Essay Abstract

The Neo-Cartesian generalization of modern physics on based the principle of the equivalence of space - matter of Descartes makes her the theory of everything. This reveals: 1) Heisenberg's inequality becomes an expression of the principle of certainty of points of space-matter, 2) The formula of equivalence of mass-energy arises as a result of the flow of forces from the Universe through the surface of the corpuscle, equal to the product of the Planck constant on the speed of light, 3) The existence of the connection of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of States of corpuscles, 4) Determination of the mass of the corpuscle through the flow of centrifugal acceleration of the rotating space, etc..

Author Bio

Dizhechko Boris Semyenovich - independent researcher, the author of the new Cartesian generalization of modern physics E-mail: fizika3000@yandex.ru Lenin prospect 85, Apartment 16, City of Sterlitamak, Bashkortostan, Russia The specialist on measuring devices.. The independent Investigator on fundamental questions of physics Education higher Employment history - 40 years Expert in instrumentation, he worked in the laboratory of plasma chemistry of NPO Technology, graduated from the Sterlitamak pedagogical University as a teacher of mathematics currently is a Russian pensioner, has published more than 25 articles in well-known open access journals, in which he outlined the basic principle of the New Cartesian Physics.

Download Essay PDF File

The new Cartesian generalization of modern physics proceeds from the principle of the identity of space and matter of Descartes, according to which space moving, as it is matter. According to Descartes, in the world there is nothing but vortices, and these swirls of space create our world, thanks to which we exist. The rectilinear motion of space, in the form of the so-called inertial systems, which underlies the theory of relativity, in its essence is a motion around a circle of infinitely large radius, which, with a decrease in the radius of curvature, becomes a rotational motion of space, obeying the laws of quantum mechanics. This radius of curvature is the de Broglie wavelength, which becomes infinitely large when the speed decreases to zero and infinitely small, but not equal to zero, when the speed of light is reached. The formation of mass near space is associated with this wave., according to which space, as it is matter. According to Descartes, in the world there is nothing but vortices, and these swirls of space ofcreate our world, thanks to which we exist. The rectilinear motion of space, in the form of the so-called inertial systems, which underlies the theory of relativity, in its essence is a motion around a circle of infinitely large radius, which, with a decrease in the radius of curvature, becomes a rotational motion of space, obeying the laws of quantum mechanics. This radius of curvature, as new Cartesian physics claims, is the de Broglie wavelength, which becomes infinitely large when the speed decreases to zero and infinitely small, but not equal to zero, when the speed of light is reached. The formation of mass near space is associated with this wave.

Thus, new Cartesian physics establishes a connection between the Lorentz transformations and quantum mechanics. The movement of space relative to itself around the circumference, due to the absence of rigid bonds, differs from the rotation of a rigid body, since it is a set of rotating spaces interacting with each other and reacting together to external influence. Any space, leaving its place, leaves a exhaustion, dragging out another space following it from the side opposite to the direction of its movement. This filling with another space occurs with a finite speed equal to the speed of light; therefore the movement of space is characterized by the ratio v / c, showing the degree of rarefaction. At the same time, in order for space to change the direction of its movement, it must go a certain distance in a straight line so that the tension moving in it runs out and the influence of the Cassimere forces on it from the whole Universe becomes equal to it, equal to the product of the speed of light and Planck's constant - ch , under the action of which space changes the direction of its movement. This means that the movement of space is oscillatory. In this case, the waves propagate at the speed of light, both in the direction of motion and against it. Both waves, caused by the shift of space, moving first in opposite directions, and then towards each other close and form a common oscillatory system of its rotation around the core. It is this Compton wave that, counteracting the external influence of the Universe, moves the space inside the atom, and its energy is accumulated in the mass.

    Thank you, Dzhechko for the interest in my essay.

    I ask you some questions:

    You try to unify special relativity and quantum mechanics, so what is the difference with the Dirac equation, or Klein-Gordon equation?

    What is the answer you give to undecidability, uncomputability, and unpredictability?

    I've been busy, so I haven't read my emails for some days.

    In general I take a few days when all the essays have been published to read them all calmly, and in depth; so as not to dissipate my time.

    Domenico

      Dear Dizhechko,

      Thanks for reading and commenting on my essay.

      Although I find your essay interesting and creative, I have fundamental problems with it. In general -as you understand from my essay- I prefer not to base my theory on quantum mechanics, especially something as vague as Heisenberg Uncertainty.

        In defining mass, matter and energy the concept or movement and constant relocation us definitely important.

        Here is will use some quick concept to illustrate this point. I was trying to write this all quickly but as connected as possible.

        Throughout human history, mankind has always gazed up at the night sky, in amazement, mesmerized by the elegance of the moon and an endless ocean of the brightly shining lights in the heavens; which are celestial features that were once thought to be individual stars like the sun, but are now known to be entire galaxies.

        And just like the sun, most of the shimmering or radiant objects in the sky or in the observable universe are objects that are in a plasma state or a excited or superheated state; which, essentially, makes plasma or the energy enriched state, one of the most abundant physical states within which matter can be found throughout the universe.

        As, all stars, solar systems, galaxies and clusters of galaxies can be classified as objects or structural entities that predominantly contain plasma, which exist as continuously and consistently rupturing, exploding and radiating mixtures of heat, electromagnetic energy and mass.

        Essentially, this makes plasmoids the main types of celestial structures, whose momentum, gravity, electromagnetism, eruptions and explosions dominate all galaxies and systems across the universe (where a plasmoid is a coherent structure of mass and energy in a plasma state whose properties mainly manifest as radiant heat and electromagnetism and/or as electrical, gravitational and magnetic fields).

        Furthermore, all the heat energy that all the objects now possess would not be new energy or newly created energy but would be energy conserved or preserved from previous systems that have now been transmuted and transformed to these newer systems or pockets of confinement.

        Consequently, the concept or model (or theoretical framework) that would be borne from this idea that the universe has always been dominated by matter in a plasma state, is one where all the matter and energy, which is now strewn across the vacuum of space as fragmented, but gravitational connected, pockets of plasma (or which now exist as asteroids, moons, planets, stars, galaxies and clusters of galaxies), all would have came from one main or central source that was already energy and rich in heat or some from of dense concentration of kinetic energy.

        In other words, for this model to hold, this central source or primary object that all this superheated energy enriched matter would have originated from would have also been a tremendously dense or vastly energetic structure.

        Essentially, it would have been an object baryonic matter in it most condensed form, held together by gravity and many of the other fundamental forces of nature (with a compact structure made entirely ultra-fast vibrating or oscillating parted exuding a tremendous amount of energy).

        Subsequently, from this object is where all the all normal matter (which now exist as oscillating and vibrating particles such as photons, protons, neutrons and electrons now contained within the plasma of galaxies and stars) would have spring forth, not as isolated fundamental particles, as depicted in other models, but as all large blobs or as galactic size viscous chunks bursting out from this once self-enclosed object. Where an irreversible spillage, ruptured it structure and caused it of its entire energy enriched internal makeup outwards creating the tapestry or web of strewned plasma objects now observed across the matter universe, still racing away from each other and the one central source that they all originated from.

        So, within this model, all the energy, mass and matter that now exist within, or is now scatter throughout what mankind precieve as the observable universe, came from or was once housed inside a single object or structure.

        Which would not have possessed infinite values for its size, mass or density but would have been polyhedron of a finite size and density and possibly a definitive irregular or spherical shape.

        And, rather than this object or structure being responsible for the creation of the matter and energy in the universe and simultaneously responsible for the creation of medium that all this matter is moving within; this object or structure would simply be responsible for first housing or holding and then eventually distributing or spreading energy, on a cosmic scale, not as a wave of tiny particles but in large viscus chuncks of superheated plama condensed matter (where these fragments would be the mass of entire galaxies and the mass of entire clusters of galaxies).

        Which would differ somewhat from the general consensus which reigns across the scientific community which is that an infinitely density singularity was responsible not just just for the creation of matter and energy within the universe but created the finite medium and time scales within which all the mass and energy of the universe now reside.

        In essence, within this new model, this primordial object at first would merely have been a storage unit, which would have store (or sealed away) all forms of energy, after which it became a conduit through which energy was transmuted into various forms, and then conveyed violently outwards, via an explosion on a cosmic scale, due in part to some newly developed instability within or throughout its very condensed structure.

        It structure would have been ripped apart not at the Planck scale, but instead, would have created or would have released superheated full size stellar and galactic mass object; and these would eventually became the stars, galaxies, quasars and other plasmoids now observe across the universe that are still yet to have fully cool down from the initial superheated state that they were dispersed with).

        Essentially, the splitting apart of this object or structure on this cosmic scale would represent the start of a systemic process were all energy that was once contained by or contained within this single object or single centralized structure, would spend the next 10's of billions of years being dispersed, outwards, futher and further from where it was all once centrally confined.

        Furthermore, this dispersed material would spend these next of billions of years gravitational pooling up in different localized reason why still maintain a somewhat collective organized motion away from the centralized location they were all expelled from.

        Additionally, during this time get all the energy and mass would essentially less dense (or compact or concentrated form), and in their superheated states would all radiate away both some of their heat and mass, to eventually reduce their collective temperatures as they move further away from each other, both in terms of their collective distances away from the central location they emerged from and in terms of their respective individual distances from each other (or to eventually change from a form of very energetic plasma into cooler states such as solids, liquids and gases).

        So, within this model, the big bang would not have dispersed Planck scale subatomic particles but would have dispersed galactic and cosmic size fragments of superheated matter, which themselves would undergo further decay and instability overtime to themselves breark in slightly smaller solar and planetary size fragments as a means to become less concentrated energetic entities and as means of getting cooler or less superheated. Additionally, many of those steller size and planet size fragments themselves could break into smaller fragments which would be the size of moons and asteroids, etc. So, moons and planetary ring would have also been plasma as well and would have been ejected from a given planet structure very early in the planets lifespan when the planet was get to fully stabilize its rotation and overall structure.

        In other words, within this model the Big Bang would not represent the creation or emergence of space-time and fundamental principles, but instead would simply represent the explosion or eruption of a cosmic scale primordial object or structure.

        Subsequently, the nature of the universe is such that the matter in the universe is always in motion and is always trying to disperse itself to the widest volume possible; so, matter is constantly trying to get released in order to spread to the largest volume or least concentrated orientation possible; while simultaneously being opposed or actively restricted by various forced, mechanisms or processes.

        The mass, matter, and energy in the universe is currently in the process of spreading itself out in a sustained expansion process as its heat, mass and motion is conserved.

        An example of this fractal nature of galaxies: Each rotating galaxy is made of moving or rotating stars systems, each star system is made of moving or rotating stars, planets, moons, asteroid, dust and gas clouds; each star, planet, moon, asteroid, dust and gas is made up of moving or vibrating atoms; each atom is made of moving, vibrating or oscillating neutrons, protons, electron, photons; and so on.

        Therefore, all these fractal structures are the structural entities, object and mechanisms in the universe that organizes and confines matter and energy and the interaction, activity, stability or instability of these fractal system determines the systemic and continual dispersal of mass, matter and energy throughout the universe.

        So, all objects or structures in the universe that are made of matter at any fractal scale in the universe (whether at the subatomic or galactic scale) are the physical constructs that release energy and interacting with already released energy, and this release energy cause the matter that remains to gain momentum (linear or angular momentum), to gain heat or an increase in temperature, and to be bathed with electromagnetic energy (light and magnetism).

        Therefore, all entities with mass in the universe contain energy trapped at fractal level within their structure that can one day be released, which fits into the laws or conservation of energy as well as conservation of momentum; which states that energy or mass can neither be created or destroyed only changed from one for to the other. In essence, matter is simple pockets of stored energy; or, unreleased energy held in confinement.

        So, in this universe all matter has energy and this energy has only two states, which is that: this energy can either be confined within a specified volume or be trapped within one or more fractal structures of a specific volume as structure; or this energy can released and free to travel without being confined, which can endow other matter in its proximity with heat, light and mechanical energy.

        • [deleted]

        Dear Dominico Oricchio, a hairdresser, is it not enough for you that a neocartesian generalization of modern physics has revealed a connection between the Lorentz factor and the probability density of atomic states, and also explained the formula of masses - energy of equivalence by the existence of pressure of the Universe on a corpuscle? Already these two facts are the greatest achievements of neocartesian physics, based on the identity of space and matter of Descartes. In order to continue to talk with you, you must show that you have acquired this identity and realized that space is matter, and it moves, since it is matter. And then we'll talk about the Dirac and Klein - Gordon equations. I think that this will not be soon. All the best to you!

        Boris Dizhechko

        Dear Dizhechko Boris Semyenovich,

        as promised i reply here to comment on your essay. Basicly i argee to the last conclusion "space is the body of God we live in" to be something very general description, but in my essay i describe time to be the origin for space to evolve from. So it seems we are "opponents" with our claims.

        There are some differences in our views:

        in contrast to your (and most any work) my work arise from a definition of time accepting Einstein A. 1905 work on simultaneity in all its "radical" aspects to advance to a "geometric" concept of time that in effect then unveils a wrong "dimension" we use today for the planck's constant. Whilte today Plancks constant is treated as Joule*second (which is meter^6/second^4 in my set of dimension) my finding suggest it must be kilogramm^-1 * second (which is second^4/meter^4 in my set of dimension).

        Following from this i can agree to the concept F = ch/ (4 pi r^2) if i use the Plancks constant in the "todays" dimension.

        The final reasoning you do on how to describe mass leads to an identical treatment of the gravitational constant as i use in my work. So it seems logical to me.

        But the different dimension of Plancks constant in our models i guess lead to the fundamental difference between our models (Descartes vs. Newton)

        - you argue space to be the first matter in Universe (i think (space) = action, i am (time) = reaction)

        - i argue time to be the first matter in Universe (Time = action, space = reaction)

        Descartes vs Newton may be some kind of never-ending Bohr vs. Einstein...

        Best regards, Manfred

        Dear Alireza Jamali, a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics excludes from it a probabilistic description of physical processes. As a result of applying the identity of Descartes' space and matter, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle takes on the opposite meaning, i.e. becomes the principle of definiteness of points of physical space, which is matter.

        聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽聽 Boris Dzhechko

        Dear Dizhechko Boris Semyenovich,

        Despite I disagree with various claims of your Essay, in particular with the issue that the Neo-Cartesian generalization of modern physics is the theory of everything, I find your Essay interesting and pleasant. Therefore, I am going to give you an high score. Good luck in the Contest.

        Cheers, Ch.

        2 months later

        Dear Dizhechko Boris Semyenovich,

        FQXi.org has allowed me to upload an updated version of my essay Why Can't Y'all See The ONE Thing I See? because of the change in the competition submission date. I would appreciate it if you could find the time to read my updated version and perhaps leave a comment about it.

        Joe Fisher

        Dizhechko Semyonovich re-uploaded the file Semyonovich_The_transformat.pdf for the essay entitled "The transformation of uncertainty into certainty. The relationship of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of states. And more from a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics." on 2020-03-25 15:21:54 UTC.

        11 days later

        Dizhechko,

        Thanks for your comment and appreciation of my essay. I'd dowmloaded yours already as I recalled we've had good agreement in the past. I've now read it, and still love your approach. We agree from the most fundamental level of condensed matter as vortices, which I agree opens up a world of better understanding.

        Much of your model is more difficult to understand, so I appreciate why you included the formulations. You're right that many won't like that, and also your mention of a TOE without additional support, and even the mention of 'god' seems to put many off! The repeated paragraph also ma not help, but it's an important one! Your present low score reflect those, but rest assured I have no such prejudices so my score will help get it up where it belongs.

        I note we also both found our dynamics on non-linearity. I assume by the way you agree our 'new foundations' are compatible, which I find encouraging for us both.

        Very well done.

        Best wishes

        Peter

        Dear Boris,

        I read your essay with great interest. The idea that space *is* matter is one that I have been playing with for some time, although my mathematical approach is somewhat different from yours. I find that in order to describe matter fully, I need both 4-dimensional spacetime and 4-dimensional momentum-energy, to make an 8-dimensional `reality'. Then in order to describe measurements, interactions and so on, I need two copies of 8-dimensional reality, multiplied together to give 64 dimensions which contain all the possible measurements and interactions. Translating the Dirac equation into this language enables me to show that mass *is* space in a precise mathematical sense, which then relates closely to the general relativistic conception of mass as curvature of spacetime. Most of this is not in my essay, as it is not really relevant to the topic of this year's competition, but you can find some of my conclusions there, along with a more philosophical and less mathematical supporting argument.

        Robert Wilson.

          Respected Professor Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich,

          Thank you for presenting a wonderful essay here!

          You did not explain the various abbreviations used in your equations. Any way I could get the concept, no problem. Lorentz transformation does not lead your theory into Blackhole singularity i suppose.

          your words....... According to Descartes, in the world there is nothing but vortices, and these swirls of space create our world, thanks to which we exist..... are well written!!

          René Descartes found that he himself must be real (exist), because he felt that he was thinking; and if he was thinking, then he must be real. This is because if he were not real, then how would he have this feeling that he was thinking. He shortened this view, saying in Latin, "Cogito ergo sum," meaning "I think, therefore I am."

          Please read my essay and give your comments also. I hope we will go into collaboration in near future... By the way I rated your essay the best...

          Best reagrds

          =snp

          Dear Prof Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich,

          Thank you for your nice response .

          I did not understand why you want so many trillions of infinities (BHs)in every centers of rotations..... I want to know your points of view

          Best

          =snp

            Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta, I don't have "many trillions of infinities (BHs) in every rotation center ....". At the center of rotation, speed reaches the speed of light, and that's all I could say. I praised your model of a dynamic universe.

            Sincerely, Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich.

            Dear Boris,

            Thank you for your comments on my essay. My reply is as follows:

            "I did not intend to imply that "spacetime" is separate from "matter". The two are simply different aspects of the same thing. But I do need spacetime and not just space, because the mathematics that I use does not permit the separation of time from space in general. This separation only arises when we take the point of view of a particular observer, at which point we have a fixed definition of time, and therefore a fixed definition of mass. All the forces that deal with fixed mass (electromagnetism and gravity, and maybe also the strong force, depending on your interpretation) then crystallise out. But the weak force is different, because it does not preserve mass, and therefore does not preserve time. That is the real reason why I need spacetime and not just space - without a unified spacetime, I cannot explain the weak force."

            More fundamentally, I believe the central issue is to explain spin 1/2 particles from a Cartesian point of view. The standard approach to quantum mechanics creates an abstract "spinor" from 2 complex numbers, which unfortunately has no Cartesian reality. This spinor arises from the double cover of the rotation group of space, and therefore does not mention time. I believe this is wrong, and that spin cannot be explained without invoking time. Now in 4-dimensional real spacetime there is room to put a 2-dimensional complex spinor, and therefore give a physical reality to an abstract spinor. At this point we have a "realist" model of quantum mechanics, rather than the standard "magical" model. A fundamental particle of matter is then the same thing as a fundamental piece of spacetime. But I do need spacetime, not just space, in order to do this.

            Robert.

            Dear Dizhechko Boris Semyenovich,

            I appreciate your aspirations to the fundamentals of building fundamental theories:

            "According to Descartes, in the world there is nothing but vortices, and these swirls of space create our world, thanks to which we exist".

            "New Cartesian physics provides the Foundation for building fundamental theories. This Foundation is built on the principle of identity of space and matter of Descartes".

            Despite the use of different terminology, we are talking about the same thing in the dispute of Descartes vs Newton.

            Best regards,

            Vladimir N. Fedorov

            6 days later

            Dizhechko,

            Does this 2006 neuroscience study predate & influence your ideas?

            https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167876006002108. How about the quantum brain? Does this fit into your ideas?

            Considering that orthodox quantum mechanics seems to make a lot of assumptions, I can't fault your Neo-Cartesian ideas. I can't pretend to understand the repercussions of treating physical space as matter and vortices created by the formation of mass in space. It is an interesting concept.

            Jim Hoover

              Dizhechko,

              In relooking at my Carlo Rovelli Reality is not what it seems book, you don't specify loop quantum gravity, but I am wondering if you are advocating that concept?

              I am adding your 11th rating, specifying it due to someone who rates a 1 for many of us.

              Jim Hoover