Hi Vladimir,

I am glad your response to mine directed me to your essay. We agree on many details about the universe, such as the flaw in Newton's laws as applied to orbiting. Your well written and technical essay is well beyond my education level. It does serve as a challenge for me to at least update my terminology limitations.

Thank you for the very nice comment about my essay. I am learning from yours. If you want to learn more of mine, I have included the principal ideas of the Universe is Otherwise system on the two pages that follow the essay at FQXi. Also My 3 paper summary of 'The Universe is Otherwise' is easy reading. It goes well beyond issues addressed here. I can send it to you.

While meeting with you, as proposed is unlikely, I would agree with carrying on communication of our common like-minded thoughts.

Paul Schroeder

Pshrodr8@aol.com

Hello again Vladimir,

Your conclusion: Thus, "fundamental" implies the absence in nature of ideal properties of matter and abstract concepts, and also requires a rethinking of the physical essence of phenomenological constants.

I humorously believe that certain things should not be discussed in polite company i.e. politics, religion, sex, and high philosophy.

Phenomenology goes after "the thing in itself". The thing that is beyond attributes. I congratulate your bravery in going after this territory beyond the concepts.

Best of luck in the contest,

Don Limuti

Dear Paul, ...(copied to your and mine)

Thanks for visiting my FQXi Essay page.

I'm glad that you liked my thoughts. Send your works as you like, you can send it by e-mail fedorovvlad53@gmail.com.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Declan, ...(copied to your and mine)

Thanks for the positive comment on my essay.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Hans, ...(copied to your and mine)

Thank you very much for your attention and explanations.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Wilhelmus, ...(copied to your and mine)

Many thanks warm words about my work and for mutual understanding.

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Dear Vladimir

(copy to yours and mine)

The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

If you are aware of more valuable essays don't hesitate to inform me.

best regards

Wilhelmus

Dear Vladimir,

Thanks a lot for reading and giving encouraging remarks my submission The Mysterious "Fundamental" (https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/2998).

I have tried to understand the new ideas propounded in your essay. Prima acie, they appear out-of-box and impressive. However, to gain a wider audience, I would suggest you to subsequently develop your ideas for people who are from non-science background. I salute the challenge you have taken to swim against the tide.

    Mr. Fedorov

    I fully enjoyed the way you put things together it and I think further words are useless.

    Rate it accordingly.

    If you would have the pleasure for a short axiomatic approach of the subject, I will appreciate your opinion.

    Silviu

      Thankyou Vladimir,

      I appreciate your comments on my essay and I am glad we had a similar approach. I read your current essay and found your claims on Newton very interesting ( from what I could understand as my physics is not as strong as yours ) and will reflect on them further.

      Good luck with your latest endeavours into nature and truth.

      Best,

      Jack

        Dear Corciovei,

        (copy to yours and mine)

        Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding. The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

        I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to understand.

        I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

        I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.

        Vladimir Fedorov

        https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

        Dear Jack,

        (copy to yours and mine)

        Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding.

        The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

        I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

        Vladimir Fedorov

        https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

        Dear Don,

        (copy to yours and mine)

        Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding.

        Understanding, respect and your advices are highly valued.

        I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

        Vladimir Fedorov

        https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

        Dear Gary,

        (copy to yours and mine)

        Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding.

        The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

        I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

        Vladimir Fedorov

        https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

        Dear Christian,

        (copy to yours and mine)

        Many thanks for the kind words, interest shown in my work and for excellent questions.

        You wrote: «Beyond your Essay, I am interested on your device for the detection of gravitational waves. Can you give me some detail?»

        Brief description of the experiment can be read in my Research notebook «The deterministic gravitational waves» https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VMlesBfYVVa-Fp6bIr1I-uzU-Vnq3FFY/view pages 53-60.

        I will tell only the history of the experiment that in 2006 I read a lot about the gravitational waves of LIGO and I had an idea that gravitational waves from stars can be recorded with the help of the Casimir effect on the surfaces of bodies. Then I hung on a torsion balance a package of many sheets of writing paper between framed by frames of the same paper. I assumed that such a package should be a similarity to a gravitational telescope with a flat radiation pattern, and signals from stars should be repeated every day, but I did not see it. But what I saw turned all my ideas about physics.

        When I processed the data and plotted the graph for 2 weeks of measurement https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1MvF-AefpMmOWx2SkE0ZjJXTG8/view , I realized that some neutrino matter is registered from the eastern quadrature of the Earth's orbit, obviously those detected by Michelson and Morley.

        I assembled the second installation, where I placed just a packet of writing paper without frames. There were practically no variations. But when I replaced it with a package with frames, I got the same variations of large amplitude as in the first setup. Those. The package of paper with frames was approximately 100 times more efficient when receiving gravitational waves than a packet without frames.

        The most vivid impression of observations on the monitor in real time was stable periodic signals of large amplitude with a period of 72 seconds. For me it was a enigma. I thought I was on the verge of a great discovery. It is now known to us that such the periodic signals of 72 seconds are recorded in the LISA project in million kilometers from the Earth. This is now I brought in the essay the simple relationships for the calculation, in practice, of all possible resonance frequencies of gravitational waves.

        These experiments were not intended for publication, they were for me.

        So, I realized that:

        1. Gravitons exist. Flows of gravitons can be focused and manage them.

        2. Gravitational waves can be easily registred with the help of packets of parallel planar bodies. X-ray telescopes can easily be converted into gravitational telescopes.

        3. The space is filled with neutrino rigid and superfluid matter.

        4. The Earth does not fall from the orbit, not because space is empty, but because there is a toroidal gravitational wave in orbit that pushes the Earth along orbit from the eastern quadrature of the orbit, compensating for the resistance.

        I understood many other interesting points.

        It is difficult to persuade people. Stimulus can only be the desire to know the truth.

        You wrote «that the abstract distortion of space-time is equivalent to a non-ideal medium of the physical vacuum-the variable velocity of propagation of the gravitational fundamental interaction. But, if it is equivalent, how can be also an incorrect use of ideals properties? Equivalent means that we have two ways to interpret a phenomenon and that both of them are correct».

        Yes, formally, they «that both of them are correct» - the result of the calculations is the same.

        For example, the force of gravitation on Earth can be calculated through the gravitational coefficient (the empirical form of recording the law of gravitation), but can be calculated by the physical form, through the gravitational potential, which has the dimension of the square of the velocity.

        However, very few people know the very simple truth that the gravitational potential is equal to the square of the equilibrium orbital velocity. And, practically, no one knows that the equilibrium orbital velocity is equal to the change in the speed of propagation of the gravitational interaction, which is equivalent to the derivative of spatial coordinates in time (to the formal equivalent - to the distortion of space-time in general relativity). Mechanisms are different - the result is one.

        For example, the speed of propagation of gravitational interaction increases from the surface of the Earth to the periphery of its gravisphere. Near the surface of the Earth, the speed of propagation of gravitational interaction is on 8 km/s less than on the periphery of the gravisphere. Gravitons in toroidal gravitational waves accelerating near the surface of the Earth form the reactive force of gravity for terrestrial bodies.

        You wrote «that the abstract distortion of space-time is equivalent to a non-ideal medium of the physical vacuum-the variable velocity of propagation of the gravitational fundamental interaction. But, if it is equivalent, how can be also an incorrect use of ideals properties? Equivalent means that we have two ways to interpret a phenomenon and that both of them are correct».

        I can quote Valery Morozov: "The formulation of the energy-momentum parameters of a gravitational field in general relativity can not be a tensor, but it is a pseudotensor, a quantity that transforms as a tensor only under linear coordinate transformations. This means that in GRT the energy of the gravitational field can not in principle be localized (which follows from the weak equivalence principle). Various authors introduce their own energy-momentum pseudotensors of the gravitational field, which possess certain "correct" properties, but one their variety shows that the problem does not have a satisfactory solution".

        However, these problems are not mine, but GRT, dig into mathematics, and not in physical mechanisms. I have nothing against the very principle of equivalence. The force of gravitation and the force of inertia have a single mechanism of action. My conclusions are based on a comparison of facts that can be observed, and on phenomena that have analogs around us.

        In my essay 2017, I clearly demonstrated in the example of phenomena in space that there is, assumedly, the only mechanism for the formation of force with the help of toroidal gravitational waves, which minimize the force of gravitation and inertia.

        The gravitational field in a toroidal gravitational wave is a vortex of the medium of a physical vacuum. I suppose the solar system is a vortex of a medium of a physical vacuum with spherical equipotential surfaces having the same speed of rotation and same gravitational potential. Despite the fact that the Earth in orbit is not moving relative to the medium of the physical vacuum, the large vortex gravisphere of the Earth has a resistance.

        However, the gravisphere of Earth in orbit is in the potential well of stability of the orbital soliton gravitational wave, which pushes the Earth along of orbit and compensates for the resistance force.

        The gradient of the gravitational potential of the orbital wave is equal to the gradient of the gravitational potential in the region of the Earth's orbit in the solar system and is directed in the opposite direction. Therefore, the forces of gravity of the Earth to the Sun and the forces of its inertia do not exist

        On the tides, you can see my answer to the question of Peter Jackson.

        If the force of attraction was, the Earth would emit X-ray radiation of enormous power in accordance with the Unruh effect, but the Earth does not radiate, and the comets radiate, because they are attracted to the Sun.

        By most powerful X-ray radiation 1 GW was possessed by a small comet Hyakutake, which moved around the Sun against the motion of the planets.

        For comparison, Jupiter, which is in a circular orbit, has the same power of 1 GW X-ray as Comet Hyakutake, although the masses of these bodies are not comparable.

        Consequently, GRT and Newton's law of gravitation are not valid for orbital bodies. Those. these laws are not fundamental, they are valid only for the surface of the Sun, the surfaces of planets and satellites in the solar system. Fundamental is the assertion that all fundamental interactions have potential stability pits, and are easily combined by a single formalism.

        I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

        Vladimir Fedorov

        https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

        Dear Austin,

        (copy to yours and mine)

        Many thanks for the kind words and interest shown in my work.

        I also have read and appreciated highly your essay.

        You are listening well to the "music" of our universe.

        I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

        Vladimir Fedorov

        https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

        Dear Branko,

        (copy to yours and mine)

        Thanks for visiting my FQXi Essay page.

        Each of our work is valuable in that it is information for thought.

        I do not exclude the fact that the gravitational constant is valid for many stars, for example, for all yellow dwarfs. But I have doubts about other classes of stars, because they are in other quantum states and can reflect other levels of matter with a different gravitational coefficient.

        I'm against using the gravitational coefficient everywhere. I proposed a formula for calculating it, to check whether can be used it to the system in question or not.

        I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

        Vladimir Fedorov

        https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

        Hi,

        I copy my answer on your comment on my essay page https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3093 also here.

        Thanks.

        Seemed my answer was 'eaten' by the net. I try again.

        toroidal gravitational waves is an interesting note. "Orbital bodies are in potential pits of stability of toroidal gravitational waves of de Broglie" - What is stability is a fundamental question too. Stability is only found within limits, and I would say it is symmetry protected states. Gravity as the weakest force is also the most longrange one, and in that way the most powerful. It is continous, but also chaotic, give rise to fractals, hence it has forms, often interpreted as Lie Groups etc.

        Toroidal forces can also be other than gravitational. They Point to asymmetry, I Think.

        The question of a varying G has some evidence. Also g varies on our Earth. The interesting question is what happens in the vacuum, or at its boundary, and what forms our space time.

        I have sometimes thought Newtonian gravity might be a quantum version :) Who knows?

        Ulla Mattfolk.

          Dear Vladimir,

          Thank you for the work you have been doing on "Archeology (archectonics) of consciousness", which I consider very meaningful. People look upon metaphysics as a lowly science. But as you quote E. Schrodinger: Metaphysics is transformed in physics in the process of development. There is a long way for us to go to crystallize the fine workings of nature, which I believe is nothing but a combinatorial output of several domains of activity at the level of cognition, sublime consciousness, supramolecular biological and cosmic organization, and fundamental driving forces.

          I hope to continue to work together on understanding these aspects in a holistic manner further. With the teamwork, I am sure one day we will grasp and unravel these layers for the benefit of humanity and supreme consciousness/absoluteness.

          Best regards,

          Anil

          Dear Ulla,

          (copy to yours and mine)

          Your essay and comments allowed to consider us like-minded people.

          Like me, you think about very interesting questions «The interesting question is what happens in the vacuum, or at its boundary, and what forms our space + time».

          In my essay it is shown that all the force interactions of the elements of matter are carried out at resonance frequencies of toroidal gravitational waves. In the universe, there is a general grid of resonant frequencies of limiting elements (such as an electron), which synchronizes all quantum parametric processes), so time is a derivative of the period of synchronous resonance frequencies and cannot be distorted.

          It is known that on the surface of the flat bodies there is Casimir effect, which, as I explain, is associated with the presence of turbulent gravitational shell and large gradient of the gravitational potential.

          The bodies are attracted to each other on the Earth because there is a turbulent gravitational shell near the surface of the Earth.

          I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

          Vladimir Fedorov

          https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080