If you do view my contest paper, it has reference#1
http://vixra.org/pdf/1709.0438v1.pdf
which has more wording on the relevant ideas wrt your mysical net than my highly-condensed contest paper. Figure A and pages 1 and 2 of the vixra paper show that I referred to braids (or universes) of three 4D colour dimensions and also referred to the braids as fibre optic cables. In some sense, these braids are analogous to fields whereas the jewels in the net are (to me, at least) analogous to particles.
To come clean, my earlier draft of the document referred to balls of wool rather than optic fibres and I even have carried some strands of red, green and blue wool in my brief case for several years. But I deleted reference to wool to avoid comments about wool-gathering, woolly ideas and dropped stitches in logic. A mystical net is a much more presentable analogy than a tangled, random hotch potch of three balls of wool.
My model is not mathematical but builds up SM particles using SM eigenvalues of fundamental properties. To do this one needs to gather the appropriate strands of coloured wool together, taking note to get the time directions of the strands correct, and tie them together using cotton to have the appropriate number and types of strands to make correct eigenvalues for whatever particle is being made. Repeat by making cotton ties for all particles in the block universe, or is that four block universes? In between particles we have strands of wool heading, as fields, forwards and backwards in time(s), to the next particle node, which demonstrates wave/particle/wave sequentiality. Likewise(?), in the mysical net the crystals reflect on each other.
Wrt free will, it all seems gridlocked to me with puritan predestination unfortunately predominating.
The cotton knots above imply particle decoherence to a point which to me seem like Penrose's CCC nodes, but for particles rather than universes. I wonder if the gridlock implies no free will across CCC cycles? That is, is the next CCC cycle already predetermined within the net?
In a way, these colour universes remind me of nearby galaxies in space but the colour universes are nearby (and interwoven) compactified universes. I suggested that our spacetime [say a brown universe] is emergent and the three colour universes are more fundamental, but that could be an observer effect and really they are all equal partners. In a red spacetime their particles could appear as interwoven strands of green, blue and brown wool and they could claim the red universe was emergent.
In a 16D block, is complex number algebra sufficient to allow analytic differentability to obtain probability amplitudes? Wrt being unhackable, distributing the mystical net data across four universes where each has its own 'spacetime' does seem a good way of protecting the data. One can only get probability densities in one's own (one of four) spacetime universe.
Best wishes
Austin