• [deleted]

Every real thing has a real complete surface. Although man has inflicted flatness on a considerable amount of earthly matter by fabricating surface producing billions of cubes and spheres, all surface must travel at the same constant speed. Light does not have a surface, therefore, light cannot move at a constant speed.

Joe Fisher, Realist

a month later

Nature: "Wayward satellites repurposed to test general relativity"

In my comment on this article I claim that there is no gravitational time dilation - the gravitational redshift (blueshift) is the result of the variation of the speed of light predicted by Newton's emission theory of light.

Pentcho Valev

15 days later

No Warped Spacetime

General Relativity at the Beach

In my comments on the video I show that the gravitational redshift (blueshift) is not the result of time dilation - it is the result of the variation of the speed of light predicted by Newton's emission theory of light.

Pentcho Valev

    6 months later
    • [deleted]

    I think that there's some confusion between the two cases (closed slight versus measurement). They achieve the same distribution at the far screen, but in the second case, that can be explained because the measurement randomizes the phase of the photon's quantum distribution. As is well known, the single-slit distribution can be obtained by smearing the two-slit distribution. This is essentially what happens when a measurement is made.

    a month later

    Perfectly synchronized atomic clocks on earth when placed on a satellite become no more synchronized due to many factors. Einstein called various reference frames. But even on same reference frame just change in height cause dis balance due to gravity. Therefore gravity changes the ticking rate in atomic clocks. Therefore you see times do not match. Therefore you correct time in GPS. Einstein named it time dilation. I prefer to call measurement dilation. So the absolute time in quantum mechanics or the relativistic time in GR/SR ? Both these concepts are in use and probably , one should be true. Some experiment may solve this issue.

    2 years later
    • [deleted]

    I came across the podcast only recently. Since it is 2018 now, the experiment should have been done or not by now. Does anyone know the outcome?

    Write a Reply...