Dear Manfred U. E. Pohl, the question you raised about the irrationality of the number π is very relevant for the neocartesian generalization of modern physics, which is based on the identity space and matter of Descartes, according to which space moves, since it is matter. I want to note that irrational numbers complement the set of rational numbers to the continuum. This is a very important aspect for materialism. From a philosophical point of view, the irrational number is the smallest source of being, moving matter, a kind of Leibniz monad.

You have a very interesting essay, I wish you to become my opponent.

I invite you to discuss some aspects of the neo-Cartesian generalization of modern physics, which I set out in my essay: "The transformation of uncertainty into certainty. The relationship of the Lorentz factor with the probability density of states. And more from a new Cartesian generalization of modern physics. by Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich »

    Dear Dizhechko Boris Semyonovich,

    thanks for your kind comments on the content of my essay. Yes, it seems like we have some analogy in certain views. I agree to various aspects of your work. In detail it might be the inverse proportional understanding of Energy between GRT and QM (which is the key aspect of my essay) that is different between our approaches. I don't speak of identity of space and matter, because in my model matter is made up from space AND time always. I guess this could be the difference between Descartes view (you) and Newton view (me)

    Give me some time to read your essay more carefully and then i will reply in your thread. Maybe we have more in common as it seems at first look.

    Best regards M.U.E.P.

    24 days later

    Dear Sirs,

    as the essay was written in a hurry and the Theory is under construction, a few mistakes migth have gone into. One i found now with cross reading:

    On page 7 (measurements given in meter and second) there is printed

    Electric current Ampere: meter^-2 * second^-3

    Obviously this is a type error. It must be meter^-2 * second ^-1

    As the Theory behind the Essay is still in development, here can be found some more details about the described 3-Dimensional time:

    http://downloads.theoryofall.org/Manfred_Pohl_Problem_of_TimeIV_Experimental_Proof.pdf

    The development of the System of Units is under construction as well..

    some sketch can be given here (might be errors still):

    Time T second s

    Length L Meter m

    Velocity ν m/s m / s

    Electric Current I Ampere s / m^2

    Magnetic Field H A/m s / m^3

    Acceleration a m/s2 m / s^2

    Electric Charge Q Coulomb s^2 / m^2

    Temperature T Kelvin (K) m^3 / s^2

    Entropy S J/K m^3 / s^3

    Mass m kilogram m^4 / s^3

    Force N Newton m^5 / s^5

    Energy Joule m^6 / s^5

    Power P Watt m^6 / s^6

    Magne Flx Dens. B Tesla m^6 / s^6

    Permeability μs H/m m^7 / s^6

    Magnetic Flux Φ Weber (Wb) m^8 / s^6

    Elec Field Stre V / m m^7 / s^7

    Electric Pot φ Volt m^8/ s^7

    Capacitance C Farad s^8 / m^10

    Electric resit Z Ohm m^10 / s^8

    Fine-structure-constant α m / s

    Gravitational constant G s / m

    Electric Charge Q Coulomb s^2 / m^2

    Boltzmans constant kB s^3 / m^3

    Planck's constant h s^4 / m^4

    Force^-1 F^-1 Newton^-1 s^5 / m^5

    The most thrilling units to me of course are Entropy and Temperature and Boltzman's constant... Final theory hopefully end of 2020.

    Best regards

    MUE Pohl

    To correct the printing error and to give an overview over physical Units in 2*3 Dim "Time" - "Newtonian" coordinate-system, i add a file with a list of physical units. "under construction", but to give a sketch how it will look like if working with Decidability.

    best, MUE PohlAttachment #1: 2x3_dim_newtonian_time.pdf

    13 days later

    I see that our essays have something in common (mine is NON-COMPUTABILITY AND UNPREDICTABILITY ARE SO YESTERDAY: WITH COMPUTABLE AND PREDICTABLE COSMIC STRUCTURE, PLUS IMPLICATIONS FOR MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE: dinosaurs and Einstein). At the end of yours is a picture of dinosaurs and a question asking if the universe will be found within life. Mine refers to Albert Einstein's General Relativity when my essay says

    "gravity is the curvature of space-time; therefore, gravity is space-time (and when my vector-tensor-scalar geometry is taken into consideration, gravity makes up the entire universe)".

    My essay also says the gravitational waves that make up space-time and the universe (some are powerful and detectable, most are tiny and undetectable) have both "advanced" and "retarded" components, and these have consequences for dating the ages of dinosaurs etc. In other words, the nature of the universe is found within dinosaurs. Suppose we accept

    "the Block Universe where the past, present and future all exist -- and are equally real -- in a possibly infinite four-dimensional block. Past, present and future are relative, just as time is not absolute in Einstein's special theory of relativity."

    These lines from my essay suggest the nature of the universe is found within dinosaurs which are still living (beyond our perceptions and scientific instruments).

    "Michio Kaku writes, "When we solve Maxwell's equations for light, we find not one but two solutions: a 'retarded' wave, which represents the standard motion of light from one point to another; but also an 'advanced' wave, where the light beam goes backward in time. Engineers have simply dismissed the advanced wave as a mathematical curiosity since the retarded waves so accurately predicted the behavior of radio, microwaves, TV, radar, and X-rays. But for physicists, the advanced wave has been a nagging problem for the past century."

    and

    "Albert Einstein's equations in the theory of General Relativity say gravitational fields carry enough information about electromagnetism to allow Maxwell's equations to be restated in terms of these gravitational fields. This was discovered by the mathematical physicist George Yuri Rainich. (23) When a dinosaur died, the advanced gravitational and electromagnetic waves composing its particles would continue traveling back in time. By the time its bones or fossilized remains, or the surrounding rocks, were subjected to modern science's dating methods; those advanced waves might have gone so far back in time that the dating method says the dinosaur died 100 million years ago or more. Radioactive dating is thus a form of (advanced) gravitational-wave detection, just as LIGO - the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (24) - picks up (retarded) gravitational waves. Technology based on the way noise-cancelling headphones work (25) might provide a more accurate reading of when the dinosaur lived. The headphones increase the signal-to-noise ratio by incorporating a microphone that measures ambient sound (noise), generating a waveform that is the exact negative of the ambient sound, and mixing it with any audio signal the listener desires. Generating a waveform that's the exact opposite of the advanced waves emitted by the deceased dinosaur should, at least partially, neutralize the advanced waves and restrict measurement to the retarded waves associated with the animal's decay."

      Dear Rodney,

      following your invitation i read your essay (not jet in every detail) but can confirm most of your ideas would cover my ideas too. Yes, there must be an quantum entaglement in solar system that is not fully understood yet. There is research needed not only for Mercurey.

      Photon becomes the Graviton in my idea.

      To make it short.. i more and more try to explain the phenomenon based on conclusions about the definition of time in the measurement system.

      It's not obvious at first hand, but considering Maxwell as theory and Hertz as experimental detaching electromagnetism from matter into space, we in fact need to deal with 3-dimensional "time".

      So speed of light in three axis of space:

      c(1) = constant (speed of light and frequency of caesium-Atom)

      and

      c(2) * c(3) * µ(0) * ε(0) = constant (properties of vacuum / ether)

      this is kind of a serious problem as following my investigation we therefore use two "times" while one is 2-dimensional (E=mc^2) and one is one-dimensional (E=hf)

      but not only this.. those both are inverse proportional so that Energy-scales of Quantum-Theory and General Relativity can't match at all.

      The only solution i see:

      - define time to be three-dimensional (seconds to be measured as "Meters" of length)

      - Investigate Solar System for three-dimensional clock (surface of earth)

      using c^3 = constant

      instead of using

      c(1) = constant and c(2)^2 * µ(0) * ε(0) = constant

      would make the µ(0) as well as the gravitational constant a variable limited to surface of earth only while not a constant for universe

      (Origin of dark matter is fixed gravitational constant in combination with fixed µ(0))

      .. so far my ideas on how to handle the funny setup between general Relativity and Quantum Theory.

      Your reasoning seem to be the right way in most aspects.

      best,

      Manfred

      (also postet to NON-COMPUTABILITY AND UNPREDICTABILITY ARE SO YESTERDAY: WITH COMPUTABLE AND PREDICTABLE COSMIC STRUCTURE, PLUS IMPLICATIONS FOR MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE by Rodney Bartlett)

      11 days later

      10 of March and i think i no can offer a more painting summery of the Final Foundation of Physics and Mathematics ...

      Label : Taking God out of Physics..

      If it is Pontifex Maximus that we have in or if it is Einsteins Cosmic very Special Religion : without calling Einstein to be ca crook and fraud, we cannot advance.

      Why am i allowed to label Einstein c crook? In Physics classromm when i was 17 an was teached Einsteins SRT i said ... hey.. this ist the most rubbish nonsense i ever heard. If that would be true, o could go through walls (plasma fusion).

      So 1 spend 30 years on the run to find the idiotic mistake that people are doing. Einstein had not stolen my childhood. But Einstein had stolen 30 years of battle against this nonsense.

      Mathematical Disproof of God

      Deleting Pontifex Maximus out of Universe

      Taking Einstein out of Physics

      Inserting LOVE (LIFE) into Universe

      http://downloads.theoryofall.org/ManfredPohl_Problem_of_time_VI.pdf

      It will be impossible to advance in Physics and take God out and Greta (love) in, if we not blame Einstein to be a crook.

      Greta asked us that we must do better as it is not enough what we are doing !

      It only takes a decision to help the crying children on this planet.

      Usually Children are in constant fear, if live is undecidable, unpredictable und Uncomputeable. By logical reason: Why are we frigthening the children and youth with the Einstein.... ?

      Finally i have to add, that the Essay was very tentative and should be understood as work in progress.

      There are some heavy MISTAKES in the essay that must be adressed:

      1. BIG Mistake : Unit of Ampere s^3/m^2 is WRONG (printing mistake) Correct is s/m^2

      2. BIG Mistake : [1,0] = 12 pi c^3 is WRONG correct is [1;-1]

      3. BIG Mistake : Entropy vs negentropy (pi,pi,1,1,1) is WRONG. Correct is (pi,pi,-1,1,1)

      I total.. i could now summarize to be the final foundations of Physics and Mathematics in a one-line-bus that run over to be the Pilot Wave of David Bohm:

      pi = pi / pi => 1 = 1 / -1

      The Observer : [pi,pi,-1,1,1]

      The Observed : [pi] (GOD of Mathematics, Pilot Wave of D Bohm)

      Best, Manfred U.E. Pohl

      Dear Manfred,

      I must admit that your essay is hard to grasp. This is not your fault, but mine.

      Have you seen the movie The Fifth Element?

      - Shawn

        P.S. Can you please describe the point of the essay in a sentence or two?

        Dear Shawn Halayka,

        In one line the point of the essay is easy: We must save the planet NOW. Greta need to be backed up by scientist to perform the Transformation on this planet. Science now must take responsabilty for doing wrong science since 2000 years. I no one is willing to do, I have to do.

        My essay should be understood as a "call" for Physicist to do Complete Theory now, as we don't have time left thinking. There is no planet B for experiments an personal feelings. We need collective intelligence.

        To me it looks like "5th" Element as it feels like whole world is fighting against me to bring me down. hehe.. So true. Even the police were at my house to check if i am a danger to society and warned me i should not write letters to german autories as if i don't want to risk.. Actual a german court tries to do a psychriatic report to check if i am a danger and must be set in psychatric ward because i claim things to be wrong and call for a change.

        The storyplot of 5th element is quite realistic... as well as Matrix or Terminator .. all in play here as we still live in Matrix.

        I am in panic mode, because my feeling say we have no time left. Or like: i feel like on a spaceship-planet that tends to want to hith the next best concrete wall for selfdestruction with no helmsman on the rudder and no Cpt. Picard in sight.

        I try to update the website http://www.theoryofall.org with daily / weekly trying to make it more understandable to the public and scientist. I don't know if there is a tomorrow so i just add things as i feel if they are correct somehow..makeing mistakes for sure but everyone is invited to jump in.. everything work in progress.. looking at the essay contest and effort all over the world i think science could manage to complete the theory in 2020. Hopefulley... I suggest everyone to pick up the idea to reduce to length of space and length of time and connect Quantum Theory to macroscopic.

        Main point.. put this "event" thinking out of time-conept. There is an event when we make 2 dollars out of one, the big bang (birth) or the blak hole (death), but time is "force of action" and "space a force of the reaction)

        Best Regards

        Manfred

        Dear Manfred U.E. Pohl,

        Your words................ In this sense, the "Number" 3,14... has no meaning at all in mathematics or in physics. It is not possible to compute something with no meaning, although "1/3 π := 1 apple / 3 banana" as receipt for a salad has a rational physical meaning (thought) included, that is computable, rational and real physical...............are Very good, but later with all the amendments it became hard to follow. You could tell few words as synopsis to me ....

        By the way, I just elaborated what should be the freedom available to an author when the " real open thinking" is supported. Have a look at my essay please.

        "A properly deciding, Computing and Predicting new theory's Philosophy"

        =snp.gupta

        Dear Sir

        Mail is not going to your id....

        contact@manfred pohl.de

        do you have any other ID? I just gave you highest of appreciation to your essay, best wishes

        =snp

        Dear Satyavarapu Naga Parameswara Gupta,

        mail should work on

        contact@manfred-pohl.de

        or

        contact@theoryofall.org

        I agree with you, that it is hard to follow my texts. Please exuse my flaws in writing.

        A synopsis in most general : Since over 2000 years (Pythagoras, Sokrates, Platon, Aristotle) was a fight if earth or sun are center of universe. Today we say: there is no preferred center. This is wrong an must be adressed very soon:

        Earth and Sun are a Electromagnetic Dipole and the fixed pointlike center of universe is constructed by taking earth as pointlike Body, Sun as Pointlike body and halway inbetween do a dot and use this three point so create a volume Sphere (3 Dimensions).

        Doing so, i very in line with your Dynamic Universe Model: properly deciding, computing and predicting.

        Best, Manfred

        Dear Manfred,

        No worries when it comes to getting an assessment. I see that you have a viXra page. Why not post your letters there, rather than writing to politicians?

        I'm neither a fan nor a critic of the handling of the current global warming. I once did a small program that visualized the temperatures of the planet over months and years, and I found that there was indeed warming over the last century.Attachment #1: world.png

        10 days later

        Dear Manfred U. E. Pohl, the fact that you considered me your opponent does not give me a reason for a low rating of your work. You are the only one who bothered to delve into the essence of my essay and compare it with yours. For this I give you the highest rating. Now I see your thoughts even more clearly and am ready to continue to cooperate with you. I will not bother you with your objections so that you focus on other participants in the competition and can get a prize. I wish you every success.

        Sincerely, Dzhechko Boris Semyonovich

        Manfred,

        Pleased to get to read it again (needed as I often tend to 'scan' 1st time) and comment. You know from RG we agree on much but certainly not all. None the less it was interesting, and of course the scoring criteria have nothing to do with 'agreement' and I found it met all the criteria well (perhaps partly as I'm familiar with your style?) so I can score it highly.

        I'm sure your aware that others may consider it takes us back centuries to 'earth centric' dynamics, certainly challenging to wide astronomical data! That quite unique view shouldn't affect scoring but, like mine, departure from even questionable doctrinal beliefs if often poorly received!

        I also look forward to your views on my essay which I know you'll understand and also appreciate. I hope you'll confirm that and ask any questions.

        Very best of luck in the contest.

        Peter

          Dear Peter,

          thanks for your kind comments. I am aware that my "style" is quite different, and the purpose of my essay was not to get a "prize", but to provoke and invite for "thinking" in terms of "imagine" what could happen if Greta Thunberg is right and it could come to a finding that would say .. "This is all wrong". Are we prepared ? (like Bill Gates asked 2015 at Tedx if we are ready for a "Pandemic" game.)

          I guess that all Talk is cheap and i will try to calculate an Experiment to demonstrate with laser in laboratory that E=hf is wrong hopefully till end of this year. We should not depend on belief, but on experimental physics.

          I did not rated your essay yet, as i have printed it and will read it carefully within the next days and after that comment and rate on it Peter.

          See you there,

          all the best

          Manfred

          Dear Dzhechko Boris Semyonovich,

          thanks a lot for your wishes and kind remarks. I think it would be great if we all could work together and cooperate to "fix" the mistakes in contemporary phyiscs. I guess all of us are driven in a similar way to find a "mistake" or a fix as we "feel" that something is wrong. As said i rate your essay as very helpful and a important contribution in this process. Are we opponent? I don't think so. It is not about winning or loosing so we can't be opponent.

          Best Regards

          Manfred

          a month later