Hi Antony

An inspiring and reflective read. I trust you will do well in this contest.

It's fine if you don't recall, however i emailed you a couple of years back. I'm an Australian surfer who spends an inordinate amount of time contemplating the nature of the world. I have an essay submission and I wonder if you might be so kind as to review it please? It focuses on the unanswered question of complexity of the world, the question of emergent awareness at the top of list. why do elementary particles for example, interact in such a way that cascades to ever higher levels of ordered structure, as described in your essay? Its one thing to observe that they do, and quite another to attempt answer this question. I argue that an organization principle is needed to fill this role in our understanding, and I point to a possable candadite.

Here's a question which you can read my essay to learn my view. Why is the universe prospectively littered with wet world's, a universe of pumping surf? Can you imagine the variety of setups out there, and what the experience of surfing might present in lower or higher gravity than earth? Boggles the mind.

Anyway, love your work and hope to hear from you. In the mean time I'll give your rating a nudge in the right direction.

Steven Andresen

http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2890

P's, I just bought a sail boat to tour our local island surf. Loving life

Hi,

I very much liked your style of writing. To me ypour essay with carefully framed sentences seemed almost like poetry.

Best,

Jarmo Mäkelä

16 days later

"the Feynman infomorphism"--

Dear Garrett Lisi,

You've said that "(the 3 generation) ... issue remains the most significant problem." I wonder if there might be more freedom and constraints available for addressing the problem by linking the proper time of an entangled system of particles to the Fokker-Pryce center of inertia and then mapping it to the set of possible coordinate times that define this proper time. Then by inferring from G. 't Hooft's work on computer automata that algorithms may underlie Hilbert space-- which means a selection algorithm would be needed to select from this set of coordinate times. The algorithm would work best by selecting only one from many possible fields rather than by selecting, say, one set comprising hundreds of fields from permutations of hundreds of types of fields. In other words, by selecting one of your E8 fields.

2 months later

Dear Anthony Garrett Lisi,

It is a pity that I could not see your essay earlier.

Yes, the arguments in favor of hierarchy of emergence all the way from most fundamental to higher levels of abstraction, are entirely agreeable. All that one requires is to lay down a formal mechanism or process of emergence that leads to irreducible representation or symbolic description of abstract objects / notions. I suppose then, you may be curious to know if such a formal description is possible at all. In fact, this is what I have attempted in my essay.

In case, your curiosity lead you to peruse my essay, I would love to discuss more details, and how such an information processing can be organized in evolving systems.

I hope to see your comments.

Rajiv

8 years later

Antony Lisi
Here’s a formal mathematical exposition for Garrett Lisi discussion,

Title: A Complex Angular Framework for Energy-Time Duality —

Abstract:

This paper introduces two composite angular functions, Unaexpon and Unainverex, as a speculative framework for modeling the cyclical relationship between energy, time, and anti-time. Defined on the real and complex unit circle, these expressions encode a directional transition through cosmological phases — from the Big Bang to heat death and beyond — suggesting a mathematical pathway for self-propagating systems with mirrored temporal components. The functions incorporate absolute trigonometric expressions and inverse interactions, suggesting bounds on conventional exponential growth and decay across the angular domain.

  1. Introduction

Conventional thermodynamic and cosmological models characterize the universe’s evolution using exponential functions for entropy and energy. However, such functions grow without bound, raising questions about their applicability at cosmological extremes.

I propose two alternative functions, Unaexpon and Unainverex, which naturally exhibit bounded growth and decay across [0, π], capturing both forward and retrograde temporal propagation. These functions are complex-valued and angle-dependent, mapping energetic and volumetric behavior onto the unit circle.

  1. Definitions

Let x \in [0, \pi], and define:

\text{Unaexpon}(x) = |\sec(x)| + \tan(x) - \frac{1}{|\csc(x)| + \cot(x)}

\text{Unainverex}(x) = |\csc(x)| + \cot(x) - \frac{1}{\tan(x) + |\sec(x)|}

Their complex-plane formulations are:

\text{Unaexpon}_\mathbb{C}(x) = \text{Re} + i \cdot \text{Im} = \left( |\sec(x)| + \tan(x) - \frac{1}{|\csc(x)| + \cot(x)} \right) + i\left( |\csc(x)| + \cot(x) - \frac{1}{\tan(x) + |\sec(x)|} \right)

\text{Unainverex}_\mathbb{C}(x) = \left( |\csc(x)| + \cot(x) - \frac{1}{\tan(x) + |\sec(x)|} \right) + i\left( |\sec(x)| + \tan(x) - \frac{1}{|\csc(x)| + \cot(x)} \right)

These expressions are smooth (except at singularities) and offer natural symmetry under the transformation x \rightarrow \pi - x, which aligns with their physical interpretations as mirrored phases.

  1. Physical Interpretation
    • Unaexpon models total energy growth, peaking at x = \frac{\pi}{2}, interpreted as the heat death — the phase boundary between time and anti-time.
    • Unainverex models the anti-energy reflection, propagating in a time-reversed, negatively volumetric direction.

We assign:
• x = 0: Big Bang
• x = \frac{\pi}{4}: Point of inflection in total energy
• x = \frac{\pi}{2}: Phase change into anti-time
• x = \pi: Total zero-energy convergence — the mirror end-state

This system aligns with a cyclic cosmology, mapping time and anti-time as halves of a full angular domain.

  1. Interpretation in the Complex Plane

On the complex plane, these functions describe self-propagating waveforms in which the imaginary component reflects volumetric or spatial characteristics (including “negative volume”), and the real component reflects energy states. The model may be seen as a kind of cosmological oscillator, with paired conjugate functions.

  1. Symbolic Commentary

“In the silence between two waves, which is the energy and which is the decay?”

This question captures the essence of the dual-function approach: that energy and anti-energy, time and anti-time, are not separate entities but interwoven halves of a total system whose dynamics are angular, not linear.

  1. Concluding Remarks

This framework is not presented as a replacement for existing physical laws, but as a speculative lens — a mathematical metaphor — for the interplay between energy, time, and mirror-structure in a bounded, cyclical universe. I welcome critique, refinement, or reinterpretation of these functions in the context of modern physics, especially as they relate to cosmological unification theories such as those explored by Garrett Lisi and others.

References:
• Lisi, G. (2007). An Exceptionally Simple Theory of Everything. arXiv:0711.0770
• Penrose, R. (2010). Cycles of Time.