An indestructible Cosmos striving to attain self-realization by Jose P. Koshy

Dear Jose p Koshy,

My papers are published in various journals. I just kept additional copies viXra. Similarly Published papers are also available on that subject super luminal neutrinos....

Best

=snp

Hi Koshy

It is rare that I have two wow moments while reading a single essay. Your essay certainly proved to be that exception. Accordingly, I rate your essay highly. I didn't know that galaxy clusters moved at one-third the speed of light and how that could be shown to be the outer limit of the universe since there is an increase of 20 times in the rotational speeds of structures like stars, galaxies etc. Also, I hadn't considered that all of mathematics could be boiled down to simple addition. A good insight.

I agree with you regarding free will being a selection from the available options. That sounds about right to me. I have modeled it as 'nurturing' capacity in my essay on intelligent systems. I am not sure but I think I will differ on 'intelligent beings represent the maximum limit that mathematics can allow in intelligence and free will'. The reason is simple. My essay is premised on the fact that the social system of intelligent beings can also be considered as intelligent, if it is sufficiently sophisticated. Basically, it would have to be a Constitutional Democracy.

A very nice read. Thanks.

Regards, Willy

Interesting essay proposing similar self-realization and emergence of concepts, that I also deal with in my essay:

The Dynamic Laws of Physics (and Universal Gravitation) have varied over time, and even Einstein had already proposed that they still has to evolve:

ARISTOTLE: F = m.v

NEWTON: F = m.a

EINSTEIN. E = m.c2 (*)

MOND: F = m.a.(A/A0)

FRACTAL RAINBOW: F = f (scale) = m.a.(scale factor)

Or better G (Gravity Constant) vary with the scale/distance due to fractal space-time: G = f ( Scale/distance factor)

(*) This equation does not correspond to the same dynamic concept but has many similarities.

Dear Jose,

With great interest I read your essay, which of course is worthy of high rating.

You are one of the few who directly answers the question put by the contest.

I share your aspiration to seek the truth

«All physical structures including living organisms are manifestations inside the Cosmos, and cannot exist outside.»

«Life is an emergent property acquired by mid-level structures formed by atoms.»

«The temperature difference between the two makes the heat engine work.»

«In addition to these, the emergent properties acquired by the intermediate structures create both bottom-up and top-down causal factors at each level.»

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

Jose,

Very interesting, if a little speculative in areas. I agree some parts are reasonable including;

"..it may be possible that the machines we create acquire self-awareness; but at the end, it may turn out that what we have done is just a duplication of the natural process." and;

"The Cosmos, .. goes through an infinite loop of pulsations" Which agree with a cyclic cosmology theory I've presented with much consistent evidence, also that we may well be around half way through a cycle. (do ask for links on my string if interested).

Sadly alternate ideas aren't as well received as they should be, so quite rigorous comprehensive and even and conclusive evidence is required and even then it may not even be looked at!

I hope you may read mine this year, but in that bracket!

Good effort. Very Best

Peter

Hi dear Jose

Your essay is very impressive by realistic approaches to problems in the whole. It is seen there clearly definitions of used concepts and categories by their meaning, role and significance, which must to be as mandatory in the scientific - research works, if we really expecting get some valuable results. Unfortunately, such lawful demands become now somewhat forgotten in present formal - mathematical methodology (I mean post classical physics.) Moreover, in your work are presented large circle of very interesting and intriguing questions such, concerning to cosmology, to quantum-classical contradictions etc. Your views on this questions deserve attention and more time that we now has. However, I can decide for myself that author of this work are one deeply thinking person who well imagine the examined subject. The main thing for me it is your critical approach to studied theme.

I hope my work can serve to your attention and I can hearing some your words in my page.

Best Regards