Dufourny et al., this is kind of a classic argument, but I am going to ask it of one of these outspoken physicists next time I meet one. We have the Schrodinger equation, General relativity, and so forth, and--on a first take--we evolve the equations through time. But what *sustains* the universe?? You could say: the universe doesn't need anything to sustain it. But that is just an opinion.

That's all I wanted to say. But Wolfe et al., why don't you put your ideas in a form that the relevant people could easily see they are right (or wrong)?

    Well Vesuvius Now, first of all, we are on a transparent platform so put your real name, and secondly develop ideas about the time if it is possible, show us what are you thought about this parameter simple to encircle, it is a simple duration due to motions , and for me we cannot check this time in travelling in time, but if you have a solution, give us your relevant maths innovative and we shall travel in time like in back to the future. Tell us also more about your philosophy about this universe, first of all what are for you the origin of this physicality and why, and what are the foundamental objects and why, after maybe we could go deeper, there it is not sufficient :) the schrodinger equation is simple to encircle like the general relativity , the big question is , must we consider that we have only photons like primoridal essence, and if yes or no, why , to you dear theinker, impress me lol

    and about your philosphy about this universe, explain it in details and prov e its porigin, but you cannot prove nor its origin and why this energy is transforned oin matters, it d be pretentious to affirm to know the truth, you don t know it , the same for the foundamental objetcs, but maybe you could convice me with concrete arguments in physics and maths :) your post is simple and classic for me, but like we are all persuaded and vanitious us the humans, you could develop more maybe ?

    it does not exist a lot of relevant general thinkers able to link maths, physics, philosophy with humility in doubting and in detailing their assumptions, Connes and Penrose for me are the best actually with Wilczek, them I will listen them if they come here in explaining their ideas, but unfortunally they are not here on FQXi, the others for the majority try to impress and satisfy their vanity, that can be sometimes relevant in cretivity but we need a pure determinism and skillingfs f

    general, it is rare, are you able to be like them ? there I could be impressed with detailes maths and physics, spherically yours

    lol sorry I write too quickly , so I make errors, already that I am frecnh speaking, that does not help. Well, so let s rebegin to speak about this main origin of our physicality and why, and its philosophy correlated , so tell me more about this physicality, this time, these mathematical and foundamental objects.

    What I meant to say is that it could be that God sustains the universe, because the idea that the universe does't need anything to sustain it is just an opinion.

    Hi Vesuvius,

    It is my opinion that the universe is sustained by a constant supply of new gravitons, like a garden hose with water coming out of it, into the back yard. But these gravitons cause quantum mechanics to work, as well as the standard model particle fields. They also overlap to create the spacetime continuum. If God decided to turn off the flow of gravitons, I think that quantum mechanics would stop working, IMO.

    Hi , unfortunally we cannot prove these philosophical assumptions , like I told the sciences community is divided and we are all free to have our own ideas about this but we cannot prove , nobody can prove or deny this infinite eternal potential if it exists, we are all persuaded that our philosophy is correct but a sure thing that we must accept, nobody knowns these deep unknowns, I consider like I told you an infinite eternal consciousness having created this physicality , and I respect the pure determinism inside this physicality, but like all I cannot prove my philosophy. All what we can do is just to try to encircle with maths and physics the deterministic laws, axioms, equations inside this physicality in accepting our limitations like humble travellers from stars .

    about this time , the schrodinger equation can be analysed with an independent time or dependent time and it is nonrelativistic , the stationary states become relevant but how can we so consider the deep unknowns like the gravitational quantm fields ?

    Solutions to the Schrodinger equation are like things that fit inside of an arbitrary potential energy. Water can fit inside of a glass or it can fit inside of a river bed; the fact that the water takes a different shape doesn't mean it's not water for both. The wave function is the same way. By that logic, a quantum entanglement can (or could be) described by a wave function. I postulated that the wave function is really a captured graviton. If so, then the entanglement between two photons is also a graviton. One might suppose that a graviton has gravitional acceleration fields built into it. But if we know that a captured graviton is identically a wave function, then we know that a graviton must have momentum, position and energy states built into it. But in order for a graviton to contribute to a gravity field, there must be momentum states that change over distance.

    This is where the idea of centrifuging two entangled photons comes it, to create the momentum states that change over distance (between the photons).

    Hi Jason, all this is interesting like extrapolation, but we need to know the real nature of these gravitons or particles of gravitation of spin 2, we know that we need a different logic to reach, renormalise and quantify this quantum gravitation, I have reached it in thinking beyond the box with the reasoning that I have explained, considering this cold dark matter encoded in nuclei also and balancing our standard model. This force seems the main chief orchestra and so the electromagntism is just emergent , we have a deeper gravitational logic, I have a fith force also with main gravitational codes farer than our nuclear forces, to encircle this reasoning, I consider just two fuels, the photons and the cold dark matter but we have main codes in this space , so I consider 3 main primoridal series of 3D spheres having the same finite number than our cosmological spheres ,it approachs the dirac large number and when they merge, they create our topologies, geometries, matters and fields, the deformations and geometries can be understood with an intrinsic ricci flow and we can utilise several mathematical tools like the clifford algebras, the lie groups, dervivatives and algebras, and the bott periodicity also can be utilise more the hopf fibrations on surfaces 2D of these spheres to rank the quasiparticles. In fact the universe seems simple generally and the 3 main series, the two fuels and the main codes in the space can explain all if we understand all the motions, rotations, properties of these spheres , it is like if we had a super matter Energy at this central sphere and that distributes the different combinations sent playing between the cold and heat like a equilibrium negentropy entropy, cold heat, +, electrom gravitaion,....the senses of rotations become relevant differenciating the two main systems ,and distributing the matters and the energy more the geometries.So all is relativelly the same but not the codes of distributions , that permits to distribute what they must become more the evolutive point of vue. Now philosophically speaking that becomes relevant considering the main primoridal energy, and the two main systems, that implies two aethers for the fuels, the luminiferous one for the photons and we have this GR , and the cold dark matter for the gravitational one but we have also this space more an other deeper that we can considewr that the aether of consciousness , it is the main energy for me transforming it at this central cosm sphere.The only infinite thing so is this aether of consciousness, not the others wich are finite .

    In resume , we have so 4 different aethers, one for the space and the main codes without motions and rotations and heat and gravitation cold, and two others the luminiferous one with our photons and this GR, and the gravitational one with these particles of cold dark matter , the 3 are under a kind of physical logic but not the fourth aether of consciousness everywhere needing this central cosmological sphere to transform and code this E in matters. We have just analysed at this moment the luminiferous one with these photons and correlated fields, waves and heat , now we need to analyse the others for me.

    You see Jason, dear all, I have just tried to encircle how this infinite energy has created this physicality, I imagined before the hypothetical BB , an infinite eternal energy of consciousness wich is not an infinite heat but a thing more than this , and I told , but why this thing that we cannot define has created a physicality ? maybe simply this thing was alone and it has taken an eternity to create the first central sphere , where the energy has coded and transformed the matter and energy, and after this thing has coded simply the things in these finite serieas of 3D spheres , the 3 main series , the space and the two fuels, for me it seems logic, now of course the complexity of combinations where is coded the informations in these series in incredible , the two fuels permit to create the motions and the distribution of this thermodynamics and the space possesses the main codes , their merging seems the secret. The 3 physical aethers are intriguing and this aether of consciousness still more, it seems that all is connected but it is beyond our human understanding. All what we can is analyse these 3 main aethers but there also we have limitations. We know so few still, we have just analysed a little bit this photonic aether, the photons permit the heat, the electromagntism and the fact to observe also due to light but the gravitational aether and this space are the other steps of knowledges, it is more difficult to study because we don t observe them. We can just try to encircle their properties with partitions.A big puzzle.

    Hi Steve,

    I'm not smarter than the physicists. I think of myself as someone who asked God, asked the ET's, how do you create a gravity propulsion hyperdrive. It took years to understand the answer, but I think I'm correct. My answer is better than other leading theories because unlike string theory, loop quantum gravity and E8, my theory can be verified experimentally. I made certain assumptions based upon some basic modern physics.

    1. wave functions describe actual "things" that exist.

    2. wave functions have states for position, momentum and energy.

    3. gravitons are the "things" that wave functions are describing.

    4. quantum entanglements can be described by wave functions; therefore, quantum entanglements are actually the effect of a graviton connecting two entangled particles.

    5. Routine experiments can entangle photons using a crystal.

    6. Photons can be forced to travel down optical fiber.

    7. Optical fiber can be placed along the radii of a spinning disk.

    8. It would take some amazing technical skill to create a machine that would simulate gravitational redshift and gravitational blue shift by spinning a disk with optical fiber, and aiming the quantum entangled photons at the inlets of the optical fiber, catching them at the outlets of the optical fiber. I predict that the result would be that the quantum momentum states would start to become aligned in a way that simulates a gravity field between the two entangled photons.

    It would be wonderful if I had the energy, degrees and everything else necessary to write a paper on this subject. But the best I can do is to describe the idea on a physics forum to anyone who will listen.

    Vanity is not a bad thing when you have something that is worth looking at.

    Jason

    Hi Jason, thanks for developing, not easy to make these experiments but possible, it will be an enormous revolution in technology when we shall check this quantum gravitation, I see simply like this, for me they turn in opposite sense and are finite series of 3D spheres like you know, so we must in logic consider not really the particles of gravitation alone but probably the main codes in this space more the fuel of cold dark matter and also an opposite resistance to this electronagntism , the 3 main finite series merging must be considered for me and we must find the secret in this puzzle but it seems very complicated, maybe a kind of Bose einstein condensate more other parameters and the problem seems that we cannot see these particles and that they don t interact also with our actual stabndard model, it is a deeper logic, the cold maybe and the sense of rotation simply generally could answer but how to change the sense of rotation of these quantum spheres ? probably in the main codes of this space for me but it seems very complicated, we must furthermore create a kind of opposite field for the spaceship or others but also in the space around, so the waves and fields that we must utilise become very complex to change , that is why the main coded spaces seem the secret. Considering the 3 aether so , we must find the good partition harmonical with waves to adapt these 3 main systems.

    Also, I interpreted the holographic universe to be the result of expanding spheres from a point (everywhere in space), from the Planck scale. In this way, spacetime is created the way a motion picture film creates the illusion of motion on a film screen.

    It is a good idea, you could generalise all this with the geometrodynamics and points and the geometrical algebras in considering several E8 and in considering the fields for the partitions, more the padics analysis ,this planck scale is relevant indeed to consider, we must find the real main codes and why we have this emergent spacetime , I don t consider personally that all comes from fields but from coded particles, the space does not really exist in my model.

    The Planck scale is where you would find the paranormal. Gravitons emit from the Planck scale, expand into our 3D+1 spacetime, by creating our spacetime.

      Dear Jason, I don t beleive in paranormal, I beleive that all is deterministic, of course we have many secrets to add and discover but all probably respect this determinism and rationalism, all seems normal, it is like a kind of God, I consider that this thing utilises a pure deterministic universe , and at this planck scale, considering the main codes, we have also normal and deterministic codes, informations, respecting the rational auniversal axioms, equations and laws. I repeat , of course we have many wonderful things to discover and that will permit to create incredible technologies but the paranormal does not seem logic for me, maybe I don t understand well what you tell by paranormal.

      Hi Steve,

      By describing the expanding graviton, I claim to be able to describe everything that exists physically with the standard model plus the expanding graviton. The big bang began as a single point from the Planck scale; so it looks to me like spacetime of our universe is an extension of the Planck scale; kind of like adding a room onto a house. The Planck scale is where everything is coming from. I know you are not a religious man or a believer, but I would tell a believer that the kingdom of God exists at the Planck scale.

      As for determinism, which I guess from what you're saying is equivalent to a non existence of the paranormal, I don't believe that such cynicism is necessary. I infer your opinion that when we die, we cease to exist. You can infer my opinion that when we die, a part of us still exists as a spirit. I would attribute that to the existence of a spirit, a soul, to fields and form that exists at the Planck scale.