"Fundamental" could become nonessential for itself by corciovei silviu

Thank for reading my essay

I think that genetic evolution (in long time) and intelligence (in short time) permit an optimal adaption in the real world: it is possible that part of our reasoning is innate, so that genetic modify our reasoning, in the deeper levels.

It is a good essay, but the answer is missing for me, changing the question to a too particular case: I think that there was the possibility, and the ability, for a deeper answer.

I have decided to give only high votes, so that I don't downgrade your essay with a low vote that you do not deserve.

Regards

Domenico

Dear Prof corciovei silviu

Wonderful analysis..."Let's suppose we play a game, named "What is fundamental?" and its main rule is to answer the question. The competitors who find the proper answer are going to win. Who is the most clear win the most" Nice hacking....

I hope you will not mind that I am not following main stream physics...

By the way...Here in my essay energy to mass conversion is proposed................ yours is very nice essay best wishes .... I highly appreciate hope your essay ....You may please spend some of the valuable time on Dynamic Universe Model also and give your some of the valuable & esteemed guidance

Some of the Main foundational points of Dynamic Universe Model :

-No Isotropy

-No Homogeneity

-No Space-time continuum

-Non-uniform density of matter, universe is lumpy

-No singularities

-No collisions between bodies

-No blackholes

-No warm holes

-No Bigbang

-No repulsion between distant Galaxies

-Non-empty Universe

-No imaginary or negative time axis

-No imaginary X, Y, Z axes

-No differential and Integral Equations mathematically

-No General Relativity and Model does not reduce to GR on any condition

-No Creation of matter like Bigbang or steady-state models

-No many mini Bigbangs

-No Missing Mass / Dark matter

-No Dark energy

-No Bigbang generated CMB detected

-No Multi-verses

Here:

-Accelerating Expanding universe with 33% Blue shifted Galaxies

-Newton's Gravitation law works everywhere in the same way

-All bodies dynamically moving

-All bodies move in dynamic Equilibrium

-Closed universe model no light or bodies will go away from universe

-Single Universe no baby universes

-Time is linear as observed on earth, moving forward only

-Independent x,y,z coordinate axes and Time axis no interdependencies between axes..

-UGF (Universal Gravitational Force) calculated on every point-mass

-Tensors (Linear) used for giving UNIQUE solutions for each time step

-Uses everyday physics as achievable by engineering

-21000 linear equations are used in an Excel sheet

-Computerized calculations uses 16 decimal digit accuracy

-Data mining and data warehousing techniques are used for data extraction from large amounts of data.

- Many predictions of Dynamic Universe Model came true....Have a look at

http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/p/blog-page_15.html

I request you to please have a look at my essay also, and give some of your esteemed criticism for your information........

Dynamic Universe Model says that the energy in the form of electromagnetic radiation passing grazingly near any gravitating mass changes its in frequency and finally will convert into neutrinos (mass). We all know that there is no experiment or quest in this direction. Energy conversion happens from mass to energy with the famous E=mC2, the other side of this conversion was not thought off. This is a new fundamental prediction by Dynamic Universe Model, a foundational quest in the area of Astrophysics and Cosmology.

In accordance with Dynamic Universe Model frequency shift happens on both the sides of spectrum when any electromagnetic radiation passes grazingly near gravitating mass. With this new verification, we will open a new frontier that will unlock a way for formation of the basis for continual Nucleosynthesis (continuous formation of elements) in our Universe. Amount of frequency shift will depend on relative velocity difference. All the papers of author can be downloaded from "http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.in/ "

I request you to please post your reply in my essay also, so that I can get an intimation that you replied

Best

=snp

Excuse me, I did not answer, not checking all my comments in the various blogs.

It is a good essay because it is well written (it reminded me Conrad), and the first part make a good analysis of languages, and reading I thought of different conclusions, linked to the representation of reality in the human brain.

The baseball-Universe dynamics seem a particular case of fundamental dynamics (restricted to the final state), that does not give - maybe just to me - an answer.

Your vote is high, so that others have thought otherwise, so do not worry about my opinion that is a minority.

Regards

Domenico

Very Nice Essay corciovei silviu,

I gave you 10, previously it was 6.5 now it is 7.2

best wishes

=snp

Dear Silviu:

You are a gifted writer.

Even though my essay writing is not as good as yours; I believe I have presented some substance.

In fact, I think your essay should be read first, before people read mine. Then they will better appreciate why the concept "Fundamental" for the human species must keep evolving.

May be we could collaborate. Then you do not have to hack my brain without my knowing: Chandra.Roychoudhuri@uconn.edu

Chandra.

Silviu,

Great game, and excellent way to look at the issue. Well done.

My essay title 'Ridiculous Simplicity' suggests a solution which is ...simply;

"Nothing can exist without motion".

I show that has rich universal meaning across all physics at all scales. Motion is a relative concept. I't motion that 'creates' fermion pairs from the vacuum, and it's rotational motion that IS all matter, or with ever more complex coupling of rotations. Then just add relative 'linear' translation and we can make an entire universe.

"what is fundamental for the final state of the universe?" Re-ionization in the greatest rotation that exists. At smaller scales 'Supermassive black holes' (AGN's) do the same but to a galaxy) The ejected matter forms the next universe in the cycle! Full (well evidenced!) picture here; https://www.academia.edu/6655261/A_CYCLIC_MODEL_OF_GALAXY_EVOLUTION_WITH_BARS

Relative motion 'IS' 'Relativity' - but rationalised (see prev finalist essays from 2011) and mine this year shows it also provides, shockingly, a classical derivation of QM!

I hope you can read and enjoy it. It's the future (In 2010 I suggested it may be 2020 but perhaps optimistically?)

very best

Peter

Dear Corciovei

I was glad that there are people interested in hacking the human brain. The consistency/complexity of the human brain is a reason that consciousness can make use of it (can reside in). So I am not saying that the complexity is the CAUSE of consciousness, no because that would be the same as "looking for the announcer inside the radio". What I myself try to do is hack consciousness...

Some remarks:

"the environment provides clues to survival and to existence". The human agency is part of the emergent phenomenon called "reality". Reality is the total environment of the agent, including emerging space and time. "Survival" is a consequence of the emergent time phenomenon. Each "living creature" is eating other living creatures.

"We notice that the intelligence has the propriety to be aware of itself, " I think that this is a not yet proved assumption. Artificial intelligence is not yet "aware" (conscious) because it is just working with algorithms. Maybe when quantum devices are being used for creating "intelligence" then ARTIFICIAL CONSCIOUSNESS may arise.

Language: mathematical and verbal. Communication is a process that involves time, Communication is also one of the tools to survive in time. Maybe there are more "languages" possible to communicate...

"With the discovery of some few immutable laws of the universe, the human being found more "essential conditions". I think that humanity at each discovery of a so-called "immutable" law, find new essential conditions that are only valid for a new short time.

I wonder what you are thinking of my attribution "Foundational Quantum Reality Loops" where I am not only trying to try to reach out to the foundational HOW but also to the WHY. So maybe you can spare some time to read, comment and eventually rate it.

Best regards

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Dear Corciovei Silviu

Thank you for reading and commenting on my essay and also for answering my points regarding yours.

I will begin with the points you ask on your essay :

1.I think we both agree here. It is quite clear to me what you mean.

2.Yes. But here it is important to make the difference between intelligence and awareness/consciousness. As you say we are constructing artificial intelligence. Intelligence is just data/information, the algorithms of software can compare data to resolve the mathematics, and give solutions to questions. Awareness is not achieved, sometimes "it looks like" awareness because of the complexity of the software, but it will stay only a "yes or no" phenomenon.

3.Indeed there are ways of communication that we will perhaps never be aware of because we have only five senses.

4.In the middle ages the immutable law was that the sun was turning around the earth, and really there were used such complex calculations that it really "seemed" to be true. The later immutable law was that it was the other way around. So the first one is no longer valuable. Humanity is only existing one second...Our "intelligence is also existing only one second and we think that we know already a lot (not me). We are indeed creating artificial intelligence but not artificial Consciousness, the new quantum devices (working with qubits) that can not only "choose" between yes or no, maybe the new evolution towards Artificial Consciousness (AC). AC will have then the "I" and the "will" to stay "alive", without the need to "eat" other AC's. The only "eating" will be the sharing of intelligence (information).

On your question on my essay: What is consciousness? I partly gave already the answer above under 4. But I will try to answer this (ultimate difficult) question very short by asking you: "What is the "I" (yourself, ego) inside you? That is the part of you that is aware of its emergent entity. It TRIES to UNDERSTAND the signals from emerging reality around YOU. It TRIES to UNDERSTAND the foundational HOW and also WHY. This consciousness is not the result of a complexity called brains, but it is the origin of the complexity. (You will not find the announcer inside the radio).

I hope that this answers your questions. I rated you an 8 today.

Wilhelmus de Wilde

Dear Corciovei

If you are looking for another essay to read and rate in the final days of the contest, will you consider mine please? I read all essays from those who comment on my page, and if I cant rate an essay highly, then I don't rate them at all. Infact I haven't issued a rating lower that ten. So you have nothing to lose by having me read your essay, and everything to gain.

Beyond my essay's introduction, I place a microscope on the subjects of universal complexity and natural forces. I do so within context that clock operation is driven by Quantum Mechanical forces (atomic and photonic), while clocks also serve measure of General Relativity's effects (spacetime, time dilation). In this respect clocks can be said to possess a split personality, giving them the distinction that they are simultaneously a study in QM, while GR is a study of clocks. The situation stands whereby we have two fundamental theories of the world, but just one world. And we have a singular device which serves study of both those fundamental theories. Two fundamental theories, but one device? Please join me and my essay in questioning this circumstance?

My essay goes on to identify natural forces in their universal roles, how they motivate the building of and maintaining complex universal structures and processes. When we look at how star fusion processes sit within a "narrow range of sensitivity" that stars are neither led to explode nor collapse under gravity. We think how lucky we are that the universe is just so. We can also count our lucky stars that the fusion process that marks the birth of a star, also leads to an eruption of photons from its surface. And again, how lucky we are! for if they didn't then gas accumulation wouldn't be halted and the star would again be led to collapse.

Could a natural organisation principle have been responsible for fine tuning universal systems? Faced with how lucky we appear to have been, shouldn't we consider this possibility?

For our luck surely didnt run out there, for these photons stream down on earth, liquifying oceans which drive geochemical processes that we "life" are reliant upon. The Earth is made up of elements that possess the chemical potentials that life is entirely dependent upon. Those chemical potentials are not expressed in the absence of water solvency. So again, how amazingly fortunate we are that these chemical potentials exist in the first instance, and additionally within an environment of abundant water solvency such as Earth, able to express these potentials.

My essay is attempt of something audacious. It questions the fundamental nature of the interaction between space and matter Guv = Tuv, and hypothesizes the equality between space curvature and atomic forces is due to common process. Space gives up a potential in exchange for atomic forces in a conversion process, which drives atomic activity. And furthermore, that Baryons only exist because this energy potential of space exists and is available for exploitation. Baryon characteristics and behaviours, complexity of structure and process might then be explained in terms of being evolved and optimised for this purpose and existence. Removing need for so many layers of extraordinary luck to eventuate our own existence. It attempts an interpretation of the above mentioned stellar processes within these terms, but also extends much further. It shines a light on molecular structure that binds matter together, as potentially being an evolved agency that enhances rigidity and therefor persistence of universal system. We then turn a questioning mind towards Earths unlikely geochemical processes, (for which we living things owe so much) and look at its central theme and propensity for molecular rock forming processes. The existence of chemical potentials and their diverse range of molecular bond formation activities? The abundance of water solvent on Earth, for which many geochemical rock forming processes could not be expressed without? The question of a watery Earth? is then implicated as being part of an evolved system that arose for purpose and reason, alongside the same reason and purpose that molecular bonds and chemistry processes arose.

By identifying atomic forces as having their origin in space, we have identified how they perpetually act, and deliver work products. Forces drive clocks and clock activity is shown by GR to dilate. My essay details the principle of force dilation and applies it to a universal mystery. My essay raises the possibility, that nature in possession of a natural energy potential, will spontaneously generate a circumstance of Darwinian emergence. It did so on Earth, and perhaps it did so within a wider scope. We learnt how biology generates intricate structure and complexity, and now we learn how it might explain for intricate structure and complexity within universal physical systems.

To steal a phrase from my essay "A world product of evolved optimization".

Best of luck for the conclusion of the contest

Kind regards

Steven Andresen

Darwinian Universal Fundamental Origin

Dear Silviu,

your essay is dense and original. I especially liked the example of baseball with which you illustrate the fundamental "equivalence" between an "inner" and an "outer" perspective on the evolution of the universe, despite their opposition. An important difference between the two perspectives is however undeniable: an outer perspective can never have a scientific validity, because it refers to some hypothetical reality or external agent (the "player") on which we can only speculate. Instead, an inner perspective is in principle within the reach of science, even if we do not know if we can ever be complete and definitive.

A question: You say:

"Confined to a logic and rational thinking, we could suppose the adaptation is a result of intelligence."

This seems to mean that intelligence is innate. So how do you explain the adaptability of beings that, from our point of view, are not intelligent? The opposite point of view can also be argued, namely that intelligence is the result, not the cause, of adaptation. I do not know which of the two is the correct perspective.

All the best,

Giovanni

Dear Silviu,

I am very grateful that you paid attention to my work. It is critical work, that is way it is difficult to find many supporters. I'm glad that you are one of them. You says //In one way or another, the mathematical language will have to be "translated" in a verbal one, more permissive then inductive.// I am saying that math is a small part of common logical analytical system, which must be serve as a must fundamental tool of natural science. So, math cannot "work" himself and separately that can brought to some of certain valuable results.

I thing you are well realized this reality and the inevitability of serious revision in the methodology of present theoretical physics.

Thus, I wish you successes in this contest and I will support you!

Best regards.

Silviu,

I try to read as many as poss before rating at the end. As it's nigh I've done yours now for a bit of a boost. I hope it doesn't also get hit with 1's as mine has!

Very best

Peter

Silviu,

Short and seemingly simple explanation but quite impressive in its ability to expound. I particularly like going from the simple example of kicking the ball and the energy applied, then expanding it to dark energy and the expansion of the universe. I like the verbal subjective combined with the mathematical precision. Your narrative helps to simplify the fundamentals of the universe.

Jim

Thankyou Silviu for your kind comments on my essay.

I think this kind of metaphysics (as you display here) which tries to place physics correctly in terms of linguistics and meaning and other complications, is particularly important in advancing our knowledge. Well done indeed.

Best,

Jack