Dear Vladimir,
Thank you for the warm feedback on my essay.
With pleasure I read your essay and voted. I found that we are in even more agreement than usual.
I have considered a number of similar problems in my articles «Fundamental atom-molecular engineering». Part 1. Model of electron
Good luck and victory.
Best wishes
Dear Vladimir Fedorov,
Thank you for your kind comments on my essay. I wanted to let you know I have in the meantime also read your detailed and wide reaching treatise on fundamental physics, complete with delightful thumbnail illustrations. I am intrigued if there is a specific link you make connecting our physical world with the notion of intentionality? Perhaps I have missed something important while enjoying your essay.
Regards,
Robert
Dear Robert,
Thank you very much for your interest in my modest work.
You asked
«I am intrigued if there is a specific link you make connecting our physical world with the notion of intentionality?»
You, basically, answered this question
«We consider as an example the case of irreversible free expansion and inject intent in form of Maxwell's Demon. This provides a thermodynamic trail with implications sug-gestive of the computational nature of intent.»
I just gave an analogy to the physical realization of Maxwell's Demon.
In my house in Bulgaria, I use an air conditioner - hyperinverter (heat pump with a coefficient of 5) which is an analogue of Maxwell's demon. This unit produces 3 kW of thermal power, cooling the atmosphere, with an electric power consumption of 0.6 kW.
The analogue of Maxwell's demon in the universe is the gravisphere from a dynamic medium of physical vacuum around particles and cosmic bodies. The attraction of bodies to the center of gravity in the universe is intended for gravitational separation - moving to the center of gravity of heavier dynamic elements of the medium. Heavier elements have a higher temperature.
Those, the variable temperature of the medium of the physical vacuum in the gravisphere is determined by the variable gravitational potential and the variable velocity of propagation of the gravitational interaction. The change in the propagation velocity of the interaction in the gravisphere (the derivative of spatial coordinates in time) corresponds to the distortion of space-time in Einstein's theory of relativity.
Thus, there is a mechanism of energy concentration in the center of gravity, which functions according to the principle of the action of the heat pump, due to a phase change in the elements of the medium of the physical vacuum. Gravisphere from the environment of the physical vacuum is a soliton. All processes of matter transformation are carried out with the help of deterministic toroidal gravitational waves of de Broglie and Compton. Toroidal gravitational waves concentrate energy in the center of gravity, and the process of "annihilation" of toroidal gravitational waves leads to energy scattering in the form of photons.
The next important point for understanding the mechanism of intentionality is a single grid of resonant frequencies of the limiting elements of matter, analogous to an electron. In my work, I tried to explain the fractal principle of the construction of elements of matter, according to which elements with more energy than the electron are elements of a deeper level of matter. In the universe there is a constant circulation of energy and interaction between elements of different levels of matter, but using a single grid of parametric resonance frequencies.
That is why in the process of collisions of elementary particles the same particles are formed, and even atoms from matter and antimatter. That is why chemical bonds are so selective, and matter is stable and diverse.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Dear Alexander,
Also thank you for the warm response about my essay.
I will certainly read your articles in mid-April and of course there are already questions.
You can also read more in my work "Deterministic Gravitational Waves" .
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir,
My essay also relates to the fallacy of an abstract laboratory description of matter: "How the ideal properties of matter and fields give rise to unfounded generalizations, to meaningless mathematical laws, to goals and to intentions."
To dispel the abstract theoretical ideas of lab models and look at matter in the field of galaxies, I speculate about a dark matter interaction in galactic space. My speculation also relates to your "The vortexes of turbulence formed in accordance with the laws of hydrodynamics." I mention studies by Philip Marcus whose research described "vortices in turbulent fluids" and Michael Brenner (I misprinted Breemer) who spoke of "optimizing interaction energies to destabilize kinetic traps."
Your area of study regarding gravitational waves could be put to use near -- in our own galaxy -- and far -- to detect BB waves. Quite interesting.
Hope you get a chance to read and discharge your ideas on my essay.
Jim Hoover
Dear Vladimir,
Your essay touches on many aspects of physics that I would like to learn more about, especially solitons and resonance.
Having read some of the material you cite, I think you are on to something fundamental - the vortexes you describe being related to the phenomenon of turbulence.
It all looks plausible to me, except for your home-made gravitational variometer. That's crazy for sure, but it is a craziness I share and appreciate, as someone who once tried to build a mechanical anti-gravity machine using gyroscopes. Whatever the outcome, these projects are fun.
Best to you,
Colin
Vladimir,
Great essay. I'd made notes and thought I'd commented but I can't see it above.
Quite apart from self organizing systems the following is also so profound I wished I'd written it myself! (actually I have written similar or equivalent in papers and previous essays)
"The Earth's atmosphere is a transition layer with a variable speed of the physical vacuum medium relative to the Earth. Near of the surface of the Earth, where the turbulent gravitational shell is forming, the physical vacuum medium, practically, is stationary relative to the Earth",
AND; "It should be note that the speed of movement of elements of matter on the ring of each toroidal vortex gravitational wave de Broglie and Compton of electron is equal to the speed of light"
Super job, top score coming now. Well derived and written.
Very best
Peter
Hi Vladimir,
Thanks for leaving a comment on my essay. Your essay looks good and interesting. For some reason when I downloaded it using the link you provided in your comment, many of the equations in the essay displayed black or other types of graphic squares, making it difficult to read - I will try again later from the main site. I will give you a good rating too - thanks...
Regards,
Declan
Dear James,
Thank you for taking the time to read my essay as well as for your kind comments. I wanted to let you know I have in the meantime also read and rated your detailed essay and have posted a reply on your forum. Good luck in the contest.
Kind regards,
Ladies and gentlemen,
In the course of the discussion it became clear that the addresses mentioned in the reference [20], in the text of my essay, do not always adequately reflect the entire text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves". Therefore, I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format.
I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.
Dear Colin,
Many thanks for the kind words about my essay .
Of course, the experiment with gravity variometer was primarily intended for me, that would sort out the mechanism of gravity and answer the question, where to move in research?
I specifically gave a simple description of the gravity vario, that it would be of interest to someone to repeat this simple experiment on registering the variations of graviton fluxes that were discovered by Michelson and Morley.
This experiment seems insane, because is generally accepted that gravitational attraction is the "magic" property of the mass. And I'm interested in the physical mechanism of gravity and self-organization, which is actually devoted to my essay.
In my opinion, attraction is the property of moving bodies, similar to the attraction of repulsive electrons moving along parallel wires.
The bodies are attracted to each other on the Earth because there is a turbulent gravitational shell near the surface of the Earth. The bodies are pierced by gravitons fluxes in toroidal gravitational waves with an equivalent velocity of 8 km/s. Those. In fact, the stationary bodies on the Earth move parallel relatively to the environment of the physical vacuum at a speed of 8 km/s, and therefore attracted.
It is possible that such an explanation would not satisfy someone, for example, LIGO employees.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Dear Declan,
Many thanks for the kind words about my essay .
I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format with text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves".
I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Dear Vladimir Fedorov,
Thank you for your kind comments. Having now read your essay I see that we agree on much. I agree that vortical action plays a much greater role than is commonly recognized, and also that the deBroglie model is the correct basis of QM. What you label "soliton potential wells of stability", I tend to think of as a 'self-sustaining soliton', and relate this to deBroglie waves induced by ultradense particle momentum. After the contest is over you might find time to look at The Nature of Quantum Gravity, which I think you will find interesting. But it does lead to a different model for the elementary particles than your model.
I believe that the density-based formulation of GR is a flat-space equivalent to curved space-time, which you seem to imply as well. However, you say that there are no particles with greater 'mass' then the electron, while I think that there are no particles with greater 'mass density' than the electron.
I am focused more on particles, so I cannot follow all your astronomical calculations, although I am impressed with the data set you have assembled and with your calculations. At this point I am still not entirely sure of your conception of gravity. In short, I agree with the essentials of vortical action, deBroglie-like solitons induced by particles, and gravity as fundamental, but our models of these particles diverge.
I think both of us wish to push mystical quantum mechanics in the direction of intuitive classical physics, which I address to some degree in my essay.
Thanks again for your comments and for contributing your ideas to the FQXi community.
My very best regards,
Edwin Eugene Klingman
Dear Peter,
Thanks for the positive assessment.
When there is time, I will certainly analyze the your interesting work.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Ladies and gentlemen,
In the course of the discussion it became clear that the addresses mentioned in the reference [20], in the text of my essay, do not always adequately reflect the entire text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves". Therefore, I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format.
Hyperlinks are distorted by the system, so I give symbolic link addresses
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=no_antivirus&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg
I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.
Dear Declan,
Many thanks for the kind words about my essay .
I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format with text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves".
Hyperlinks are distorted by the system, so I give symbolic link addresses
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=no_antivirus&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg
https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg
I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Dear Edwin,
Thank you for your kind comments.
You understood me correctly
«that the density-based formulation of GR is a flat-space equivalent to curved space-time»
The change in the propagation velocity of the gravitational interaction in the gravisphere (the derivative of spatial coordinates in time) corresponds to the distortion of space-time in Einstein's theory of relativity.
The square of this velocity is equal to the gravitational potential. This is very convenient for calculations and for an intuitive understanding of the mechanisms of gravity. Particularly contributing to the understanding of the mechanisms of gravity is the representation of the de Broglie and Compton waves as Wheeler's geons (waves closed by their own gravitational field), whose idea was formed by Wheeler as a result of disputes with Einstein.
I wish you success in the contest.
Kind regards,
Vladimir,
I consider very interesting your conclusions:
- The physical vacuum medium - there is the material, non-linear, multi-level and fractal medium. All transformations and interactions of matter in the classical world are carriing out with help of the main universal process - with help of quantum parametric resonance in the physical vacuum medium - with forming soliton.
-The mass does not distort space-time, but it changes the spatial coordinates derived with respect to the velocity-time of propagation of the gravitational interaction and the speed of the physical processes in the vortex of the physical vacuum medium.
- Newton's law of gravity is valid only near the surfaces of celestial bodies of the solar system, similar to the Casimir effect, near the surfaces of the bodies. Newton's law of gravity is a particular solution of the general law of gravitation in the fundamental gravitational interaction, which has property to form the potential well of stability, as the strong interaction.
We should discuss and join our essays... I sent you my book by email... we are in contact !!
Wow!
A lot of good content in the essay. It perhaps tried to squeeze in a bit too much general information on your work, but the parts that dealt with the assigned topic directly made a lot of sense. Overall; I liked this paper a lot, but it is decidedly not written in a conventional style. I like the fractal connection, and I too think DeBroglie has answers others often overlook. You bring so much to the table, Vlad, and it's easy to miss seeing which detail you want the reader to notice. These are first impressions and I'll have to leave a detailed comment after reading a few more. Good work!
All the Best,
Jonathan
Vladimir,
Thank you so much for the interesting read. I am not qualified to judge the finer points of the physics, but appreciate the way you approach the questions. as you recall from conic sections, what you get depends on how you slice it. At some point we will find the right angle of approach and a new pattern will emerge.
Perhaps the pieces of the answer are all here in these essays and they simply require assembly.
Buoyancy,
Don Foster
