New paradigm of motion by Vladimir Rodin

Dear Vladimir, you are very absorbed in their thoughts, creating new definitions of proto-medium, peony, etc. , I agree with your fractal hierarchy, it is in good agreement with the densest hexagonal packing.

When I introduced something similar, but then agreed with Descartes, who argued that space equals matter. The concept of moving space-matter helped me:

To convert the uncertainty principle Heisenberg in the principle of definiteness of points of space-matter;

To reveal the law of the constancy of the flow of forces through a closed surface space-matter;

To formulate the law of gravitation Lorentz;

Give the formula of the pressure of the Universe;

To reveal the essence of gravitational mass as the flow vector of the centrifugal acceleration across the surface of the corpuscles, etc.

From New Cartesian Physic great potential in understanding the world. To show this potential in his essay I gave materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural. Inmay, I made a mistake that has bound New Cartesian physiks with the paranormal and supernatural, because it does not attract the attention of others. Visit my essay and you will find something in it about New Cartesian Physic.

Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko.

в--ў

Отправить перевод

dear Vladimir Rodin, I think your essay and my essay pisses a bit overlap in terms of motion but you are arguing about the causative facts to rely at its mechanistic foundation but I am trying to explain what you and I could see and observe the facts in terms of motion through the way of dealing force...a real force, much different in the pattern and formulation than that of Newtonian.... I am totally unclear about your eassay which is to philisopic but one thing I have distinguish is about the definate states of inertia for the material body (like the definite states of energy of electron in its orbit) ,........but if you look through my way there is no really the inertial effect that the moving bodies really posses....we are illusioned for more than 3 centuries about this kind of concept......further, you mention that we could get the unified theory from your interpretations..but I don't see real mathemathical frame in your essay to be so....you know i could say in my essay that there is no dark matter as my equation would fit to the tally fisher result exactly...but I didn't.... why?...because I should first do all calculations...and if got fitted then only expose it out....so, in my view to refound the real foundations of physics we rather need to think more critically in what we could see and observe...

best regards from Nepal

Dear Vladimir Rodin,

I am just reading your essay. It is probably so interesting for me. I have to studiously read and understand your essay. After reading your essay completely, I will post my comment on your essay.

Best Wishes,

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

Dear Vladimir Rodin,

I have read your essay which deserves a high appreciation. It agree with your point of view and the approach. I will by all means find time for detailed acquaintance with your works.

I think that there is a simple mechanical motion of fundamental reality behind the complicated reactions and phenomena.

I think that the aether came from ancient Creek was proposed by the greatest philosophers. We should remember they began now day's science. I cannot think that the greatest philosophers said completely wrong.

I think that at the foundation of the natural structure (Foundations of Hierarchy), there might not be any energy dissipation while being perfect.

Ch.Bayarsaikhan

Dear Vladimir,

I have read with great interest your deep analytical essay with ideas and conclusions, that will help us overcome the crisis of understanding in fundamental science through the creation of a new comprehensive picture of the world, uniform for physicists and lyrics filled with meanings of the "LifeWorld" (E.Husserl). FQXI Contests are first of all new ideas. You give new ideas,

I consider particularly important:

«This magical presence appears, first of all, in the form of preon offset»

«The preon offset phenomenon is an elegant way to bypass the poorly-grounded concept of "space curvature" when it comes to describing, for example, the nature of gravitation.»

«In view of the foregoing, the complete period of harmonized disturbance in closed corpuscle circuits is always proportional to the number of proto-element pairs that form those circuits, and the number of the pairs is a multiple of three.»

«Those who can take a more courageous step will assume that substance is a complex of matter and antimatter like a complex variable in mathematics: an imaginary part of an imaginary number corresponds to the antimaterial part of substance.... Antimatter exposes itself as a wave response to preon offset.»

«...a source of action, or that very versatile criterion that allows explaining the motion as an evidence of interactions at all levels of the material hierarchy.»

«...according to law (1), the existence of any kind of matter (i.e. the material World itself) is conditional upon the ability to retain the constant value of corpuscular disturbance (substance) transfer speed in proto-medium of the Universe at various levels of its fractal hierarchy.»

I believe that the actualization of the concept of the "basic law of the Universe" is extremely important in order to see the Universe as a whole and build a model of the "self-aware Universe" (Vasily Nalimov) .

Yours faithfully,

Vladimir

Dear Vladimir,

This is an interesting and provocative Essay. Although I do not agree with all your claims, I think that your ideas should deserve to be spread in the scientific community. Hence, I decided to give you the highest score.

Congratulations and good luck in the Contest.

I hope that you will have a chance to read our Essay.

Cheers, Ch.

Dear Vladimir Rodin,

Thank you for your kind words.

With great interest I read your essay.

Your essay allowed to consider us like-minded people.

I'm going to write a comment on your work in your forum thread.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov

Dear Vladimir,

With great interest I read your essay. I agree with you that the process of cognition is arranged in such a way that the matter in the long run is always for the small. Behind a tedious string of dry mathematical signs and formulas lies a modest and clear, sometimes deafening image of a new idea.

I have investigated some similar problems, for example, the unity between micro and macro". Femtotechnologies Presentation .

Best wiches

Vladimir,

I found your ideas and conceptions very interesting and mostly well conceived. I also generally like and agree with your descriptions that

" wave disturbance of the proto-medium, leads to the formation of materialized (having mass) matter that also enjoys wave properties"

and certainly of; "infinite hierarchical nesting of material systems." which I've identified lead to important new understanding in past essays.

I too address that; "Elementary disturbances in a vacuum are transferred by means of spinor polarization, i.e. the transfer of angular momentum (qubit of data) via connected pixel pairs" and would be interested in your views on my own derivations.

Well done, and Best wishes

Peter

Vladimir,

Thanks for your kind comments on mine too. The trolls should have their 1's re-applied to their own or be disqualified, it would be simple to have a rule to stop it. Both I and Jonathen have proposed wordings on the essay admin blog. I've now had 11 1's applied in all!

In compensation for the hits on yours I'm scoring it highly now, well deserved anyway.

Best of luck.

Peter

Dear Vladimir

I enjoyed reading your essay and tried to understand your proposed system. In another essay of yours Puzzles and Laws a figure shows space as made up of spherical pixels - this is very similar to my 2005 Beautiful Universe (BU) Model - but your approach is more analytical.

Question - Why nested universes? Isn't one enough ? A figure would be helpful to explain your concept.

I do accept the concept of preons but could not understand the idea of preon effect of symmetry of Compton wavelength that you mention.

In my BU model time emerges from the analysis of stored 'images' of the various 'now' states of the Universe. Time has no absolute existence of its own. Without time the speed of light cannot be constant - that concept depends on variable time and space dimensions as defined by Einstein - a totally artificial idea.

You describe motion " The motion of physical bodies in a vacuum is, actually, a sequential phase sublimation of fractally structured disturbances of the vacuum itself" - this is very similar to how I conceive it in BU - a pattern of energy moving in the nodes (preons) which themselves do not move. Your preons have energy, but in (BU) they have polarity - otherwise how can matter emerge out of space?

I wish you all the best in your work and in this contest!

Vladimir

Dear Vladimir,

I have to admit that mostly I am puzzled by your composition, so that I do not even see how it does relate to the topic of this contest. One thing though attracted my attention in a special way:

"Eternity in our Universe is just a moment for the next level Universe, which our one is nested in, as a spatial pixel."

This image reminded me the butterfly parable of Chuang Chou (Zhuangzi), leading to his famous question, repeated much later by Descartes: what if all wanderings toward goals are totally misleading and futile, as dreams? Apparently, the Chinese sage left this problem unresolved, while the French father of science gave his circular solution. I guess this problem belongs to the core of the contest's topic.

Cheers,

Alexey Burov.

Vladimir,

I was disappointed that there was nothing in your essay about wandering or goals or aims, though I must admit the word "intention" was used!! Why didn't you address the topic of the essay?

Best wishes,

Lorraine