Dear Brajesh,

(copy to yours and mine)

Thanks for the kind words and advice. «I would suggest you to subsequently develop your ideas for people who are from non-science background».

I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

Vladimir Fedorov

https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

Vladimir!

Well I have to say toroidal gravitational waves sounds like a super interesting idea -- after reading your paper I have to say it is smashing. So much information and detail (almost an overload of information and diagrams and graphs) about ideas and concepts that are very foreign to my way of thinking.

I have some "overarching" questions -- does your model indicate the metaphysical nature of the world when tordial gravitational waves are interacting. Do we a "real world" in the sense we have realism. Since all are waves and fractals, if "fractal waves are it" then how do you explain "the world" as one entity.

Since there is "no place" for "the bird's eye view" hence we cannot an objective viewpoint so we cannot have objective truth in any sense only "a series of "truths" against the fractal background of tori waves.

I understand how your model "matches" the radial velocity curve of galaxies, but due to the fractal background doesn't that imply we will have a constant curve for the entire universe as a whole.

I don't see how you can get acceleration down a slope, that is Newton's laws (sorry if you cover that in your dense paper). And if all is fractal what happens to Man's noble enterprise called "science"

Your theory cannot support - the hypothesis chain of induction to an deductive conclusion -- since it is fractals all the way down and up --like a stack of turtles all the same way up -- you cannot turn over any turtle individually to stop the infinite regression of f1 to f2 to f3 and so on, since you cannot stop the series hence only induction. Therefore you cannot really set up a math structure of deterministic entities. As you claim.

Secondly -- how do you differentiate between animate and inanimate matter. Is there a "place or space" for consciousness. How can we have any observers who can perform any observation if all is just waves on fractals.

Sorry for being so philosophical about your very complex essay -- but the "big picture" metaphysics isn't dealt with at all. How can you perform science at all in your schema from a fundamental viewpoint with "isolated" entities which can have an objective view of "anything at all" -- these are the deep questions your fabulous paper evokes in my mind's eye.

I have rated your essay very highly indeed, well done. Yours Harri

If you have time have a look at my essay - -it equates the imaginary unit with the speed of light and Plank's constant. That we make a "elementary square area" the imaginary unit and then apply Pythagoras Theorem to that area. An interesting approach though it is tough to understand if it comes to anything it was more for the idea. See here https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3133 Harri

Most very interesting ideas -- marvelous effort and

    Vladimir,

    Thanks. I think there'll also be a lot of nonsense about gravity for some time yet. Spending millions on machines to do what we can do simply with closer bodies is perverse, as is 'interpreting' it according to beliefs.

    Just to advise I'm now applying scores and yours was was one at the top.

    Best of luck

    Peter

    Dear Vladimir Fedorov,

    I totally agree with you as saying that "Fundamental" means the underlying principles, laws, essence, structure, constants and properties of matter.

    I understood that your idea is based on nonideal medium of a physical vacuum.

    Exactly the medium is the most fundamental for reality of the Nature.

    My first question, would you describe it more clearly?

    Is that similar at that https://www.intechopen.com/books/selected-topics-in-applications-of-quantum-mechanics/physical-vacuum-is-a-special-superfluid-medium

    In other words, the medium is an invisible perfect fluid similar the Aether, or not?

    How do the fractal structure of matter physically come from the medium?

    That is very interesting for me, "The matter of the fundamental elements in the universe can be in two basic phase states: in the form of toroidal gravitational waves and in the form of photons."

    For the one mentioned above by you, If one assumes the space as an invisible perfect fluid with critical speed of c (the light speed), a single photon may exist in form of a vortex ring of the invisible perfect fluid. More strictly speaking, a single photon may exist in form of Chaplykin Lamb dipole of the invisible perfect fluid whose only speed of free motion is to be c, there is no way to move at a speed more or less than the critical speed of c.

    Regarding the annihilation of electron and positron, electron and its antiparticle, may exist in form of a bubble of the invisible perfect fluid.

    Therefore, there must exist continuous deformation between the vortex ring (photon) and the bubble (electron or positron). Mathematically, there are two homeomorphic spaces share the same topological properties.

    The Best Regards,

    Ch.Bayarsaikhan

      Dear Jouko,

      (copy to yours and mine)

      Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding.

      The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

      I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to understand.

      «I'm happy that maybe you are on the threshold of some new discovery.

      So by reinterpreting the Born Rule, as probabilities |Ψ|2 or (Ψ*Ψ) then the wave-functions of the ket *i and bra i* states respectfully, give us enough mathematical elbow room to accommodate both Relativity and Quantum mechanics in one scheme».

      «Current maths thinking only uses "one" encoding side -- the complex conjugate of the

      Dear Jouko,

      (copy to yours and mine)

      Many thanks for the kind words about my work and for mutual understanding.

      The understanding and appreciation are highly valued.

      I highly appreciate your well-written essay in an effort to understand.

      «I'm happy that maybe you are on the threshold of some new discovery.

      So by reinterpreting the Born Rule, as probabilities |Ψ|2 or (Ψ*Ψ) then the wave-functions of the ket *i and bra i* states respectfully, give us enough mathematical elbow room to accommodate both Relativity and Quantum mechanics in one scheme».

      «Current maths thinking only uses "one" encoding side -- the complex conjugate of the a+ib| side -- to obtain areas. Basically in current maths thinking there is only z=a+ib, with zero=0+i0. We can devise a different set of complex numbers z=a-ib with zero=0-i0. And both can be related to the area of the imaginary unit, to obtain a new dual mathematics».

      As a radio engineer and mechanic, I highly appreciate the idea of a new interpretation of complex numbers.

      In a couple of days, I'll try to answer some of your questions.

      I wish you happiness in your scientific work in search of truth.

      I hope that my modest achievements can be information for reflection for you.

      Vladimir Fedorov

      https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

      Dear Vladimir,

      Thank you for interesting ideas of your essay. They are very stimulating and deserve high estimation.

      With the best regards

      M.Yu.Khlopov

      This essay is a marvel of wonders Vladimir...

      There is a lot to like and approve of in this essay, and some of what you write is both inspired and inspiring, while I see a few other things as curious, suspicious, or just plain wrong. I think part of what is erroneous comes out of an attempt you make to force fit your work with pieces of the mainstream thought that are off target or incompatible with the way you have framed your ideas.

      Matter and the universe as fractal? I have no problem with that; in fact I like it a lot. Toroidal gravity waves contributing to particle structure? After seeing Alexander Burinskii talk at FFP15; I know exactly how or why that might work. Even the pieces about an EM drive don't phase me. I've seen some proof of concept demonstrations, so I know it's not out of the realm of possibility.

      But I feel as though you have fed me a salad of mixed greens rather than a meal. And you have given folks a mixture of profound truths with some falsehoods or obfuscation, in the style of Bob Frissell's book "Nothing in This Book Is True, But It's Exactly How Things Are." I too have hung out with New Age folks, and I had to listen to quite a few mainstream Physics talks, before I learned how to present offbeat ideas to scientists.

      I am still learning.

      Warm Regards,

      Jonathan

      You are from Krasnoyarsk, which I have visited as part of a visit of K-26 for an accident evaluation. But now you are in Bulgaria. Your essay is very good, but only algebraic and not calculus and a fundamental theory must deal with calculus and not just algebra.

      There is a logic to what is called operator algebra and that is the essence of what is indeed fundamental, but you intuition is truly amazing. Do continue in your quest to understand what is fundamental...

      Vladimir Fedorov

      I have read your article. I found it very interesting and informative.

      Best regards from ______________ John-Erik Persson

      Dear Bayarsaikhan,

      Many thanks for the kind words, interest shown in my work and for excellent questions.

      The questions on the forum help to identify topics that I did not explain well enough in the essay.

      You write: «I understood that your idea is based on nonideal medium of a physical vacuum».

      Non ideality of the medium of the physical vacuum is a key concept.

      «The rightmost term describes dissipation of the energy stored in the vortex. As a result, the vortex with the lapse of time will disappear».

      This is the main reason why doctrinal physics abandoned toroidal vortices. And to prove that vortices are stable in a linear system is impossible.

      Therefore, to solve this problem Sbitnev suggested the following.

      «Assuming that the fluid is a physical vacuum, which meets the requirements specified earlier, we must say that the viscosity vanishes».

      On the one hand, Sbitnev is mistaken that it is possible to solve the instability of vortices by introducing the ideal properties of the viscosity of a medium in a physical vacuum. Each of us knows that there are no ideal properties of matter. It's just mysticism. For example, the introduction of ideal properties contradicts the observed deceleration of the Pioneers, they were decelerated with the viscosity index determined by the Hubble parameter, how the photons that form the redshift are decelerated.

      On the other hand, having declared ideal properties, Sbitnev has lost all opportunity to adequately explain the causality of all processes in the universe and the self-organization of matter.

      For example, let us recall the main argument of OTO supporters when they refused from ether - if the ether were, then due to friction, the Earth would fall on the Sun. In fact, Sbitnev commits a similar error by announcing the ideal properties of the viscosity of the physical vacuum medium.

      In my work is affirmed that all processes in the universe are carried out because of the finite viscosity of the medium of the physical vacuum, determined by a parameter equal to or greater than the Hubble parameter. The low viscosity is compensated by the fact that all processes occur at the frequencies of high-quality parametric resonance between soliton toroidal gravitational waves (de Broglie and Compton waves), where a weak coupling leads to strong interactions. This is analogous to a weak connection in high-Q circuits, which leads to the transfer of almost all energy.

      The nonlinearity of the medium of the physical vacuum is due to the well-known dynamic regularity of the de Broglie wavelength from the velocity of the Compton wave. Most importantly, it is necessary to understand that the dynamic de Broglie waves are necessary to maintain the Compton waves in a stable state with any change in the rate of their perturbation.

      Each de Broglie wave forms its de Broglie wave, as a result, it has a certain range of stability. Thus, around each toroidal gravitational wave of Compton, a large gravisphere (this is your bubble) is formed from the set of toroidal gravitational waves of de Broglie.

      Gravisphere concentrates energy in the center of gravitation, working on the principle of the heat pump. Gravisphere has a variable density, forms the effect of mass and inertia, continuously rebuilding its structure and changing energy. Thus, the gravisphere is always adjusted to new conditions of motion in a rigid and non-linear medium of the physical vacuum, minimizing the resistance force.

      The medium of the physical vacuum consists of toroidal gravitational waves of de Broglie, which are quantum-parametrically transformed on harmonics or subharmonics of parametric resonance. Some waves of de Broglie "annihilate", turning into photons, others are synthesized. Those. photons dissipate energy, and toroidal gravitational waves focus the energy.

      In my essay in 2018 I gave simple relationships for the basic parameters of elements (of de Broglie waves) of the physical vacuum medium, including for fundamental frequency grids on which the elements of matter are transformed.

      The Earth does not fall from the orbit, not because space is empty, but because there is a toroidal gravitational wave in orbit (toroidal gravisphere, toroidal gravitational field).

      A constant force is also acting on the Earth, it pushes forward it on orbit around the Sun by a stream of physical vacuum in a toroidal gravitational wave, with an equivalent velocity of 8 km/s (this was discovered by Michelson and Morley). Accordingly, a gravitational potential equal to the square of the equivalent velocity of 8 km/s (the first cosmic velocity of the Earth) is formed on the Earth's surface.

      For example, it was found that the Sun moves relative to the propagation medium of microwave radiation at a speed of 369 km/s. To minimize the resistance force in a rigid environment of physical vacuum, the Sun forms a huge gravisphere, several light-years in size. The force of the deceleration of the sun in the medium of the physical vacuum is determined by the Hubble parameter, as is the anomalous inhibition of the Pioneers and the red shift of the photons. The entire energy of the braking of the solar system is concentrated in the Sun according to the principle of the action of the heat pump. Through the force of deceleration of the Sun, its radiation power is easily calculated.

      Thus, one of the most fundamental parameters in the universe is the energy dissipation coefficient (Hubble parameter) in the medium of the physical vacuum, which determines all the parametric processes in the universe. The stars in the Universe are shining, due to the dissipation of photon energy in the medium of the physical vacuum.

      Only a periodic process of motion of bodies along the orbit is able to form such orbital waves (toroidal gravispheres), which completely compensate for the energy loss on the non-ideality of the medium of the physical vacuum. Moreover, stable planetary systems are only those that have a common system of interconnected parametric resonances, as the atoms. Therefore, the solar system is an analog of a stable atom and is in a strictly defined quantum state.

      You asked:

      «How do the fractal structure of matter physically come from the medium?»

      This is easy understanding to me. I'll try to explain.

      We know that pairs of Cooper electrons at low temperatures in a state of superfluidity they move in equilibrium in eddy currents without resistance in the state of superconductivity of matter. This phenomenon is analogous to the free motion of photons in the medium of a physical vacuum. Only electrons are elements of a higher level of matter and can move in equilibrium 43.6 times slower than the speed of light. And at a speed close to the speed of light, the parameters of their de Broglie waves are close to the parameters of the electron.

      The electron itself is the limiting element of matter and can not have another energy. Each wave of de Broglie forms the following de Broglie wave, close to the Compton wave. Thus, the mass of an electron and all its de Broglie waves tends to infinity. If the relativistic electrons will be to collide, we can obtain elements of a deeper level of matter, but with more energy than an electron.

      For example, we can obtain quarks whose equilibrium velocity is equal to the speed of light.

      The following example: if the elements of the electron-positron pair consisting of 137 quarks are broken, then a pair of spiral elements (photons of the quark matter level) are formed, also from 137 quarks. Quarks moved in an equilibrium state in an electron, and continue to move at the speed of light in the composition of photon spirals (pairs of nematic crystals). The pairs of spirals of photons are screwed into a rigid medium of a physical vacuum and move rectilinearly.

      At a forced speed of 43.6 times more of the speed of light, the mass of the limiting quarks tends to infinity, and they can turn into heavier preons. Preons can become Amers, etc. So in the process of collisions, limiting elements and their de Broglie waves of all levels of matter in the Universe are formed. Fundamental elements (which have a fractal structure) are formed from the de Broglie waves from multiple levels of matter, at common resonant frequencies. Those. elements of different levels of matter in one common fundamental element have one common resonant frequency of parametric resonance.

      I think that reading my Research notebook will help you understand my position.

      Deterministic gravitational waves. (Research notebook v02) Jan. 20, 2017. Gravitational waves v02.pdf https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VMlesBfYVVa-Fp6bIr1I-uzU-Vnq3FFY/view?usp=sharing

      Vladimir Fedorov

      https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3080

      12 days later

      Vladimir Federov

      Thanks for interesting discussions. If you nread this you may be interested in my last blog at:

      blog

      Best regards from _________________ John-Erik Persson

      Write a Reply...