Boris S. Dzhechko
I like your paper, being attracted by your intense focus on Descartes and whirlpool swirls. We both see space as introduced by Descartes.
Science took a step backward when his swirl of space theory was overcome by Newton's gravity model. Newton needed an emptiness of space to avoid friction. I further develop that perspective to explain local spatial events. Your paper follows this swirl both for the whole universe and for a point. The radius of curvature is the de Broglie wavelength, which becomes infinitely large when the speed decreases to zero and infinitely small but not equal to zero, when the speed of light is reached. Beyond that you include Heisenberg and Lorentz.
Your paper connects to mine under Einstein's mass energy equivalence as you follow it with the pressure of space is the cause of all movements occurring in the real world. I connect with gravity that pushes and its source is EM radiation everywhere. In that way space is matter.
We agree in a more detailed view that 'in the world there is nothing but vortices, and these swirls of space create our world, thanks to which we exist'. We can follow each other's papers in GSJ and/or hopefully help each other here.
Paul Schroeder
