Frequency shifting in electromagnetic radiation near gravitating masses in Dynamic Universe Model by Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta

Dear Satyavarapu,

I answered your comment in https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2978

Greathings, Hans

Dear Satyavarapu,

I answered your comment in Hans van Leunen

Greathings, Hans

Respected Sir,

Marvelous !

You have given an impressive glimpse of persistent hard work carried over decades to come up with a model "Dynamic Universe Model". Your work is an important contribution in this Essay contest.

The outcome of experiments, as suggested by you, can tell how far your model is accepted by the Scientist Community. My please refer para 6.1 on sustainability of scientific theories - There I have mentioned - In place of expecting to see rise of absolute theory (perpetually true theory) it would be better to rate nascent theory by making use of Bayesian inference to update the probability for it to be true as more evidence or information becomes available.

My view is that any model cannot be a true reflection of reality. At a given point of time - we may have different competing theories that will qualify as a 'Fundamental Theories'. We are only a budding knowledge society as of now.

I would love to get more insight about your work.

With best wishes

Brajesh Mishra

Clarification - Para 6.1 of my Essay - The "Mysterious" Fundamental

Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

I read with great interest your deep essay with new radical ideas that are aimed at overcoming the crisis of understanding in fundamental science. The Contests of the Fundamental Questions Institute are, first of all, competitions of new ideas in fundamental science. Your model of the Universe gives such new ideas. I believe that there should be a World Bank of Fundamental Ideas in all UN languages, with their constant discussion by all members of the world scientific community. The global scientific community must support the competition of ideas, primarily in cosmology .

Successes in the Contest!

Best wishes,

Vladimir

Satyavarapu,

Your paper contained a good understanding of observations regarding red and blue shift. We are both interested in Dr. Rubin's work and the need to understand dark matter. I notice that some of your other papers address this issue. I agree with your statement that the physical laws are everywhere the same. I had not seen your equation 25 before but your use of the equation to predict frequency seemed to be accurate. You mentioned continual nucleosynthesis in your abstract but I got stuck on how this began. If frequency shift occurs when electromagnetic radiation grazes a massive body and if this is related to formation of mass (nucleosynthesis), where did the original mass come from? I would like to have seen more discussion about general relativity. I think your equations might lead to frequency shifting as a cause of light bending near massive objects, not the shape of space. Is that correct?

Dear Gene H Barbee

Thank you for all Your words of appreciation.......

.........Your paper contained a good understanding of observations regarding red and blue shift. We are both interested in Dr. Rubin's work and the need to understand dark matter. I notice that some of your other papers address this issue. I agree with your statement that the physical laws are everywhere the same. I had not seen your equation 25 before but your use of the equation to predict frequency seemed to be accurate.

..................... reply....

It was published in many earlier papers, I can send you if you give me your mail id... But you can search some of the old papers of Dynamic Universe model in the web page...

https://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/p/10-feb-201-6-all-my-published-papers.html

.............your words.....

You mentioned continual nucleosynthesis in your abstract but I got stuck on how this began. If frequency shift occurs when electromagnetic radiation grazes a massive body and if this is related to formation of mass (nucleosynthesis), where did the original mass come from?

...............reply.....

See the above link for nucleosynthesis please...

..............your words....

I would like to have seen more discussion about general relativity. ...............reply.....

I also like to have a discussion with you any time, you start asking questions please...

..............your words....

I think your equations might lead to frequency shifting as a cause of light bending near massive objects, not the shape of space. Is that correct?

.............yes mam you are correct, .... Shape of the space does not have any effect in Dynmic Universe model, no space time continuum here.....

Best regards

=snp

snp

Thank you for your kind comments on mine. I re-post my response here as requested;

I recall your model, much in which agrees with the discrete field model but also much doesn't. As a quick check;

1-5; I agree. 'Collisions' are interactions and common (but not galaxy growth by collision). 'Black Holes' exist but as Active Nuclei, quite different from early theory still often assumed and including a larger scale fractal version as a 'big whoosh' recycling process not bang. No 'worm holes', but all matter is re-ionised and used again with other freshly condensed - so maybe a similar result!

All than agreed rejected up to 'dark' matter (but only n=1 fermion plasma) and dark energy (condensate) which do exist.

No multiverses but all the complex CMB anisotropies emerge in detail from the 'AGN' type recycling model.

Then; NO accelerating expansion required to explain redshit, Newton incomplete, linear 'absolute' time, ...then often qualified support for most of the rest.

By all means raise any item and I'll explain my comments. All in all not a bad model but still inconsistent and with a couple of major conflicting assumptions. None I can see that are fatal, but it looks to me like more solid foundations are still needed.

I have your essay on my list.

Very Best

Peter

As requested, I will alert you of my reply to your post at essay 3009:

Hi S. N. P. Gupta,

"Can FT or CT work for multivariable business forcasting?"

FT with analytic continuation as well as CT are methods to perform a spectral analysis of already measured data, not immediately a forecast. What do you mean by multivariable business?

While I didn't deal with models of the universe and I don't intend doing so, I will have a brief look at your model of our universe as soon as possible.

So far, I am happy that you found out and pointed to a rather amazing fundamental argument from my 9th essay. My most fundamental assumption is causality.

Best,

Eckard Blumschein