Dear Vladimir,
thank you very much for the substantial comment and appreciation of my work.
All of us know that the way to the true is infinite, but there are criteria on which it is possible to estimate correctness of scientific approaches. The first of such criteria is simplification of model of a material world, the second is experimental acknowledgement of the offered model. It would be desirable to believe that it will be possible to me both that and another.
Sincerely yours,
Vladimir
Dear Vladimir Rodin,
Thank you for your kind words.
With great interest I read your essay.
Your essay allowed to consider us like-minded people.
I'm going to write a comment on your work in your forum thread.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Dear Vladimir,
With great interest I read your essay. I agree with you that the process of cognition is arranged in such a way that the matter in the long run is always for the small. Behind a tedious string of dry mathematical signs and formulas lies a modest and clear, sometimes deafening image of a new idea.
I have investigated some similar problems, for example, the unity between micro and macro". Femtotechnologies Presentation .
Best wiches
Vladimir,
I found your ideas and conceptions very interesting and mostly well conceived. I also generally like and agree with your descriptions that
" wave disturbance of the proto-medium, leads to the formation of materialized (having mass) matter that also enjoys wave properties"
and certainly of; "infinite hierarchical nesting of material systems." which I've identified lead to important new understanding in past essays.
I too address that; "Elementary disturbances in a vacuum are transferred by means of spinor polarization, i.e. the transfer of angular momentum (qubit of data) via connected pixel pairs" and would be interested in your views on my own derivations.
Well done, and Best wishes
Peter
Peter,
thanks a lot for attention to my essay and also for some consent with not the most important thoughts of my work. It's certainly pleasant. It's less pleasant to observe how some trolls already in the fifth time lower my rating without comments. Well, as great Confucius told: «If to you someone spits in a back, it means that you ahead».
I already read your article and I'll comment on it in the near future in your thread. Should notice that you have not badly coped with your work too.
Best regards,
Vladimir
Vladimir,
Thanks for your kind comments on mine too. The trolls should have their 1's re-applied to their own or be disqualified, it would be simple to have a rule to stop it. Both I and Jonathen have proposed wordings on the essay admin blog. I've now had 11 1's applied in all!
In compensation for the hits on yours I'm scoring it highly now, well deserved anyway.
Best of luck.
Peter
Dear Vladimir
I enjoyed reading your essay and tried to understand your proposed system. In another essay of yours Puzzles and Laws a figure shows space as made up of spherical pixels - this is very similar to my 2005 Beautiful Universe (BU) Model - but your approach is more analytical.
Question - Why nested universes? Isn't one enough ? A figure would be helpful to explain your concept.
I do accept the concept of preons but could not understand the idea of preon effect of symmetry of Compton wavelength that you mention.
In my BU model time emerges from the analysis of stored 'images' of the various 'now' states of the Universe. Time has no absolute existence of its own. Without time the speed of light cannot be constant - that concept depends on variable time and space dimensions as defined by Einstein - a totally artificial idea.
You describe motion " The motion of physical bodies in a vacuum is, actually, a sequential phase sublimation of fractally structured disturbances of the vacuum itself" - this is very similar to how I conceive it in BU - a pattern of energy moving in the nodes (preons) which themselves do not move. Your preons have energy, but in (BU) they have polarity - otherwise how can matter emerge out of space?
I wish you all the best in your work and in this contest!
Vladimir
Dear Vladimir,
I have to admit that mostly I am puzzled by your composition, so that I do not even see how it does relate to the topic of this contest. One thing though attracted my attention in a special way:
"Eternity in our Universe is just a moment for the next level Universe, which our one is nested in, as a spatial pixel."
This image reminded me the butterfly parable of Chuang Chou (Zhuangzi), leading to his famous question, repeated much later by Descartes: what if all wanderings toward goals are totally misleading and futile, as dreams? Apparently, the Chinese sage left this problem unresolved, while the French father of science gave his circular solution. I guess this problem belongs to the core of the contest's topic.
Cheers,
Alexey Burov.
Vladimir,
I was disappointed that there was nothing in your essay about wandering or goals or aims, though I must admit the word "intention" was used!! Why didn't you address the topic of the essay?
Best wishes,
Lorraine
Above post was from me.
You know Lorraine, the first reason is simple up to banality. I participate the first time in FQXi contest; my friend has suggested me to take а part. I was very busy then have charged to my assistant to submit one of my fresh works.
Secondly I believe that in my work is clearly enough expressed both the goals and intentions, despite a lack of such words in the text. The New Paradigm of Motion offers the new approach in the description of the laws of dynamics on purpose to explain the reason of origin of all interactions.
In global sense, the goal of evolution of the Universe is reflected in the title of my theory; "Hierarchical Stabilization of Systems", in which basis the New Paradigm of Motion lies.
Best regards,
Vladimir
Vladimir,
thinking about it some more, I realise that we share an interest in "what is the Motion?", though I come to a different conclusion to you about it. So, I hope you keep up the good work on this important issue.
Regards,
Lorraine
Lorraine,
my Paradigm just offers the answers to three fundamental questions:
1. "What is the Motion?"
2. "What is a source of the Motion?"
3. "How should be defined (mathematically) the fundamental Law of Dynamics?"
I'd tell slightly more, on the basis of my theoretical research, I've calculated exact distribution of all kinds of the Matter (Energy) in our Universe including Dark Metter and Dark Energy. My results are correlated to the empirical and theoretical data of advanced science.
It's certainly pleasant, but it is not the main thing for me.
Cheers,
Vladimir
