Dear Mohamed Ali Haj Yousef, I was waiting for your comment on my essay in my subject. It turned out that You only work in your theme.
We write about the same thing, only in different words. You go from private (the monad) to the General, I go from General to specific. Here are your words:
"In effect, this model brings back the concept of aether and quintessence in a novel way that does not require it to affect the speed of light or matter particles, since it is now the background space itself, and not something in the background. Moreover, this one directional and linear progression of time that is continuously creating the space and its contents can also provide a straightforward explanation of entropy and the arrow of time"
Monada you have creates space. I proceed from the principle of Descartes's identity of space and matter. In New Cartesian Physic in the role of monads are irrational points of space defined by the principle of certainty of Heisenberg. Irrational point of physical space is the last point of existence, which requires an infinite large momentum to move it in space.
In your theory there a split on one side you build a space with unique properties, on the other hand you don't want to distance themselves from the current nonsense physics: dark matter, dark energy, big Bang, the concept of space-time, etc. In the New Cartesian Physic time is a measure in aggregate of all changes in the physical space. Statement in philosophy that matter exists in space and time should be put incorrect. Correctly one should say that matter creates space and time are attributes, not existing independently.
We need to reconcile our theory. Your theory can only have a New Cartesian sequel. You have to be in the lead of the competition. For your deductive structure of the space I give you the highest rating.
All the best, Dizhechko
