Can Time Be Saved From Physics?

The 'sense of sight' is in other words being able to see. If you can see you have a sense of sight, like it or not.

Georgina,

One can do nothing else but see VISIBLE surface with one's eyes. One cannot do anything else but smell VISIBLE surface with one's nose. One cannot do anything else but touch VISIBLE surface with one's VISIBLE surface. One cannot do anything else but hear sounds caused by VISIBLE surface with one's ears. One cannot do anything else but taste the VISIBLE surface of the once living material we put into our mouths. Although white male scientist chose to pretend that they could identify invisible finite senses lurking in human brains, ETERNAL NATURAL VISIBLE REALITY AM UNIVERSAL.

Joe Fisher, The VISIBLE Realist

Craig

Time can be saved by abolishing time dilation by revealing the wrong arguments provided by the assumed transverse effect in the MMX tests and thereby also giving up the wave or particle paradox. See link below!

From ___________________ John-Erik Persson

The most fundamental paradox

Joe,you lack an understanding of high school level human biology.We cannot see just with eyes but require functioning optic nerves and visual regions of the brain. A person with healthy eyes can be blind if the visual cortex is not functioning as it should, or if the optic nerves are damaged. Input to the various sense organs cause generation of electrical impulses that are transmitted to the brain and processed into sensations that are experienced. Experiences are not generated by the sense organs themselves.

Georgina,

The optic nerve has a VISIBLE surface that the brain surgeon can easily locate once he removes part of the VISIBLE skull covering.. One sees a black VISIBLE surface even if one has one's eyes closed. Blind people see a dim or dark VISIBLE surface. VISIBLE surface existed BEFORE men with excellent 20/20 vision ever appeared on the real VISIBLE surface of this planet.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Planck Time (tP) opens basic questions. First, tP is a direct correlation and necessary relation with a length and light in much the same way Einstein's well-known equation, e=mc2 necessarily and dynamically relate mass, energy and light. These four Planck base units are each natural units that use only the most fundamental universal constants to define them. What if these define the very first moment of space, time, mass and energy? What if the universe starts cold? What if the first expression of these five facets of our reality first manifest as a sphere? John Archibald Wheeler suggested quantum foam. Others are suggesting that we call these spheres, planckspheres. What if there is an application of cubic close packing of equal spheres (ccp) at this scale and the stacking amounts to a doubling? Within 202 doublings (or base-2 notations), these Planck base units have become the age of the universe, the size of the universe, the total mass of the universe, and the total energy of the universe, and yes, it is still happening right now. The universe is expanding! Exploring such a simple model has been our effort since December 2011: Homepage Review the chart of the numbers and to get a sense of the emergence and natural inflation.

Planck Time (tP) opens basic questions. First, tP is a direct correlation and necessary relation with a length and light in much the same way Einstein's well-known equation, e=mc2 necessarily and dynamically relate mass, energy and light. These four Planck base units are each natural units that use only the most fundamental universal constants to define them. What if these define the very first moment of space, time, mass and energy? What if the universe starts cold? What if the first expression of these five facets of our reality first manifest as a sphere? John Archibald Wheeler suggested quantum foam. Others are suggesting that we call these spheres, planckspheres. What if there is an application of cubic close packing of equal spheres (ccp) at this scale and the stacking amounts to a doubling? Within 202 doublings (or base-2 notations), these Planck base units have become the age of the universe, the size of the universe, the total mass of the universe, and the total energy of the universe, and yes, it is still happening right now. The universe is expanding! Exploring such a simple model has been our effort since December 2011: Homepage Review the chart of the numbers and to get a sense of the emergence and natural inflation.

Your reply shows a lack of knowledge of human anatomy. Ignoring that; you now admit that as well as seen surface appearance, there is 'not seen' material that has to be exposed in order for there to be surface appearance of it. Which surely contradicts your premise that only visible surface exists.

Exposing a previously covered material exposes it to the'light', which enables an observer to receive the reflected 'light' and the observer's visual system to generate the surface appearance seen.

Georgina,

There am only VISIBLE surface. Although English fluent humans have given names to supposedly finite measured objects such as say an internal combustion engine, all parts of every combustion engine that has ever been built has a VISIBLE surface, whether it am installed or not. All humans always have a VISIBLE surface. All teachers of human anatomy always have a VISIBLE surface at the time they are teaching a course in human anatomy which they retain later that night when they retire to go to bed.

Joe Fisher, Realist

Joe, an engine inside an opaque car is neither visible nor surface. Cars would not function without their unseen interior workings. That they do work is evidence you are wrong. If you are now claiming 'surface' applies to both exterior and interior, it has lost it's meaning which differentiates those conditions, I have explained why only the surface of opaque materials is seen. What is perceived is an observation product, not the independently existing material reality, which is more than just surface appearance.

Dear Georgina,

Am it possible for any human to see one unified VISIBLE infinite surface? Of course not. Every human has a finite sized pair of eyes.

Joe Fisher, Observant Realist.

Joe, you have not relied to my arguments.

Georgina,

I have relied on NATURE. The only irrefutable fact the white male physicists have ever proven am that the real Earth had a real VISIBLE surface for millions of real years BEFORE any white male physicist ever appeared on that real VISIBLE surface and began publishing his unnatural guesswork about how the VISIBLE universe slowly emerged from out of an empty void 13.75 billion light years ago due to an invisible explosion, and it is still expanding faster than the speed of light. Could you please answer this question? Supposedly, the greatest white male thinkers of all time have gained that reputation for daring to ask where the real Universe came from. Why has no woman of any color ever asked where the real VISIBLE Universe came from? Could it be that every woman of any color am sensible enough to intuitively know that the real VISIBLE Universe could not possibly have came from anywhere else? Why do all women of any color know that the real VISIBLE Universe must have been in the same place FOREVER, OTHERWISE IT WOULD NOT BE WHERE IT WAS, WOULD IT?

Joe Fisher, White Male Realist

Joe, you have just ignored my arguments.There seems to be a problem with the claim that only surface exists, and yet the unseen internal structures of machines sand organisms are required for their function. There is also a problem with using 'surface" for both internal and external. Are you unable to explain yourself?

time has only the math existence, time as the 4th dimension of space is Einstein's mathematical Trick.

While Craig Callender in his video spoke in a murky manner that was difficult to completely understand for me, I am nonetheless sure, his focus on psychological time cannot hide that the so called physical time does definitely not provide a complete picture of reality. When Einstein denied the now, he referred just to models that are thought as complete, i.e. equations considering merely a finite amount of influences and implying a predetermined future.

Common sense is more prudent. I guess, the here and the now are essentially the only two genuine singularities of reality, the only two natural (in the sense of non-arbitrarily chosen) points of reference. In reality, there is no negative already elapsed time as there is also no negative distance.

Using the symbol box is clever - when operating with models. Cf. also my cusanus.docx and cusanus vs SR.docx.

The confrontation between different viewpoints is always an interesting procedure to approach a better understanding of our reality. The article and the conference which has been organized about the thematic "time" is an effort going into that direction.

Now, since our life is irremediably going from one unavoidable event (the birth) to another one (the death), two fix points in any human trajectory, it is difficult to not see a link between the concept of time and the one of thermodynamic state (the comparison is not new). In my mind, this does not mean that the time does not exist; on the contrary, I would say it is the proof of the existence of time in an obvious three-dimensional space.

What is the nature of time? This is the real question. I belong to the group of persons believing that the time can be described by an arrow, a vector; at least in each small enough volume. I have developed a theory with this idea, pushing the calculations of the variations of the basis vectors until the second order and trying to build an extension of Einstein's general theory of relativity... (the literature around that theory is on a temporary website: cosmicstrings.de). Provided, I did not make too much mistakes, the results are surprising.

I am only an amateur (no professional) but, I like all these discussions around the foundations of our knowledge.

Time has only the math existence and Higgs mechanism is pure failure

Physical reality can be hacked and hacking physical reality exposes the erroneous scientific method as anthing but scientific and to start with physics in its entirety is based on light sources as a measurement tool and as used it only measure physics lab physical motion = 27.32 days found in all physics experimentation measurements and the errors is textbooks of physics