Dear Theodore St. John,

I will have a look at your essay because I got to a similar judgement.

Eckard Blumschein

Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta

How much is the acceleration between the galaxy and the void (I mean, the acceleration of zero does not exist)?

Where can I see your Excel file with data and calculations or just the data for the stars in the Milky Way?

With best wishes,

Branko

Dear Theodore St. John,

Thank you for the nice support.

CMB is starlight , Galaxy light etc... No bigbang generated microwave radiation. These Noble prizes are more of political nature

I am working on No Black hole collision paper also...

What about Blue shifted Galaxis?

What are other points you are having still doubts , lets have some discussion

Best Regards

=snp

Dear Paul Schroeder,

Thank you for the kid supporting words......."

Your paper includes a promising new solution to N body motion problems along with a fine relevant history of mass motions and locations. "

............ Your words.........

First off you present frequency shifting in EM radiation. Let's see if I understand your 'EM radiation grazing near mass' by using a different perspective. A photon beam encounters a hydrogen atom in Earth's upper atmosphere. The wave structure of the photon interacts with the hydrogen wave structure, forming a more complex atom which settles lower in the atmosphere. Then another earth grazing photon combines its waves with the more complex atom adding further complexity. This continues until nitrogen, oxygen etc. are formed and the particle falls to earth. Mass is created. This collision process works better when the atom is moving toward the photon as the net motion is slower than c. It is c - u. On the other side of earth fewer interactions arise as the elements are moving away from the photons at speed u. The speed of any combination becomes c u and an atom is less likely to settle before it exits the atmosphere. This mass creation provides equilibrium as recycling occurs with the release by earth of heat and light.

................. Reply ..........

Not exactly that way Paul, a photon hitting atmosphere hydrogen.... cannot alter atomic structure. See my Nucleo Synthsis paper... You can get it from Dynamic Universe model Blog.

..................Your words........................

Note that your close pass issue states frequency increase (red shifted), in your abstract, your introduction and cases 1 &2. This is confusing - inverted shift. The questions you answered within the paper are all about frequencies. But including photons is mostly a side extension of your Dynamic universe model and your formula 25.

.................Reply................

There was this error. FQXi don't change paper, I was on a travel, I posted it hurriedly. I did a correcting abstract after few days on this essay, please see...

Author Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta wrote on Jan. 2, 2018 @ 21:58 GMT

.......................your words........................

I do agree with your discussion of creation of mass via extreme blue shifting of light. I also like your dynamic model for masses. You discuss mass rotation and its influence on the flow of other bodies and on the speed of light. You are able with tensors to plot the logical flow of matter via your program SITA which applies rotational drives from N number of masses to an item/group. The program must address many drive factors. You delete dark matter by including all components of N. I arrived at similar thoughts by placing two equal masses near each other. They have to rotate or will be crashed together...................... Reply......................

Correct

.................. Your words....................

The rotations must all be the same - counterclockwise . Opposite rotations will crash. The universe is a counterclockwise whirling flow. We can see it in our solar system. Solar rotation drives planetary revolutions and rotations. Apparent imperfections such as Venus rotation, the moons rotation and the 90 degree tilted axis of rotation of Uranus are explained by factors such as the placement of the rotational force. A most interesting situation is the high latitude small moons of Jupiter which seem to orbit in reverse. Actually they jointly flow in a coiled path. Examining the varying distances from the sun and velocity changes keeps counterclockwise relevant. Can you process this flow near Jupiter in your program?

......................... Reply................

Not yet tried, I am planning to work it out soon.

regards,

=snp

Dear Branko,

I attached a file here. You can get all accelerations, Velocities and positions at that moment of of time, It was a simulation file. Not actual data was used.

You can search internet, give me your mail id to send you, as higher sized attachments can not be added here.

Please check and discuss...

Thank you for your asking and your interest in Dynamic Universe model

Best regardsAttachment #1: Vak_Branko_accl_Blue_shifted_Galaxies.xls

Dear Satyavarupa,

Thank you, I'll look at your essay. I've not found any mention of the Shapiro time delay of light, you say there have been no experiments relating to this kind of question. But there have, and the experimental results appeared to confirm standard theory. Best wishes, Jonathan

    snp:

    What is the link to the papers that compare the Dynamic Universe Model to actual observations?

    The STOE did this in STOE model of the universe http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1648

    I ask because I think it fails to fit data:

    Rotation curves are error?

    CMB(background radiation fits black body curve very, very well - not starlight.

    Other 10 observations of Pioneer anomaly (especially annual and diurnal variation) not accounted.

    Several other issues.

    Hodge

      Satyavarapu,

      While I've only had time to read it through once, we do seem to have a similar overall concept; That there is a cyclical relationship between expanding radiation and collapsing mass.

      The point I would emphasize is the sense that mass is only a stage of the contraction. That mass is an effect of what we call gravity, rather than gravity a property of mass and this contraction extends to all stages and aspects of frequency contraction, or blueshift.

      Such that the gravitational effect attributed to "dark matter' is really extensions of this frequency contraction throughout the light and radiological spectrums.

        Gupta:

        Very interesting however I do not understand your claim:

        If photons are red and blue shifted relative to passing next to gravitational massive objects when they move away and toward the direction

        How does a photon passing near the sun in eclipse change the frequency because in this situation the velocity of the sun is transverse to the velocity of the photon?

        wolfgang Baer

          Dear Jonathan Kerr,

          In a paper published earlier, I did mentions it, in the name of Gravitational time delay.... I will contact you with full details ASAP....

          Thank you for mentioning this...

          Best

          =snp

          Hodge

          Thank you for nice questions. Dynamic Universe Model solves with different problems at solar system level, Neutrino level, Galaxy level, Conglomerations of Galaxies level for the last 35 years. Some data is available here on my laptop, some is available with Academia web, some data in available in some floppy disks...., Some old data is in old hand written note books.... Some data is lost....

          Generally these are large files, many can not be uploaded into publishers web pages...

          You please ask me specific paper, I will search out for you.

          Many of these papers and books are available for free downloads from...

          https://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

          Everything I will have to do you know without guidance, financial or other without any support. I came to fag end of life.... I am not a rich man, just a steel plant employee, I used to go on a bicycle with my wife on the back carrier...

          .............Your words.......

          What is the link to the papers that compare the Dynamic Universe Model to actual observations?

          ..............Reply.......

          Read the above explanation and.....You can see here...

          https://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

          .............Your words.......

          The STOE did this in STOE model of the universe http://intellectualarchive.com/?link=item&id=1648

          I ask because I think it fails to fit data:

          ..............Reply.......

          No, show me the data, I will fit and show for you... what is STOE model...

          .............Your words.......

          Rotation curves are error?

          ..............Reply.......

          Yes, observations not error, interpretation is error

          .............Your words.......

          CMB(background radiation fits black body curve very, very well - not starlight.

          ..............Reply.......

          Lets check calculations, I can take any open challenge

          .............Your words.......

          Other 10 observations of Pioneer anomaly (especially annual and diurnal variation) not accounted.

          ..............Reply.......

          Lets take the data and see openly....

          .............Your words.......

          Several other issues.

          ..............Reply.......

          All such issues can be solved dear Hodge, don't worry, we will do it, you your self can doi with Dynamic Universe Model without any problem, I will guide you. You should know Excel that's it. No expensive software....

          Best regards

          =snp

          Please note..

          I have read your essay (first pass), and visited the blogspot site. I will have some comments, but I wanted to first let you know I saw you had visited my forum page.

          All the Best,

          Jonathan

            Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

            Your thoughtful comments about my essay are much appreciated, and I am glad to provide comments on your essay.

            Particularly in your questions and replies, you frequently mention the theme of empirical or experimental testing. This would seem to be the right emphasis at the present time. You have proposed the Dynamic Universe Model, and you have developed it sufficiently to the point where some of its implications and details are apparent. Logically the next step would be empirical testing of predictions made by the model.

            Exactly how that would be done, technologically or practically, I do not know. Certainly, however, that would be an important and necessary process. Best wishes for this phase in the work on the Dynamic Universe Model.

            Laurence Hitterdale

              Satyavarapu,

              Thank you for checking out my essay. As you mention, frequency shifts should not be difficult to observe, given the right resources. I'm assuming that you would prove the fundamental relationships of mass and energy in dynamic settings with your proofs. Different effects of gravitational lensing as well.

              An different but interesting approach. I am in the review phase of my readings.

              Plan to return.

              Jim Hoover

                Dear John Brodix Merryman

                Thank you for reading my essay....

                You have nice concept; probably that there is a cyclical relationship between expanding radiation and collapsing mass.

                It is nice idea .... I never heard it before... this concept is good... that ' That mass is an effect of what we call gravity, rather than gravity a property of mass and this contraction extends to all stages and aspects of frequency contraction, or blueshift.'

                We should develop further, lets work out together.... By the way there is no darkmatter in Dynamic Universe Model.......

                Best Regards

                =snp

                Prof Wolfgang Baer

                Thank you for reading my essay....

                Probably there are slight confusions, here the photons are moving grazingly near the mass. There will be one relative velocity between photon ray and mass. It will be irrespective of coming near the mass or going away from mass.....

                I said, this phenomenon can be observed on a solar eclipse day..... not exactly ... " during a solar eclipse the photon changes its frequency"

                Best

                =snp

                Dear Jonathan J. Dickau

                Thank you for visiting my page, I am waiting for your valuable comments.... You did a wonderful discussion "we should instead see gravity as a consequence of the remaining forces - rather than a fundamental force - and this view gives unique insights into possible quantum gravity theories and the nature of gravity itself." You gave a nice introduction to quantum Gravity!

                Respected Dr Laurence Hitterdale,

                Thank you for your esteemed nice words and blessings on Dynamic Universe Model,

                I am also hoping for someone will help me for testing this model's new prediction. I am an individual and independent researcher from a lower middle class family. I cant do all these testing myself. I hope you will help me to find a means for testing this proposition..I hope and pray God for the best...

                You wrote a very nice essay, I am giving my maximum appreciation (10) for your essay now best wishes for your essay....

                Thank you once again for pleasant words again.....

                Best regards

                =snp

                Dear James Lee Hoover

                Thank you for your esteemed fine words on my essay. Thank you for saying that "frequency shifts should not be difficult to observe, given the right resources." Can you please help me further? How to do that?

                I am providing " the fundamental relationships of mass and energy in dynamic settings with your proofs." .... As in Dynamic Universe model is nothing but E=mC2 only, which is nothing but Einstein's mass to energy to mass conversion. Now Dynamic Universe Model proposes to have energy to mass conversion this time in this essay.

                All my Published Books and essays are available at in "books published" and "papers published" tabs of ....

                https://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.com/

                And on "Different effects of gravitational lensing as well" ....... "Multiple Bending of light produces multiple images for Galaxies on earth", was published almost about 30 years back .... If you need further information I will give you

                Thank you for your blessing words "An different but interesting approach. I am in the review phase of my readings." I am hoping for the best.....

                Best Regards

                =snp

                I am sorry to disappoint, Satyavarapu...

                There is some value to various ideas featured in this essay, but it is full of basic errors that seem to reflect a fundamental misunderstanding. Perhaps you have under-estimated the depth of the problem, or perhaps you have some misconceptions about what the endeavor of Physics should be. However; if I was sent this paper as a reviewer for any of the journals where I have been a referee, I would have to say it has some flaws too deep to fix. Academic reviewers often use a three strike rule, where once they see 3 major flaws they will stop reading and if they are kind, they will enumerate those errors.

                I read the whole paper, however. So I'll start with the color vs frequency issue; do you realize that blue has a higher frequency than red? In several places; you appear to be saying the opposite. I think you mean that wavelength increases are a red shift while decreasing wavelengths indicate a blue shift. I agree, by the way, that evidence for blue-shifted galaxies is often ignored, and people have the false impression that everything in the cosmos is red-shifted. At the 2nd Crisis in Cosmology conference, back in '08; more than one speaker cited blue shift evidence in their talk.

                I also agree with your basic premise that gravity can be treated as a kind of frequency shifting phenomenon. There have been a handful of serious academic papers about this, and it is an interesting topic to explore. Unfortunately; a much deeper understanding of things like virtual particles and photons, wave-particle duality, energy of motion, deBroglie wavelength, and so on, is required for a factual treatment of this subject. You come up short.

                I think you got lucky, because I already rated this paper a few days ago, and I was likely more generous than I would be today. Even with some of the deficiencies; it would not be so bad except for the exaggerated claims. But the fact you make such bold promises without a firm basis is offensive.

                All the Best,

                Jonathan