Dear Jose

Thank you for your enlightning post.

Of course QM is grainy, it is the essence of the this way of thinking.

A way of thinking is expressed as "idea". Ideas are also constituted of parts because no idea can exist without time, it is the "order" of the parts of the idea that are constituting a new idea through consciousness.

The infinite loop of "pulsations" as you name it, is also a way of thinking, so in my perception an availability, thee reducing is again the result of time, we just cannot perceive a timeless and spaceless infinity of thoughts. But any thought is a part of the TOTAL, without the smallest there is no Total.

best regards

Wilhelmus

So we agree that our 3-D universe is an emergent phenomenon.

Quanta does not mean: inbetween these "units" there is a "space".

Regards,

Branko

    My dear Wilhelmus,

    I can be with you completely agree, when I see how growing my grandchildren in the other world than it has been in our time.

    I can also think that maybe the crocodile can be born from the chiken eggs with the time! However, I never can think that energy preservation law, or the value of pi (3,14 ...), can be changeable, in the past, or in the future.

    I have initially put high score on your essay because it is informative and written just beautiful! Excuse me if something is not that!

    Best wishes

      Hi Wihelmus,

      No she is dead 3 years ago and my grang father also like my father.I have no brother nor sister,alone with two small dogs.She is dead due to cancer and depression.I have had a lot in 41 years you know.I try to take the force of this faith instead of this depression due to an ocean of sufferings and personal sufferings.This planet is sometimes very difficult psychologically speaking.But it is like that,some have easier others more difficult.I accept my situation and I try to evolve.I am thanking you Wihelmus ,It is nice in all case,take care.

      Friendly

      Dear George,

      In your emergent reality (the one you are experiencing right now) and in our collective NOW memory, energy preservation and pi are stable,. Changing of life-line may reveal that they may be changing, when you change life lines you are not aware of the specific changes.

      I thank you for your rating, but it is best not to talk about in the threads I think.

      best regards

      Wilhelmus

      Wilhelmus de Wilde,

      QM is based on simultaneity of grainy and continuous. A photon is a particle and wave at the same time. Einstein, though he had a crucial role in developing the quantum concept, never agreed with this uncertainty. The metaphysical beauty of QM lies in this uncertainty, 'God playing dice'. Physical reality may not be that much beautiful.

      Jose P Koshy

      Dear Jose,

      I agree with you that our emerging physical reality is not that much beautiful. God playing dice means for me Total Consciousness leading to the blinking of a time and space restricted consiousness with all its uncertainties, defaults and incomprehensions. We are just smelling at TS through our thinking of QM.

      best regards

      Wilhelmus

      Thank you very much dear Sridattadev.

      I am going to inhale your essay right now

      Wilhelmus

      Dear Mr. Wilhelmus de Wilde,

      Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

      I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate."

      Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

      The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

      A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

      Joe Fisher, Realist

      I did not rate your essay. I do not expect you to rate my essay. I am not bargaining with you. I am educating you.

      Joe Fisher, Realist

      Okay then it was acoincidence that just after your post another 1 came on.

      But...Your realism is not mine as you will know when you read my essay...

      I respect every perception of others but also expect that from them, each "education" as you are putting it is not only a way of sharing knowledge, but it is also away of trying to change the conclusions of the apprentrice. I am aware that you never will be able to know the totality, so yes I am learning every day with an open mind. I hope that your interpretation of what you call "realism" is also open for transformations in order to en large your knowledge. So perhaps in a few years you may think that the title "realist" is not covering the contents of your philosphy.

      regards

      Wilhelmus

      Your paper definitely gives food for thought. In particular, trying to explain entanglement in a different way is nice because it is something that has always bewildered me how entanglement can truly be possible.

      I agree that there are so many different paths and choices that we all take, and collectively, this could result in an infinite number of possibilities. But I sure hope that this doesn't mean that there are parallel universes where our decisions spawn a parallel path. It's hard to prove or disprove a parallel universe, but I personally believe that they don't exist. I believe that nature is simple and I sure hope that we can prove this one day.

        Dear Jeff,

        I also think that paralel universes don't EXIST is our own reality, and as we cannot (yet) jump from one reality to another by trespassing the Planck Wall, the paralel and other realities are only probabilities outside our own. It is like I mentioned in the essay : the dimension behind the Planck Wall doesn't exist in our emergent phenomenon. Other emergent phenomenae are only thoughts.

        best regards

        Wilhelmus

        Dear Wilhelmus

        I am struggling with some of your concepts such as ENM, but agree very much with the e Subjective Simultaneity Sphere. This was in effect pointed out by Helmholz a long while ago.

        For me "now" is not eternal but is continually changing.

        Regards

        George Ellis

          Dear George,

          Thank you for your answer on my essay and the reference to von Helmholz.

          NOW is never eternal in our emerging reality, we experience a FLOW of time.

          This 'flow" is the result of the capacity of our memory. The continuation of this flow is created by the addition of a new NOW moment. This new NOW moment is originating from Total Simultaneity where it is a timeless entity (so eternal) and I called it the ENM. The ENM is NOT existing in our emergent phenomenon called REALITY.

          Our experience (like you are saying is continually changing) of NOW is entangled with its "ENM" in TS but NOT existing in our experience of reality. The timeless ENM becomes an addition to a timeless experience in our memory.

          I hope to have explained my interpretation.

          best regards

          Wilhelmus

          Wilhelmus,

          First, a minor criticism. You use a lot of acronyms that are of your creation. Until something is widely accepted as an acronym, it is better not to do this. It makes it difficult for the reader.

          The real meat of your essay starts when you discuss the two slit experiment. That is a nice touch and fits well with the flow of things. I was not aware of the delayed choice experiment by Wheeler ... many thanks. The interpretation of the Wheeler experiment and the discussion of Bob and Alice then follows cleanly. The diagrams you provide here are helpful.

          It seems to me that what you describe as TS Consciousness is similar to the complex plane in my essay.

          All in all this is a respectable effort.

          Best Regards and Good Luck,

          Gary Simpson