Thank you Gupta for reading my essay.
I read a lot of essays this year, like the other years, and I have decided to vote only for those who deserve a good vote, because of I don't downgrade other entries; so that this year I voted for a little number of essays: for some reasons it was a disappointing year.
Your essay is a good essay, but I think it does not answer the question - "What is Fundamental" - or I cannot find it.
Regards
Domenico
Your policy is very good that you don't downgrade other entries, I also do the same, I also will give good marks or none...
Thank you for saying my essay is a good essay, and it answers your question also- "What is Fundamental" - it is nothing but Gravitation of the Universe acting on that body at that time... or in other words UGF... the universal gravitation force, instead of just two body gravitation....
Have a look at
http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html
Regards
=snp
Zdrastavite Boris Dizhechko
Thank you for remembering me esyoras...!
Thank you for saying that the idea of dynamic Universe model is very good.
You said... "However, you don't use the fundamental principle of Descartes's about identity of space and matter, which allows to see that the Sun releases energy of rotation of the Galaxy..."
Descartes rejected the splitting of corporeal substance into matter and form; second, he rejected any appeal to final ends, divine or natural, in explaining natural phenomena.[15] In his theology, he insists on the absolute freedom of God's act of creation...... Says present day wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Descartes
Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.
In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "
You said......."If you say that photons falling on a massive body, then I say that on the Sun falls space, which according to Descartes is matter and there is transformed into corpuscles."
Dynamic Universe Model says the frequency shift happens when EM radiation goes grazingly .... Not when photons fall into massive body.
You said ...... "In addition, I showed that the formula of mass - energy equivalence is derived from the existence of the pressure of the Universe. In General, I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity. Visit my essay"
I will visit... and post again...
Best Regards
=snp
Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara, I largely agree with you and have already used all their capabilities to boost your rating. The principle of identity of space and matter can improve your model of the dynamic Universe that he fills the gaps between the planets, stars, etc. matter, we do not see and from which to build atoms. molecules, etc..
I wish all the best to you and your family.
BSD
Dear Boris Dizhechko,
Thank you very much for all the support, I don't know how to repay, except reciprocating your help....
Best Regards
=snp
Hi Frank Dodd Smith
Why NOTHING is Fundamental ? Dear Frank Dodd Smith.... You can start with the status of Universe is as it is, it is Dynamically Changing......
Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :
Hi Steve Agnew
Wonderfully matching ideas dear Steve Agnew.... The concept "Although continuous space and time seem to be fundamental to our universe, Discrete Matter and Action is Fundamental" you are correct.... Very nice idea.... I highly appreciate your essay and hope for reciprocity.
Hi S N P Gupta,
First you need to realize that I do not try to convince others who have a theory of everything of their own to believe mine. But you asked what I think so I will share...
As someone else already posted - Your essay really does not answer what is fundamental. My opinion is that what you have presented in your essay will not contribute to a theory of everything. The reasons is because you start with known entities, parameters and equations. I know basic physics and the mathematics required to express the postulates of general relativity. I also know the essence of quantum mechanics and its basic equations and what they represent. My theory is only advanced to the internal energy structure of spacetime, primordial photons and the first two elementary particles that possess mass. It took a 350 page book to present this work. Physicists will need to take over where I left off. However my model does derive all the math of the known physics we have now.
I am not here to win research money, I am an orthpedic surgeon and my wife a cardiologist - I am only here to help physicists realize that the foundation they are looking for is right under their noses but impossible to arrive at from current math and any experiment that can be performed. I really do not care what my ratings are - It will be even more fun if they are low when reading about it in my historical book about getting the theory of everything out into academia
I wish you the best of luck -
Scott S Gordon, MD
Sayavarapu
Your article is interesting with many new ideas. However, I am not qualified to judge the idea of frequency shift near a mass, unfortunately.
Regards from ________________ John-Erik Persson
Hi Scott S Gordon
...........Your words........
First you need to realize that I do not try to convince others who have a theory of everything of their own to believe mine. But you asked what I think so I will share..
.................My reply..............
Yes sir, my thinking was also same, when I gave my first presentation about 35 years back on Dynamic Universe Model in IIT, Madras, India, But immediately I realized people should use this model get the real benefits .... Even after 35 years, whatever the predictions came true like existence of blue shifted Galaxies, the results I show, or results of Dynamic Universe Model..... people never bothered.... Now I came to FAG end of my life...So I am trying to reach individual thinkers like you to make understand this model so that I can pass-on this..... Even-though you are like this now, after getting some more results, I am sure you will do the same at some point of time in your life however closed you keep it.
.............Your words................
As someone else already posted - Your essay really does not answer what is fundamental. ..............My reply..............
You mean I should beat around the bush discussing "what is fundamental", or discussing about the FQXi question ... "what is fundamental?" I took a fundamental question of frequency shifting which is foundational to element formation....and energy to Mass conversion.... Is it not fundamental? Sabine Hossenfelder's observation is important... that's what I told. .................Your words.......
My opinion is that what you have presented in your essay will not contribute to a theory of everything. .................My reply..............
I never said Dynamic Universe Model is theory of every thing.... Why did you think like that...?
.................Your words.......The reasons is because you start with known entities, parameters and equations. I know basic physics and the mathematics required to express the postulates of general relativity. I also know the essence of quantum mechanics and its basic equations and what they represent. My theory is only advanced to the internal energy structure of spacetime, primordial photons and the first two elementary particles that possess mass. It took a 350 page book to present this work. Physicists will need to take over where I left off. However my model does derive all the math of the known physics we have now.
.................My reply..............
Good work sir, you did nicely, that means you should use bad words for the other peoples work especially when you don't understand, you ask questions about it, try to understand it....
.................Your words.......
I am not here to win research money,
.................My reply..............
Very good sir, you are a rich man, you don't require any money.... For me I am not rich, I never got any support from Physics or mathematics communities, either, leave alone financial support, that does not mean I should not tell the benefits of Dynamic Universe Model to others, is it not?
..............Your words.......
I am an orthpedic surgeon and my wife a cardiologist -
.................My reply..............
I am retired steel plant employee, my wife is house wife in India.
.................Your words.......
I am only here to help physicists realize that the foundation they are looking for is right under their noses but impossible to arrive at from current math and any experiment that can be performed. I really do not care what my ratings are - It will be even more fun if they are low when reading about it in my historical book about g etting the theory of everything out into academia
.................My reply..............
Good objective sir, hope they will use your expertise...
.................Your words.......
I wish you the best of luck -
.................My reply..............
Best wishes to you too, thank you for valuable time spent for reading and giving your esteemed thinking
=snp
Dear John-Erik Persson,
Thank you for your Good words and Blessings.... You please don't Under estimate your self sir....
Best Wishes for your essay...
=snp
SNPG
You use c+u (I use u because I have no mu) which leads to a velocity larger than the
speed of light. This is a Newtonian view and not an Einstein view as you say. Newton
offers good results for velocities much smaller than the speed of light, but Einstein is correct
for speeds close to c, as many experiments confirm. Perhaps your ideas can be formulated
to respect that reality.
JK
Hi S N P Gupta,
I agree that we should keep our minds open for alternatives, even if they might appear baffling, and this is fundamental. Isn't it puzzling that in hep you can propose almost anything, while just hinting to some skepticism about the big bang puts you in the 'fringe' category? I should have to find time to reread you essay and to take a look at your other papers.
Best.
a.l.
Satyavarapu,
First, this is not a discussion on what is fundamental in physics or elsewhere. Secondly, I am not qualified to comment on the content of the essay.
This said, you have come a long way from the steel mill, with a theory, books and presentations. In my opinion, the photon is a soliton like wavelet. The h Planck content is locked into a specific delivery time, the period. All photons have the same Planck content. The only difference is in the delivery time. In other words, the photon is "Power". It makes sense to see it this way because in a universe with a running time background, "how quickly" something happens is what is important.
Best of luck,
Marcel,
Surely Sit
The continual creation of matter may link quantum with gravity.
none remain the fundamental in that case and the process itself is fundamental
the creation of life from matter is another level ..
regards
alok
Dear SNP Gupta ! I pushed the rating of your essay a bit up. DUM is an alternative physical theory, and I like thinking out of the box. This nucleosynthesis thing is crucial, and I found it interesting.
Nice observations Alokji,
"The continual creation of matter may link quantum with gravity." ..... Elaborate on this some more please...
Best
=snp
Dear John Rider Klauder ,
Thank you very much for nice observation, that is one of the Dynamic Universe Model predictions came true
There were some recent experiments that showed velocities higher than that of light are achieved... in Europe as I remember. You can check in Wikipedia. Please see my paper on Velocities more than light for a more elaborate discussion ....
https://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/
Waiting for more questions....
Best Regards
=snp
Thank you dear a losev,
For your blessings and more open view about my papers and alternative (fringe!) models... There are very few people take it that way....
I request you go through my papers and you can reply me even after this contest closed to my ID...
snp.gupta@gmail.com
Waiting to see some more observations from you....
Best
=snp
Dear Stephen,
Thank you for pushing me up.... I also did the same, now your score reads 6.2... Best wishes to your essay
=snp
