The Cosmic Computer: digital manipulation of matter, space and time by Mohamed Ali Haj Yousef

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Without postulating the duality of time and the resulting continuous construction of space, this concept of imaginary time does not have any meaning or justification outside the mathematical formulation, because both the Euclidean space and Minkowski space-time consider space and time to be coexisting together, i.e. they both are real. The fact that each frame of the inner time (which constitutes space) appears as one instance on the outward time is what justifies treating time as imaginary with relation to space, thus perpendicular on it. Moreover, this same fact, that the inner time/space and the outer time do not exist together, has another more essential characteristic, because it is the only way we can think of granular space-time without any background. This is exactly the reason why strings theory and loop quantum gravity could not succeed in fully quantizing space-time, because they could not get rid of the background continuum.

John Murelle

Amazing!

What I like about your theory is the way it explains things before any mathematical formulation. When the theory is correct, mathematics will follow. It is in the oven as you said.

Janice Murin

I also believe that time has to be imaginary, that is why it is very difficult to understand it. I read before that some theories use imaginary time but this is the first time I see it can be used in relativity.

Janice Murin

I read before that some theories use imaginary time but this is the first time I see it can be used in relativity.

Janice Murin

Thank you for replying, I have not seen this before, because it was not displayed.

Janice Murin

Thank you for replying, I have not seen this before, because it was not displayed.

Janice Murin

Thank you for replying, I have not seen this before, because it was not displayed.

Janice Murin

Thank you for replying, I have not seen this before, because it was not displayed.

Janice Murin

Your theory is interesting but it is very complicated, maybe it is a good idea if you make some videos describing it to interested people like us.

Janice Murin

Do you have a link to the paper/talk or FTAP2017 conference proceedings?

Paulan Moldier

It is very clear that somebody is intentionally down rating this exceptional essay. I remember it was rated very high, and then it ran down: 7.8, 7.2, 6.6, 6.4, ... and now 5.8? They should not allow rating down with reasoning!

Paulan Moldier

Why don't force the users who rate to make comment, even if it is negative, because they must give the author the chance to defend his hypothesis, and prevent blind rating down.

Paulan Moldier

I mean now it is 4.8 ???????

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Yes! Unfortunately, I must say that I am greatly disappointed by this site because it is being misused by some people who are voting without reading and without commenting or discussing the essay.

Originally I posted this essay to share it with professionals, but by looking at most of the essays in this contest I see that they are simply repeating previous matters and not discussing any real fundamental questions, as the name FQXI means.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

In the recent developments, I found that just like time, energy can also be imaginary and negative. This appeared very clearly in the equations. If fact, it turned out that energy is multi-dimensional, just like space which according to the inner level of time is being created continuously.

What this means? Well it means that a huge energy can be stored in some other dimension that can be harmless in our level of time, for example just like mass is a huge energy that stored in harmless form.

Paulan Moldier

I just read your post above, and I think it AMAZING:

>>>>

Paulan Moldier

I think this is quite plausible result if you go along the postulate of multi-leveled time.

Because energy is related directly to time.

I wish I live long enough to see this theory in application.

if you like to post more details it would be just great.

Mohamed Haj Yousef

Thank you dear Paulan for encouraging me....

Recently there has been a great achievement recently. The concept is now a full scale theory, with almost all the essential problems tackled. The duality of time meant in the end that there is real time and imaginary time as I said. This solved many problems and turned gravity into quantum Euclidean, without singularities !!!!!

The application of imaginary discrete time to the relativistic energy-momentum gave two terms whose sum is invariant, that meant that the COMPLEX force which is the derivation of momentum is always ZERO, just like the imaginary velocity is always zero in the outer time as I described above. This meant that the real part of the force always equaled its imaginary part, which is the EQUIVALENCE PRINCPLE? can you imagine, I got the equivalence principle by direct mathematical derivation?

You know what does this mean? AGREAT THING, it is like the derivation of the law of gravity.

pjackson

Mohamed,

Very interesting, original (still!) and nicely written. The models seems to be getting ever more refined, and I entirely agree and invoke local modulation to c by fermions. After someone just surprisingly suggested on my blog that 'Relativistic QFT had unified SR & QM' it was nice to read; "Quantum Mechanics had also been proved successful in describing the interactions between fields and subatomic particles, despite the fact that it clearly contradicts the aforementioned central principle of Relativity".

A good score coming. I hope you get a chance to read mine before the impending deadline as it lead to an important (dynamic geometrical) classical derivation of QMs predictions which DOES emerge as compatible with QM (also refined, from last years red & green reversible socks!). Please do any analyse and falsify it if you can. A short taster video is here. 100sec glimpse and full version here; Classic QM on Vimeo.

Very best of luck in the run in.

Peter

« Previous Page Next Page »