Alas, Albert Einstein was an abstractions addicted ignoramus as are the people who run and comment at this site.

The real Universe am infinite. Finite amounts of energy, mass and light speed cannot exist infinitely. Matter cannot possibly be finite for that would entail that matter would have had to have a finite commencement from infinite non-matter. The moment that happened, non-matter would not be infinite would it?

Joe Fisher, Realist

  • [deleted]

Apparently you do not know what is an addition or a multiplication or an exponential Mr Fisher,

ps you are on this site also ?

Please fqxi ,people still hack my pc ,it is tiring ,help me,I am not good in algorythms and pc,pleasee, the cause is from LinkedIn I think

It is fom India I beleive but I am not sure, I have some names but I am not sure

Dear Steve,

I know that all mathematics is finite abstraction. I know that the absurd claims put forth by Newton, Einstein and Hawking are finite abstractions that have nothing to do with the real Universe that am infinite.

This site has published 4 of my essays. This site removed my comment that all real things have a real surface and therefore all real surfaces must travel at the same constant speed. As light cannot have a surface, real light is the only stationary substance in the real Universe. Dr. Brendan Foster marked it as unacceptable SPAM. If you complain about these posts, Dr Brendan Foster will dutifully remove all of my comments for you.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Mr Fisher,

You know, in the past I was too much arrogant and too much parano, be sure that it is not the good way. Mr Foster is a moderator, so he has a responsability when people are not correct or too much arrogant.Severalofmy posts in the past were deleted, and frankly it was better like that. It is just for your reputation. It is better to be more calm and more civilized you know,you can tell us your ideas with a more calm attitude.

About your reallight being a stationary substance, I don't understand you?

Light is composed by particles in motion,c,and the fermions on the line time evolution encode particles and their informations,that is why the mass increases.It is difficult to understand you there?

Why you see light in this line of stationary reasoning? It isnot rational in fact Mr Fisher?

Regards

Dear Steve,

One real Universe am infinite. One real substance must be infinite. Finite particles cannot be infinite. Therefore, light cannot consist of finite particles and the only way light could be infinite would be if it did not have a finite surface but attached itself to an infinite surface. When you look at the stars, or a lightning bolt, or an active light bulb, you can easily determine that the light does not move from its source.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Hello Mr Fisher,

I am sorry to disagree. In my model of spherisation,it is essential for the proportions to have a finite universal sphere in evolution. That said I agree about the finite quantum entanglement.

Light also is a finite system with its informations.I have really difficulties to encircle your line of reasoning.

The finite systems are essential for the encoding of informations with its sortings and superimposings.

Light is from stars which is also a finite system.

Light is always from its source you know,even when we analyze the quantum state and the separation of energy from the fermionic state.

I see only infinity when we are above our planck scales, quant or cosmo,so above our walls of perception.Or with adds or multiplications, but never for our physicality and its uniqueness. If you said me that energy is infinite, there I can agree but for the physicality I have difficulties, really.

Best Regards

This is a good but not great experiment. Similar to the time delays or gravitational deflection of quasars as a function of earth's orbit about the sun, this measurement will result in two correlated circles of time delay interferences superimposed on each other from each of the moons of Saturn.

[link:mattertimemeaning.blogspot.com/2015/04/deflection-of-starlight-by-sun.html]Deflection of Starlight by the Sun[/link]

This shows many references and also shows that these kinds of radiotelescope measurements have a great deal of noise, especially when the radiotelescope is close to the direction of the sun. It is not clear if these workers in this latest rendition will have enough signal to noise to actually do this measurement.

It is further not clear what new information about cosmic time delays it will reveal besides what has been amply demonstrated time and again, but what the heck...

The LISA pathfinder experiment that is heading out to L1 very soon will be much more fun. LISA's precise weighing of two very cold 2 kg Au/Pt cubes in a well controlled L1 orbit promises to reveal much more about the nature of our aether reality. The confusion of geodesics at L1 results in a gravity beamsplitter that should show quantum effects.

[link:mattertimemeaning.blogspot.com/2014/07/gravitational-beamsplitter.htmlGravitational Beamsplitter[/link]

Will the cubes become entangled at L1 and show interference effects beyond the interferometry that will measure their masses? That would be a lot of fun...

    Hello Mr Agnew,

    I agree about this experiment, it is good but not really relevant considering that these waves are above the logic of our electromagnetic waves.

    That said, it becomes relevant in inserting several parameters in this interfermotry of Michelson.The 75 per cent of Au and 25 per cent of Pl wawww,but is it relevant for this gravitomagnetism.

    I have an idea, a spherical rotor with the good proportion of elements and of course more my humble équations about sphères,quant and cosmol.

    With an algorythm permitting to sort the other cosmological perturbations.An other algorythm can be inserted with the volumes of cosmological sphères,we can so find the central main cosmological sphère and so its effects on the spacetime respecting the general relativity.

    Just a thought

    Regards

    There is aproblem with our newtonian mecanic and our perception with our electromagnetism.The velocies of particles and also the mass of cosmological black sphères are a problem for the gravitomagnetism.

    Newtonian field and Einsteinian field are not sufficient at my humble opinion.

    Just a thought.

    There is a correspondance that said for these gravitational fields.

    Matter and energy can be better understood with my equations.I am insisting.THE EQUATION OF SPHERISATION FIELDS with spherical volumes....AND THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELDS appear AND ALSO the cosmological constant must be imrpoved at my humble opinion.

    Schrödinger and Maxwell should agree it seems to me :)

    The quaNtum gravitation is so in the same line of reasoning.

    I d like to find this constant linking all central quantum sphères at this central cosmological sphere. WHO has an idea for the correct mathematical formalism dear scientists ? The universal spherical constant :)

    thought for souls ...

    • [deleted]

    Dear Steve,

    You can call me Joe. The real Universe am infinite. The real Universe cannot be modeled on any finite systematic attributes. Please understand that while the shortest distance between two points is supposed to be a straight line, the furthest distance two points can be placed apart is a real infinite straight line. Real stars do not emit light. Real stars radiate and when the real radiation strikes a surface the surface becomes coated with light. Light does not have a surface. Light can only appear on a surface and it does not matter if the surface appears to be solid, liquid, or vaporous, the light stays on the surface.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    Dear Joe,

    :) I am going to have difficulties to change your line of reasoning it seems to me.

    Tell me please what is the infinity ? So you think that our universe is without borders,without planck walls?

    Please explain me because there I have really difficulties to encircle your point of vue, really Joe,it is not rational.Even a photon ois a finite system, even an electon or a fermion or a boson or a baryon or a quark or this or that ???Explain me please what is the infinity for you ,and don't sayme that pi is infinite,I know :)

    Regards

    Dear Steve,

    The real Universe am singularly infinite. If I was to write that the real universe is infinite, I would be writing incorrectly. As former President Clinton once stated under oath, the finite word "is" has more than one finite meaning. The word "am" only has one infinite meaning. The finite word "is" and the finite word "was" has caused ignorant scientists to mindlessly speculate about how a finite universe could be or could have been, or is likely to be in some unfathomable finite future.

    Joe Fisher, Realist

    Dear Joe,

    It is a spiritual meaning so?. So The real universe is you ,not are so ???

    It is not easy to follow you Joe, really. I like so much the spiritualnalyze but there It is difficult your infinity and your am.

    Regards

    For ideas, you have come to the right place...for answers, this place might keep your futures possible.

    All particles have intrinsic spin and so the spinning sphere is a paradigm for all microscopic quantum charge bonding. All gravity objects likewise have spin and so the spinning sphere is likewise a paradigm for cosmic gravity bonding.

    The relative phases of spins of microscopic particles determine how they bond to each other and three particles bonded with a pi phase are what we call a straight line while if those three particles have a pi/2 phase, we call that a right angle.

    Our notions of Cartesian space and motion in space and even continuous time all come from the bonding actions of the spin phase of rotating spheres. On the cosmic scale, we see that a rotating Earth rotates around a rotating sun inside of a rotating galaxy as part of a rotating galaxy cluster.

    Is that enough rotation of spheres for you?

    The Earth rotation decays at 0.28 ppb/yr and the international prototype kilogram decays at twice that rate because time also decays, not just matter. Millisecond pulsars are rotating neutron stars and there rotation decays on average about 0.26 ppb/yr...is that enough cosmological spheres for you?

    Rotating spheres are what make the universe work at quantum and cosmic scales.