Blurring Causal Lines

Any normal person can readily see that it is only real infinite illuminated visible surface that moves at the same constant speed. Light does not have a surface, therefore, light is always stationary. Einstein was utterly wrong when he tried to prove that finite objects moved at varying rates of finite speed and light moved at the same constant speed through an invisible vacuum.

Joe Fisher, Realist.

Mr Fisher,

I d like that you develop a little instead to always repeat the same things about Einstein having false.That has no sense to say that light is stationary.In fact,you confound a little the spirituality and the physics and its laws, deterministic and foundamental.I found where is your error.It is about the luminerous aether, you consider it like a vaccuum towards the infinite entropy above our walls.So like a fluid , where god is present and stationary.It is interesting like spiritual analyse, that said you must be more rational you know.A lot of our past thinkers had the universal faith,a kind of faith in this infinite entropy above our physicality Tesla, Newton,Einstein,...thought about god.That said their reasonings were dterministic when they would to describe the physics of our universe.The aether furthermore is in logic gravitational and not luminerous.If this infinite entropy above the physicality creates a kind of project in imrpovement, so let's admit that the central cosmological sphere is the singularity where all gravitational codes come from.It is the only way in logic to inform us by the gravitational informations.Our standard model needs to insert an other logic than our electromagnetism and bosons encoded.It is just a step with foundamentals and laws like is c.The light is not stationary ,it is produced like particles and they are linear like is the spherons produce by BH.See that if we are instantaneous connected with this entropy, it is with this central cosmological singularity, the biggest BH producing the smallest and speedest particles of gravitation.Dark matter is this matter, not baryonic.If a kind of stationary aether due to its linear speed but in fact they aren't stationary physically speaking.You must really differenciate the spitituality and the determinism and the formalisation.Both can be harmonised with this said determinism.Einstein had right you know about his special and general relativity.This relativity is just a tool permitting to class our cosmological evolution for example in seeing our past in space.

Eckard,

From the article:

"But here was the trick. To allow the physicists to create a superposition between the order of events in Alice and Bob's laboratories, Brukner's team conjectured that the two laboratories were not part of a larger causal system. This causal fuzziness created an uncertainty in the order in which events between Alice and Bob had taken place."

In other words, they ASSUMED (conjectured) no "larger causal system" in order to subsequently deduce no "larger causal system".

Now let them prove that there is no larger causal system, without first assuming that to be the case.

Rob McEachern

Dear Mr. Dufourny,

You have a real complete visible skin surface. Einstein had a real complete visible skin surface when he was alive. No matter in which direction you look, you will only ever see a plethora of real visible seamlessly enmeshed partial solid, liquid and vaporous surfaces. No matter in which direction Einstein looked when he was alive, he would have only been able to see the same mixture of visible surface. The only reason real surface can be seen is if it is illuminated, light therefore cannot have a surface. Please stop writing nonsense about invisible particles and invisible God.

Joe Fisher, Realist

well,still an illuminated wanting to give a course about universality, the am and the ego.Now you are going to ponder a vanitious post in logic.Well well well .You are am universe .You are am the sphere.And for your information, God was important for my favorite thinkers like Newton, Einstein,Tesla,....You thinkwhat ? that your spiritulity is better than an other.We are all equals mr Fisher.The rest is vain.Since that I see your posts you never develop, never utilise the correct language,never you are general???We are on a Platform where we share ideas and theories and models.The most of the time,the community developps and improves their works.Of course the sciences community is very hormonal and very vanitious.We have all our proud comportments.That said the critics can be relevant and interestings.It is not in always repeating that am or realist or this that you are going to have a correct credibiliy.We are on a Platform of physics and not philosophy.Develop, how do you see the sparticles, thestandard model, the bosons,how doyou explain the quantum gravitation?how do you interpret the dark matter, the dark energy?doyou think that luminerous aether is rational?how doyou interpret a BH? What are theseparticles not baryonic composing the dark matter? What is a fermion for you ? what is a boson? What is a neutrino ?What is the form,the shape of our universe ?

Steve Realist

Dear Mr. Dufourny,

My contention that all visible surfaces travel at the same constant speed and light is always stationary because light does not have a surface is true. Although this site keeps publishing ridiculous articles about invisible atoms and invisible quantum particles and invisible black holes, and everyone else who visits this site pretends to understand this preposterous codswallop, I know I am right.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Hi Mr Fisher,

That is all? Could you develop please with physics.And what are the results of this ? I have really difficulties to encircle what you want to tell us? Develop please, in physics, philosophy,spirituality,evolution,...what you want in facct but develop ...

Dear Mr. Dufourny,

Please join with me in singing the Peggy Lee song: "Is that all there is?" Yes indeed, the real unique visible Universe am one infinite surface illuminated by an infinite amount of surface less light. Abstract physics information about invisible phenomena has been developed far past the limits of absurdity.

Joe Fisher, Realist

:) you are cool in fact ,a realjedi of the sphere ,I like :) we are all linked indeed since the begining of the big polarization after all.Like jedis travellers froms stars and galaxies.We imrpove and we create, we evolve and we increase in mass entropy .We are all linked in a dance of rotations and spherisation.let's sing together the alleluia :)

Do we exactly know that flow of time is in continuous progression or in bits of Planck time ? The possibility of loosing causal for an effect can not be ruled out. As such quantum effects become probabilistic in nature.We should be doubtful about a super computer on such loosing information in quantum bits.