The main codes after all we search,these main primordial codes implying this physicality.We are limited still in our universal knowledges but we appraoch all days.In 250 years of sciences, we have well Evolved and imrpoved but we are still so youngs.We know only some codes and laws in fact.But with our minds and mthas and physics extrapolations we can appraoch the truths and truth.They turn so they are afterr all these 3D sphères.

Dear Irwin,

Your ideas and thinking are excellent for eg...

1. We discuss the plausibility of a third axiomatic option - geometric language; the code-theoretic axiom

2. An example of this is the model of the Newtonian clockwork universe [33], which postulates that, if one knew the starting conditions, a powerful computer could predict every event [30].

3. Levinson, M.H.: The clockwork universe: Isaac newton, the royal society, and the birth of the modern world. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics 69(4), 479-480 (2012)

Wonderful Irwin, DYNAMIC UNIVERSE MODEL is also based TOTALLY on Newtonian Physics, thanks for bringing Newton into picture.................

..................... At this point I want you to ask you to please have a look at my essay, where ...............reproduction of Galaxies in the Universe is described. Dynamic Universe Model is another mathematical model for Universe. Its mathematics show that the movement of masses will be having a purpose or goal, Different Galaxies will be born and die (quench) etc...just have a look at the essay... "Distances, Locations, Ages and Reproduction of Galaxies in our Dynamic Universe" where UGF (Universal Gravitational force) acting on each and every mass, will create a direction and purpose of movement.....

I think intension is inherited from Universe itself to all Biological systems

For your information Dynamic Universe model is totally based on experimental results. Here in Dynamic Universe Model Space is Space and time is time in cosmology level or in any level. In the classical general relativity, space and time are convertible in to each other.

Many papers and books on Dynamic Universe Model were published by the author on unsolved problems of present day Physics, for example 'Absolute Rest frame of reference is not necessary' (1994) , 'Multiple bending of light ray can create many images for one Galaxy: in our dynamic universe', About "SITA" simulations, 'Missing mass in Galaxy is NOT required', "New mathematics tensors without Differential and Integral equations", "Information, Reality and Relics of Cosmic Microwave Background", "Dynamic Universe Model explains the Discrepancies of Very-Long-Baseline Interferometry Observations.", in 2015 'Explaining Formation of Astronomical Jets Using Dynamic Universe Model, 'Explaining Pioneer anomaly', 'Explaining Near luminal velocities in Astronomical jets', 'Observation of super luminal neutrinos', 'Process of quenching in Galaxies due to formation of hole at the center of Galaxy, as its central densemass dries up', "Dynamic Universe Model Predicts the Trajectory of New Horizons Satellite Going to Pluto" etc., are some more papers from the Dynamic Universe model. Four Books also were published. Book1 shows Dynamic Universe Model is singularity free and body to collision free, Book 2, and Book 3 are explanation of equations of Dynamic Universe model. Book 4 deals about prediction and finding of Blue shifted Galaxies in the universe.

With axioms like... No Isotropy; No Homogeneity; No Space-time continuum; Non-uniform density of matter(Universe is lumpy); No singularities; No collisions between bodies; No Blackholes; No warm holes; No Bigbang; No repulsion between distant Galaxies; Non-empty Universe; No imaginary or negative time axis; No imaginary X, Y, Z axes; No differential and Integral Equations mathematically; No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to General Relativity on any condition; No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models; No many mini Bigbangs; No Missing Mass; No Dark matter; No Dark energy; No Bigbang generated CMB detected; No Multi-verses etc.

Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true, like Blue shifted Galaxies and no dark matter. Dynamic Universe Model gave many results otherwise difficult to explain

Have a look at my essay on Dynamic Universe Model and its blog also where all my books and papers are available for free downloading...

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/

Best wishes to your essay.

For your blessings please................

=snp. gupta

Klee Irwin,

After reading and re-reading your essay, I am honored to have received the rating you gave me. Our ideas complement each other. However for this essay contest, your essay is more complete. If I were one of the judges, you would get my vote for the best essay. That is why I rated you a 10.

I find it interesting how we came to many of the same ideas from entirely different directions. If you read my essay in detail, I cryptically make reference to supporting evidence outside of the scope of this essay. If you are curious about unusual phenomena prompting my model, I would be glad to share it with you. Thank you, Graham

Klee Irwin,

Your essay is very interesting and deserving of a high ranking. Your essay places high importance on information: "energy is made of information" and information is "meaning conveyed by symbolism". Much of your focus is through quantum physics to examine the "here" (consciousness, aims and intentions).

I read the original essay question as two parts, 1) how did we get here, starting with a mathematical universe and 2) what is "here"? The key question to the first part is how did the earth get to the first plant and animal cell? Was it creation? A derivation of a cell from an ocean vent that managed the switch from vent-chemical energy to the sun's energy? Or even a weak form of your consciousness that helped direct the formation of the cell? Note I said "helped" rather than "created". Given the existence of the plant and animal cells, then Darwin's natural selection rewarded the development of the brain to current day human levels.

Your essay focuses on the second question, what is "here"? My essay borrows from Graham Cookson's binary reflective fields where one field is the 3-D physical world and the other co-field is a field of relationships. This second field could have quantum characteristics. I chose to call it an information dimension that contains many bits of information and relationships, where the combination of bits and relationship produce what we commonly refer to as information.

Upon reading a number of essays on this forum, I could categorize information in four ways. 1) physical information that travels with light, sound, radiation, etc. Plants and animals do react to this information. For example, I see a tiger that is stalking me for its next meal - my response: I need some preventative actions. This information is not in my information dimension, although my thought process would be.

2) an entangled particle pair may have its spin and direction on the information platform and since both parts of the pair utilize piece of the information platform, the individual particles can know its complement's characteristics faster than the speed of light; 3) the thoughts, memories, and imagination of a human brain are reflected back and forth between the information dimension and the physical world; and 4) the ability of some humans and some animals to access the stored information from others, example migrating birds.

I hope you have the opportunity to read my essay.

Hi Irwin

Your essay and "what is reality" on YouTube are very interesting and there are many principles and views that I share. I agree with you that reality is possible and not random but yet, it is not predetermined. I agree that reality is information and there is a sub-strata of a natural language. This language has in it already the geometrical potential possibilities. Meaning based information exists already in the relationship between 2 existents and it hold at least one action (or no action) for each of the existents (natural language). the space is full of relations that hold potential information for choice actions. If there is no relation there is no meaning based information or any potential relation. I see the continuously changing Present exists, and time is not complex in its movement from Future to Past, and all is convexed within the changing Present Continuous. In my essay I explain how the Continuous duration works and why there is a continuous change.

I am an ontologist philosopher and I also solve the Bergson Continuous Duration. Time is a rate of change within each existat in relation to at least another one.

Causality is a special case in the occurrence of a phenomena. In my essay I explain how an action-movement is chosen by the self-organization whether it is made of 2 actions-movement or trillions of them. It is all in the 20 attributes of a single movement and its qualities. I do think that we can combine the theorem of relativity and quantum theorem under either new development in string theory or your more develop theory to find and prove the existent of the attributes of a movement.

I don't need to have solution placed within a Universal Consciousness or any type of Dualistic type solution.

Yes, your work is interesting me and maybe our work will some day soon, unite in the proof of the existent of basic level of fundamental natural language.

Thank you much, hope we will meet and our essays do have a real impact!

yehuda

I went to your website. What you are looking into looks interesting. I attach a copy of Freeman Dyson's classic essay "Birds and Frogs." This connects with some of what you and your group are concerned with. The matter of quasi-crystals, which Dyson concerns himself with in this essay. He too invokes the idea of higher dimensional forms. The theory of quasi-crystals involves Pisot-Vijayaraghavan numbers {α_i}. These a solutions to polynomial equations of which one of the simplest is the solution for the golden-ratio, or φ = (1 + sqrt{5})/2. These are the systems of Galois fields Q(α).

Now shift focus to Heegner numbers 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 19, 43, 67, 163. These are Q(\sqrt{-d}) = -1 such that for the j-invariant j(1 + sqrt{-d}/2) is an integer, and

exp(π\sqrt{d}) = j(1 + sqrt{-d}/2) + 744 + tiny error.

These are Ramanujan numbers. For d = 2 this discrete system is the set of Gaussian primes. For higher Heegner numbers this determines infinite lattice systems. Also the j-invariant is connected to Jacobi θ-functions, which are representations of the E8 group.

The Heegner primes determine a set of elements Z + ω(d)Z with ω(d) = -(1 - i\sqrt{d}/2. The Heegner numbers determine systems of differential forms with various symmetries. In particular this symmetry embeds the Heisenberg group. The translation symmetry of the Heisenberg group in SU(2,2), SO(16) or E8 symmetries is the abelian group in the BMS symmetry. There is a lot here and I am just giving a quick blush on this subject I am working on.

There does seem to be a connection here between the PV numbers and the Heegner numbers and symmetries. They both have something to do with exception or sporadic symmetries.

Cheers LCAttachment #1: birds_and_frogs_Dyson.pdf

    Lawrence, excellent post! Speaking of primes, let me know what you think of a paper I wrote:

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314209738_Toward_the_Unification_of_Physics_and_Number_Theory

    I just downloaded your paper. I have not read anything yet. I noticed you have discussion on the 200 and 600-cell. This is the 4-dim Coxeter H4 sub-cell of E8. This is an interesting area to work.

    As I see it this should all feed into Langlands S-duality and a correspondence between the abelian symmetry of the Heisenberg group and the translation symmetry of spacetime.

    Cheers LC

    Excellent. Feel free to give me any feedback at Klee@QuantumGravityResearch.org

    We are interested in learning more about what you plan on focusing on going forward at Princeton.

    That rocks Jedis of the Sphere

    Interesting indeed Lawrence ,I recognize your virtuosity in playing with maths.The Galois works seems relevant also like the different geometrical algegras and the fractals of dimensions and scales and ranks.I didn't know these numbers of Heegner.It is also interesting for the ranking.The maths are like the music, the harmony like a chief orchestra and this imagination like a troch of truth like d have said Einstein :) we are going to check tyhis gravitation ,this weakest but also the strongest force with the spherical volumes and their 3 motions.Now the relevance is to utilise the good serie of numbers.But how can we be sure that we have the primordial serie.It is not sufficient like the lie algebras.The best you know is to know the volume of our central coslmological BH and after we make a / between this 1 the center and x the numb of glaxies,so the num of supermassive BHs ,we make a kind of average between these volumes and after we try to find the serie between x and 1.This serie in logic is the same than our quantum serie of quantum BHs, the gravity appears with the cold and this number finite.After it is just a fractal of this quantum of E the spheron possessing the serie and its finite numnber.We can utilmise all the mathematical methods Lawrence that we want ,if we have not some datas like the volume of our centralp cosm singularity of this or that, never we can find this serie.And if we do not find this number and these volumes, so we cannot understand their properties diue to their newtonian motions, spinal,orbital, linear.The geometrical algebras and the theory of groups have something to do with this primordial serie but we have not still found it.I seartch a road in inventing these spherical geom algebras but if I have not these volmumes and these numbers , never I could find this seri towar(ds this quant gravity and these singularities.You can find perhaps a road to find this serie of volumes, spherical ? Difficult this finite serie, primordial and universal from all singularities.Lawrence?Klee.... these volumes and this zero absolute .....give the road if the finite serie of uniquenss if found, the ultim fractal ....Regards

    Hi Klee,

    Cool name by the way ;)

    I got a little bit into your paper and I felt like I could see the code. How vibrating balls smash together as they move up the pyramid (upside down) running into larger and larger balls with a glowing vibrating electric (electron) field. Now you eventually run into other fields and the matter grows...etc. etc. Now I typed this on 3/10 on your board... but cut / copy and paste it into my book where I hope to God I remember to send this post to you (Klee) in the future (3/25) where people can see how I can picture the future...

    Best of luck in the contest!

    will I AM

    Hi to both of you,

    This universal gravitation is really the chief orchestra it seems to me.The works of Newton and Einstein about this gravity and the motions are very troubling.The fact that the motions are relative are fascinating.Like if all was in motions but wityh relativity.They fall down at the same time and the motion is relative.Why ? They turn why ? Not due to our thermo and electromagnetic forces in fact.If all quantum and cosm 3D sphères turn ,it is like an universal equilibrium between all rotating sphères.The fact that this gravitation is a different force implies that we cannot consider it like an emergent electromagnetic force.We cannot also modify the newtonian mechanics,we must just superimpose the relative motions and their proportions.It seems evident that this gravity is the main code from this, cosmological singularity, the biggest BH producing the speedest spherons implying this gravitational aether.The fact to consider the zero absolute is very important if this gravity is the main chief orchestra implying codes and comportments in space time evolution by encodings of informations of evolution implying an increasing mass and complexification.We have main primordial codes and these codes are gravitational.Photons seem simply like a complementary fuel for death life cycle.The fact that this gravitation is at all scales and relative become a key for a better understanding even of our photons Under their gravitations.Like if the codes and informations were in a dance of evolution Under this gravitational codes.That is why in a pure philosophical point of vue we die electromagnetically but not gravitationally considering our quantum singularities,our central quantum BHs.We are Inside an incredible universe of improvement of our matters, souls, bodys,minds.....Fascinating ios a weak word....

    Regards

    a main importance is that when we fractalise with primes the central singularity the biggest spherical volume, the space disappears implying that only matter and energy exist and that this aether is gravitational.This model can be computed and the 3 motions of 3D sphères can permit to rank, synchronize, superimpose,sort....we have even a rational road for the quantum 3D computing.If convergences must be made,it seems to me that we must converge with this universe and its foundamentals, its 3D sphères are universal at all scales.They turn so they are .....

    Best

    It is important at my humble opinion to consider this quantum weakest force differently.If for example you fractalise our standard model and its electromagnetic forces ,that cannot give the road towards this weaker force than our electromagnetism and photons.The photons are bosons like for our standard model and cannot answer.It does not exist a weaker or smaller photons.It exists a different puzzle superimposed to our standard model with new particles which are nor baryonic, nor bosonic nor relativistic.The fact to consider this serie , primordial for the spherons and the uniquenss is important for a real understanding of this weakest force paradoxally the strongest also due to fact that all is encircled by this gravity.Like if this cold zero absolute permitted to thermo, heat and electromagnetism to have properties Inside the physicality in evolution.

    Best

    Now retourning about the lattices and the cells and the distributions of numbers with these geometrical algebras.The lattices infinite and the series of numbers chosen become simply like a choice about the Tools.The real relevance is to well choose its domains and laws.That is why the real primordial serie is essential with its finite number.I see Lawrence that said an interesting convergence withy these lattices tending to infinity.If now you superimpose the gravitational aether and the serie of spherical volumes with this gravity tending to infinty in this weakest force.So we can superimpose this quantum gravity and in taking particles of gravitation with relative volumes, we have so a space disappearing and implying that only matter and energy exist.Now the aim is to find the good numbers, not to add the worksd about numbers.The strings and Mtheory and the spherical volumes can permit to create these spherical geometrical algebras(I work on this at this moment but it is not easy )The vectors, scalars, domeins, series,associativity, commutativity or not,the tensors, rotors....in fact all this puzzle is Under a specific universal serie of motions of spherical volumes.The utilisations of reals and imaginaries complexs must be Under an universal partitioning if I can say.The gamuts are precise like the gravitation being the main primordial chielf orchestra.The fact to find this serie of spherical volumes is the key at my humble opinion.If my equation is correct and that dark matter BHs quantum Bhs and quantum gravity are linked so it explains this quantum gravitation.E=m(b)c²+m(nb)l² see also my second equation about all 3D sphères but there are problems with this second, that said we can see the proportions with the volumes and the velocities, that is why the aether is gravitational from the central cosm BH singularity producing the speedest spherons.I have a problem with the spherical volume of spherons in logic they are smaller but there is a problem I must improve it.mlosV=constant with the 3 motions of 3Dspheres linear, orbital,spinal ,volume and mass.See that the universal sphere does not turn ....the central cosm singularity turns slowly...you can see the proportions in my reasoning.Until soon, I like the numbers and these geomtrical algebras, the works of Hopf and Clifford, Banach and Hilbert also seem relevant,we can check it ......this quantum gravity.....REVOLUTIONARY :)

    Hi Klee,

    I see that you work about the cold fusion.

    If I can with thermo and heat,I beleive that I found why they cannot create this fusion Klee.

    In fact we must simply remake the same paramters than on our sun.So pression,temperature... the problem is that we are on earth with g of 9,81m/s²,we can mimate the fusion like on the sun but we have g' and not g ,so we must put the system of pression and temperature and volume PV=nRT in rotation in space for example and after we reach g' the gravitation on sun.In logic the fusion appears but chuuuut it is a secret :)

    it is he same that the perpetual motion Klee, on earth, difficult, on space just an impulsion is necessary because the gravitation is this perpetual motion :)

      Not sure why you think that. Cold fusion is well known to be a fact now with over 2,000 papers published and experimental results at MIT, Stanford, US Navy, NASA and countless university and private groups throughout the world. You might be privy to old information in the few years post Pons and Fleischmann. The paper you mentioned of mine, for example, provides 100 peer reviewed experimental papers demonstrating the result.

      I don't say that cold fusion is not possible,I just say that if we want to mimate the sun, we must simply put the parameters of this sun with g' of the sun instyead of our g on earth.The mass of the earth is less than our sun, so an artiuficial gravitation due to rotation reaching g' is necessary for this fusion like in the sun.

      About the cold fusion, I don't know well.I beleive that quantum gravitation is linked with this cold dark matter.And if we make a kind of technology with a kind of bose Einstein condensate reaching the zero or near this zero can permit to better encircle this gravitation at quantum scale.If the cold permits the fusion, so it is a new fusion correlated with gravitation but not with thermo in logic paradoxally.The fusion is possible indeed and the checking of this quantum gravity also.I don't critic your researchs, I just explain my reasoning and hiow I see this fusion respecting our thermodynamics and heat .In my books of Zemansky ,there is one of my favorite equation of physics PV=nRT This equation can be imrpoved with the spherical volumes and their motions.Perhaps that cold fusion is more than we can imagine Klee when we analyse this infinite entropical potential dancing with the cold and the heat builbing this physicality.The main codes for me are in the cold and are gravitational considering all singularities.That said this cold possesse all the heat ....Paradoxal Klee.Best

      God does not play at dices Klee like said Einstein.Tesla,Newton and so more understood that main primordial codes have been created by a thing above our simple human interprétations.The mathematical singularities and the physical singularities need this infinite coded gravitational potential.If this infinite consciousness without dimensions, physicality, time has created a system in improvement of matter energy, there are reasons and all is precise and coded and Under these gravitational universal laws.The cold and heat are more than we can imagine.The electromagnetism is just like a fuel,a catalyser implying life death and cycles.The encodings of photons and spherons are on the road.... again ....:)