Dear Branko,

thanks for your appreciation.

I've had a look to your essay for 2015-contest in which the rule of "octave harmonic" (powers of 2) is in line with my personal thinking. Thank you for your suggestion.

On the subject of elementary charge I still have a problem with your (25) and (26) because at the end you have that [kg*m^3*s^-2] is [J*m]. May be I've not quite well understood.

If you take eV as Energy you have (in SI) [A*s][kg*A^-1*m^2*s^-3] that is [kg*m^2*s^-2] and that corresponds to J. So squared charge [C^2] should infact correspond to [J^2*m^-2*s^2] that is in SI [kg^2*m^2*s^-2]. This makes clear the correspondance between Charge and Momentum (m*v).

Probably,in your (25) we should find mass^2 and vel^2 as numerators, or if you have mn^2*c^3 you should have tn/rn as well. This is what I caught, at least.

I hope my work and suggestions could help in your work.

Best regards,

Claudio

PS Don't forget to give your rating

Caro sig Borsello

Si può vedere la wikipedia che è [is [ML^3T^-2], https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statcoulomb

È importante che la mia teoria è corretto valore ottenuto per tutte le costanti fisiche. Valutazione per voi 9 dopo i vostri commenti sul mio forum. Cercate di capire la mia teoria e approccio matematico. Il modo migliore è cercare di trovare un errore in matematica così come nel commento del sig Walker. Non sono stato coinvolto in elettrostatica. E 'possibile comprendere molto meglio con il mio approccio e nell'elettrostatica. Spero che tu capisca che in (26) costante 10 ^ 9 risultato strana definizione di Coulomb.

Saluti,

Branko

    Dear Branko,

    first of all I want to say that your theory is strong and fascinating, and I think that it will lead to interesting insights.

    I get your point about StatC, that is expressed in Gaussian units.

    In such metric, vacuum permittivity ε0 is included (1/squareroot) in the charge definition. Since SI units for ε0 are [A2*s4*kg-1*m-3], if you divide C[A*s] by the squareroot of such units you get exactly [s-1*kg1/2*m3/2], that is physically coherent with cgs metric.

    Best regards,

    and thank you for your appreciation,

    Claudio

    In equation (2) for Gravity, F = G M1 M2 / R^2, note that I have suggested the replacement

    F = ( ( 1 - 2 D-M-C-C )^-1 ) G M1 M2 / R^2, where D-M-C-C, the dark-matter-compensation-constant, has the value square-root((60±10)/4) 10^-5 -- the Gravity Probe B science team says that my idea has already been refuted -- but I suggest that the 4 ultra-precise gyroscopes worked correctly and confirmed what I call the Fernández-Rañada-Milgrom effect.

    "Of course freedom, as the possibility of making choices, can be used for making a better world or to destroy it." Freedom for developing science and technology might have the basic effect of speeding up Darwinian evolution -- and such speeding up might not be pleasing to human beings.

      Dear David Brown,

      thank you for your comment. Actually I'm trying to test the validity of my assumption with each known equation, descovering perhaps new correspondences. Your corrective proposition could be as well tested in the Electromagnetical domain just for seeing whether it applies a similar correction to the capacitance law.

      I will read your essay and comment.

      Best regards,

      Claudio

      SIMPLICITY by Joe Fisher

      I'm sorry I don't find your comment any more, anyway I want to give you an answer.

      I agree with you and with Meister Einstein that we cannot make Nature simpler that it (or Her) is. This is "simply" because we are not allowed to ... say Nature how She should be ...

      By opposite our models will be necessarly less accurate that reality and so simplicity is welcome with them.

      I will read your essay and comment.

      Best regards,

      Claudio

      Dear 8M Borsello,

      Nice essay,

      Your ideas and thinking are excellent for eg... in your conclusion...you said," We can extend the exposed concept using a fractal analogy. So we can say that the chain of our choices, as conscious entities, can be seen as the actuation of a superior decision, and that the whole of decision could be the actualization of an higher aim, no matter if you call it God or not. But at the lowest level it is materialized in our tangible physical world."

      A Good idea, I fully agree with you............

      ..................... At this point I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ...............reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc...just have a look at my essay... "Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe" where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement.....

      I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems

      For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

      Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

      With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

      Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

      Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

      http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

      Best wishes to your essay.

      For your blessings please................

      =snp. gupta

      Dear Claudio Baldi Borsello,

      I am sorry for the typing error in your name,

      regards

      =snp

      Hi Claudio,

      This is a very clear thought provoking essay. I rate it as one of the best.

      "This implies that at the very border of the quantic world a single unit cannot be divided, so it must "decide" "where" to go, either one side or the other (I simplify in a mono-dimensional scenario)."

      This is getting down to one of the fundamental "funny businesses" at the heart of physics. Is Calculus valid for physics below the wavelength of the particles that make up objects. We could say Newton got away with it, but at Newton's time atoms and QM were unknown (or not accepted).

      Check out my website www.digitalwavetheory.com and my essay (shortest in the contest).

      Thank you for your essay.

      Don Limuti

        Hi Don,

        thank you for your rating.

        I've had a look to your essay and website, I find it great and funny. I hope you can find something worthy to be referenced in my personal works. I will let you know when I will publish other papers.

        I would like to highlight the fact that we constantly "force" the result of some stochastic processes in order to materialize the very first impulse for our conscious actions, despite all the consequences are deterministically ruled by physics laws. In particular when we decide to communicate a bit of (real) information.

        Best regards,

        Claudio B. Borsello

        15 days later

        Claudio,

        Nice essay and proposal. I agree both the fractal and scalar elements. I saw you had only 8 scores so it'll now be only 1 short of the 10 to qualify (and deservedly rather higher!).

        My favourite comment reflects a key thesis in my own essay; "we can say that the chain of our choices, as conscious entities, can be seen as the actuation of a superior decision, and that the whole of decision could be the actualization of an higher aim"

        If you understand any QM do look over my classical derivation and comment, (also see the video link in some of the posts).

        Best of luck

        Peter

        Dear Sirs!

        Physics of Descartes, which existed prior to the physics of Newton returned as the New Cartesian Physic and promises to be a theory of everything. To tell you this good news I use spam.

        New Cartesian Physic based on the identity of space and matter. It showed that the formula of mass-energy equivalence comes from the pressure of the Universe, the flow of force which on the corpuscle is equal to the product of Planck's constant to the speed of light.

        New Cartesian Physic has great potential for understanding the world. To show it, I ventured to give "materialistic explanations of the paranormal and supernatural" is the title of my essay.

        Visit my essay, you will find there the New Cartesian Physic and make a short entry: "I believe that space is a matter" I will answer you in return. Can put me 1.

        Sincerely,

        Dizhechko Boris

          Dear Boris,

          you speak about paranormal.

          I think it's just a "still unknown"-normal reality.

          I asked myself whether a different physic model could bring into "normality" such strange behaviours. And I think so. Without infringing any known law of Nature, of course.

          I've given a taste in my essay,please tell me your opinion.

          Best regards,

          Claudio

          Dear Claudio,

          the first part was a little bit confusing for me (I don't understand it), but at the second part I found some interesting philosohphical ideas.

          I scored it more than average. Thanks for your comment in my forum.

          I see also much passion in your work.

          All the best

          Torsten

            Thank you Torsten for your appreciations. I've also good scored yours.

            I'll try to be less confusing next time. The first part of my essay was an extract from a larger work, but I wanted to introduce such redefinition of basic measurement units in order to show the amazing simmetry of all phisic laws.

            Have a nice contest,

            Claudio

            6 months later
            Write a Reply...