Can Time Be Saved From Physics?

I - (r / rв‚Ђ) = eВ± i П‰ t = cosine П‰ t В± i sine П‰ t

(1/T) ∫_o^Tв-'гЂ-(r/(rв‚Ђ))dt гЂ-- = (1/T)∫_0^Tв-'(cosine П‰t+ i sine П‰ t)dt

Observed along the line of sight = (1/T) ∫_0^Tв-'(cosine П‰t)dt

= Sine П‰ T/ П‰ T = Spin speed/ Visual orbital speed

The angle П‰ T = (C/R)

= 2 О©; О© = ecliptic plane angle

R = Earth's radius = 6371000 meters

C = 299792458 meters

II - (ОёК№ / ОёК№в‚Ђ) = eВ± 2 i П‰ t = cosine 2П‰ t В± i sine 2П‰ t

(1/T) ∫_o^Tв-'гЂ-(ОёК№ / ОёК№в‚Ђ)dt гЂ--

= (1/T)∫_0^Tв-'(cosine 2П‰ t В± i sine 2П‰ t)dt

Observed along the line of sight:

= (1/T) ∫_0^Tв-'(cosine 2П‰t)dt

= Sine 2П‰ T/ 2П‰ T

The above is a Fourier transform or a map or an integration into real time gives sine w t / w t = spin speed/orbit speed an w t = C/R C = 299792458 meters claimed by Ole Roemer as light speed and r = Earth's theoretical radius.

Hacking Physical Reality

Real Time Physics

With Applications: The Sun's motion in 365.256 days cycle wrongly assigned to Earth and Earth's 27.321 days cycle wrongly assigned to the not moving and Sun's light reflecting Moon Burning 500 Years of Classical Physics & 120 Years of Nobel Quantum Illusions Relativistic Delusions modern physics not as a has been a physics but as a never was any physics

By first and only Physicist Joe Nahhas

We have only 2 times in the universe:

- psychological time that has its origin in the neuronal activity of the brain

- duration that is the results of the observer measurement

all the rest

- coordinate time, proper time, cosmological time, thermodynamic time.....is pure imagination

https://bistra.si/images/2021/Time_as_the_Result_of_Measurement.pdf

The phrase above "...argued that time does not exist at all" shows how constrained we are by space and matter. Of course time doesn't 'exist'; it occurs. We think that 'things' [matter] can exist in a dimension. We never grant that (kinetic) energy might occur on its own in a dimension (time).

Our human sense of a flow of time only suggests that there are some physical conditions from which that sense emerges. Yet our senses also tend to lead us to discount Time in any real way. The problem still remains that for there to be measurement of observation there must be something in between any two detectable objects we observe. If there is neither Time or Space in a physical reality then our measurements are predicated on a comparison of prior observations in which we arbitrarily assign a span of duration and a span of distance with the assumption that the scale of each is the same as the other. But there exists no observable to base that assumption on, only that everything isn't in the same place all at once.

All measurement therefore depends on some other measure evolved from Earth based common notions of size and motion intuitively conceived in antiquity. Eventually, that ad hoc methodology did arrive at some irrefutable if inconvenient conclusions, perhaps the most notable being the calculable constancy of light velocity by Maxwell. Not for all the commonly cited rationale however valid, but for the often ignored simple condition of the light velocity proportionality between the intensity of the electric field and the magnetic field in a point charge; because for any chemical reaction to take place in one locality, that same proportionality would have to be the same for any chemical reactions to be predictable in any other localities. The postulates of Special Relativity are a consequence of that inconvenient truth.

So we do have at least one universal bounded interval from which to protract scales of measure in reality. And that argues well for a multidimensionality of physically real Spacetime. Let the games begin!