You are very close to the truth, but you took a right hand turn instead of a left hand turn...your paper states:

"There is no experimental evidence that clocks measure time. It is convenient to replace the concept of time with the numerical order of material change. This view corresponds more adequately to the physical world and resolves Zeno problems of motion."

But what clocks measure is what defines time. In fact, all objects in the universe are clocks since there is a fossil time record in how every object evolved. Clocks are simply objects that have a very regular action called a tick rate, but the earth is also a clock in the fossil layers of its geology. We can tell time with any object, but clocks are especially useful.

You replace the word time with a words numerical order of material change, which sounds a little bit like replacing continuous time with the discrete time delays of matter change. In denying continuous time, you accept discrete time delays, but call it a "numerical order of material change."

There are actually many different ways to describe how the universe really works but you really should not simply redefine time with new words for time. This can be really confusing since your main thesis is really about the vacuum energy of space, not time. Another paper states:

"Starting from the above fundamental considerations, we have already proposed [7] a novel model of Quantum Vacuum consisting of a granular structure of the universal space, similar to that assumed, for example, in many version of loop quantum gravity, but conceptually very different and based on the conception of a physical 3D space composed by energetic packages having the size of Planck volume."

So you redefine continuous space with a discrete granular structure that you call the quantum vacuum of universal space. You even have a particle for that quantum vacuum that defines all matter...go figure. However, nowhere do you use the term aether.

In other words, you have an aether theory in every possible way except the word. These kind of euphemisms are used in most aether papers since there is a strong prejudice against the notion of an aether that fills space. Your quantum vacuum is a classic example of an aether that fills space.

You have not yet gotten to the pressure-less dusts or quantum fluids of others, but I see the outline of those issues in some of your various papers. There are numerous pathologies that you need to address that you have not yet addressed. You work very hard explaining things that already have explanations, like gravity. You should focus more on explaining things that have no explanations, like black holes.

Thus your approach is to fill space with aether called quantum vacuum and to replace time with sequences of discrete events. What happens at the event horizon of a black hole? What is the entropy of a black hole? Does your quantum vacuum explain why the CMB is so uniform? Are the speed of light, Planck's, and fine structure truly constant for all time?

Predict something that we do not already know and then measure it and verify your prediction...

And for your information, an axiom in maths must be well utilised. The black sphères are logic ,if an axiomatic formalismmust be made, I will do with rationalism and empirism in respect of the scholl of Copenaghen.

At this moment I have not seen a good mathematician to help me on this Platform.

I just see a kind of play of vanity without generality.

It is not you you know who are going to helpme to formalize my works nor your friends.Mr hawking or Mr Corda, them are competent.So frankly let's be serious when we speak about how our universe works.

Don't teach Mr Agnew, you don't understand the planck walls and the universal constants.

How could you interpret the gravitational Aether ?with your electromagnetic aether perhaps ???? Let me laugh!

and I am repeating, a BH is a sphere!If you don't see this evidence, so return at school of universal generalities.

Even your critics are not relevant.Amrit understands the entropy and the encoding of informations,so don't insist.

Gee, you do not need to get all upset. Your questions and statements do not seem very technical and so it is not clear whether you want more math or more examples or both.

This forum is all about words and discourse with words. If you want to know about the technical side of aethertime, there are lots of detailed technical papers. But you do not seem to have a technical background and have a very intuitive approach instead.

So there is a blog with a little more [link:mattertimemeaning.blogspot.com/]wordsy[/link] discourse, but somehow it does not seem like discourse is what you are after...

Universal_Quantum_Action_in_the_Matter-Time_Universe

BLACK_HOLES_AS_BOSON_STARS_BOUND_BY_AN_ETERNALLY_COLLAPSING_OBJECT_WITH_MATTER_TIME_METRIC

Variation_of_the_Fine_Structure_Constant_over_Time_in_the_Matter_Time_Universe

GALAXY_ROTATION_WITHOUT_DARK_MATTER_IN_THE_MATTER-TIME_UNIVERSE

Correlation_of_Solar_Sunspot_Cycle_with_Nearby_Stars_Procyon_and_61-Cygni

Decay_of_the_International_Prototype_Kilogram

Well, discourse is the soul of of teaching, but it is nice to have some concrete examples. Actually, only non rotating black holes are spheres...as soon as a black hole rotates, it becomes oblate just like any spinning object.

Entropy is a very important concept and once there is a technical description of a black hole, it will be possible to calculate its entropy. Just saying you understand black holes does not really help calculate the entropy of a black hole. If someone calculates the entropy of a black hole, that person can make some claim.

In aethertime, gravity and charge are just scaled versions of each other, which seems really nice. This means that photon dipole exchange of charge scales to a photon pair quadrupole of gravity, scaled by the time size of the universe. That also seems nice and simple.

Since the math all seems to work out fine, aethertime explains many heretofore unexplained observations. Oh, and it unifies charge and gravity, but do not expect any accolades or prizes...at least not at this time. It will take much more precise measurements of matter decay and of the early universe will either prove or disprove aethertime.

Even though there are many measurements that show matter decay, the IPK, millisecond pulsar decay, earth spin decay, and so on, they are all called artifacts today and it will take more than one person on this planet to believe these artifacts actually represent the way the universe is...

all is said Mr Agnew,and batman and superman exists of course.

Return at school of determinism.

All is said I have said

your tezchnical analyses don't interest me, it is just Wind.

You don't understand I am repeating the gravitational Aether, the entropy and the encoding of informations.

So don"t insist ,it will be my last post perhaps with you.You are nor technical, nor general.

...so instead of being interested in learning and the discourse of new ideas, you close your mind and the resort to perjoratives...oh, how surprising is that?

Yes I prefer ,I am cooking,I need to eat a little.

Surprising is a weak word indeed .

and you continue with your aether correlated with electromagnetism still and still on faster than light's thread.

How are you going to understand that the aether is a spiritual road and linked with gravitationalwaves.

It is very bizare your obstinacy in this road.

Do you beleive in God Mr Agnew because me yes, and the secret of the aether , it is that, the faith.

Einstein if he was there d forget the lumin.aether and d accept the gravitational aether.

It is evident.

E=mc² is not sufficient because we cannot calculate the entire entropy of our universe when we analyse it with theprinciple of uniqueness without add.

That is why the dark matter is essential for the encoding and the correlated energy.

You are in a kind of prison, electromagnetic simply.Open your mind and soul.

Faster than light, yes but not in an electromagnetic analyse.Only the gravitationalwaves can answer to this problem.

God creates the universal sphere,Entropy becomes smass.It is essential and for that, several laws and doudamental are necessary.If the sphere is a reality, there are reasons, it is the perfect equilibrium of forces.

If a specific dynamic is a reality about encoding of black particles and photons, there are reasons.

The central cosmologicalsphere implies the universal gravitational spherical wave.It is logic.God is not far of us.

Einstein d like this meaning if he was here.Because he thought about God and its universal project of enrgy becoming mass in improvement.It is not possible to understand entropy and the gravitationalaether without these essential.

God creates a sphere with sphères turning around sphères. It is logic when we analyse the encoding of informations.These informations are not only bosonic particles but also gravitational particles of several kind.The sphericalvolumes are essential so.

If God has chosen this logic, there are reasons , they turn so they are !!!!The evolution , spherisation for me, shows us what a wonderful future we create.We are still Young universally speaking and the road is still long towards the perfect equilibrium between all quantum and cosmological sphères.The improvement is so important.We are created by this entropy and the project is wonderfull with or without our approvement.

    My two other passions are playing piano, guitar, and the horticulture,the flowers and the naturelike the music show us the harmonisation of froms and waves.

    All forms can be created with these quantum sphères.When I see the possibilities of this nature, I amfascinated ,you imagine the créations Inside this universal sphere if already on earth, we hacve so many combinations.Only the sphères can create this reality. At this present it exists so many planets and lifes,so many créations with infinite combinations and we are still Young.We create a kind of paradise in fact.It is wonderful and the word is weak.

    We could contemplate the créations for eternity because all is eternal when, we see above our limits, walls,physical and temporal.

    I am not for the multivers at this moment due to our principle of uniquenss and our Young age, but the future can show us a kind ofmultispheres because the entropy is infinite above our planck walls simply.

    God is difficult and simple to understand.The most important is to accept this evolution and to be a catalyser of universal love after all.The rest seems vain.

    I don't speak about God in the scientific world, because only a little number of persons understands really what is the realmeaning of entropy.Probably a lack of general studies. The colors are from this light indeed , but it is just a complementary tool this light premitti,ng to see the things and to encode informations , bosonic.

    But the puzzle is more complex than this c , the aether is more than electromagnetic waves.We are still so far of the real entropy, we just utilise a so small step.It exists other stepsof énergies correlated with dark matter.The volumes of sphères are so important to encircle this energy,and that in the two senses, quant and cosm.

    We are travellers from stars in the future, we are still babies created.The SR is a problem for the future universalcommunications and the future travels Inside this sphere.God so has created other possibilities but perhaps we are still Young and not able to harmonise the universe.Already that we have difficulties toharmonise our planet.When I see the sufferings and the stupidities on this earth, so perhaps it is better that we cannot travel Inside this universal sphere at this moment.

    Entropy entropy, shows us the road of universal love above our souls and minds.....

    Spherically yours with universal humility.

    We are all in a kind of prison...it is called the universe. We cannot know anything outside of the boundaries of the universe and that includes why the universe is the way that it is, why we are here right now, and why is it us and not someone else who is here right now. These are all supernatural beliefs in which we must simply believe in order to make sense out of reality.

    You believe in a supernatural agent that seems to be similar to that of many others, but my supernatural agents are simply the unfounded and unconditioned axioms of matter, time, and action. These supernatural agents are mysteries enough for my universe and I do not find a need for any other unfounded or unconditioned supernatural agents.

    E=mc2 does not really have much to do with entropy and besides, all that is necessary to know what a black hole is is to calculate the entropy of a black hole by states of matter within the object known as a black hole. An understanding of a black hole necessarily means an understanding of its states and therefore of its entropy.

    Besides, I thought that you had nothing to learn from superman or batman...still not surprising...

    It is well what I thought.You speak about the einsteinian aether and you don't understand its meaning.All our big thinkers knew the real meaning of entropy, not you.

    You think simply it is the disorder or this or that.Don't speak about things that you don't understand please.Newton, Copernic, gallileo,Planck,Hawking,drake,Borh,and the list is long you know.You utilise their équations and reasonings and you cannot understand their meaning?There is a problem there you know, really, a big problem even.

    You confound the entropy of a system(here the BH entropy and its thermodynamical analyse) with the universal entropy.How could you elaborate what are the steps of energy ?Frankly Mr Agnew , it is sad that you insist you know.

    ps I am ironman, not batman nor superman, I am rational me.

    If you think that entropy is only the disorder and the chaos ,so you understand only the present.So you don't understand the evolution and theincrease of entropy and thecorrelated mass.So you don't understand the equation of Einstein about matter and energy.You must be more general and not limited in a prison of thoughts and reasonings.

    I suggest that you buy several books of sciences(evolution, chemistry,better physics book,cosmology,astrophysics and this and that....)You are really in a prison of mind.

    Be general when you speak about the gravitational aether of God Mr Agnew.

    It is ironical there.

    You are correct in that my view of entropy seems to be a lot simpler than yours. Entropy is simply the log of the number of equivalent states of a system. If you know the density of states of an object, the entropy follows along with heat capacity, enthalpy, and free energy.

    That is the way that I learned entropy in graduate school and that is the way that I have used entropy all of my career; entropy is a part of thermodynamics and statistical mechanics and is very useful for qualifying objects with things like pressure, temperature, and so on.

    If you know the density of states of a black hole, you know the entropy, heat capacity, enthalpy, and free energy and all of those qualities are very useful for predicting the futures of that black hole. If you do not know the entropy of a black hole, you do not know the states of a black hole and you do not understand a black hole and therefore cannot predict its future. That seems simple....and not surprising...

    I know my thermo ,I have a wonderful book of Zemansky "heat and thermo"

    I am repeating, you are in a prison, open your mind and you shall understand perhaps the real entropy.But if you rest in your lineof reasoning, never you shall understand its meaning.You lack of universal faith, and it is the secret of our generality.But if you cannot accept that, it is your problem, not mine.

    Me I understand both of them,the thermo of a system and the universal entropy .

    How is it possible that you utilise words like Aether so?Have you an explaination to this irony.

    Me I have one.Your vanity.Open your universal mind.How can I explain you,I don't know? It is difficult to explain the generality to a person who does not encircle it.

    But for your help,I am there, don't hesitate to ask concrete questions about the universal sphere and the message of God.I will answer with pleasure with humility.

    ps Hawking also has an universal faith, his works explain the entropy of a system with the priciple of holography like MrCorda ,but Hawking pass above the prison, him, with the black holes radiations and I am persuaded that Mr Corda also understandsthisuniversal entropy.Why you no?Because you think you are right of course.It is sad you know,really.

    A last thing before that I am going to sleep.I read a book of Hawking , a short story of time,for your information , he thinkS also about an omnipresent God.

    He separates correctly entropy simply for the steps of energy.You d see better if you make the same.

    Until soon ,I am tired, I am epileptic and I take several meds, so it is time to stop for me.It is tiring to explain entropy to a person who does not encircle it.

    Tomorrow I will be there.

    Entropically and spherically yours

    God bless you