Dear Steve

Thanks for reading my essay and indeed uniquity is indeed singularity of the self organization but it is the only principle of the self organization. As stated in the essay all existents, self organizations, are uniqueness, unity in multiplicity.

Our uniqueness is due to the difference in the qualities of our attribute of movement.

Thanks again

yehuda atai

Dear steve

In my post above to you it should be read: "but it is NOT the only principle of the self organization".

thanks

yehuda atai

You are welcome,with pleasure, I am always happy to this universalism, general and the real understanding of what is this infinite entropy above our understanding that we name God.

:) "humanity is like a rainbow, a diversity of colors unified, united in light"

"it is difficult to turn off a big fire with one water drop, nevertheless a whole of drops makes the Ocean."

all linked since the begining and all in tyhe same boat towards eternity ,entropical ....we create the paradise in fact,we are still so youngs, we are still babies Inside this SPHERE in spherisation of matter energy souls by quant and cosm 3D Sphères :) they turn so they are after all ....Take care and all the best Mr Atai

Yehuda,

A very interesting and rather unique essay, nicely written and, for me, with many agreeable philosophical concepts. A few favourite lines;;

..show in a phenomenological approach that "movement", though it is the common denominator of all phenomena in space, does not itself suffice to explain the ratification of concreteness..

.....all tried to define and verify the concrete, but they too stayed within a causal and dualistic perception, yielding an inadequate account of the concrete.

..'memory reservoirs'

..The brain, as the central organ of memory, has the important role of preserving information and updating all its contexts.

..The sources of thought are to be found in various activities of retrieval and recycling information from one of the memory reservoirs, particularly relational information, in accord with circumstances. "

In particular regarding; "Properties shared by all phenomena; finitude, uniqueness, unity and multiplicity I have written on these matters, in particular identifying a 're-ionization mechanism involving recycling of most all galaxy material, giving a pattern and asymmetries which seem also to match the CMB peculiarities at the biggest scale.

I find your score of 1 impossible to rationalise and quite ridiculous, but there are trolls around as I had two 1's myself early on! A proper score now coming to yours. I do hope you'll read, appreciate and score my quite ambitious offering too.

Best of luck.

Peter

Dear Peter

Thanks for your comments and reading my essay.

I will gladly read your essay and hope for wide exposure for our articles.

Thanks again

yehuda atai

12 days later

The abstract looks interesting. Will read on but I have one question before I do. Are the ontological details really necessary? Can't we do simply with mass-energy? Second, since we know that there are situations in which cause and effect can provably be reversed in the temporal sense, how does your idea of movement and other characteristics address this pathology?

    Dear Abdullah

    reality is ontological and we are continuously ratifying it.

    Causality is a special case in the evolvement of phenomena.

    you are welcome to read my essay.

    thanks

    yehuda atai

    Dear Professor Atai,

    Very good and attention grabbing essay, I was enjoying reading your essay, this forum is just about new and different ideas that everybody on this planet could access.

    Kind regards

    Koorosh

    Dear Koorosh

    Thank you for reading my essay. Yes, it is a good platform to exhibit our thoughts to the world.

    Have a great week

    yehuda atai

    Dear Prof. Yehuda Atai,

    Thank you for your post on my essay....

    In my opinion, Time has one directional movement as in practice we never see time going "BACKWORDS". We don't see any thing previous except in our memories, history or records... why should we introduce things like going into time in backwards direction? As per space is concern in can be infinite, no problem.

    For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

    Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

    With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

    Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

    Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

    http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

    Best wishes to your essay.

    For your blessings please................

    =snp. gupta

      5 days later

      Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta

      Thanks for your comment here and indeed your perception is interesting.

      Though I have a disagreement with your statement:"No imaginary or negative time axis". First the ability to imagine is at least the ability to calculate. Even a single movement is calculating its State as a phenomenon. Second, Time is not a direction. Time is the differential change between at least two ontological "existents. Time is the rate of change.

      Yet I hope you get large exposure of your essay.

      have a nice weekend

      yehuda atai

      6 days later

      Hi Yehuda,

      I found your essay very interesting! I would be interested in knowing your thoughts on my essay The Code-Theoretic Axiom as well as a rating...

      I also wonder about any input on our new movie 'What Is Reality' which can be found on the Quantum Gravity Research youtube channel.

      Warm Regards,

      Klee Irwin

      Hi Klee Irwin

      Thanks for reading my essay and found it interesting. Yes, in my perception of reality , it is all in the attributes of a movement. the quality of our attributes are those that singular us as subjective and unique.

      I will read your essay and see you YouTube "what is reality" and comment at your essay on them. looking forward and a greater exposure for all of us.

      Thanks again

      yehuda

      Dear Atai,

      Time goes into one way only. it increases into future. it is not a vector, calculations of imaginary time will take us nowhare, but confusion only...

      best Regards

      =snp

      Dear SNP Gupta

      It seems you did not understand or read my essay.

      Time is a Human perception of reality and it does not exists in reality. We slice the event to measure it. We assumes time, because the changes between day and night etc' and the way we perceive reality with Causality and Duality principles, which gives us order and control. Causality and Duality are special cases in the occurrence of phenomena.

      All the best

      yehuda

      Yuda,

      What a magnificent essay you wrote. You certainly capture "I and Thou". You could leave off the 20 attributes of the schema; your insightful poetry is enough. The consciousness field is intended as the seamless seal of our shared concreteness. It is sensitive to momentum density, which is to say intensity of motion, and it spans the universe, but nowhere more spontaneously and more at home than here on earth.

      I profoundly enjoyed your essay.

      Edwin Eugene Klingman

        Edwin,

        Thanks for your response and your profound enjoyment of the essay.

        The idea of unique consciousness field for each human resemble the idea of a unique "soul" out of a general ancient soul in Kabbalah (just a thought).

        Your essay indeed a challenging one.

        Hope we get large visibility and readers.

        yehuda atai

        Yehuda,

        Quite interesting essay, a different idea on ontology. Showing the movement from within the atom and how the concreteness of being relate to physical force, and movement, but even beyond momentum, vector, M/E, and time there are attributes going to aims.

        "I move, therefore I am" seems a new paradigm. Even moreso, "we are together, therefore I am"

        I assume you did not rate my essay. Often trolls strike when others comments and I've had countless trolls.

        Regards,

        Jim Hoover

        Dear Mr. Atai

        Thanks for the proton. Now I'm sure.

        If the two protons are identical, then it is also be identical their surroundings.

        Surroundings are not identical. So, two protons are not identical. Why ? Becouse, in the formula (17) are two transcendental mathematical constants. Thus, all our equations are approximations. Sometimes with immense accuracy, but they are not identity.

        Best regards,

        Branko

          Dear Branko,

          Yes, they are NOT identical otherwise as you said:"If the two protons are identical, then it is also be identical their surroundings" which is impossible to be. Proton B cant be in the exact and identical position in space as proton A.

          Thanks, best

          yehuda