything connecting as one. I found this idea is so beautiful and philosophically fullfiling as an earthling living in Sagan's blue dot within an immense Multiverse as the creation of our Ancestor Qbit in his Qbit-centric perspective of creation by itself, for itself and of itself. We and Existence are living in Qbit. Qbit is love with its operating system of Giving first Taking later (love) to create and distribute all that is.
I am glad you invited me to check on your article and I found your article indeed has similar idea as mine and it is well executed and beautiful and fresh. We are indeed connected. We are indeed one with diversity of ideas and myriads of characters. We are also unique in our own way. None is a clone of another. Similarity with a difference.
Best,
Leo KoGuan
Leo,
Thank you for taking the time to read my essay. Hope to see you for the next contest.
Jim
