Dear Semyonovich,

Dzrasti !

Your observations are excellent,

1. Throughout his life, starting with the first steps, a person accumulates in the subconscious mental images, able to control his organs on the principle of "if this, then that." These images of the action, emerging from the subconscious to consciousness force the person to perform certain actions and define his life.

2. The abstractness of mathematical laws, especially in symbolic form makes them on the one hand mindless and on the other hand they are based on experiences with counting objects, which have accumulated during the long period of human development in the form of mental images that pop up in the mind and causing reaction of eye pupils to a higher or lower.

3. I just have a desire to acquaint others with New Cartesian Physics. But many don't want to know because they have formed own worldview, model Logo, and no one wants to break it, everyone is on his own opinion, opposing someone else's. Exit here alone - to introduce her for young physicists, when they are still in school and have begun to wander towards a Goal.

Hope you don't mind a little discussion................

You are correct; everybody samples the world and accumulates images through his senses. May be visual, may be by touch or taste. All these images are accumulated in brain as experience images... Mind acts on these images. Mathematical laws are formed by mind by comparing some of these relevant images. Then these math laws tested and later will be given out to the world. What do you say?

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Best wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please................

spasibo

=snp. gupta

    Dear Branko!

    Thank you for the nickname you gave me: "Semyonovich" in your reference.

    My name is Boris Dizhechko. My English is no, I use the electronic translator.

    An essay is a literary genre, not a research report. According to the proposed topic, I had to show how the mathematical formulas define my purpose and intention in life. I may be wrong, as the majority of participants went beyond this genre. Wrong, perhaps, in the fact that I tied the New Cartesian physics with the paranormal and supernatural, as it did not attract the attention of others.

    I respect Balkovec, however, he attracted and repelled particles, but I consider the movement of space inside of the corpuscle, where it spreads as a wave of Compton.

    Half of the Schwarzschild radius occurs when considering the energy leaving the black hole, I consider the radius of the orbit, where the space is moving at the speed of light, i.e. equal to the first cosmic velocity

    Now a question for you as a meteorologist. This winter we are constantly blowing South wind. I believe that when the summer axis of the Earth turns to the Sun, and the movement of air masses will remain in the same orbits, we will often blowing North wind. Am I right or not?

    Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko.

    Dear Boris,

    Very interesting analysis in the spirit of radical Cartesian doubt and ideas to help find a way out of the modern crisis of understanding in fundamental science. Indeed, "WorldUnderstanding - SpaceUnderstanding". (Pavel Florensky) Necessary to search a reliable knowledge base with the conscious use of the competing gnoseological paradigms. The whole history of basic science and the current crisis confirms this necessity.

    Good luck in the contest!

    Yours faithfully,

    Vladimir

      Dear SNP. Gupta!

      The dynamic model agrees well with the concept of moving space-matter. I am a materialist and so I say that space is matter. All visible body, the planets, the stars are benchmarks that indicate the movement of the space. Physical space that moves, should be distinguished from a fixed geometric space.

      You are correct; everybody samples the world and accumulates images through his senses. May be visual, may be by touch or taste. All these images are accumulated in brain as experience images... Mind acts on these images. Mathematical laws are formed by mind by comparing some of these relevant images. Then these math laws tested and later will be given out to the world. What do you say?

      Here you understood me correctly. I said only that in the creation of a mental image involves not only the molecules of the brain, but the space between them that comes out and is able to influence both our actions, and on the space of other bodies.

      Sorry, I do not know English and use online translator, so it's hard for me to discuss.

      I wish you success!

      Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko

      в--ў

      Отправить перевод

      Dear Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich,

      Please excuse me for I have no intention of disparaging in any way any part of your essay.

      I merely wish to point out that "Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." Albert Einstein (1879 - 1955) Physicist & Nobel Laureate.

      Only nature could produce a reality so simple, a single cell amoeba could deal with it.

      The real Universe must consist only of one unified visible infinite physical surface occurring in one infinite dimension, that am always illuminated by infinite non-surface light.

      A more detailed explanation of natural reality can be found in my essay, SCORE ONE FOR SIMPLICITY. I do hope that you will read my essay and perhaps comment on its merit.

      Joe Fisher, Realist

      Thank you fore your post on my essay. Here are also you gave a Nice reply

      Best wishes to your essay...

      =snp.gupta

      Dear Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich,

      Thank you for the explanations.... It is ok.Thank you for your posts on my essay.

      Thank you for the fast replies and Blessings. The translator is not very good. But I got the central idea.

      Best Wishes for your essay

      =snp.gupta

      Boris,

      This is a very interesting essay. I'm not sure I would have included the speculation regarding psychic ability, but I see the connection between your form of the Lorentz Transform and what I present as a hypothesis in Equation 2 of my essay.

      One of the considerations for quaternions is that they allow for space to be rotated as desired. I have tried to think of what this might mean on the microscopic scale. You have given something very serious to think about.

      Best Regards and Good Luck,

      Gary Simpson

        Gary, I believe that we should not focus on the adoption of the concept of space-time. In New Cartesian Physic space rotates in the micro and in the macro scale. If you're using quaternions will show the rotation of the space - it will be perfect!

        Success to you!

        Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko.

        Boris,

        There is a Physicist whose work might interest you. His name is Milo Wolff. He died roughly a year ago. His work focused upon a scalar solution to the spherical wave equation. His work is generally called the Wave Structure of Matter.

        Best Regards and Good Luck,

        Gary Simpson

          Gary,

          Miles Wolff is worthy of respect. However, he did not make a radical step towards recognizing the identity of space and matter, the first which recognized Descartes. Waves of space there are, however, more important than the vortex space.

          Cartesian Physic claims that the space rotates, the speed of its movement in the center of the vortex reaches the speed of light and due to time dilation its nucleus becomes stable. That is the model of corpuscle. If you can show it with quaternions, it will be greatest achievement for the New Cartesian Physic. I have appreciated your essay.

          Success to you!

          Sincerely, Boris Dizhechko

          Dr. Semyonovich,

          I think your idea concerning the interdependence of matter and space and its implication that the continuum is always in motion may be onto something.

          My essay, Rethinking the Universe, argues that the interdependence extends to time, and is incessantly manifest as gravity. Even your hypothesis seems to imply (as mine certainly does) that matter-space interdependence means the average density of the Universe is constant.

          Most importantly, the model I've proposed can be tested with a simple, feasible experiment. I hope you find it to be of interest.

          Richard Benish

            Boris Dizhechko,

            The imagination and ideas of the brain are very important as you have noted in my essay.

            I thought you may be also be interested to read the essay of Christoper Fiorillo who discusses meaningful information and says that even particles have information, although particle information is very limited. I also think you may enjoy a book on Amazon Kindle by Grey House titled "Making Waves".

            I had trouble following some of your formulas as your text describing the formula was different than the formula itself. The translation from Russian to English may have caused this confusion.

            Your name appears in FQXi as Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich, so it was an difficult to find your essay. You mentioned a rating of my essay, however, it has not appeared.

            William Goodwin

            Dear Boris Semyonovich!

            Your approach to an explanation of the space and the matter is very close and clear to me, for example conception of the mass, but some positions I treat differently.

            I don't consider that the space moves. The geometry or, more precisely, topology of the space underlies the movement laws. Movement is the wavy disturbance transferred in space as is longitudinal with a velocity of light (massless radiation), and in the form of corpuscles (closed disturbed chains) possessing with mass which transfer speed in space is constant and equal to two thirds of velocity of light. This conservation law defines dynamics of all interactions. Thus in my statement the space is a material basis (scalar proto-medium) at which disturbance the corpuscular matter (substance) is formed. The substance moves in space with constant speed. Depending on energy change the length of a wave of a wave fragmentation of substance in space changes only. Movement occurs just in a space, not concerning of a space. From this point of view your thesis «the Space is a matter, the matter is a space» is certainly true.

            Of course, your work deserves an appreciation.

            Best regards,

            Vladimir A. Rodin

            Dear Boris!

            I am very grateful to your attention to my work and your willingness to support me. I downloaded your work and began to study it. And it seems to me that we are striving for a largely common goal.

            1. You note, for example, that you explained the essence of the Lorentz transformation in the Cartesian coordinate system - this is extremely interesting to me, because I also tried to do the same, though, somewhat differently (see in Ref. [3]).

            2. You also talk about the principle of uncertainty of Heisenberg, which is also an intriguing topic for me.

            3. The problem of gravity, and the task of accurately assessing Einstein's legacy, are also very close to me questions.

            4. On your results on the interpretation of paranormal phenomena, however, I can not say anything definite, because I have not dealt with these problems yet. But, I'm sure that I can find there valuable approaches for me, in the near future. If questions arise, I think you will help!

            So, for this preliminary inspection, I can only welcome your work and definitely support you!

            With good wishes,

            Here is my requested reader response, Boris ! Science has deviated from the logos (memra)of divine vibrations, i.e. the destruction of creation coninues, because there is no healthy balance between a science 'for economic production/human consumption' and a 'science for life'. Concerning new Cartesian physics, I have been reading your 2 scientific articles in the I-Net. Good work.In my opinion, the best testing field for your approach is the human body and medical science. I am in agreement with your physical conclusion that the living human body is more than matter (space) and energy (motion), i.e. cellular consciousness is scientifically very probable which implies the method of integrative healing. The aging of the cellular body may be a direct consequence of disconnecting human consciousness from the logos.Good luck: stephen

            After reading many other entries in this contest and the few responses to my entry, I think something has been missed in my entry.

            A point of the little story of the two physics students was to highlight a significant point. They did not see the reality of the situation with the penny. They concluded with their own idea of what happened.

            The point is that is that our ability to intend and control our future may well be dependent on something else and we deceive ourselves in seeing the reality of the situation. In other words, "We don't understand anything yet and deceive ourselves thinking we are conscious."

              David, thank you for your question.

              If you believe that mass is the flow vector of the centrifugal acceleration across the surface of the corpuscle, the square root of the mass would mean the flux of the vector of the centrifugal acceleration across the line lying on the surface of the corpuscle. The number of 2/3 comes from the fact that the surface has two dimensions, a line one dimension and only exists in space of three dimensions.

              I wish you success!

              Dizhechko Boris

              Wiemy, al Schneider, I have no way to force you to believe in the identity of space and matter as there is ordinary consciousness and the scientific consciousness. Ordinary consciousness is used to look at space as an empty space, it's easier for him to live. Scientific consciousness to explain certain phenomena, it is necessary to fill the space fields, physical vacuum, dark matter, etc. I say Why do it? We have a space that is matter, and the rest is its condition. It helped me, for example, find the pressure force on particles of the Universe. All movements in the real world occur under the influence of this pressure. The impact of this knowledge on our future - don't know. Perhaps everyday, our minds will not notice New Cartesian Physic and will continue to live, as it exists now.

              "I wish you doze off in the dark!" - so said one of our poet.

              Dizhechko Boris