Ladies and gentlemen,

In the course of the discussion it became clear that the addresses mentioned in the reference [20], in the text of my essay, do not always adequately reflect the entire text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves". Therefore, I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format.

Hyperlinks are distorted by the system, so I give symbolic link addresses

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=no_antivirus&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg

I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.

Vladimir Fedorov

Dear Declan,

Many thanks for the kind words about my essay .

I give two direct links to download the file in pdf format with text of my article "The deterministic gravitational waves".

Hyperlinks are distorted by the system, so I give symbolic link addresses

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&confirm=no_antivirus&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg

https://drive.google.com/uc?export=download&id=0B1MvF-AefpMmU3hTSWtQTWUtRTg

I apologize for the inconvenience, and hope for understanding.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

Dear Edwin,

Thank you for your kind comments.

You understood me correctly

«that the density-based formulation of GR is a flat-space equivalent to curved space-time»

The change in the propagation velocity of the gravitational interaction in the gravisphere (the derivative of spatial coordinates in time) corresponds to the distortion of space-time in Einstein's theory of relativity.

The square of this velocity is equal to the gravitational potential. This is very convenient for calculations and for an intuitive understanding of the mechanisms of gravity. Particularly contributing to the understanding of the mechanisms of gravity is the representation of the de Broglie and Compton waves as Wheeler's geons (waves closed by their own gravitational field), whose idea was formed by Wheeler as a result of disputes with Einstein.

I wish you success in the contest.

Kind regards,

Vladimir

Vladimir,

I consider very interesting your conclusions:

- The physical vacuum medium - there is the material, non-linear, multi-level and fractal medium. All transformations and interactions of matter in the classical world are carriing out with help of the main universal process - with help of quantum parametric resonance in the physical vacuum medium - with forming soliton.

-The mass does not distort space-time, but it changes the spatial coordinates derived with respect to the velocity-time of propagation of the gravitational interaction and the speed of the physical processes in the vortex of the physical vacuum medium.

- Newton's law of gravity is valid only near the surfaces of celestial bodies of the solar system, similar to the Casimir effect, near the surfaces of the bodies. Newton's law of gravity is a particular solution of the general law of gravitation in the fundamental gravitational interaction, which has property to form the potential well of stability, as the strong interaction.

We should discuss and join our essays... I sent you my book by email... we are in contact !!

    Wow!

    A lot of good content in the essay. It perhaps tried to squeeze in a bit too much general information on your work, but the parts that dealt with the assigned topic directly made a lot of sense. Overall; I liked this paper a lot, but it is decidedly not written in a conventional style. I like the fractal connection, and I too think DeBroglie has answers others often overlook. You bring so much to the table, Vlad, and it's easy to miss seeing which detail you want the reader to notice. These are first impressions and I'll have to leave a detailed comment after reading a few more. Good work!

    All the Best,

    Jonathan

    Vladimir,

    Thank you so much for the interesting read. I am not qualified to judge the finer points of the physics, but appreciate the way you approach the questions. as you recall from conic sections, what you get depends on how you slice it. At some point we will find the right angle of approach and a new pattern will emerge.

    Perhaps the pieces of the answer are all here in these essays and they simply require assembly.

    Buoyancy,

    Don Foster

      Well, strange. I rated your essay but you still have two rather than three ratings. Maybe it needs to percolate. Hope it comes through. Best.

      Dear Vladimir,

      due time constrains (besides, the voting ends today), I won't be able to properly comment your essay. It would take me a few more days for that, since right now By "properly", I mean, sharing some ideas and thoughts. I really enjoyed your essay. I hope we can keep in touch.

        Dear David,

        Thank you for the good evaluation of my essay.

        I quickly read your book. I think that it is very useful and makes think differently about the universe.

        I think that right now it is necessary to think about the next step - to fill the subsequent work by models, calculations, examples, experimental proofs and practical applications.

        Kind regards,

        Vladimir Fedorov

        Dear Don,

        Many thanks for the kind words about my essay and high rating.

        I really hope that you are right

        «At some point we will find the right angle of approach and a new pattern will emerge.»

        My very best regards,

        Vladimir

        Dear Daniel,

        Many thanks for the kind words about my essay and high rating.

        Congratulations on the successful completion of the next stage of the contest.

        I also «hope we can keep in touch.»

        I wish you success in the contest.

        Vladimir

        I didn't know I could post after April 7th... I guess I will be able to tell you something useful! :)

        I think now there is a lot of time to think about the past discussion. In the course of the discussion, several tasks were realized, but there were no questions of principle to my work.

        I felt that many did not agree with my point of view on the universe, but no one asked serious questions and did not explain why my point of view does not correspond to the theme of the contest.

        I think that the format of the contest does not allow to discuss effectively the results until April 8.

        Write a Reply...