Dear Alexey,

I am also glad to see your essay in this contest!

Thank you very much for your comment. Today, physicists introduce hypotheses without philosophical foundation. These hypotheses can not be verified experimentally. In particular, the hypothesis of a "big bang", which has quite a lot of opponents . Therefore, to overcome the "crisis of understanding, "crisis of interpretation and representation ", "trouble with physics" required ontological standard of basification (justification) on the basis of ontology ("modified ontology"), which establishes the common basis of knowledge (ontological framework, carcass, foundation) uniform for all levels of existence of the Universum. Here the key idea - the total dialectical ontological unification of the matter along the "vertical" of being. The criterion of truth for the new model of ideality - seeing language of nature, which speaks to us in the language of mathematics - "triangles, circles" (Galileo). Today is needed most profound dialectical ontological interpretation of the "triangle" (Plato's " heavenly triangle"), "circle", "point". Philosophy, "the mother of all sciences", helps to overcome the crisis in the knowledge and fear. You know it well, since you are looking for the deleted meanings of being.

I start reading your essay.

Yours faithfully,

Vladimir

Dear Vladimir, as I said, your "ontological standard" sounds like a totalitarian project. I think it would be good if you show how it might avoid this. Another problem I see in your approach is that I do not think that mental world can be adequately presented in the language of mathematics or similar objectivistic language.

Cheers,

AB.

Dear Alexey,

The ontological structure of being of the Universum as a whole can not be "totalitarian project". It may be only a "total project", based on the fact that Tot / Θώθ - the god of wisdom and numeracy, the patron of sciences, scribes, holy books, calendar creator in ancient Egypt. But the hypothesis of "The Big Bang Theory" and the system of views on the Universum without any justification of the ontological structure of "beginning" - "totalitarian project".

I do not share the triune world to "worlds" as did Penrose and Popper. I entered the central category of the structure of the Universum - "the ontological (structural, cosmic) memory and presented the primordial structure of the Universum in the form of simple mathematical symbol. Each mathematical concept - object, which is used in the ontological construction - "point with germ of vector", "vector of absolute state of matter", "ontological heavenly triangle (Plato)"- has the deepest (limit, extreme) ontological interpretation. With this I decide two key science issues: super hard problem of the basification (justification, substantiation, foundation) of mathematics (knowledge) and "hard problem of consciousness".

Cheers,

VR.

Dear Vladimir ! You embarked with J.A.Wheeler's call for a physics of human consciousness and you introduced your hypothetical construct of ontological memory as being the cosmic matrix of consciousness. Advancing consciousness is,therefore, an extension of the ontological memory of the self; this can best be done by tuning in soulfully with the cosmic memory (the Logos or eternal vibration of perpetual re-creation); such a harmonic life style will lead to the onto-logical stage of absolute simultaneity which means that eternity is now.Take this a my reader response; cordially: stephen

    Dear Stephen,

    Many thanks for your deep comment and understanding. You give profound philosophical eidoses, concepts, and the way to overcome the total crisis of understandingin in the fundamental science and global society, deep existential crisis of humanity. Yes, we earthlings, have to make a sharp turn in the thinking. I think that mathematics and physics will be able to overcome the crisis. Sincerely, Vladimir

    You are absolutely right, Stephen! And philosophy, "the mother of all sciences", is to bind and embrace this solid foundation and framework of knowledge. We, humans must always bear in mind the philosophical covenant of J.A.Wheeler: "Philosophy is too important to be left to the philosophers"

    Dear Vladimir, You wrote a good philosophical the review in the style of the essay.

    I've been looking for in philosophy, the answer to the question: "What is the matter?" and not found. The only thing she stubbornly repeated, matter exists in space and in time. At some point I suddenly realized that this is a false statement. It would be correct to say that matter creates space and time. I think it would be a great addition to your essay. I will give you a high ball, when i learn to do it accurately

    Boris Dizhechko

      Dear Boris,

      Many thanks for your insightful comments. I agree: «It would be correct to say that matter creates space and time.» ... Our task is only to establish the ontological structure of matter, then, accordingly, the ontological structure of space (the ontological space) and its geometry, and then - the nature of time. I'm starting to read your essay with great interest.

      Sincerely, Vladimir

      Vladimir,

      Almost breathlessly packed with ideas and information, quoting philosophies of old that should replace a lot of current thinking. Physical things alone do not render understanding. "Today we demand of physics some understanding of existence itself."

      "Mattersoul" truly brings the mindless math laws and "actual entities" together into goals giving meaning to life. That is really a difficult concept to bring together. I pondered for days trying and am not satisfied with my effort. You parade much thinking before the reader -- ideas that lend wisdom.

      I like Whitehead's thought that the "actual world is a process which is the becoming of actual entities." Concrescence is profound in the human thought of the embryo coming together in a seemingly miraculous process of human birth.There is the "generation of individual urgent entities, each having absolute consciousness," and Florensky's "the more solid any system of thought is the more specific is determination of the space as the kernel of this system."

      I make a similar metaphoric use of the human fetus and theories about the growth of the early universe modeled in similar amniotic fluid.

      Hope you can check out my essay.

      Regards,

      Jim Hoover

        Jim,

        Many thanks for your insightful comments. Indeed, way out of the contemporary "crisis of understanding" in basic science give us an idea of the outstanding mathematician and philosopher Alfred Whitehead Norton and philosopher Pavel Florensky. Today we need a deeper look at the matter as the eternal process of generation of the material - ideal structures, as "nurse", "godmother" (Plato). Only then we will understand the "soul of matter", including "atom", will understand the direction and purpose of the process of generation of structures.

        I enjoy getting to read your essay.

        Regards,

        Vladimir

        You are welcome Mr Rogozhin,

        I agree totally.The unification at all scales after all is a foundamental.We imrpove, optimise,continue the road of complexification of matter, mind, body soul.Like a general harmonious imrpovement.In this line of reasoning, the bad, the evil is purely dedicated to disappear in time space evolution.I beleive that God is near us with this gravitational aether produced by the central cosmological singularity.The gravitational sphere produced by the cntral Sphere Inside the sphere.It is the meaning of my equation E=m(b)c²+m(nb)l² I have simply inserted this matter not baryonic cold the dzark matter with l their linear velocity.My second equation which must be irmpoved can show some proportions with the spherical volumes of motions.That is why th biggest BH produces the speedest spherons.Particles of gravitation.I consider that a photon is a spheron even coded by this cold gravity.Like our standard model at all scales encircled by this gravitation.I have so inserted quantum BHs withn forces stronger than our nuclear gluonic forces and also spherons encoded them with forces weakeer than electromagnetism and photons.It is paradoxal because this force is the weakest but the strongest also.Now the relevance is that we have a road towards this entire infinite entropy and that we can break our special relativity with spherons.A photon cannot, a spheron yes because a spheron is nor baryonic nor relativistic.Of course technologically speaking it becomes difficult to check it, this quantum gravitation.But it is possible, thjisz zero absolute and this gravity are more than we can imagine.We are still youngs.We utilise only at this moment the thermodynamical and electromagnetic technologies.We are at doors of a revolutionary sciences.We can do it :) check this gravitation and break c.Our personall quantum cnetral sphere, our singularities turn around this cosm singularity .....we are babies in evolution :) thanks for sharing your ideas

        all the best from Belgium