Dear Vladimir Rogozhin,
With great interest I read your essay, which of course is worthy of high praise.
You very correctly put questions and answer them.
«What way should we choose for overcoming total crisis of understanding in fundamental science? It should be the way of metaphysical construction of new comprehensive model of ideality on the basis of the modified ontology.»
«the understanding of world and worldview is the solution of the problem of ontological structure of space and creation of new model of basic ideality ("idea of ideas", "eidos of eidoses") establishing ontological framework, carcass and foundation of knowledge.»
Great work.
However, you have considered only one side of ideality - "idea of ideas", "eidos of eidoses".
The second concept of ideality interests me most: the ontology of "the use of ideal and abstract properties of matter and fields," which is used, for example, to simplify physical models.
The whole experience of mankind shows that there are no analogues for ideal and abstract properties of matter and fields, except for supernatural properties.
Vladimir Voevodsky: «What we call crisis of the Russian science now isn't crisis only of the Russian science. There is a crisis of world science. Real progress will consist in very serious fight of science with religion which will end with their integration.»
In my opinion, it is the widespread use of ideal and abstract properties of matter and fields, assuming their realizability in the universe, is a key mistake and the cause of the crisis in science.
The whole experience of mankind shows that there are no analogues for ideal and abstract properties of matter and fields, except for supernatural properties.
Werner Heisenberg wrote: «The physics of particles informs us, strictly speaking, on fundamental structures of the nature, but not on fundamental particles. These structures are much more abstract, than it seemed 50 years ago.»
For example, problems in quantum mechanics associated with the use of ideal and abstract properties of the medium of propagation of light (empty space) that lead to the collapse of the wave function and singularity are known. As a consequence, false tasks are set for the development of normalizations and calibrations. All this leads to, in practice, fruitless attempts to answer the question about the causes of self-organization of matter.
The introduction of nonlinear transformation of elements in the medium of a physical vacuum and a dissipative function leads to the use of the Mathieu causal equations for quantum parametric resonance and solitons, instead of causeless Schrödinger equations. The process of self-organization of matter are carried out according to the principles of the heat pump in parametric resonance and solitons, is a direct and simple answer to the questions of this contest.
And how do you think, how relevant is the individual philosophical theme for the second part of the interpretation of ideality?
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir Fedorov