All that "many world's interpretation" of quantum mechanics is also wrong. It's like thinking that your house has 5 rooms, and that every room requires a whole new house. MWI is total baloney. But quantum mechanics does suggest that space itself is made of quantum wave functions. That's also equivalent to saying that space itself is made of wave functions (although the details of how are a little bit illusive).

So basically, the last major breakthrough in physics was general relativity. But hat was a 100 years ago. What have you done lately? Nothin'! You've been staring at black holes which has not given you much to brag about. I saw the picture of a black hole. It looks like a coffee stain.

I have a prediction. In the second term of president Trump, the aliens, the ExtraTerrestrials, will confirm their existence. You will have to learn to live with telepathic beings who are a lot further along scientifically, emotionally, mentally then you are. Won't that be fun! :)

Once again, you are the one who has nothing...your model does not explain anything. Matter action explains many heretofore unexplained observations:

Matter-action discrete aether is consistent with many unexplained observations like galaxy rotation without dark matter, galaxy cluster rotation without dark matter, gravity lensing without dark matter, fine-structure constant variation in deep space, pulsar decay, IPK decay, 11 year sunspot cycle, coupling of stellar variations in star clusters, and so on.

Your model accepts spacetime singularities, matter action eliminates spacetime singularities like black holes. Current science is just now understanding the neutron equation of state and what happens deep inside of neutron stars. Right now it is a mystery why every neutron star does not collapse into its own black hole.

Matter action has a path for quantum neutron equation of state...work in progress...science is fun...new science is really fun...

    unfortunally , all what you tell is an assumption not proved and all your ideas are not innovative, you reapet things known mixed with affirmations not proved, sorry but it is a fact, you have not proved that the DM does not exist, you don t consider foundamental objects and your philosophy general about the origin of this universe and this antiverse is just in your head unfortunally, like all you have just assumpotions and you have not proved them, so maybe you could doubt instead to affirm, it is not like this this that the sciences act, doubt and calculate your assumptions, after maybe we could accept them, at this moment you just discuss and nothing ir really concrete and proved. Too much affirmations not proved simply, me I don t affirm my assumptions, I work on them to prove them, you could make the same Steve Humbly in recognising this like all rational thinkers trying to explain our unknowns.

    I know what is a biphoton, I speak about the fact that you consider only photons like primordial essence, and also that you have made the same than verlinde in modifying this newtonian mechanics and so you forget this DM, it is not proved, your antiverse like balance, the same it is not proved, and you don t develop the correlated philosophy, thirdly, you consider gravitons, they are not proved and are hypothetical and 4 what do you consider like foundamental objects, develop, and explain , are they points or strings and why , and what are your geometrical algebras, but there also it is not proved, the nmatter action is not the problem and the bipohotons also, the proofs are the problem about this planck scale, the main codes and the philosophical origin, so you can repeat and tell all what you want, that will not change the fact that all are just assumptions not proved.

    your balance is not bad about a kind of antimatter for this universe ,so an antiverse but it is not proved and you cannot affirm simply and I repeat, the same for your ideas about this DM, and the same for your gravitons, but apparently you affrim these thingfs like facts, where are the formalisations and mathematical proofs ?

    the same for your aether , you consider a luminiferous aether like main primordial essence, it is not proved , and you speak about the matter action discrete like if we had what ??? what is the cause of these matters actions, fields ??? and why ? strings and oscillations and why ? have you proved them ?no you have not

    what I try to explain is that this antimatter is necessary because we need a balance for our ordinary matter , but the fact to affrim its origin and its mechanics is odd, we don t know this balance, all what we have actually are assumptions about this balance , and you can utilise the schrodinger and klein gordon equations or einstein fields equations , that will not change the problem that we don t know this real origin of this universal balance, I consider a cold dark matter but me I don t affirm, you you affir, feynman had its ideas but he didn t affrim, the same for dirac , they thought differently but they didn t affirm, they have not proved these unknowns simply and they recognised this. This universal balance is the main important problem for me and if we find the solution, we solve many unknowns, but we cannot affirm actually simply, so why you affirm ???

    that implies also that we don t know about this time , dirac and feynman had different points of vue about this anti matter, so how can we affirm things that we cannoty prove actually, it seems odd, that is why we must doubt and begin a post aboiut these things by maybe I beleive that...or I have an idea but I am not sure I have not proved still, but no, you you come with assumptions and you affirm them ????

    A sure thing is that we need this balance and we have had proofs with several experiments like the Lawrence livemoreNational Laboratory, if my memory is correct they have discovered these positrons with the decays matter anti matter, but we don t know nor its origin philosophical and physical. I have a model that I don t affir, Dirac had his ideas, Feynman also , like Hawking and the BHs, and others also but all we recognise that we don t know really this hard problem. We have just assumptions I repeat. For me and I don t affirm, it is correlated with this cold Dark matter because it is also encoded in nuclei for me, and the day that we shall check this anti matter it will be revolutionary , that can be even utilised for the propulsions and the energetical systems, but we are not there actually.

    In fact , all is a question of positive energy and negative energy but never it is said that we need an antiverse for this negative energy, and never it is said that we must only consider E=mc^2 , what we must do in logic is to complete this equation and the dark cold metter seems one of the most logic interpretation and furthermore can explain the evolution and furthermore can predict the future of this universe , the baryogenesis can be better understood simply with this negative energy like this cold dark matter turning in opposite sense even in my model and in the cold, that permit to balance really , I don t affirm of course, but I see like that. It is there that my equation intuitive becomes relevant for the baryogenesis and the neutrality of the dark matter,not need of an antiverse and all is inside the universe simply,See that this Dark matter explains the problem of this antimatter lacking furthermore and this evolution , it is very important like idea. All this reasoning permits to go deeper even than this BB and inflation, due to a kind even of primoridal gravitational essence and correlated energy, fields and matters, well see now the annihilation and the CP violation .... you shall understand better my cosmological model of spherisation

    The luminiferous aether, taking it out of the realm of alchemy and relocating into theoretical physics, is the effect of expanding gravitons that fill all of space with momentum and position quantum states... places for particles to inhabit and permissible velocities.

    we see a little bit the same about the expanding gravitons like main primordial essence, continue to search answers with this reasoning, it seems good, I consider just a different primoridal essence with this space and this dark cold matter but that converges a little bit with you , the balance for the baryons seems the answer

    Hi Steve,

    My idea about the wave function being a captured graviton allows me to declare that the quantum operators, particularly the momentum operator, are properties of the graviton. The expectation value of momentum is,

    [math]p_x = - i \hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}[/math]

    Furthermore, the equation for a force is,

    [math]\vec F = \frac{d\vec p}{dt}[/math]

    For a wave function of the form,

    [math]\Psi(x,t,\omega(x)) = Ae^{i(k_x x - \omega (x)t)}[/math]

    We are left with the suggestion that a frequency that changes with position, like a blueshift or redshift, could be an indication that a force exists.

    2 months later

    Time is the 4th dimension that explains wave particle duality. Once you measure an electron/photon you get rid of the 4th dimension and it becomes a particular point in time space. When past/present/future all exist at once a point particle is a wave. By observing we break continuity of time and give it a specific value. Enjoy! luksio63@gmail.com

    a month later
    6 days later

    Hi Vesuvius, we search all answers and the philosophy probably is important but unfortunally we have many limitations in knowledges ,in physics like in philosophy, we cannot affirm to possess the truth, all what we have are assumptiuons, the same for the deep unknowns in physics .We must prove afeter all our assumptions and after we can accept them like facts . It is like this that the sciences are , regards

    Hi Steve,

    On the nature of time, we can assume that time exists as a kind of force or thing, or we can assume that time does not exist as a kind of force or thing.

    What if everyone assumes that time does exist, and it turns out that times does not exist.

    Hello Jim, this time seems a parameter inside this physicality correlated with the motions rotations, the quaternions are interesting for this. I consider it like irreversible on this entropical arrow of time , this time is aflow linear, that said when we observe with the spacetime and this GR , it is relativistic of course but it for observations. In quantum physics the equation of schrodinger is interesting considering the evolution and the hamiltonian. If we consider the philosophy, that becomes intriguing considering the infinity and eternity maybe but it is an other story to understand the beyond this physicality . It exists inside this physicality for me but not beyond this physicality. Regards

    Hi Steve,

    If time exists, it must be compelling something. What would happen if we could turn time off?

    Would everything freeze, as portrayed on Star Trek.

    We have motion in our timeless Universe.

    Hi Steve,

    Every one of us is affected by the rotational motion of the Earth. The Earth`s rotational motion`s surface speed at the Equator is about 1,000 miles per hour. How we could freeze that in time, I don`t know, but if the rotational motion stopped, everything down to bedrock would be swept away.

    We use the Earth`s rotational motion as our measurement baseline for measuring time.

    We use motion to measure time. Motion exists, time does not.