David

Wow! Sorry I didn't read your essay earlier. Excellent writing style and I agreed with just about all! And just in time. Nice big score coming!

I really hope you'll rush over to mine which I'm sure you'll like. It leads up to a shockingly simple(ish!) physical mechanism producing a Classical QM derivation. (most physicist will run screaming from the very concept!) It does exactly what you suggested, re-formulates (though Diracs equation holds!) to explain the reality of objective 'wave function collapse', which results from 'requantization' on interactions. There's also a video;Classic QM on Vimeo.

Do throw all you can at it, though it only finishes the well tested model in last years essay which was scored top.

As an aside; (look afterwards) the same fundamentals have already predicted coherent compatible SR and pre 'BigBang'(NOT!) conditions in a fractal 'recycling' cosmology.

DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.1.4540.5603.

I hope you get to read/comment/score mine before the time limit.

Many thanks for the great read.

Very best

Peter

    Thanks Peter,

    Am delighted to hear that you enjoyed the essay.

    Having heard about this essay competition quite late, I had been rather rushed in its preparation, and ideally would have liked to have spent a bit more time tightening up the prose and/or content!

    But even given that relative shortage of available preparation time, I thought I should get an entry in - since I feel that competitions like these can be such an important vehicle for researchers and thinkers, especially independent ones, to circulate some ideas/conjectures and discuss them more widely. So I am very glad that you found the essay so readable.

    I have had a quick look at some of your work, and find it very interesting - I think we probably have many compatible views on a variety of fundamental topics!

    I will now pop over and read your essay before the voting time limit ticks over...

    I must admit that I had originally intended to play a more interactive part in this (voting) phase of the competition - but probably got a bit discouraged by so many low scores being passed out, seemingly by many who had not even taken the time to read the essay?

    Regards,

    David C.

    David,

    Interesting concept of the universe viewed as the product of a lengthy historical process shaped by Darwinian-like evolution. This doesn't sound based on the Steinhardt Endless Universe with endlessly repeating cycles of evolution, each accompanied by the creation of new matter, but it has been a few years since I checked out this theory. I believe each cycle was a few trillion years.

    A pre-space far beneath our observed world enhanced by neighboring loci, evolving information and algorithms evolving into complexities like our origins. With the full detail of development, it could probably make as much sense as the big bang.

    Your roiling sea of potentiality reminds me of the dynamic conditions I speculate might cause dark matter as the product of EM, strong, weak, and graviton forces in a galaxy.

    In the short time that remains, I hope you get a chance to check out my essay.

    Jim Hoover

    Dear Sirs!

    Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use «spam».

    New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

    New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

    Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

    Sincerely,

    Dizhechko Boris