New paradigm of motion by Vladimir Rodin

Dear Mr. Rodin

Your essay is 95 percent promising. The reason that you do not have a prediction in your research is in those 5 percent. You must get rid of the prevailing stereotypes including, I quote:

„The universe attraction appeared at the beginning of our Universe evolution, when formerly solid hydrogen became gas due to a decrease in the atomic protium density caused by corpuscular disturbance spherical wave front expansion [2]."

Universe is spatially finite, but eternal in time (in past and future). So there is no beginning of our Universe evolution.

Really, your 2/3 also appear in my previous essays FQXi in another context.

For me, the interesting part:

"But this is only possible if the mass of such a particle would be expressed using a complex value". I have no any prediction in this part, but it is good idea.

Of course, you deserve high rate.

Regards,

Branko

Dear Dr. Rodin,,

Please excuse me for I do not wish to be too critical of your fine essay and I do hope that it fairs well in the competition.

Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

One real visible Universe must have only one reality. Simple natural reality has nothing to do with any abstract complex musings about any imaginary "At the heart of a new paradigm lies the law defining the reason of interactions in micro and macro systems of the material world."

The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and comment on its merit.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Dear Vladimir A. Rodin,

You are forgetting one fundamental question which forms the basis of your essay. You are assuming in your essay that it is totally expanding Universe. That means you are considering only about 40 percent of total Galaxies in the Universe, the other Galaxies like Blue shifted Galaxies, Quasars and many other types you are not considering, which amounts to more than 60 percent...

Then probably you will have to modify your motion equations accordingly...

Best Regards

Dear Vladimir

Your work has interested to me as I find there many things in the unison to my approach. The matter is concerned mainly to a concept of wave-field nature of the unique primordial substance. It is Einstein's idea, which was arisen after when he realized that his theories incomplete (as you mentioned). Here is impossible to listing the important results that derived on this basic concept (that you also have chosen.) The particles really can be represented as the different kinds of standing Compton's waves - as 1) the single wavelength, 2) as multiple wavelengths and 3) the half (quarter, etc) wavelength circularly polarized standing waves. These itself in same time are the wave interference patterns. On this basic imagination, almost everything in the microcosm, become explainable ...! Then I hope you can find many interesting things in my works, and we will get some more complete building. Please answer to me not so immediately, but after looking my works.

I am very welcome your essay!

Hi To both of you,

It seems really odd to say that there is not a beginning for our physicality.Let's imagine an infinite eternal entropy with dimensions before this hypothetical BB.Why a physicality has been created ? Why codes and informations have been created in a system of evolution by polarisation of matter energy implying an increasing mass and complexification of this mass ?

The fact to consider a main causality for these informations of evolution seem essential and foundamental.If there is nit a begining so why we have an evolution ?Now explain me also why we have coded singularities for all quantum serie in its uniqueness ?And if these quant singularities have been created and that these singularities evolve and encode, so there is a main cosmological cause implying these codes of evolution complexification.Imagine simply that this infinite eternal entropical consciousness that here on earth we name with reduction God,has wanted to share something with this physicality.Perhaps simply this eternity was alone and has wanted create a physicality.But of course we are in the philosophy,that said we see that it exists a thing above our simple human interpretation.Newton, Tesla,Einstein and so more general thinkers had understood that this entropy was a foundamental for the generalm équations abouty matter and energy.God after all does not play at dices.The eterrnity without dimensions and time is abnove this physicality, so we must be objective about this entropical irreverszible Arrow of time.We cannot in this physicality and its objectivity confound the things.A begining is necessary.But your approach is interesting in a subjective extrapolation of this time.We are indeed eternal and infinite and without dimensions, but we are in aphysicality where we have time, dimensions and evolution of mass.So we must make a difference with this subjectivity comparated with nthis objectivity,even if they converge with our mind.Best to both of you

Dear Vladimir, you are very absorbed in their thoughts, creating new definitions of proto-medium, peony, etc. , I agree with your fractal hierarchy, it is in good agreement with the densest hexagonal packing.

When I introduced something similar, but then agreed with Descartes, who argued that space equals matter. The concept of moving space-matter helped me:

To convert the uncertainty principle Heisenberg in the principle of definiteness of points of space-matter;

To reveal the law of the constancy of the flow of forces through a closed surface space-matter;

To formulate the law of gravitation Lorentz;

Give the formula of the pressure of the Universe;

To reveal the essence of gravitational mass as the flow vector of the centrifugal acceleration across the surface of the corpuscles, etc.

From New Cartesian Physic great potential in understanding the world. To show this potential in his essay I gave materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural. Inmay, I made a mistake that has bound New Cartesian physiks with the paranormal and supernatural, because it does not attract the attention of others. Visit my essay and you will find something in it about New Cartesian Physic.

Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko.

в--ў

Отправить перевод

dear Vladimir Rodin, I think your essay and my essay pisses a bit overlap in terms of motion but you are arguing about the causative facts to rely at its mechanistic foundation but I am trying to explain what you and I could see and observe the facts in terms of motion through the way of dealing force...a real force, much different in the pattern and formulation than that of Newtonian.... I am totally unclear about your eassay which is to philisopic but one thing I have distinguish is about the definate states of inertia for the material body (like the definite states of energy of electron in its orbit) ,........but if you look through my way there is no really the inertial effect that the moving bodies really posses....we are illusioned for more than 3 centuries about this kind of concept......further, you mention that we could get the unified theory from your interpretations..but I don't see real mathemathical frame in your essay to be so....you know i could say in my essay that there is no dark matter as my equation would fit to the tally fisher result exactly...but I didn't.... why?...because I should first do all calculations...and if got fitted then only expose it out....so, in my view to refound the real foundations of physics we rather need to think more critically in what we could see and observe...

best regards from Nepal

Dear Vladimir Rodin,

I am just reading your essay. It is probably so interesting for me. I have to studiously read and understand your essay. After reading your essay completely, I will post my comment on your essay.

Best Wishes,

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

Dear Vladimir Rodin,

I have read your essay which deserves a high appreciation. It agree with your point of view and the approach. I will by all means find time for detailed acquaintance with your works.

I think that there is a simple mechanical motion of fundamental reality behind the complicated reactions and phenomena.

I think that the aether came from ancient Creek was proposed by the greatest philosophers. We should remember they began now day's science. I cannot think that the greatest philosophers said completely wrong.

I think that at the foundation of the natural structure (Foundations of Hierarchy), there might not be any energy dissipation while being perfect.

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

Dear Vladimir,

I have read with great interest your deep analytical essay with ideas and conclusions, that will help us overcome the crisis of understanding in fundamental science through the creation of a new comprehensive picture of the world, uniform for physicists and lyrics filled with meanings of the "LifeWorld" (E.Husserl). FQXI Contests are first of all new ideas. You give new ideas,

I consider particularly important:

«This magical presence appears, first of all, in the form of preon offset»

«The preon offset phenomenon is an elegant way to bypass the poorly-grounded concept of "space curvature" when it comes to describing, for example, the nature of gravitation.»

«In view of the foregoing, the complete period of harmonized disturbance in closed corpuscle circuits is always proportional to the number of proto-element pairs that form those circuits, and the number of the pairs is a multiple of three.»

«Those who can take a more courageous step will assume that substance is a complex of matter and antimatter like a complex variable in mathematics: an imaginary part of an imaginary number corresponds to the antimaterial part of substance.... Antimatter exposes itself as a wave response to preon offset.»

«...a source of action, or that very versatile criterion that allows explaining the motion as an evidence of interactions at all levels of the material hierarchy.»

«...according to law (1), the existence of any kind of matter (i.e. the material World itself) is conditional upon the ability to retain the constant value of corpuscular disturbance (substance) transfer speed in proto-medium of the Universe at various levels of its fractal hierarchy.»

I believe that the actualization of the concept of the "basic law of the Universe" is extremely important in order to see the Universe as a whole and build a model of the "self-aware Universe" (Vasily Nalimov) .

Yours faithfully,

Vladimir

Dear Vladimir,

This is an interesting and provocative Essay. Although I do not agree with all your claims, I think that your ideas should deserve to be spread in the scientific community. Hence, I decided to give you the highest score.

Congratulations and good luck in the Contest.

I hope that you will have a chance to read our Essay.

Cheers, Ch.