Dear Vladimir,

I have been very interested in LIGO and LISA projects, I read an article last year from Russian scientist that predicted that the gravitational waves that were detected recently, would happen about couple of hundred times per year,

As Japanese, Chinese German and Italian scientist are building or improving their antennas to be more sensitive for gravitational waves, and I really hope that all these stations would grab these waves simultaneously, what is your opinion??

Kind regards

Koorosh

Thank you, Dear Vladimir Nikolayevich, for your kindly attention on my work and for favorable words.

I have read your nice article also and fully agreed with you in many points. I especially like your vortex - toroidal structures that can form elementary particles. So, we can welcome each to other as realistically thinking engineers.

Of course, we can have some disagreements also what we have actually. The matter is you are a mechanical engineer and I am a poor electrical engineer only. That is why we must always to fight on the question - which principles should be in the base of formation the primordial substance of matter - is this should be mechanical or the electrical?

I see you are silently - intuitively inclined on the mechanical side that is why you cannot be free from the environment (I mean the physical vacuum with its special, different properties).

Here I have nothing to tell you, but only I will ask to you to listening advice of old man - try to build everything from the beginning without using any of hypothetical (unproven) things. (Let me tell only that it is really is possible!)

To help you somewhat, I will tell you that the physical vacuum is the same undetectable ether that was silently renamed, to be solve the huge problems in the microcosm for this time. You and I have big respects to Einstein. His first greatest merit was that he realized whole unnecessary of physical environment (that we can call the ether, physical vacuum or other) and he try remove it out from physics. Moreover, there is the proven kind of physical reality that can exist and work itself - without any environment, which are the electromagnetic field. The second greatest merit of Einstein (in my view) is that he says; everything can be build from this single kind of reality only that is the electromagnetic field! So, try please to work without physical vacuum!

With all this, I see your work as a good significant.

I wish you successes!

Dear Gupta

«....................... Do you mean these 'vortices of deeper level of matter' have no relation with Gravitational waves....?»

Yes, you are right, vortices rotate in pairs in opposite directions. Pairs of vortexes are formed simultaneously, to compensate for the torque. They are only in pairs can quantum-parametrically converted, often through a phase of photons.

«............... I think these pairs of vortices are rotating in opposite directions. What do you say....?»

"Vortices of deeper level of matter" are the same as gravity waves (vortices), but of deeper level of matter. There are many levels of matter, so do not call them a specific name. To each level of matter corresponds its fundamental interaction.

We know three fundamental interactions from set. A fourth weak interaction is not interaction, this merely phase transition of the electron from orbit of neutron on orbit of hydrogen atom. I.e., the neutron contains the electron-positron pair and converted into the proton. Electromagnetic fundamental interaction should be divided into two fundamental interactions - magnetic and electric, they are substantially different in propagation speed of interaction.

«............ What are your results....?»

Description and summary results are shown in 2 last paragraphs of my essay.

These results confirm the validity of the experiments of Michelson and Morley

In experiments it was found that interaction of the fundamental gravitational involved at least two levels of matter. One of them is the level of quark matter, other preon level of matter

[Section 2.2., Figure 13.].

My comments about your essay will be on your forum thread.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov

Dear Boris Semyonovich

Thank you for your kind words.

With regard to the supernatural, it is necessary to call all their names. And Einstein's theory of relativity and the quantum mechanics are using abstract and ideal (supernatural) properties of matter and fields. I would have called the theories as "general the Bible of relativity, " and "the bible of quantum mechanics", this is, in my opinion, better reflects their nature. This is what would smile.

My comments about your essay will be on your forum thread.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov

Dear Koorosh

I apologize for the delay in the response, I havenot enough time to process the information.

It's great that you are interested in a very interesting topic about LIGO and LISA.

In the Earth's magnetosphere often occur conversion powerful toroidal gravitational waves. In this case, there are intense bursts of electromagnetic radiation over a wide frequency range and recorded the characteristic signals of gravitational waves LIGO project, that unreasonably taken as the signals from the "binary pulsars".

At the end of my essay , I briefly described the simple and very sensitive setup I implemented for registering gravitational waves that actually record directed fluxes of gravitons. More details can be found in my article "Deterministic Gravitational Waves" in Section 2. In Section 5.7. is described a lot of toroidal gravitational waves (tedious), related to the Earth, which are registered by all gravitational and electromagnetic devices.

In the Earth's gravisphere there is a constant process of energy circulation by the formation of toroidal gravitational waves, their transformation into electromagnetic waves and back.

We can place on Earth and in space thousands of simple instruments for recording gravitational and electromagnetic waves and to process information.

And is posible also visually observe toroidal gravitational waves by photographing with various filters, including polarization ones. Gravitational waves deflect, change brightness and change the polarization of optical waves. The imposition of images with some combination of filters gives a visual image of toroidal gravitational waves. For example, images of toroidal gravitational waves of the Solar system Voyager-1 were obtained, In particular, the orbital toroidal gravitational wave of the Earth.

Directly on the surface of the Earth, one can obtain an image of toroidal gravitational waves that are perpendicular to the surface , like coronal loops on the Sun (the same toroidal gravitational waves). This image was obtained frosty night near Moscow. Such neutrino toroidal gravitational waves pierce us on Earth and form the force of gravity.

The system of visualization of toroidal gravitational waves would be very useful for aviation navigation, warning pilots of aircraft about powerful air pits from the action of toroidal gravitational waves.

My comments about your essay will be on your forum thread.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov

Dear George Kirakosyan

Many thanks for the criticism, for me it is very important.

I have no doubt in the big importance of your work.

I agree with you that there are significant differences between our views, but that's okay.

I do not think that we can achieve full understanding now, now is important exchang of information and a long process of reflection. Each of us must move by a parallel course in chosen direction.

Kind regards,

Vladimir Fedorov

1

Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov

Thank you for such nice post on my paper.

Thank you for all observations...

Thank you very much for your encouraging support.....

You wrote a big post with large number of different subjects! So I am dividing the whole post into 15 small posts, so that individual posts can be discussed separately and easily. Probably you will not mind it.

2

Your words...............

Excellent essay about the dynamic universe, it is so close to me.

You very correctly said that

«Ours is single universe and is a closed one. In other words, our Universe reproduces its Galaxies, as and when light and other electromagnetic radiation condenses to form enough matter».

I completely agree with you, although we use different terms.

Reply..........

Thank you for your Blessings.... Lets Discuss....

3

......... Your words..............................

The energy of gravitational waves is circulating in the Dynamic Universe. ......

.............. Reply ......The concept of Gravitational waves is not required in dynamic Universe Model

................Your words........Galaxies emit electromagnetic waves, and the intergalactic medium..............Reply...................

Aether was not found

I am giving 3 posts here for your information

Best regards

=snp.

Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov

I invite you and every physicist to read my work "TIME ORIGIN,DEFINITION AND EMPIRICAL MEANING FOR PHYSICISTS, Héctor Daniel Gianni ,I'm not a physicist.

How people interested in "Time" could feel about related things to the subject.

1) Intellectuals interested in Time issues usually have a nice and creative wander for the unknown.

2) They usually enjoy this wander of their searches around it.

3) For millenniums this wander has been shared by a lot of creative people around the world.

4) What if suddenly, something considered quasi impossible to be found or discovered such as "Time" definition and experimental meaning confronts them?

5) Their reaction would be like, something unbelievable,... a kind of disappointment, probably interpreted as a loss of wander.....

6) ....worst than that, if we say that what was found or discovered wasn't a viable theory, but a proved fact.

7) Then it would become offensive to be part of the millenary problem solution, instead of being a reason for happiness and satisfaction.

8) The reader approach to the news would be paradoxically adverse.

9) Instead, I think it should be a nice welcome to discovery, to be received with opened arms and considered to be read with full attention.

11)Time "existence" is exclusive as a "measuring system", its physical existence can't be proved by science, as the "time system" is. Experimentally "time" is "movement", we can prove that, showing that with clocks we measure "constant and uniform" movement and not "the so called Time".

12)The original "time manuscript" has 23 pages, my manuscript in this contest has only 9 pages.

I share this brief with people interested in "time" and with physicists who have been in sore need of this issue for the last 50 or 60 years.

Héctor

    Dear Vladimir,

    I read with great interest your deep analytical essay with ideas and conclusions that will help us overcome the crisis of understanding in fundamental science through the creation of a new comprehensive picture of the world, uniform for physicists and lyrics filled with meanings of the "LifeWorld" (E.Husserl). FQXI Contests are first of all new ideas - "crazy ideas" (N.Bohr). You give such ideas. I have one question: What is the ontological status of "the physical vacuum medium"? Yours faithfully, Vladimir

      Dear Héctor,

      Thank you for the invitation to your essey, I posted the answer on your forum thread.

      I liked your essay, especially the phrase

      «I can easily explain that "time dilation" is a physically inexistent phenomenon, because is just inertia or gravity "clocks slowing" and also can show in detail that twin paradox».

      I congratulate you with interesting thoughts and wish you every success in the contest.

      Kind regards,

      Vladimir

      Dear Vladimir Rogozhin

      Thank you very much for evaluating my essay and an interesting question.

      "Scientists consider physical vacuum to be a special state of matter that claims to be the foundation of the world."

      When I write about the environment of a physical vacuum, from an ontological point of view, I emphasize its real energy and material basis of the world, instead of an abstract foundation, in the form of emptiness, as well as virtual and quasiparticles.

      For example, phonons are generally considered quasiparticles, which form photons that carry real energy. I believe that such supernatural, phantom and abstract concepts should not be in science. All particles are real. If a photon is fixed, this means that in the physical vacuum environment there was a pair of real particles.

      On the one hand, matter consists of energy, on the other hand, it is energy that forms the mass. Mass derived from energy, it can be formed, under certain conditions, and may not be formed.

      For example, an electron-positron pair is actually a phonon (it is not a quasiparticle) that has energy and mass. "Annihilation" of the electron-positron pair leads to the formation of a pair of massless photons. Each photon carries half the energy of the electron-positron pair. In fact, one photon is the pure kinetic energy of an electron-positron pair. The potential energy of the electron-positron pair is a pair of vast gravispheres from the medium of the physical vacuum, which includes a set of de Broglie waves. Gravispheres form a mass, and their energy is parametrically transformed into a second photon during the "annihilation" process.

      Thus, the electron-positron pair has a mass, while the photon has no mass and its temperature is close to zero. At the same time, in the process of "annihilation" only the structure of the elements of matter has changed. For example, for an electron - the toroidal structure has turned into a cylindrical spiral. The electron, as consisted of a nematic sequence of 137 quarks, continues to consist of 137 quarks in the photon. In this case, the cross section of the interaction of a photon with the medium of a physical vacuum decreased by a factor of 137, in comparison with the electron-positron pair. Therefore, a photon is a pair of elements (a pair of baryons) of a deeper neutrino and quark level of the fractal structure of matter. Therefore, an electron in the Cooper pair can move in the equilibrium superconducting state only at a speed 43.6 times slower than the speed of light, and the photons move at the speed of light. A boson from a pair of quarks is a graviton (gluon).

      An electron-positron pair can be formed only from a photon with an energy of 1023 keV.

      The inverse transformation of photons with an energy of 511 keV into a pair of particles with an energy of 256 keV leads to the absorption of energy from the medium of the physical vacuum for constructing their gravispheres and mass formation. Therefore, laser cooling will allow cooling of the body, practically to zero temperature.

      In fact, "annihilation" of particles is the process of their division on the second subharmonic of a parametric transformation with the release of energy, which can be used to synthesize heavier particles with energy absorption.

      Thus, the process of division and synthesis of the elements of the physical vacuum environment is the main process of energy circulation in the universe, which leads to parametric resonance and solitons. Phase transformation of the elements of the physical vacuum environment is the cause of self-organization of matter according to the principles of the heat pump. This is the answer to the main question of this essay contest.

      Kind regards,

      Vladimir Fedorov

      Dear Vladimir

      I have read your fascinating essay full of your confident statements and calculations. I liked the small icons links to full size illustrations I should try that method in my future essays! The idea of hydrodynamical-like vortices forming matter in a universal fluid is intriguing. In my Beautiful Universe Model the universal lattice is formed of rotating dielectric nodes. A vortex has opposite spin direction if you look at its axis from different direction, and these spins may be the equivelant of the and - poles of the proposed dipole building blocks. The electromagnetic right- hand rule must derive from such primitive spins. You frequently mention deBroglie waves surroundng matter. I totally agree that such wave constitute the gravitational field. Beyond these remarks I am not technically qualified to comment on your essay. For example of the many equations you present I am not sure which are your own proposals and which are commonly accepted ones.I wish you good luck! Have fun with physics.

      Vladimir

      Dear Vladimir F. Tamari

      Many thanks for the kind words about my essay.

      My equation for the de Broglie waves is derived from the conventional equation and the momentum conservation law. In the conventional equation, it is unreasonably assumed that one can put any mass in the denominator and obtain, for example, the Planck mass and the Planck wavelength, as a de Broglie wave. However, I have shown that the existence of an element of the electronic level of matter with a greater mass than an electron is not possible. This also confirms the example given with the calculation of the Planck mass and length.

      Indeed, how can in conventional equation for the de Broglie wave put any mass, for example, the mass of the Earth? The angular momentum of the Earth is not equal to the angular momentum of one electron (Planck's constant).

      And with my equation it is easy to calculate the orbits of planets through the radius of inertia. For some of the planets, the discrepancy is 2 times greater, or less. This indicates that the orbits of planets are formed on harmonics or subharmonics of parametric resonance and means that quantum phenomena occur in the macro world also. Consequently, de Broglie waves are always larger in size than Compton waves.

      My second equation is the decoding of the gravitational coefficient through the physical parameters of the planetary system. The calculation of the gravitational coefficient includes the ratio for Kepler's third law, as constant, and mass of the central body of the planetary system. This second equation is a criterion for the possibility of using the gravitational coefficient to calculate practical problems. Therefore, it is argued that the arbitrary use of the gravitational coefficient is unacceptable - it is not a fundamental constant for all cases, it is valid only for the solar system.

      Kind regards,

      Vladimir Fedorov

      5 days later

      Dear Vladimir,

      You wrote an interesting and provocative Essay. Despite I disagree with some of your claims, in particular the ones on gravitation and gravitational waves, I feel that some of your ideas deserve more attention by the scientific community. Thus, I will give you the highest score in order to help you to better spread them. Good luck in the Contest, I hope that you will have a chance to read our Essay, which, instead, discusses "traditional" gravitational waves.

      Cheers, Ch.

      http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2862

      Dear Christian,

      I pleasure read your essay, gave him high mark, and understood why many people have questions to him.

      But I'm not embarrassed «confused about the relevance of this essay».

      This dispute about gravity and gravitational waves has the deep roots of the dispute between Descartes and Newton and the dispute is still not resolved.

      "Today it is hard to believe, but contemporaries accused Newton that his theory "returns science in the Middle Ages" Thomas S. Kuhn The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. (1970) . If the bodies are attracted one toonher, then they should spend energy, but from the theory it is not visible, where does the energy come from and how does it replenish? ... There was no (and is no now) a cycle of energy in the theory, and this happened after Descartes, After Descartes introduced the principle of conservation of momentum, which natural science took literally as a life-giving sip of water." L.E. Fedulayev (2009).

      The dispute that you raised about the gravitational waves will allow adequately answer the questions of this contest. The theory of gravitational waves is the key theory of self-organization of matter, therefore we observe gravitational attraction as a mechanism for its realization, which is still to be understood in detail.

      I wish you success in the contest.

      Kind regards,

      Vladimir

      Vladimir,

      There are a lot of Vladimirs in this contest:-)

      This is an interesting essay. You present many novel ideas, perhaps even too many for a single essay. I suspect you could go into greater detail and make 3 or 4 essays from this subject matter. This is not a bad thing. It simply means you are very enthusiastic about your work.

      Some of your ideas I am agreeable with. Some of the ideas I am less clear about.

      The third paragraph of the Introduction clearly states the many difficulties that plague Physics in its present form.

      I too am a believer that the vacuum is some type of medium ... I'm simply less clear regarding what its properties must be. I do think there is a scalar term present such as h/(2*pi) that accounts for vacuum energy and the lowest energy level of the electron.

      You mention photons travelling for billions of years and suggest that they lose energy to the vacuum. This idea is frequently refered to as "tired light" ... i.e., the light is tired because it has lost energy due to the distance and time it has traveled. I'm less clear regarding this since I know of no evidence that the vacuum has any kind of viscosity. Even if the argument is made that there is a small amount of hydrogen present in interstellar and intergalactic space, it would not result in viscosity. It would behave like an extremely rarefied gas. Aerospace engineers have to deal with this type of analysis for airplanes that fly very high ... also for spacecraft in the upper atmosphere.

      I like your idea of resonance and vortices. If you watch a fire, you will see lots of tiny spinning vortices in the flames. They flitter in an out pretty fast but sometimes they are stable. I think that nature prefers structures that are stable and this is one such possibility.

      I am not familiar with the Mathieu Equation. You reference it several times.

      A soliton is a very stable wave that does not interact with other waves. It does not act like a heat pump or any such analogy. Trust me on this. I'm a chemical engineer and we know heat pumps.

      There is a way of eliminating some of the mathematical singularities that you mention. Milo Wolff did so in his Wave Structure of Matter theory. The essence is that the wave-function is a solution to the spherical wave equation and that solution is of the form (1/r)*sin(r). At r = 0, the value is one.

      I like your analogy between gravity and the Lorentz Force. I have thought along that line of reasoning myself although I attribute it to a blend of absolute motion and relative motion. For me, the sun's motion through space creates the gravitation that keeps the planets and such in their orbits. This is what I mean by so many ideas .... just the idea of Lorentz type gravity could be a whole essay:-)

      I have never thought about the speed of gravity as you describe. I do not think gravity propagates at light speed as is required by General Relativity. This is supported by the fact that orbit calculations are performed using the actual position of objects rather than the apparent position based upon light speed.

      I've already written a lengthy response to your essay and I could easily go one. Let me simply close by stating that you have many novel and useful ideas that can be further developed. Just remember Occam's Razor ... The simplest idea is the best idea, but it must explain all that is observed. Well done!!

      Best Regards and Good Luck,

      Gary Simpson

      Vladimir,

      BTW, I rated your essay after a cursory reading several weeks ago ... The score was between a 5 and 10 ... I don't want to tell you too much because people should not trade votes.

      Best Regards and Good Luck,

      Gary Simpson

      Dear Vladimir Nikolaevich,

      First of all I'd like to notice that it's very worthy work deserving undoubtedly high score.

      I've found a lot of interesting and deep thoughts in your essay, some of which correspond to my approach in an explanation of space, time, a matter etc. With some I don't agree. For example I have other conception about the electron structuring or atom formation. Nevertheless, I've found in you more an adherent than the opponent.

      I wish you the further creative successes!

      Vladimir Rodin

      http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2752

      Dear Dr. Vladimir Nikolaevich Fedorov,

      As you said "The physical vacuum medium - there is the material, non-linear, multi-level and fractal medium." I agree with it, but to my opinion, it is that

      Ultimate foundation of the nature of the large scale structure of the Universe is that elementary particles or a physical vacuum medium?

      I think, you should to define it in more detail.

      If someone consider whether the foundation of the nature is a physical vacuum medium or an elementary particle, it must be defined more definitely, as close as possible to the reality of nature.

      Of course, it is a big question.

      "Law of gravity is valid only near the surfaces of celestial bodies of the solar system", but it is impossible to be definable at plank scale and around supermassive black holes in the center of many galaxies, unless an exact mechanism of gravitational interaction is discovered.

      As taking into consideration the electron-positron annihilation and the de Broglie wave, your hypothetical helicoidal vortex ring and vortex ball rotating may cause to produce elementary particles and virtual particles. But, I think that there a cause to generate the vortices is that a "critical flow speed" of the physical vacuum medium. In other words, the speed of light may become a key property for this.

      "Unfounded generalizations and frequency of parametric resonance" is very interesting for me, while associating with an equilibrium condition and being without energy dissipation.

      For that "The medium of physical vacuum, together with the earth, is moving at a speed in spherical gravisphere of sun", I think "The medium of physical vacuum, together with the earth" may take a place only within the Hill sphere.

      With Best Regards,

      Ch.Bayarsaikhan

      Dear Vladimir Rodin,

      Thank you for your kind words.

      With great interest I read your essay.

      Your essay allowed to consider us like-minded people.

      I'm going to write a comment on your work in your forum thread.

      I wish you success in the contest.

      Kind regards,

      Vladimir Fedorov